Aug 20 08:00 PM PDT  09:00 PM PDT EMPOWERgmat is giving away the complete Official GMAT Exam Pack collection worth $100 with the 3 Month Pack ($299) Aug 20 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT Take 20% off the plan of your choice, now through midnight on Tuesday, 8/20 Aug 22 09:00 PM PDT  10:00 PM PDT What you'll gain: Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics, and much more. Thursday, August 22nd at 9 PM EDT Aug 24 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Learn reading strategies that can help even nonvoracious reader to master GMAT RC Aug 25 09:00 AM PDT  12:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day verbal workshop and learn how to ace the Verbal section with the best tips and strategies. Limited for the first 99 registrants. Register today! Aug 25 08:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Exclusive offer! Get 400+ Practice Questions, 25 Video lessons and 6+ Webinars for FREE.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57108

In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Apr 2015, 03:08
Question Stats:
53% (02:13) correct 47% (02:05) wrong based on 225 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y? (1) z = 151 (2) r = 11 Kudos for a correct solution.
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________




Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1224
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33 GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40

In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Apr 2015, 03:30
Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution. We can write this task in such way: \(z = x*y + r\) 1) we know only \(z\) and this is insufficient. 2) we know only \(r\) and this is insufficient 1+2) \(151 = x*y + 11\) This is looks like insufficient, but we know that \(x\) and \(y\) should be integer and remainder should be less than divisor: \(x>11\). And from this information we can infer that \(x*y = 15111 = 140\) and as \(x\) should be more than 11, the least possible number is 14 and \(y\) should be equal to 10 So \(x > y\) and answer is C
_________________




Director
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 511
Concentration: International Business, Technology

Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
22 Apr 2015, 20:30
Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution. z=xy+r (1) z = 151 Insufficient. (2) r = 11 Insufficient. x*y= 140 x>11 so minimum 'x' is 14 and maximum 'y' is '10' . Answer C .



Retired Moderator
Status: I Declare War!!!
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 232
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 03182015
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)

Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Apr 2015, 07:31
Hi, IMO it should be C. that is after combining both statements. St 1) just be talking about z151 nothing comes out. 151/2 or 151/150. so remainder being same still x and y cant be quantified. st 2) r = 11. still nothing comes out combining both: find the number which when divides 151 leaves remainder of 11 x should be 14 and y be 10. Though while solving I assigned x as 140 / 28 too.. which leaves remainder of 11 when divided by 151 hence C Regards Celestial Kudos if its a correct solution Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution.



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57108

Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Apr 2015, 03:10
Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution. VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x. Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve. Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's: z = xy + 11 And clearly not enough information to solve. But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables? 151 = xy + 11, so: 140 = xy The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 49
Concentration: Other, Other

Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Apr 2016, 07:25
Bunuel wrote: Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution. VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x. Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve. Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's: z = xy + 11 And clearly not enough information to solve. But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables? 151 = xy + 11, so: 140 = xy The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient. Typo: Should be Dividend=Divisor*Quotient + Remainder



Manager
Joined: 23 Apr 2018
Posts: 112

In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Dec 2018, 05:32
Bunuel wrote: Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution. VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x. Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve. Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's: z = xy + 11 And clearly not enough information to solve. But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables? 151 = xy + 11, so: 140 = xy The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient. Bunuel , can you help me out with my confusion here, i read that Y is the quotient, and X is the divisor.. Why x has to be greater than y ? as We can also divide 140 by 7 i.e X and in that case quotient i.e Y would be 20. Please correct me if i am missing out on some information, but it's causing me a lot of confusion here. How's X > Y here ?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 57108

Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Dec 2018, 05:49
Shrey9 wrote: Bunuel wrote: Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution. VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x. Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve. Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's: z = xy + 11 And clearly not enough information to solve. But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables? 151 = xy + 11, so: 140 = xy The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient. Bunuel , can you help me out with my confusion here, i read that Y is the quotient, and X is the divisor.. Why x has to be greater than y ? as We can also divide 140 by 7 i.e X and in that case quotient i.e Y would be 20. Please correct me if i am missing out on some information, but it's causing me a lot of confusion here. How's X > Y here ? If \(x\) and \(y\) are positive integers, there exist unique integers \(q\) and \(r\), called the quotient and remainder, respectively, such that \(y =divisor*quotient+remainder= xq + r\) and \(0\leq{r}<x\).For example, when 15 is divided by 6, the quotient is 2 and the remainder is 3 since \(15 = 6*2 + 3\). Notice that \(0\leq{r}<x\) means that remainder is a nonnegative integer and always less than divisor.It's easier to understand if you consider a simple example: when you divide by 3, the remainder could only be 0, 1, or 2. For more on this please check the links below: 6. Remainders
_________________



Intern
Joined: 25 Jun 2017
Posts: 35
Location: Canada
GPA: 3.5
WE: Human Resources (Consumer Products)

Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 May 2019, 21:26
Bunuel wrote: Bunuel wrote: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?
(1) z = 151
(2) r = 11
Kudos for a correct solution. VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x. Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve. Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's: z = xy + 11 And clearly not enough information to solve. But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables? 151 = xy + 11, so: 140 = xy The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient. How come x can't equal 70 and y equal 2? The remainder would be 11 is this case as well.
_________________
If you liked my post, give me Kudos! Thanks!




Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,
[#permalink]
30 May 2019, 21:26






