Last visit was: 16 Jul 2025, 17:27 It is currently 16 Jul 2025, 17:27
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
prashantpareek
Joined: 21 May 2014
Last visit: 26 Dec 2016
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
47
 [12]
Posts: 12
Kudos: 47
 [12]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
rj12
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Last visit: 17 Nov 2014
Posts: 19
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Date: 09-27-2014
WE:Analyst (Computer Software)
Posts: 19
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
aditya8062
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Last visit: 26 Nov 2020
Posts: 503
Own Kudos:
659
 [1]
Given Kudos: 61
Posts: 503
Kudos: 659
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
BPD
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Last visit: 23 Sep 2014
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 12
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
My answer is D.
This seems to be the only option that can weaken the conclusion by offering an alternate reason.
User avatar
jslovelu
Joined: 23 May 2014
Last visit: 26 Jun 2014
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Status:Preparation Stage
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GPA: 3.39
Posts: 2
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D explains most. Financially weak background led them to cheat apparently. :)
avatar
DesiGmat
Joined: 27 Oct 2013
Last visit: 06 Feb 2021
Posts: 174
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 79
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 03-02-2015
GPA: 3.88
Posts: 174
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
According to me Option D is correct.

Please share the OA.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ans e->the possibility that people who were more likely to cheat to begin with chose to read the money related articles, a situation that would have implied that their chances of cheating were higher even before they read the article and hence, their basic nature and not the reading of the money related articles led to the higher incidence of cheating.
Assumption- The selection of the articles was not at the discretion of the participants.
User avatar
Madhavi1990
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Jul 2021
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 931
Posts: 256
Kudos: 91
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the OA? I also picked D - it seems that the cheating came due to an external reason and not because of the article
Any thoughts?
User avatar
rocko911
Joined: 11 Feb 2017
Last visit: 12 Apr 2018
Posts: 158
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 206
Posts: 158
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prashantpareek
Hey There

Here is another question to test your CR skills. See if you can crack it. Will post the answer later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In an experiment conducted by two psychologists from the University of Nalanda, participants were given mathematical tasks after seeding them with concepts related to money or time through articles written on these subjects. They were told to reward themselves with 100 pounds for each task they completed successfully and to donate 50 pounds for each one they couldn’t. It was found that those who read money-related articles cheated more when evaluating themselves compared to those who read time-related articles. Therefore, reading money-related articles led to the higher instance of cheating in the former group.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given above?

A. One of the psychologists had not completed her PhD when the experiment was conducted.
B. In the absence of a penalty for unsuccessful attempts, the group which read time-related articles would have earned more money than the other group.
C. The standard of the mathematical tasks was much higher than the education level of the participants.
D. Most of the participants of the group who read money-related articles were from a financially weak background.
E. Participants could read only one type of articles, as per their choice.

Regards
Prashant


People were from weak background so they stole more money?
I think taking this as a reason is not at all suitable, I think GMAT wont make us think in this way...

Rather I will go for C , As standard was much high so it made them to cheat to get more success in the experiment

I am impressed with D but I really dont think GMAT will ever make us think that people who are from weak background will more likely steal the money or do the cheating
User avatar
Madhavi1990
Joined: 15 Jan 2017
Last visit: 15 Jul 2021
Posts: 256
Own Kudos:
91
 [1]
Given Kudos: 931
Posts: 256
Kudos: 91
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rocko911
prashantpareek
Hey There

Here is another question to test your CR skills. See if you can crack it. Will post the answer later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In an experiment conducted by two psychologists from the University of Nalanda, participants were given mathematical tasks after seeding them with concepts related to money or time through articles written on these subjects. They were told to reward themselves with 100 pounds for each task they completed successfully and to donate 50 pounds for each one they couldn’t. It was found that those who read money-related articles cheated more when evaluating themselves compared to those who read time-related articles. Therefore, reading money-related articles led to the higher instance of cheating in the former group.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given above?

A. One of the psychologists had not completed her PhD when the experiment was conducted.
B. In the absence of a penalty for unsuccessful attempts, the group which read time-related articles would have earned more money than the other group.
C. The standard of the mathematical tasks was much higher than the education level of the participants.
D. Most of the participants of the group who read money-related articles were from a financially weak background.
E. Participants could read only one type of articles, as per their choice.

Regards
Prashant


People were from weak background so they stole more money?
I think taking this as a reason is not at all suitable, I think GMAT wont make us think in this way...

Rather I will go for C , As standard was much high so it made them to cheat to get more success in the experiment

I am impressed with D but I really dont think GMAT will ever make us think that people who are from weak background will more likely steal the money or do the cheating


Hi! I do understand the contention - but lets look at C --> it says that the level of questions was high. And the stem asks us - what is 'true' so that it could seriously weaken the conclusion.
In an experiment conducted by two psychologists from the University of Nalanda, participants were given mathematical tasks after seeding them with concepts related to money or time through articles written on these subjects. They were told to reward themselves with 100 pounds for each task they completed successfully and to donate 50 pounds for each one they couldn’t. It was found that those who read money-related articles cheated more when evaluating themselves compared to those who read time-related articles. Therefore, reading money-related articles led to the higher instance of cheating in the former group.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given above?
premise: there was an expt, where two groups were there. One group read time article and one read money- post this they did some math tasks and basis that rewarded themselves or donated.
conclusion: it was seen that money reading group rewarded themselves more and author concludes that because they read articles on money, they cheated a little more.
task: we need to weaken the variable (money reading) on reward - and the options should help us do that

A. One of the psychologists had not completed her PhD when the experiment was conducted. - Cannot weaken - PhD has no impact on results
B. In the absence of a penalty for unsuccessful attempts, the group which read time-related articles would have earned more money than the other group.This is extraneous - we are not talking about penalties. Also it uses one of the groups as a distractor
C. The standard of the mathematical tasks was much higher than the education level of the participants. Possible - but then it would have an effect on both the groups not one of them (time group and money group). In addition the stem asks us to weaken conclusion of those reading money articles cheating more. In short,
we need to find another reason than reading money articles

D. Most of the participants of the group who read money-related articles were from a financially weak background.Not the most comfortable or moral,
but in case they were somewhat deprived, there may have been a reason to quote more in reward than others- its not definite; but its a weakener. We aren't anyway drawing a judgement - out of all of them; this one; despite its uncomfortable claim; comes close as a variable that could explain the 'cheating'.

E. Participants could read only one type of articles, as per their choice. Again re stating what is above

My guess is that GMAT CR weakener questions ask us to look for variables or themes that could weaken the conclusion - so it maybe strange or amoral,
but we need to solve it either way. Also, if this question had more of 'weakener' option - say [color=#662d91]'money article group had received incorrect instructions halfway through the experiment;
it CAN imply that may have rewarded themselves more; and hence weaken the conclusion again. This kind of option would be stronger than 'financially weak' backgrounds; but we have to make the best of what we have. Hope this useful!! :) [/color]
User avatar
kumarparitosh123
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Last visit: 19 Dec 2018
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 121
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Posts: 131
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I am confused , but I ll go for C because may be the tough level might have led them to commit many mistakes.

Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
abhimahna
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Last visit: 06 Jul 2024
Posts: 3,519
Own Kudos:
5,697
 [1]
Given Kudos: 346
Status:Emory Goizueta Alum
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,519
Kudos: 5,697
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kumarparitosh123
I am confused , but I ll go for C because may be the tough level might have led them to commit many mistakes.

Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Hi kumarparitosh123 ,

C cannot right answer. We are no where given that one group is reading difficult articles while the other is not.

Both the groups are reading mathematical articles. Hence, this point is no where telling us why money article readers are cheating .

These articles are above the level for both. Hence, this option is incorrect.

rocko911

People were from weak background so they stole more money?
I think taking this as a reason is not at all suitable, I think GMAT wont make us think in this way...

Rather I will go for C , As standard was much high so it made them to cheat to get more success in the experiment

I am impressed with D but I really dont think GMAT will ever make us think that people who are from weak background will more likely steal the money or do the cheating

Hi rocko911 ,

This is allowed on GMAT. Note that we need to somehow weaken author's conclusion. By saying that they are from weak family, I am making author's conclusion doubtful.

Reason for rejecting C has been explained above.
User avatar
amarsinha
Joined: 20 Jul 2012
Last visit: 27 Jun 2024
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 1: 650 Q47 V33
Posts: 85
Kudos: 44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion - Reading money related material makes one to do more cheating.

Premise - 2 groups...one on time and one on money...studying ...studying about money did cheating...

There should be some alternative which may explain why they are cheating.

One may do cheating and the cause may not be that they are reading money related articles.

or

Those who do cheating may read money related material

A. out of context. What does Phd has to do with this.
B. This doesn't weaken the conclusion
C. This doesnt weaken. As both who read time related as well as those who read money related articles are equally prone to do cheating.
D. This gives an alternative explanation why the people who were reading money related articles were doing cheating.
E. This is from the premise only.
User avatar
kumarparitosh123
Joined: 02 Nov 2015
Last visit: 19 Dec 2018
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 121
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V29
Posts: 131
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Madhavi1990
rocko911
prashantpareek
Hey There

Here is another question to test your CR skills. See if you can crack it. Will post the answer later.
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

In an experiment conducted by two psychologists from the University of Nalanda, participants were given mathematical tasks after seeding them with concepts related to money or time through articles written on these subjects. They were told to reward themselves with 100 pounds for each task they completed successfully and to donate 50 pounds for each one they couldn’t. It was found that those who read money-related articles cheated more when evaluating themselves compared to those who read time-related articles. Therefore, reading money-related articles led to the higher instance of cheating in the former group.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given above?

A. One of the psychologists had not completed her PhD when the experiment was conducted.
B. In the absence of a penalty for unsuccessful attempts, the group which read time-related articles would have earned more money than the other group.
C. The standard of the mathematical tasks was much higher than the education level of the participants.
D. Most of the participants of the group who read money-related articles were from a financially weak background.
E. Participants could read only one type of articles, as per their choice.

Regards
Prashant


People were from weak background so they stole more money?
I think taking this as a reason is not at all suitable, I think GMAT wont make us think in this way...

Rather I will go for C , As standard was much high so it made them to cheat to get more success in the experiment

I am impressed with D but I really dont think GMAT will ever make us think that people who are from weak background will more likely steal the money or do the cheating


Hi! I do understand the contention - but lets look at C --> it says that the level of questions was high. And the stem asks us - what is 'true' so that it could seriously weaken the conclusion.
In an experiment conducted by two psychologists from the University of Nalanda, participants were given mathematical tasks after seeding them with concepts related to money or time through articles written on these subjects. They were told to reward themselves with 100 pounds for each task they completed successfully and to donate 50 pounds for each one they couldn’t. It was found that those who read money-related articles cheated more when evaluating themselves compared to those who read time-related articles. Therefore, reading money-related articles led to the higher instance of cheating in the former group.

Which of the following statements, if true, most seriously weakens the argument given above?
premise: there was an expt, where two groups were there. One group read time article and one read money- post this they did some math tasks and basis that rewarded themselves or donated.
conclusion: it was seen that money reading group rewarded themselves more and author concludes that because they read articles on money, they cheated a little more.
task: we need to weaken the variable (money reading) on reward - and the options should help us do that

A. One of the psychologists had not completed her PhD when the experiment was conducted. - Cannot weaken - PhD has no impact on results
B. In the absence of a penalty for unsuccessful attempts, the group which read time-related articles would have earned more money than the other group.This is extraneous - we are not talking about penalties. Also it uses one of the groups as a distractor
C. The standard of the mathematical tasks was much higher than the education level of the participants. Possible - but then it would have an effect on both the groups not one of them (time group and money group). In addition the stem asks us to weaken conclusion of those reading money articles cheating more. In short,
we need to find another reason than reading money articles

D. Most of the participants of the group who read money-related articles were from a financially weak background.Not the most comfortable or moral,
but in case they were somewhat deprived, there may have been a reason to quote more in reward than others- its not definite; but its a weakener. We aren't anyway drawing a judgement - out of all of them; this one; despite its uncomfortable claim; comes close as a variable that could explain the 'cheating'.

E. Participants could read only one type of articles, as per their choice. Again re stating what is above

My guess is that GMAT CR weakener questions ask us to look for variables or themes that could weaken the conclusion - so it maybe strange or amoral,
but we need to solve it either way. Also, if this question had more of 'weakener' option - say [color=#662d91]'money article group had received incorrect instructions halfway through the experiment;
it CAN imply that may have rewarded themselves more; and hence weaken the conclusion again. This kind of option would be stronger than 'financially weak' backgrounds; but we have to make the best of what we have. Hope this useful!! :) [/color]
Kudos !!!
Awesome explanation !!

Sent from my Lenovo TAB S8-50LC using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
Danush649
Joined: 26 Apr 2020
Last visit: 16 Jul 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
Posts: 41
Kudos: 27
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i think it could be E
Maybe people who cheat like to read Money related magazines. this would break the conclusion by saying reading money related mag. was not the cause of cheating.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7359 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
235 posts