Jul 26 08:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT The Competition Continues  Game of Timers is a teambased competition based on solving GMAT questions to win epic prizes! Starting July 1st, compete to win prep materials while studying for GMAT! Registration is Open! Ends July 26th Jul 27 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC Jul 28 07:00 PM EDT  08:00 PM EDT Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Sunday, July 28th at 7 PM EDT
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2006
Posts: 1640

If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 12 Aug 2014, 03:52
Question Stats:
50% (02:14) correct 50% (02:17) wrong based on 415 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ? (1) 1/a > 1/3 (2) 1/a + 1/b + 1/c = 1
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
Originally posted by yezz on 16 Aug 2009, 00:45.
Last edited by Bunuel on 12 Aug 2014, 03:52, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic, edited the question and added the OA.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 56372

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
12 Aug 2014, 04:04
If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ? (1) 1/a > 1/3 > crossmultiply ( notice that we can safely do this since we know that a > 0): a < 3. As c < a, then c < a < 3. Sufficient. (2) 1/a + 1/b + 1/c = 1. If c is more than or equal to 3, then 1/c is less than or equal to 1/3 ( for example, if c is 3, then 1/c is 1/3 and if c is 4, then 1/c is 1/4). In this case both 1/b and 1/a would be less than 1/3. So, 1/a + 1/b + 1/c = (less than 1/3) + (less than 1/3) + (less than or equal to 1/3) = (less than 1), which contradicts the given statement. Therefore our assumption that c could be more than or equal to 3 was wrong, which implies that c < 3. Sufficient. Answer: D.
_________________




Intern
Joined: 01 Aug 2009
Posts: 27
Location: Australia

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Aug 2009, 08:30
IMO....D (1) 1/a>1/3 Solution: 0 < a < 3 Since a > b > c > 0....and a < 3, then c must be < 3. Sufficient. 2) 1/a+1/b+1/c=1 1 = 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 if C=3 then 1/a < 1/b < 1/3 Hence, the sum of the fraction can never reach 1.... Therefore, c has to be < 3 in order to get the sum of fractions reach 1 Sufficient.
_________________
The three most significant times in your life are: 1. When you fall in love 2. The birth of your first child 3. When you prepare for your GMAT



SVP
Joined: 29 Aug 2007
Posts: 2239

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Aug 2009, 08:43
scarish wrote: IMO....D
(1) 1/a>1/3 Solution: 0 < a < 3 Since a > b > c > 0....and a < 3, then c must be < 3. Sufficient.
2) 1/a+1/b+1/c=1
1 = 1/3 + 1/3 + 1/3 if C=3 then 1/a < 1/b < 1/3 Hence, the sum of the fraction can never reach 1....
Therefore, c has to be < 3 in order to get the sum of fractions reach 1 Sufficient. Thats D. good job for good question.
_________________
Verbal: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtotheverbalforumpleasereadthisfirst77546.html Math: http://gmatclub.com/forum/newtothemathforumpleasereadthisfirst77764.html Gmat: http://gmatclub.com/forum/everythingyouneedtoprepareforthegmatrevised77983.html
GT



Senior Manager
Joined: 25 Oct 2008
Posts: 492
Location: Kolkata,India

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2009, 18:01
Stmt 2 is not crystal clear.. We have here,a+b+c=abc which is only true when a,b,c=3.However,from the stem we know that a>b>c..hmmm..getting there but missing something...
_________________
http://gmatclub.com/forum/countdownbeginshasended8548340.html#p649902



Manager
Joined: 16 Apr 2009
Posts: 242

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
23 Oct 2009, 20:32
humm , for stmt 2 , is there any other way to solve the problem other than one mentioned by scarish ab+bc+ab = abc , now can i solve from this ?
_________________



Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2014
Posts: 6

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Aug 2014, 18:36
Can some one explain Stm 2 better than the above explanations



Manager
Joined: 14 Mar 2014
Posts: 145

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
05 Aug 2014, 05:04
ashutoshbarawkar wrote: Can some one explain Stm 2 better than the above explanations Statement 2 : 1/a + 1/b + 1/c = 1
given a>b>c and all are positive thus == >1/c > 1/b > 1/a (i)
let me assume values
1/a 1/b 1/c C 0.1 0.2 0.7 10/7 0.2 0.3 0.5 10/5 0.3 0.4 0.4 > This violates the condition(i)
Thus C value will always be <3 ..
_________________
I'm happy, if I make math for you slightly clearer And yes, I like kudos ¯\_(ツ)_/¯



Manager
Joined: 13 Sep 2015
Posts: 82
Location: United States
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, International Business
GPA: 3.84

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Nov 2015, 16:56
ashutoshbarawkar wrote: Can some one explain Stm 2 better than the above explanations definitely you can get c<3 from the condition: a>b>c>0 so 1/a<1/b<1/c because 1/a+1/b+1/c=1 if you replace 1/a with 1/c, and 1/b with 1/c, you will get a sum bigger than 1: 1/c+1/c+1/c>1/a+1/b+1/c=1 so 3/c>1 so c<3



CEO
Joined: 12 Sep 2015
Posts: 3857
Location: Canada

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
10 Nov 2015, 17:19
yezz wrote: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
(1) 1/a > 1/3 (2) 1/a + 1/b + 1/c = 1 Here's a slightly different approach . . . Target question: Is c < 3? Given: 0 < c < b < a Statement 1: 1/a > 1/3 Since we can be certain that a is positive, it's safe to take the inequality 1/a > 1/3 and multiply both sides by a to get: 1 > a/3 Likewise, we can take 1 > a/3 and multiply both sides by 3 to get: 3 > a If 3 > a and c < a, then we can conclude that c < 3 Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 1 is SUFFICIENT Statement 2: (1/a) + (1/b) + (1/c) = 1 IMPORTANT: If 0 < c < a, we can conclude that 1/a < 1/c Likewise, since 0 < c < b, we can conclude that 1/b < 1/c In other words, 1/c is BIGGER than both 1/a and 1/b So, if we take the equation (1/a) + (1/b) + (1/c) = 1 and replace both 1/a and 1/b with 1/c, the resulting sum will be BIGGER than 1 That is, (1/c) + (1/c) + (1/c) > 1 Simplify to get: 3/c > 1 Since we know that c is positive, it's safe to take the inequality and multiply both sides by c to get: 3 > c Since we can answer the target question with certainty, statement 2 is SUFFICIENT Answer = D Cheers, Brent
_________________
Test confidently with gmatprepnow.com



Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2015
Posts: 43
Concentration: General Management, Economics
WE: Engineering (Transportation)

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Mar 2016, 01:27
a>b>c>0 is c>3? 1) 1/a >1/3 since a is positive we can multiply both sides by a . therefore a <3 3<a<c , and hence c >3 ...sufficient 2) 1/a+1/b+1/c =1 we have to prove c>3 ... also means 1/c >1/3 ...also means 1/c>33.33% ( since 1/3 is 33.33% for getting rid of fraction, i have a phobia of fractions ) also 1/c>1/b>1/a ( rephrasing given data, it says 1/c should be greatest) now back to st. 2 we can write this as 1/a + 1/b +1/c =100% as we have to prove 1/c >33.33% take a case where 1/c is 30% .. then 35+35+30 =100 ( cannot happen since 1/c should be greatest) 1/c has to greater than equal to 40% in this case (21+39+40) so 1/c >33.33 % sufficient. ans is D i hope i am right



Intern
Joined: 27 Apr 2016
Posts: 6

Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
Show Tags
16 Mar 2018, 01:49
Hi,
is it possible to do the following for the 2nd statement:
[a + b + c][/abc] = 1
a+b+c = abc
this forces us to use numbers for a, b, and c, that will both add and multiply to give the same answer. Is this a viable approach?




Re: If a > b > c > 0, is c < 3 ?
[#permalink]
16 Mar 2018, 01:49






