GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 17 Jan 2019, 05:03

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel
Events & Promotions in January
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
303112345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
272829303112
Open Detailed Calendar
  • The winning strategy for a high GRE score

     January 17, 2019

     January 17, 2019

     08:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Learn the winning strategy for a high GRE score — what do people who reach a high score do differently? We're going to share insights, tips and strategies from data we've collected from over 50,000 students who used examPAL.
  • Free GMAT Strategy Webinar

     January 19, 2019

     January 19, 2019

     07:00 AM PST

     09:00 AM PST

    Aiming to score 760+? Attend this FREE session to learn how to Define your GMAT Strategy, Create your Study Plan and Master the Core Skills to excel on the GMAT.

In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52227
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2015, 02:08
2
8
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  85% (hard)

Question Stats:

52% (01:40) correct 48% (01:20) wrong based on 248 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.

_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Most Helpful Community Reply
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Posts: 1231
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2015, 02:30
3
4
Bunuel wrote:
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.


We can write this task in such way:
\(z = x*y + r\)

1) we know only \(z\) and this is insufficient.
2) we know only \(r\) and this is insufficient

1+2) \(151 = x*y + 11\)
This is looks like insufficient, but we know that \(x\) and \(y\) should be integer and remainder should be less than divisor: \(x>11\).
And from this information we can infer that \(x*y = 151-11 = 140\)
and as \(x\) should be more than 11, the least possible number is 14 and \(y\) should be equal to 10
So \(x > y\) and answer is C
_________________

Simple way to always control time during the quant part.
How to solve main idea questions without full understanding of RC.
660 (Q48, V33) - unpleasant surprise
740 (Q50, V40, IR3) - anti-debrief ;)

General Discussion
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 533
Concentration: International Business, Technology
GMAT 1: 630 Q49 V27
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2015, 19:30
1
Bunuel wrote:
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.


z=xy+r

(1) z = 151
Insufficient.
(2) r = 11
Insufficient.

x*y= 140
x>11
so minimum 'x' is 14 and maximum 'y' is '10' .

Answer C .
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Status: I Declare War!!!
Joined: 02 Apr 2014
Posts: 237
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, Economics
GMAT Date: 03-18-2015
WE: Asset Management (Investment Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2015, 06:31
1
Hi,
IMO it should be C. that is after combining both statements.
St 1) just be talking about z-151 nothing comes out.
151/2 or 151/150. so remainder being same still x and y cant be quantified.

st 2) r = 11.
still nothing comes out

combining both:
find the number which when divides 151 leaves remainder of 11
x should be 14 and y be 10.

Though while solving I assigned x as 140 / 28 too.. which leaves remainder of 11 when divided by 151
hence C
Regards
Celestial


Kudos if its a correct solution


Bunuel wrote:
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52227
Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2015, 02:10
Bunuel wrote:
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.


VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:

Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x.

Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve.

Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's:

z = xy + 11

And clearly not enough information to solve.

But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables?

151 = xy + 11, so:

140 = xy

The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient.
_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 52
Concentration: Other, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2016, 06:25
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.


VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:

Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x.

Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve.

Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's:

z = xy + 11

And clearly not enough information to solve.

But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables?

151 = xy + 11, so:

140 = xy

The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient.



Typo:
Should be
Dividend=Divisor*Quotient + Remainder
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Apr 2018
Posts: 15
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 04:32
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.


VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:

Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x.

Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve.

Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's:

z = xy + 11

And clearly not enough information to solve.

But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables?

151 = xy + 11, so:

140 = xy

The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient.


Bunuel , can you help me out with my confusion here, i read that Y is the quotient, and X is the divisor..
Why x has to be greater than y ? as We can also divide 140 by 7 i.e X and in that case quotient i.e Y would be 20.
Please correct me if i am missing out on some information, but it's causing me a lot of confusion here.
How's X > Y here ?
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 52227
Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Dec 2018, 04:49
1
Shrey9 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, the dividend is z, and remainder is r. Is x > y?

(1) z = 151

(2) r = 11



Kudos for a correct solution.


VERITAS PREP OFFICIAL SOLUTION:

Quick hypothetical situations should prove statement 1 to be insufficient. If x is 151, then you'd be dividing the same thing by itself and y would be 1 with no remainder, and x would be much larger than y. But you could flip that and make x = 1, in which you'd just be dividing 151 by 1 and the quotient (y) would be 151, much larger than x.

Recognizing the algebra of division can be quite helpful here, too. Since Quotient = Dividend * Divisor + Remainder, just knowing statement 1 tells you that 151 = xy + r, and clearly that's not enough information to solve.

Statement 2 is also insufficient. Keep in mind here that, without knowing statement 1, you essentially just have an undefined problem with a remainder of 11. Algebraically that's:

z = xy + 11

And clearly not enough information to solve.

But taken together, the information is sufficient. Why, if it still leaves two variables?

151 = xy + 11, so:

140 = xy

The other crucial element of this being a division problem is that the divisor can't be less than the remainder! If you're dividing 151 by, say, 7, you'd never have 11 left over. Even though 7 * 20 = 140, you wouldn't stop there and say that the remainder is 11, because 11 can still divide one more time by 7 (making it 21, remainder 4). So since 140 = xy AND x > 11, there's no way for an integer y to be greater than x. Therefore the two statements together are sufficient.


Bunuel , can you help me out with my confusion here, i read that Y is the quotient, and X is the divisor..
Why x has to be greater than y ? as We can also divide 140 by 7 i.e X and in that case quotient i.e Y would be 20.
Please correct me if i am missing out on some information, but it's causing me a lot of confusion here.
How's X > Y here ?


If \(x\) and \(y\) are positive integers, there exist unique integers \(q\) and \(r\), called the quotient and remainder, respectively, such that \(y =divisor*quotient+remainder= xq + r\) and \(0\leq{r}<x\).

For example, when 15 is divided by 6, the quotient is 2 and the remainder is 3 since \(15 = 6*2 + 3\).

Notice that \(0\leq{r}<x\) means that remainder is a non-negative integer and always less than divisor.

It's easier to understand if you consider a simple example: when you divide by 3, the remainder could only be 0, 1, or 2.

For more on this please check the links below:

6. Remainders



_________________

New to the Math Forum?
Please read this: Ultimate GMAT Quantitative Megathread | All You Need for Quant | PLEASE READ AND FOLLOW: 12 Rules for Posting!!!

Resources:
GMAT Math Book | Triangles | Polygons | Coordinate Geometry | Factorials | Circles | Number Theory | Remainders; 8. Overlapping Sets | PDF of Math Book; 10. Remainders | GMAT Prep Software Analysis | SEVEN SAMURAI OF 2012 (BEST DISCUSSIONS) | Tricky questions from previous years.

Collection of Questions:
PS: 1. Tough and Tricky questions; 2. Hard questions; 3. Hard questions part 2; 4. Standard deviation; 5. Tough Problem Solving Questions With Solutions; 6. Probability and Combinations Questions With Solutions; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 12 Easy Pieces (or not?); 9 Bakers' Dozen; 10 Algebra set. ,11 Mixed Questions, 12 Fresh Meat

DS: 1. DS tough questions; 2. DS tough questions part 2; 3. DS tough questions part 3; 4. DS Standard deviation; 5. Inequalities; 6. 700+ GMAT Data Sufficiency Questions With Explanations; 7 Tough and tricky exponents and roots questions; 8 The Discreet Charm of the DS; 9 Devil's Dozen!!!; 10 Number Properties set., 11 New DS set.


What are GMAT Club Tests?
Extra-hard Quant Tests with Brilliant Analytics

GMAT Club Bot
Re: In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y, &nbs [#permalink] 21 Dec 2018, 04:49
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In an integer division operation, the divisor is x, the quotient is y,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.