Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 22:23 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 22:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
705-805 Level|   Weaken|         
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,103
 [15]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
14
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,103
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,103
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Cana1766
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
79
 [2]
Given Kudos: 11
Posts: 85
Kudos: 79
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Abhi310
Joined: 10 May 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 19
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A.

Dont know why but it feels right the correct answer.
User avatar
Dipan0506
Joined: 24 May 2021
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 72
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Products:
Posts: 72
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The paragraph states that most of the employees join and leave company Z , employees with certification leaves the company within first year.

Point A strengthens the argument that possessing the certificate leaves company for higher positions.
Point B strengthens the argument that company doesn’t provide incentives for such certification that’s why they leave the company .
Point C weakens the argument that engineers are not required to submit their certifications prior to joining. Certifications should be informed prior to joining which helps in choosing teams with project management.
Point D strengthens the argument that teams use agile methodologies .
Point E strength are the argument that after joining they obtain the certificate , and upon receiving the certificate they opt for better opportunity outside of the company .
Hence point C is the answer
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,282
Own Kudos:
784
 [1]
Given Kudos: 236
Products:
Posts: 1,282
Kudos: 784
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Prethinking:
What if the reporting is incorrect or not everyone completed the annual HR survey?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms. We do not care about why engineers leave but want to focus on if possessing the certification does make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications. This has no effect on the conclusion. May be people are doing it for other reasons
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company. This suggests underreporting. May be people had the certificate before they joined the company and hence is a weakner
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies. We don't care if the majority uses it. We want to focus on if possessing the certification does make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company. That's alright, but we don't know if it's the first year or seasoned folks

Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Emkicheru
Joined: 12 Sep 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2025
Posts: 119
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Kenya
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
GPA: 3.7
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V48
GRE 1: Q167 V164
Posts: 119
Kudos: 22
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


Option A is True will weaken the statement, because engineers based their actions on payment not certification
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 8,423
Own Kudos:
4,979
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,423
Kudos: 4,979
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
the argument states that in company z Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification.
and only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification
conclusion : Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms. ; the option is a strengthening the conclusion
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications. the reasoning provided does not weaken the conclusion , but strengthens the conclusion.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company. this options weakens the conclusion strongly
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies. ; gives reason why people who do not have certificate should get one ..
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company. does not provide reason to weaken conclusion

OPTION C is correct

Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Heix
Joined: 21 Feb 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 361
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
GPA: 3.4
WE:Accounting (Finance)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 485 Q76 V74 DI77
Posts: 361
Kudos: 153
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise 1: 18% of engineers who left within their first year had an agile-project-management certification.
Premise 2: Only 8% of all engineers who completed the HR survey reported having that certification.
Conclusion: Possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.
The argument assumes that the certification causes or contributes to engineers leaving. To weaken this argument, we need to find an altemative explanation for the correlation or show why the data might be misleading.
Let's evaluate each answer choice:
(A) This tells us why engineers leave (voluntarily for other jobs), but doesn't address whether the certification affects their likelihood of leaving.
(B) This information about incentives doesn't explain the correlation between certification and leaving.
(C) If engineers aren't required to report certifications, then the 8% figure might be an underestimate of the true percentage of engineers with the certification. However, this doesn't directly weaken the conclusion about leaving rates.
(D) This tells us about the work environment but doesn't address the relationship between certification and leaving.
(E) Correct. This weakens the argument by reversing the cause effect relationship. The argument concludes that having the certification makes engineers more likely to leave. However, if some engineers obtain the certification only after joining the company, then they couldn't have had the certification when they were hired. This suggests that engineers might be getting the certification shortly before leaving (perhaps to make themselves more marketable), rather than the certification causing them to leave. This alternative explanation significantly weakens the conclusion that possessing the certification makes engineers more likely to leave within a year of being hired.
User avatar
simondahlfors
Joined: 24 Jun 2025
Last visit: 23 Sep 2025
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Posts: 48
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Information given:
- Several engineers joined and left Company Z in a year
- Among engineers who left within their first year, 18% held an agile project management certification
- Only 8% of all engineers reported having that certification
- Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave within a year

Question:
- Which statement, if true, most seriously weakens the conclusion that having the certification makes it more likely an engineer will leave within a year?

Solution:
- A: Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
- Just explains why they leave, but doesn't break the certificate-leaving link, invalid

- B: Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
- Does not impact the link between having the certificate and leaving, invalid

- C: Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
- If true, the '8% of all engineers' number could be much higher, so the difference between 18% and 8% may not exist
- Directly attacks the reliability of the data, strong weakener, valid

- D: The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
- Does not affect the correlation between certification and leaving, invalid

- E: Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.
- Suggests reverse causation (they get the certificate because they plan to leave). Weakens, but does not invalidate the numbers, invalid

Answer: C, Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.

Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Rishika2805
Joined: 13 Dec 2023
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Posts: 31
Kudos: 24
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We have the conclusion that the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.
[*]18% of engineers who left within their first year held the certification.
[*]Only 8% of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification.

We have to weaken the conclusion. So, from the below mentioned options I have chosen B

A: This strengthens the argument. That is because of certification, they can pursue better opportunities, as it gives them an edge.
B: No effect. They may explain why the overall certification percentage is low.
C: This is my answer. If they are not required to report so they haven't. More than 18% of the people have the certificate but because it not mandatory so they haven't reported. So, the 18% among leavers is no longer disproportionate. In fact, it would be lower than the true company average.
D: No relevant.
E: It would strengthen




Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
Harika2024
Joined: 27 Jul 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 80
Own Kudos:
65
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 80
Kudos: 65
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's check the options:

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms. This explains the reason for leaving but doesn't explain why certified engineers would be disproportionately represented among those leavers. It doesn't weaken the link the argument attempts to draw between certification and leaving.

(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications. This might explain why the overall percentage of certified engineers (8%) is relatively low. However, it doesn't explain why the percentage among those who left (18%) is higher, and thus doesn't weaken the argument's conclusion.

(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company. This option directly attacks the representativeness of the 8% figure. If engineers are only reporting certifications obtained after joining, or are not required to report all certifications, then the "8% of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification" is an underestimate of the true percentage of certified engineers within the company's entire workforce.

(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies. This provides context about the company's work environment but doesn't explain why certified engineers would be more likely to leave. If anything, one might expect certified individuals to be a good fit and perhaps less likely to leave. This doesn't weaken the argument.

(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company. The 8% figure already includes those who "reported holding that certification," regardless of when they obtained it (before or after joining). This statement does not introduce new information that would alter the interpretation of the 8% figure or undermine the comparison. It doesn't weaken the argument.

The strongest weakening factor is (C)
User avatar
harshnaicker
Joined: 13 May 2024
Last visit: 25 Sep 2025
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 84
Kudos: 60
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option A: This is a good option. It introduces an alternate reason for the engineers leaving within their first year thus shedding doubt on the possible causality pointed out in the statements.
Option B: It actually sort of strengthens the argument by highlighting how procuring certifications did not result in any positive outcomes for these engineers which is why they might have left.
Option C: Not really relevant.
Option D: Not relevant to the question.
Option E: Not relevant.

Option A is the correct answer.
Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
vnandan2001
Joined: 22 Apr 2025
Last visit: 05 Nov 2025
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 8
Posts: 25
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(C)"Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company."
→ This means the HR survey (which says only 8% are certified) could be underreporting!
So the 8% might be lower than the actual percentage of all engineers with the certification.
That makes the comparison (18% vs. 8%) unreliable → weakens the conclusion!

Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

User avatar
shashank17gupta
Joined: 19 Jun 2025
Last visit: 29 Oct 2025
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
12
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 19
Kudos: 12
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument claims that engineers with an agile-project-management certification are more likely to leave Company Z within a year, based on the higher percentage of such certifications among early leavers (18%) compared to all engineers (8%).
Option A: This explains why engineers leave but does not address whether the certification itself is related to leaving
Option B: This is about company policy and does not affect the relationship between certification and leaving.
Option C: This explains how getting certified would not help the engineers joining other firms, so weakening the main
argument.
Option D: This provides context about the work environment but does not directly affect the argument about
certification.
Option E: This means some engineers counted as "certified" among leavers may not have had the certification when
hired, so the certification could be a result of their time at Company Z, not a cause of leaving.
So overall, option C is weakening the argument presented
User avatar
iamchinu97
Joined: 14 Dec 2020
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Given Kudos: 34
Products:
Posts: 132
Kudos: 139
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

=> Argument is based on the figures HR survey had. so if any option which try to undermine this can be our potential weakner.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms. => okay even if they are doing so voluntarily it does not weaken the relation that certification is making them leave they are probably leaving voluntarily because they have certification so not the ans

(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications. => Okay providing incentives is not affecting argument in any shape or form. it does not matter if company provides incentive or not. people are leaving. so not the ans

(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company. => This is interesting if Engineers are not required to report certification and prior to joining and most of the new joiners will be having certification then it invalidate the claim of 8% figure. as author is trying to link this to engineers leaving if we attack it then it will weaken authors claim so hold on to this

(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies. => What majority are using or not using does not having impact on people who are leaving the company so not the ans

(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company. => Whether engineers are obtain it only after joining even if they get it but the people leaving due to certification then it does not have any affect on argument. so not the ans

Hence Ans Option C
User avatar
Abhiswarup
Joined: 07 Apr 2024
Last visit: 08 Sep 2025
Posts: 178
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 42
Location: India
Posts: 178
Kudos: 154
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument in the passage is possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

We have to find statement which weakens the argument. Lets analyze the statements:

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
The statement tells why most engineers leave company within a year but no connection with certification is explained. Thus doesn't weaken the argument. Eliminate
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
Factual information and irrelevant. Eliminate
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
Factual information and irrelevant. Eliminate
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
The statement means most engineers are using agile methodologies and are expected to have agile management certification. It means there will be some other reason to leave company Z. Correct answer
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.
Factual information. Eliminate

Correct answer is D.
User avatar
Dav2000
Joined: 21 Sep 2023
Last visit: 14 Sep 2025
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 75
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

A. Out of scope as reason for leaving not discussed in argument.
B. Irrelevant.Incentives not discussed in argument.
C. Does not weaken, if engineers are required or not to report the certifications does not concern annual HR survey.
D. Out of scope. argument is not discussing if agile methods are used or not.
E. Correct, provides a good reason to question the analysis on which the conclusion is based. Hence weakens.
User avatar
harishg
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
100
 [1]
Given Kudos: 27
Products:
Posts: 85
Kudos: 100
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - The reason employees leave within their first year does not have any bearing on whether possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

B - The angle of incentives to obtain certifications is irrelevant

C - This weakens the argument as it suggests that the number of employees possessing the certification may be higher than 8% and thus the conclusion derived would be doubtful

D - We are only concerned about the certification and not on what the teams work on

E - Irrelevant to the argument as the conclusion still stands as it is derived from the premise.

Therefore, Option C
User avatar
APram
Joined: 23 Jun 2024
Last visit: 17 Nov 2025
Posts: 671
Own Kudos:
263
 [1]
Given Kudos: 240
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
GPA: 3.608
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q86 V78 DI76
Posts: 671
Kudos: 263
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Background: Several engineers both joined and left Company Z
Premise: Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification.
Conclusion: possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

This is a cause effect argument. Processing time is of certificate is leading the engineers to leave
We need to weaken this cause effect link

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
This does not do anything to the argument. If they voluntarily leave then we cannot attribute this behaviour to either due to processing time or anything else.

(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
Providing incentive or not does not do anything to the argument as we do not have any further information regarding this. The argument still holds true that due to longer processing time, the engineers leave

(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
Yes this does weaken the argument. If engineers do not require to report certificates they obtained prior to joining the company then there is under reporting to HR survey. May be they hold certification but not reported.

(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
This has nothing to do with certification numbers and thus does nothing to argument

(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.
What some engineers obtain does not weaken the argument as we don't know exact numbers

Hence C is correct

Bunuel
In a recent calendar year, several engineers both joined and left Company Z. Among engineers who left within their first year of employment, 18 percent held an agile-project-management certification. Yet only 8 percent of all engineers who completed the annual HR survey reported holding that certification. Therefore, possessing the certification appears to make an engineer more likely to leave Company Z within a year of being hired.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) Most engineers who leave company Z within their first year do so voluntarily, often for positions at competing firms.
(B) Company Z does not provide incentives for employees to obtain professional certifications.
(C) Engineers are not required to report certifications they obtained prior to joining the company.
(D) The majority of engineers at company Z work in teams that use agile methodologies.
(E) Some engineers obtain their agile project management certification only after joining the company.


 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT Club Olympics Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 

 1   2   3   4   5   6   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts