GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Oct 2018, 15:19

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jan 2008
Posts: 640
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 25 Aug 2013, 00:48
4
18
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

82% (01:07) correct 18% (01:26) wrong based on 1489 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.

(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained

Originally posted by prasannar on 22 Apr 2008, 07:31.
Last edited by mau5 on 25 Aug 2013, 00:48, edited 1 time in total.
Added the OA
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 195
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Re: SC:Steel plant  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2008, 07:39
1
E - || large plants... small mills, have been... (have) remained
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 16 Sep 2007
Posts: 208
Re: SC:Steel plant  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2008, 07:53
prasannar wrote:
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.


(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained


eliminate b enabled does not agree with remaining
eliminate c enabled does not agree with remaining
eliminate d comparison not parallel should be "large plants that take" to "small mills (insert verb)"
eliminate e "remained" is in the past tense

A
CEO
CEO
User avatar
Joined: 17 May 2007
Posts: 2866
Re: SC:Steel plant  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Apr 2008, 22:41
1
D works. Incorrect comparison in ABC and incorrect tense in E.
prasannar wrote:
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.

(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining


(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain


(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 26 Mar 2008
Posts: 276
Location: Washington DC
Re: SC:Steel plant  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2008, 13:32
1
D)small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain
Option D has || and to put and to remain are also||(second to is not necessary) so E cannot be correct.
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2007
Posts: 719
Re: SC:Steel plant  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Apr 2008, 14:55
3
Sentence has parallel comparison issue: In contrast to X, Y
Eliminate A, B and C


Parallel Issue – to put … and remain – eliminate E

(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained

Answer: D
Manager
Manager
avatar
Status: Struggling hard to maintain focus
Joined: 14 Jun 2011
Posts: 94
Location: Kolkata
Schools: ISB, IIM
Re: SC:Steel plant  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2011, 08:46
Maple wrote:
prasannar wrote:
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.


(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained


eliminate b enabled does not agree with remaining
eliminate c enabled does not agree with remaining
eliminate d comparison not parallel should be "large plants that take" to "small mills (insert verb)"
eliminate e "remained" is in the past tense

A


In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (have) remained economically viable.

Can we not have " have" omitted here? In that case, "E" will be OK.
Experts, please answer.
_________________

* An ounce of prevention is worth a pound of cure
** Every single second counts.
*** One KUDO earned is One step closer to GMAT. Help me in getting closer to GMAT.
**** http://gmatclub.com/forum/i-invite-you-in-my-gmat-journey-121396.html.


Test Description_______Date____Total___Quant_____ Verbal
GMAT PREP1_____________________610
GMAX online test 1____29.07.2011__540_____43________19
MGMAT CAT 1_________03.09.2011__580____42________28
MGMAT CAT 2_________02.10.2011__690____48________36
GMAX online test 2_____16.10.2011__640____48________32
MGMAT CAT 3_________23.11.2011__670____47________34
Veritas free CAT______ 31.10.2011___630___ 46________33
MGMAT CAT 4_________06.11.2011__690____48________36
MGMAT CAT 5_________13.11.2011__660____46________34
MGMAT CAT 6_________19.11.2011__680____51________33
GMAT PREP2__________23.11.2011__680
GMAT Exam___________24.11.2011__690____50________34

Retired Moderator
User avatar
D
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4479
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: SC:Steel plant  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Sep 2011, 09:16
2
Quote:
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (have) remained economically viable.

Can we not have " have" omitted here? In that case, "E" will be OK.


You can see the breakage of structural //ism in the colored part. If E has to be chosen as structurally and logically //, the correct version should be -- “have been able to put capital into new technology and (have) been able to remain economically viable. Instead we have passive voice on one side and active voice on the other. That is the reason D is better
_________________

you can know a lot about something and not really understand it."-- a quote
No one knows this better than a GMAT student does.
Narendran +9198845 44509

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 18 Sep 2009
Posts: 292
Re: verb tense  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2012, 11:51
Hi

Thank you for your detailed explanation.

still I am not clear on this: About your question, 'have been' doesn't indicate passive voice here. 'Remain' is parallel to 'put'. "have been able to" is present perfect form of "to be able to".

I dont know how to spot parallelism here. When i saw verb " remained" , I assumed the subject of the verb "remained" must be "small firms". can you please suggest some tips on how to spot parallelism.

Thanks
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: SLOGGING : My son says,This time Papa u will have to make it : Innocence is BLISS
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 163
Location: India
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Re: verb tense  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2012, 13:49
1
I dont know how to spot parallelism here. When i saw verb " remained" , I assumed the subject of the verb "remained" must be "small firms". can you please suggest some tips on how to spot parallelism.

subject is Small firms because as piya correctly shared her pointer , its a contrast ( between Large firms & Small mills ) , so we can zone in between D & E

In D n E ; remove the middle modifier & reread

D : Small firms have been able to PUT................AND............REMAIN.......

E : Small firms have been able to PUT...................AND...........REMAINED..........

you can always be in look out for markers such as AND / OR............. and then try to check the portions before / after AND ( they should be parallel )

Parallelism : more like A ( B+C) = AB + AC

A : SMALL FIRMS HAVE BEEN ABLE TO , B : Put , C : Remain/Remained

Now do a quick check wrt to the above equation substituting the individual variables:

LHS : Small firms have been able to ( PUT + REMAIN/REMAINED )

RHS for D : Small firms have been able to PUT ..............+........... Small firms have been able to remain

RHS for E : Small firms have been able to PUT ..............+........... Small firms have been able to REMAINED ( does this sound correct ?) = Eliminate

Leading to D
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2708
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Aug 2012, 12:13
1
1
Hi Tom,

The key to identify the correct intended parallel list in the sentence is to understand the logical intended meaning ofthe sentence. Here is the analysis of this question with all due importance to the intended meaning.

In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.


Image

• The sentence presents a contrast.
• Large steel plants process iron ore to produce several kinds of steel.
• Unlike them, small mills process steel scrap into specific products.
• This has enabled them to do two things:
o put capital into new technology.
o remain economically viable.

Image

Error Analysis:

• In contrast to large steel plants
o that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel,
• (cont. of first clause.) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.

(blue = subjects, pink = verbs)

The two entities contrasted in the idiom in use - in contrast to X, Y … are not logically parallel. X= large steel plants (noun phrase) which is not logically parallel to Y= processing steel scrap… (verb-ing phrase).

POE:

(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain: Incorrect for the reason stated above.

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining: Incorrect.
a. Same error as choice A.
b. Processing steel scrap has enabled small plants to – i) put capital into new technology and ii) remain economically viable. The two are independent purposes. “Remaining” ∦”to put”. Furthermore, this choice distorts the meaning. It unnecessarily links the two independent purposes. The choice now suggests that “remaining economically viable” is the result of the action of small mills “putting capital in the technology”. This is not the intended meaning of the sentence. Furthermore its not clear what is “remaining economically viable”. Per the structure of the sentence, “processing steel scrap” is remaining economically viable, but this is illogical.

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining: Incorrect. Same errors as in choice B.

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain: Correct.

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained: Incorrect. "to put" is not parallel "remained".

Image

1. The two entities compared/ contrasted must be logically as well as grammatically parallel.
2. Identify the correct list in the sentence. You can identify the correct list if you have understood the intended meaning well.

Hope this helps.
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 721
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2013, 02:52
To Egmat : why cant we view the parallelism in E as follows :
E: small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (have) remained

in other words "have" can go along with "been able" and "remained"
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2708
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Mar 2013, 11:32
1
aditya8062 wrote:
To Egmat : why cant we view the parallelism in E as follows :
E: small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and (have) remained

in other words "have" can go along with "been able" and "remained"


Hi Aditya,

Note that "been" is very much part of "have". The present perfect helping verb verb is "have been". To this you can add any verb in its participle form to create a proper verb in a sentence. In choice E, "have been able" is a correct verb but we cannot say "have been remained". Also, we just CANNOT choose to remove "been" for the sake of parallelism. If we need to keep helping verbs understood then we need to keep "have been" understood", not just anyone.

Hope this helps. :)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 23 May 2014
Posts: 99
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Jun 2014, 09:20
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.


In contrast to large steel plants .......................................small mills ....
1. We need "smalls mills" to rectify the comparison issue.
2. Small mills....have been able to do two things
a) put capital into new technology
b) remain economically viable

(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain - Incorrect as explained above in point 1

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining - [b]Incorrect as explained above in points 1 and 2


(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining - Incorrect as explained above in points 1 and 2

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain - Correct. rectifies comparison error and both sides of parallel marker and are parallel

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained - Incorrect. Resolves comparison error but put and remained are not parallel as explained in point 2
Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2086
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jan 2017, 21:00
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.

(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain - Illogical comparison - large steel plants is a noun phrase and processing steel scrap is verb- ing phrase.

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining - same error as A . Remaining distorts meaning

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining - same error as B

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain - Correct

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained - parallelism issue - to put and remained are not parallel

Answer D
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2016
Posts: 255
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Mar 2018, 01:18
Dear mikemcgarry, GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja, MagooshExpert Carolyn, sayantanc2k,

I picked up E because of two action that small mills do
#1 have been able to put
#2 (have) remained

Why "have been able to put" cannot be parallel with "(have) remained" ,which omits have
Please point out

Thanks in davance
Have a nice day
>_~
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
S
Joined: 30 Oct 2017
Posts: 182
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Mar 2018, 20:55
zoezhuyan wrote:
Dear mikemcgarry, GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja, MagooshExpert Carolyn, sayantanc2k,

I picked up E because of two action that small mills do
#1 have been able to put
#2 (have) remained

Why "have been able to put" cannot be parallel with "(have) remained" ,which omits have
Please point out

Thanks in davance
Have a nice day
>_~


Hi zoezhuyan!

Happy to help :-)

The main problem with E is just that "remained" shouldn't be in past tense, period. The rest of the verbs in the sentence are all in some version of the present tense, and it doesn't make sense to just throw in a verb in the past tense with no context.

Also, we cannot just omit "have" in a verb -- that changes the tense. The verb "have remained" is in the past perfect tense, and "remained" is in the simple past tense.

Of course, neither of these work in this context because they're in some form of past tense, which we just shouldn't have at all here. We want "remain" to match "have been able to put", which would be "have been able to remain". That's why we want "remain" here, not "remained" :-)

Here's an article about parallelism that might be useful!


-Carolyn
_________________

Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 15 Nov 2016
Posts: 139
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Apr 2018, 10:52
In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through all the steps needed to produce several different kinds of steel, processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain economically viable.

"In contrast to x, Y" is the correct structure.
A, B and C are eliminated.

(A) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology and remain

(B) processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(C) the processing of steel scrap into a specialized group of products has enabled small mills to put capital into new technology, remaining

(D) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remain

This the correct choice.

(E) small mills, by processing steel scrap into a specialized group of products, have been able to put capital into new technology and remained
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jan 2018
Posts: 107
Location: Taiwan
GPA: 3.34
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2018, 05:36
have been able to put capital into new technology and remain

Those who said the word "and" connects "have been" and "(have) remained" should look at the sentence more closely.

Answer choice is (D)
GMAT Club Bot
Re: In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through &nbs [#permalink] 21 Apr 2018, 05:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

In contrast to large steel plants that take iron ore through

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.