Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 21:27 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 21:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,096
 [13]
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,096
 [2]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,096
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
debjit1990
Joined: 26 Dec 2017
Last visit: 14 Nov 2025
Posts: 257
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
Location: India
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V27
Products:
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V27
Posts: 257
Kudos: 281
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
DUtkarsh
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 25 May 2013
Last visit: 06 Feb 2022
Posts: 22
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 2.8
WE:Account Management (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The historian reasons that the enactment of a law regarding timber imports from Poran during the third Nayalese dynasty suggests that timber trade was conducted between the two nations. The critic argues that since there exist many laws today regarding activities in which people no longer engage, the historian’s reasoning is thereby flawed.

Answer choice (A): This is the correct answer choice. The historian’s reasoning is that the enactment of laws about an activity implies that people were engaging in that activity. The critic argues that since it does not hold true in modern day – many existing laws are regarding activities in which people no longer engage – the argument is also likely flawed about the past. Thus the critic is implying an analogy between the present and the past, in that since the historian’s reasoning does not hold true about the present, it is therefore also flawed concerning the past.

Answer choice (B): The critic does not identify any general principle that the historian’s reasoning has violated.

Answer choice (C): The historian argues that the fact that a law was enacted suggests that timber trade was conducted. Thus there is a distinction between certainty – a law regarding timber imports was enacted – and possibility – timber trade might have been conducted. However, the critic’s response has not addressed this distinction.

Answer choice (D): The critic’s response does not establish any explicit criteria that must be used in evaluating indirect evidence.

Answer choice (E): The critic has not addressed the roles that law plays in distinct societies.
User avatar
analytica233
Joined: 04 Aug 2019
Last visit: 15 Nov 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 745
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, Strategy
Schools: Desautels '23
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
WE:Research (Other)
Products:
Schools: Desautels '23
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 62
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Historian: There is no direct evidence that timber was traded between the ancient nations of Poran and Nayal, but the fact that a law setting tariffs on timber imports from Poran was enacted during the third Nayalese dynasty does suggest that during that period a timber trade was conducted.

Critic: Your reasoning is flawed. During its third dynasty, Nayal may well have imported timber from Poran, but certainly on today’s statute books there remain many laws regulating activities that were once common but in which people no longer engage.

The critic’s response to the historian’s reasoning does which one of the following?


(A) It implies an analogy between the present and the past.

(B) It identifies a general principle that the historian’s reasoning violates.

(C) It distinguishes between what has been established as a certainty and what has been established as a possibility.

(D) It establishes explicit criteria that must be used in evaluating indirect evidence.

(E) It points out the dissimilar roles that law plays in societies that are distinct from one another.

(A) It implies an analogy between the present and the past.
On today’s statute books there remain many laws regulating activities that were once common but in which people no longer engage. Similarly, there could be a law setting tariffs on timber imports from Poran which was enacted during the third Nayalese dynasty but timber trade may not have existed during that period. (A) is correct.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Historian: There is no direct evidence that timber was traded between the ancient nations of Poran and Nayal, but the fact that a law setting tariffs on timber imports from Poran was enacted during the third Nayalese dynasty does suggest that during that period a timber trade was conducted.

Critic: Your reasoning is flawed. During its third dynasty, Nayal may well have imported timber from Poran, but certainly on today’s statute books there remain many laws regulating activities that were once common but in which people no longer engage.

The critic’s response to the historian’s reasoning does which one of the following?

(A) It implies an analogy between the present and the past.

(B) It identifies a general principle that the historian’s reasoning violates. - WRONG. Both highlighted text asre not ascertainable.

(C) It distinguishes between what has been established as a certainty and what has been established as a possibility.

(D) It establishes explicit criteria that must be used in evaluating indirect evidence. - WRONG. No criteria discussed.

(E) It points out the dissimilar roles that law plays in societies that are distinct from one another. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

Between A and C, C loses out because of the blue text in the passage. There is no such distinction. Critic accepts that fact and presents his/her counter argument.

Answer A.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,836
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,836
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts