WA@akr6194
https://gmatclub.com/forum/guidebook-writer-i-have-visited-hotels-throughout-the-country-and-hav-80358.html#p375669
I went through this answer explanation by GMAT Ninja and I am really confused as to how one could arrive at the best answer choice. Any suggestions as to how to work through such questions ?
The key is to focus on the conclusion: the guidebook writer claims that carpenters before 1930 were more skilled than those after 1930, based on the hotels he visited.
To weaken this, we need to question whether his sample is truly representative.
Let’s eliminate the wrong choices:
A – Compares carpentry in hotels vs other structures: not relevant to the argument
B – Size or accommodation capacity doesn’t determine carpentry skill: irrelevant
C – If materials were similar before and after 1930, that actually strengthens the claim (it removes an alternative explanation)
E – Length of apprenticeship is not discussed in the argument: irrelevant
So we’re left with D.
Why D weakens the argument:
The writer only visited hotels that still exist from before 1930. But buildings with poor carpentry are less likely to survive over time. So his sample is biased toward the best-built older hotels.
This creates a survivorship bias: he’s comparing a filtered set of high-quality old hotels with a broader, less filtered set of newer ones. That makes older carpenters appear more skilled than they actually were.
It’s like saying “old music is better” because we still listen to classics from the past. We forget that many average or bad songs existed back then too. Only the best survived.
So, the conclusion is flawed because it’s based on a biased sample, making D the correct answer. I think now the explanation of GMATNinja will make sense.
WA@akr6194
https://gmatclub.com/forum/guidebook-writer-i-have-visited-hotels-throughout-the-country-and-hav-80358.html#p375669
I went through this answer explanation by GMAT Ninja and I am really confused as to how one could arrive at the best answer choice. Any suggestions as to how to work through such questions ?
Working through elimination works best in such cases. Most of the options in this question were irrelevant or strengthened the argument. After some practise, you will intuitively understand why the correct ones makes sense. For the first few questions that you practise, try writing reasons or explanations as to why you are eliminating something. It markedly improved my understanding of CR questions.