GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 26 Apr 2018, 21:56

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 46
Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 04 Jan 2018, 03:21
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  25% (medium)

Question Stats:

62% (00:35) correct 38% (00:41) wrong based on 156 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity

(A) since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity
(B) because it can be corrected and the other cannot
(C) for ignorance can often be corrected but stupidity cannot
(D) because of the correctable nature of ignorance
(E) because the two differ regarding ability for correction

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA is not clear to me at all.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Originally posted by imaggic on 15 Nov 2011, 12:40.
Last edited by Mahmud6 on 04 Jan 2018, 03:21, edited 1 time in total.
Formatted
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: D-Day is on February 10th. and I am not stressed
Affiliations: American Management association, American Association of financial accountants
Joined: 12 Apr 2011
Posts: 214
Location: Kuwait
Schools: Columbia university
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2011, 15:33
78) Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity

(A) since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity.
"you", shouldn't be there because the sentence didnot indicate that this is a connversation or something, and even so, its not clear whom it refering to.
(B) because it can be corrected and the other cannot
"it" is not obvious whether it is refering to ignorance or stupidity, and in turn, "ther other" is not clear who it refering to.
(C) for ignorance can often be corrected but stupidity cannot.
this is the best answer as it is clear and concise and gramatically corret
(D) because of the correctable nature of ignorance.
this ignores stupidity and awkward rephrase and wordy enough to make you think it is correct
(E) because the two differ regarding ability for correction
this doesn't show the difference between ignorance and stupidity. and it is not clear what does it mean

so the correct answer is C
hope that helps
_________________

Sky is the limit

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 46
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2011, 15:37
C indeed looks good here. But in general, none of the choices sound right.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2011
Posts: 168
Concentration: General Management, Technology
Schools: Sloan '16 (D)
GMAT 1: 760 Q49 V44
GPA: 3.76
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2011, 16:32
C.

78) Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity
(A) since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity
Not parallel. You is not parallel to stupidity.
(B) because it can be corrected and the other cannot
Unclear.
(C) for ignorance can often be corrected but stupidity cannot
Clear and correct.
(D) because of the correctable nature of ignorance
Says nothing about stupidity.
(E) because the two differ regarding ability for correction
Wordy and unclear which is correctable.
1 KUDOS received
BSchool Forum Moderator
avatar
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 794
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2011, 17:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
imaggic wrote:
78) Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity
(A) since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity
(B) because it can be corrected and the other cannot
(C) for ignorance can often be corrected but stupidity cannot
(D) because of the correctable nature of ignorance
(E) because the two differ regarding ability for correction
OA is not clear to me at all.


I simply choose C after 10 second because of the existence of comma. When subordinate clause go after the independent clause, SC will not need the comma before it.

Recommend: you should read more about coordinator FANBOYS (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so) and subordinate clause.

Hope that help
_________________

Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you :)

The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need

CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 46
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Nov 2011, 17:54
"for ignorance" makes the sentence weird.
Director
Director
avatar
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 592
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2011, 04:41
+1 for C.

"for" here is acting as "because".

Crick
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 11 May 2011
Posts: 357
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Nov 2011, 10:48
tuanquang269 wrote:
imaggic wrote:
78) Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity
(A) since you can often correct ignorance but the same is not true of stupidity
(B) because it can be corrected and the other cannot
(C) for ignorance can often be corrected but stupidity cannot
(D) because of the correctable nature of ignorance
(E) because the two differ regarding ability for correction
OA is not clear to me at all.


I simply choose C after 10 second because of the existence of comma. When subordinate clause go after the independent clause, SC will not need the comma before it.

Recommend: you should read more about coordinator FANBOYS (for, and, nor, but, or, yet, so) and subordinate clause.

Hope that help


Ignorance is not equal to stupidity - independent clause
ignorance can often be corrected but stupidity cannot - independent clause

Both the independent clause must be added with FANBOYS word. hence C is correct.
Cheers!
_________________

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What you do TODAY is important because you're exchanging a day of your life for it!
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Retired Moderator
User avatar
Status: 2000 posts! I don't know whether I should feel great or sad about it! LOL
Joined: 04 Oct 2009
Posts: 1418
Location: Peru
Schools: Harvard, Stanford, Wharton, MIT & HKS (Government)
WE 1: Economic research
WE 2: Banking
WE 3: Government: Foreign Trade and SMEs
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Nov 2011, 21:21
+1 C

(A) "since" doesn't mean "because" in SC. Only in SC!
(B) "and" is wrong. we need "but".
(C) "for" means "because". Right.
(D) The meaning is not complete.
(E) It is not clear.
_________________

"Life’s battle doesn’t always go to stronger or faster men; but sooner or later the man who wins is the one who thinks he can."

My Integrated Reasoning Logbook / Diary: http://gmatclub.com/forum/my-ir-logbook-diary-133264.html

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Aug 2016
Posts: 533
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
GMAT 2: 700 Q50 V33
GPA: 4
WE: Consulting (Consulting)
Premium Member CAT Tests
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jan 2018, 02:25
imaggic wrote:
"for ignorance" makes the sentence weird.


Nope it doesn't. the word "For" is used in the form of because. Just as the word "As" can have multiple meanings, the same goes with the word "for".
Re: Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often   [#permalink] 04 Jan 2018, 02:25
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Ignorance is not equal to stupidity, since you can often

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.