On analyzing the Options one by one :
(A) Long-term job retention
Irrelevant — this is about future career paths, not immediate performance improvement. Eliminate
(B) Time spent on personal distractions
Seems relevant — if Group 1 focused more, it could explain productivity.
BUT: This doesn’t test the perception mechanism directly; it's more of a result, not a test of the cause. It’s helpful but not the most useful for evaluating the hypothesis itself. Plausible, but not best. Eliminate
(C) Prior experience-Useful for eliminating confounding variables, but the study said the groups were randomly assigned, which typically controls for such differences.
So while this matters in general, it’s less directly useful here than something that targets the core assumption. Eliminate
(D) Satisfaction with pay - Totally unrelated to the hypothesis — not about cognitive perception.Eliminate
(E) Whether routine clerical tasks are commonly perceived as cognitively undemanding - Now this directly targets the core assumption in the hypothesis:
That the message changed perception and that this new perception led to better performance.
If routine clerical tasks are normally seen as NOT cognitively demanding, then the message could have shifted the workers' mindset significantly, validating the causal claim.
If they are already perceived as demanding, then the message likely had little effect. Keep
Hence the Final Answer is E
This is the best answer because it directly helps evaluate the plausibility of the mechanism proposed in the hypothesis.