Last visit was: 06 Sep 2026, 16:20 It is currently 06 Sep 2026, 16:20
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
   1   2   3   4   5   
User avatar
priyanka06
User avatar
Joined: 10 Sep 2025
Last visit: 05 Sep 2026
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
36
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 60
Kudos: 36
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 04:40
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A . not useful as it just points out similar finding in another region
B. not useful as same animals can be commonly be hunted for food as well as Rituals
c. useful because it strengthens the possibility of one hypothesis over the other
D. not useful as the animals in their Prime can be used as food as well in their Rituals
E. not useful because a written record of contemporary culture in general can not be a sure fact about the settlement being discussed.
Bunuel
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.

In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?

(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
Show more
User avatar
geocircle
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
143
 [1]
Posts: 150
Kudos: 143
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 04:48
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A What happened in other sites doesn't help distinguish these two specific explanations for this site.

B Both food preparation and sacrifices could involve local species, so not decisive.

C Right answer. It's directly relevant. Presence supports food preparation and absence supports sacrifice.

D It could be relevant but less directly decisive.

E It's indirect and not as useful as direct evidence from the bones themselves.

Answer C
User avatar
sunshineeee
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2020
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
53
Given Kudos: 266
Location: Indonesia
Schools: Stern '26 (WL) Tepper '26 (WL) BU'26 (A) Ross '26 Johnson '26
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Schools: Stern '26 (WL) Tepper '26 (WL) BU'26 (A) Ross '26 Johnson '26
Posts: 174
Kudos: 53
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 05:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There are 2 hypotheses.
First, animal bones were from food.
Second, animal bones were from religious ceremonies.

We can check by knowing whether the bones belong to animals commonly hunted for food or not. If yes, it would be the 1st hypothesis. If not, it would be the 2nd hypothesis.

So, B is the answer.

Others are incorrect.
A. Incorrect. We did not talk about region/location
C. Incorrect. We did not talk about the way it was butchered.
D. Incorrect. We did not talk about the age of animals
E. Incorrect. Can be the answer, but even knowing the animals are used for religious ceremonies. We need to know the type of the animals.
Bunuel
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.

In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?

(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
Show more
User avatar
jkkamau
User avatar
Joined: 25 May 2020
Last visit: 03 Sep 2026
Posts: 285
Own Kudos:
244
 [1]
Given Kudos: 147
Location: Kenya
Schools: Jones '26 (A$$)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
GPA: 3.5
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Schools: Jones '26 (A$$)
GMAT 1: 730 Q50 V46
Posts: 285
Kudos: 244
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 05:06
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. This does not address the hypothetical differences
B. Animals hunted for food could also be used for sacrifices
C. This clearly resolves the hypothesis coz if the animals had cuts resembling meat they would be definitely for meat otherwise sacrifice
D. This is irrelevant to the hypothesis
E. This is out of scope
Ans C
Bunuel
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.

In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?

(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
Show more
User avatar
Jay29
User avatar
Joined: 03 Sep 2020
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 122
Posts: 22
Kudos: 21
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 05:20
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A - doesn't provide support for other hypothesis. NO

B - A commonly hunted species for food , can also be used for sacrifices. so NO

D- Age of the animal is inconsequential. We need evidence if it was slaughtered or burned whole. NO

E- If animal usages depicted well and good, but lack depiction or records doesn't imply that it did not occur. NO

C - If we see butchering cut marks on bones, it will mean that they were slaughtered for meals. A whole burned animal won't have that.

C is our answer.
User avatar
AviNFC
User avatar
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 09 Aug 2026
Posts: 365
Own Kudos:
421
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 365
Kudos: 421
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 05:33
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region Even if it is found it cannot be confirm the purpose of such burnings.
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region This still doesn't confirm the purpose because what if the same animals are used in religious activities??
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat Correct. If cut marks are available for meat removal then they are for consumption as religious activities need the whole body.
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime Age Information is irrelevant as still the purpose of burning remains unclear
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies Such information doesn't clear the confusion arisen for the burning at this specific site.

Ans C
User avatar
chan992
User avatar
Joined: 21 May 2020
Last visit: 19 Jul 2026
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Posts: 13
Kudos: 10
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 05:39
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ANS : C

A, D, E : IRRELEVANT

B : THIS COULD BE THE REASON BUT IT LACKS THE SOUNDNESS IN THAT THE ABUNDANT ANIMALS STILL COULD BE THE SACFIRICING ANIMALS
User avatar
JollyScale
User avatar
Joined: 04 Jul 2026
Last visit: 28 Aug 2026
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
49
Location: India
Schools: HBS '27 CBS '27 Stanford '27
GPA: 6.87/7
WE:Marketing (Finance: Diversified Financial Services)
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Schools: HBS '27 CBS '27 Stanford '27
Posts: 55
Kudos: 49
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 05:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to distinguish between 2 hypothesis.

Only option C does that

Bunuel
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.

In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?

(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
Show more
User avatar
firefox300
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 151
Own Kudos:
140
 [1]
Posts: 151
Kudos: 140
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 05:49
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A It provides context, not a way to distinguish between the two explanations.

B Food animals can also be sacrificial animals.

C CORRECT. Butchering cut marks indicate meat removal, supporting food preparation over animal sacrifice.

D Either practice could involve animals of different ages, so it's not decisive.

E It shows sacrifice existed elsewhere, not that this deposit came from sacrifice.

The correct answer is C
User avatar
Parry104
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2025
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Operations
Schools: ISB '27 IIM NUS '27
GRE 1: Q170 V158
GPA: 3.14
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Schools: ISB '27 IIM NUS '27
GRE 1: Q170 V158
Posts: 28
Kudos: 26
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 06:17
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hypo 1 = Bones are of animals which are used for cooking.
hypo 2 = Bones are of animals which are used in sacrifice.

For option C, if bones of these animals have meat cuts == > used for cooking. If not present ==> used for sacrifice

Answer C
User avatar
redandme21
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2025
Last visit: 01 Aug 2026
Posts: 157
Own Kudos:
144
 [1]
Posts: 157
Kudos: 144
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 06:18
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Similar deposits elsewhere may provide context but don't distinguish food preparation from sacrifice in this deposit.

B Even sacrificial animals could be common food animals, so this doesn't discriminate well.

C Correct. Cut marks from butchering strongly support the food preparation hypothesis. Their absence would make ritual sacrifice more plausible.

D Both food and ritual practices could involve animals of various ages.

E Contemporary depictions of religious ceremonies don't show that this particular deposit resulted from sacrifice rather than feasting.

IMO C
User avatar
shaliny
User avatar
Joined: 30 Oct 2023
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 132
Own Kudos:
33
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,216
Posts: 132
Kudos: 33
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 06:33
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To decide between two hypothesis we have to find the information that make one of the hypothesis more obvious.
premise used: bones represent several different species and show varying degree of burns.

H1- deposits may be the the remnants of communal food preparation(slaughtered and cooked), If this is true:
degree of burning would be less
bone could have some cut marks due to slaughtering
H2- deposits may have represent the remains of ritual animal, in which animal burned whole as offerings. If this is true:
degree of burning would be more
bone would have no or unlikely have cut marks

with these two pre thinking, lets evaluate the options:
A- provide same information but at other settlements. it is not helping in deciding between two hypothesis. Incorrect
B- it is telling commonly hunting species for food in surrounding region does not give idea for the the region archaeologists are excavating-Incorrect
C-matches the pre thinking. Correct
D-it is not helping distinguish the two category of hypothesis. Incorrect
E-By depicting animals in records we can not have any idea about the bone deposit . we can not have keen observation about degree of burning n bone surface

Bunuel
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.

In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?

(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
Nsanghavi
User avatar
Joined: 08 Jul 2025
Last visit: 29 Aug 2026
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
46
Given Kudos: 20
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 59
Kudos: 46
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 06:33
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The given question mentions that the archaelogists have found deposits on animal bones - It can be because of 2 reasons - 1) Either remanants of communal food - animals were slaughtered and cooked or b) remains of ritual animal sacrifices.

We have to find out which hypothesis will help determine the use of deposits

Option A - Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have found at other settlements in same region - This is not correct since even if charred animal bones were found in another region then also its use will not be known hence we can't select this.
Option B - Whether bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food - This is incorrect - since even if the bones were related to commonly hunted animal - the use of deposit is still not known
Option C - Whether bones display cut marks of kinds preoduced when animal were butchered for meat removal - This seems correct since it supports view a as mentioned in the question above - but still let's check the other option.
Option D - Whether deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime - Irrelevant - this is not asked anywhere in the question hence not correct
Option E - Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies - This is very close - It mentions that the records can help us determine but even if records mentions the majority - the actual can be different and if we compare between Option E and C - Option C is more conclusive

hence the correct answer is Option C
User avatar
snorlax02
User avatar
Joined: 22 Dec 2025
Last visit: 30 Jul 2026
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
24
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 39
Kudos: 24
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 06:50
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How to know bones found were for animal used for cooking vs sacrafise

Main difference between scarifies and eating is that for eating we would maybe clean or remove meat from bones but for sacrafise we will just burn the animal whole

A - won't help much knowing about similar situations in nearby region doesn't help classify the usage
B - This can help because if animal are easily huntable mostly would have been used for cooking but they can also be used for sacrafise as they are easy to catch
C - yes this info can be useful to distinguish between scarifies and cooking
D - age of bones doesn't matter. What does it say about cooking or sacarifise one can cook or sacrifice animal of any age
E - This might help but still won't be enough to conclude the purpose of burning as cooking is always a necessary requirement for survival

Ans - C

Bunuel
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.

In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?

(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
Show more
User avatar
AthaniX
User avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2026
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
27
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 33
Kudos: 27
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 06:58
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
So either animals were sacrificed or cooked, both have different approaches of providing damage to the animals. Butchered or Burned.

A. Doesnt tell is whether food or ritual
B. Rituals may also use food animals
C. Yes! if cut marks-> butchered, if not its ritual
D. Age doesnt matter in either scenario
E. Doesnt tell us what happened at THIS settlement

IMO C
User avatar
K812
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2020
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
36
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 45
Kudos: 36
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 06:59
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A tricky one!

Here is what we know: Charred animals were discovered- their bones belonged to different species and they have different degrees of burning.

Two hypothesis and the respective details:
1. "Communal" Food preparation- For this to be true, (1) animals should be slaughtered first and then (2) cooked during (3) "large gatherings" of inhabitants

2. "Ritual" animal sacrifices- Animals were (1) burned whole as (2) offerings (3) during religious cermonies

Now, to decide between these two, we need any information that can either strengthen or weaken any or all parts of the evidence of one of the hypothesis

Analyzing answer choices:
A. This just strengthens the fact that the animals were burned but for which reason, there is no information for it. Basically, it does not provide any new information that can serve as strengthener/weakner for the decision

B. This is a confusing one. Here is why I wasn't convinced with it- The same animal species that are burned as offerings can also be hunted for food by inhabitants. It does not provide any information with regards to the specific processes/evidence that are needed to decided between one of the hypothesis

C. Correct - I was sure of this because if animals were butchered for removal of meat, then they were not burned as "whole"- a necessary requirement for the second hypothesis. So, it weakens that while supporting the first one where animals are slaughtered first

D. Incorrect- age has nothing to do here because there is absolutely no such relationship established for any hypothesis to be true or false

E. Incorrect- again, this is luring but it does not strengthen or weaken any of the requirements of the ritual offering hypothesis- so we can not assume this relationship
User avatar
topgmat25
User avatar
Joined: 15 Dec 2025
Last visit: 27 Jul 2026
Posts: 150
Own Kudos:
139
 [1]
Posts: 150
Kudos: 139
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 07:03
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A Evidence from other settlements doesn't clarify which of the two possibilities applies to this site.

B Both food consumption and sacrificial rituals could involve the same types of local animals.

C The presence of butchering marks would strongly indicate meat removal for eating, favoring the communal meal idea over whole animal burning. Correct answer.

D The age range of the animals does not reliably differentiate between feasting and ritual offering.

E Depictions from other cultures are not direct evidence and are less useful than physical features of the bones.

The answer is C
User avatar
prepapr
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2025
Last visit: 25 Aug 2026
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
121
Given Kudos: 71
Location: India
Schools: INSEAD Aug '27 IIM IIM ISB '27 NUS '27
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q84 V84 DI82
GPA: 8.9
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Schools: INSEAD Aug '27 IIM IIM ISB '27 NUS '27
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q84 V84 DI82
Posts: 165
Kudos: 121
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 07:03
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Premise: Archeologists found a deposit of charred animal bones.
Two possible explanations:
1) food preparation (animals butchered and cooked)
2) ritual sacrifice (animals burned whole)

question:
Find the info that best helps decide which is corrrect

Analysing answer choices
A) Doesn't explain why this deposit exists. this is incorrect.
B) Both food and rituals could use the same animals. Doesn't distinguish
C) if it is food prep, cut marks expected. If animals are burned wholly, only few/no cut marks. This helps distinguish the two explanations, This is correct
D)Either hypothesis could involve different ages
E) Shows rituals existed, not that this deposit is ritual. This is indirect.

Therefore C is the answer.
Bunuel
Archaeologists excavating an early agrarian settlement discovered a concentrated deposit of charred animal bones at the center of the site. The bones represent several different species and show varying degrees of burning. The deposit may be the remnants of communal food preparation - animals slaughtered and cooked during large gatherings of the settlement's inhabitants. Alternatively, the deposit may represent the remains of ritual animal sacrifices, in which animals were burned whole as offerings during religious ceremonies.

In order to help decide between the two hypotheses about the origin of the bone deposit, which of the following would it be most useful to know?

(A) Whether similar deposits of charred animal bones have been found at other settlements in the same region
(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region
(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat
(D) Whether the deposit contains bones from animals of various ages or predominantly from animals in their prime
(E) Whether written or artistic records from contemporary cultures depict animals being used in religious ceremonies

 


This question was provided by GMAT Club
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win over $30,000 in prizes such as Courses, Tests, Private Tutoring, and more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
Show more
User avatar
harishj1996
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jun 2026
Last visit: 01 Aug 2026
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
28
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 38
Kudos: 28
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 07:05
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question is interesting and the options are clearly divided into B & C. B is the trap whereas C is the answer.

We can eliminate A, D and E because none of these options are relevant in determining which of the two hypotheses would prevail. Hence they can be discarded.

So far as Option B and Option C:

(B) Whether the bones belong to animal species that were commonly hunted for food in the surrounding region

While this may indicate that these animal species that are commonly hunted for food would then be used for food as well, it doesn't specifically eliminate the possibility that these could be captured and burned alive whole in religious ceremonies. The very fact that this doesn't rule out the possibility mean that it cannot be the answer.

The answer must be one that if applied, it would render the other theory completely inapplicable.

(C) Whether the bones display cut marks of the kind produced when animals are butchered for the removal of meat

This is extremely relevant in ruling out the hypothesis that the animals would've been used in religious ceremonies. There are two key points:
(i) If the bones have cut marks of the kind that results from butchering for meat, it very likely indicates that they were cut for slaughter and consumption.

(ii) The question stem provides that the animals utilized in religious ceremonies were burnt whole. They would not have acquired cut marks naturally which are indicative of butchering. Their burning and rendering into char would be more natural as compared to the artificial act of cutting and butchering. Hence, we can rule out that such animals would not have been used for religious ceremonies.

Hence the final answer is C.
User avatar
canopyinthecity
User avatar
Joined: 12 Jul 2025
Last visit: 06 Sep 2026
Posts: 159
Own Kudos:
106
 [1]
Given Kudos: 25
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Posts: 159
Kudos: 106
 [1]
GMAT Club World Cup 2026 (Day 4): Archaeologists excavating an early 10 Jul 2026, 07:06
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) this does not help

(B) it says hunted - we are trying to find if deposits are from communal food preparation where animals are slaughtered (option 1) or is it from religious ceremonies.( option 2). Therefore hunting will not help to distinguish

(C) This is the answer as marks can tell whether it could be option 1 or not - hence it is correct.

(D) is not helpful to distinguish

(E) this is not helpful to distinguish too as if there is record of animals being used in religious ceremonies, it does not tell anything about these remains which are discovered
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
AbhishekP220108
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts