It is currently 13 Dec 2017, 12:53

Decision(s) Day!:

CHAT Rooms | Ross R1 | Kellogg R1 | Darden R1 | Tepper R1


Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 01 Aug 2003
Posts: 49

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Location: Mumbai
In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2003, 04:39
2
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

65% (01:38) correct 35% (01:51) wrong based on 1243 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The Official Guide for GMAT Review, 11th Edition, 2005

Practice Question
Question No.: CR 16
Page: 472

In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragments dating back 1 million years. Analysis of the fragments, which came from a variety of animals, showed that they had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood, the most common tree around Swartkans.

Which of the following, if true, would, together with the information above, provide the best basis for the claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids?

(A) The white stinkwood tree is used for building material by the present-day inhabitants of Swartkans.

(B) Forest fires can heat wood to a range of temperatures that occur in campfires.

(C) The bone fragments were fitted together by the archaeologists to form the complete skeletons of several animals.

(D) Apart from the Swartkans discovery, there is reliable evidence that early hominids used fire as many as 500 thousand years ago.

(E) The bone fragments were found in several distinct layers of limestone that contained primitive cutting tools known to have been used by early hominids.
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

Last edited by hazelnut on 18 Nov 2017, 22:03, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 05 Aug 2003
Posts: 1

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: India
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2003, 05:41
Charred bone fragments dated back 1 million years where as choice D says that there is reliable evidence that early hominids used fire
as many as 500 thousand years ago.

I fail to understand how this provides the best basis for the
claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence
of the use of fire by early hominids. :?:

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Feb 2003
Posts: 1603

Kudos [?]: 312 [0], given: 0

Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2003, 09:47
vote for E.

Since charred bones are found together with tools, it is likely that the chared bones have the same age.

B weakens the argument, providing another reason for evidence.

Kudos [?]: 312 [0], given: 0

1 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 04 Jun 2003
Posts: 30

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Location: california
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Aug 2003, 18:58
1
This post received
KUDOS
Agree on "E"

D only indicates that the use of fire was 500,000 years ago, but the charred bones were dated back 1 million years. Thus, there is a large time gap between the two evidences.

Kudos [?]: 1 [1], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2003, 05:15
boarderlee wrote:
Agree on "E"

D only indicates that the use of fire was 500,000 years ago, but the charred bones were dated back 1 million years. Thus, there is a large time gap between the two evidences.


Okay guys, lets structure the arguments in the stimulus.

1) Charred bone fragments of animals found, dating back a million years

2) The bone fragments had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires

The question asked is, which choice best supports the claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids

Now E only points that bone fragments were found with cutting tools used by early hominids. This means that the hominids could have known how to use the tools, but do not support the argument that they used fire.

D supports the claim because it says that, "there is reliable evidence that early hominids used fire as many as 500 thousand years ago."

Remember, the question does not claim that early hominids used fire A MILLION YEARS AGO, but only that they used fire. Therefore, D supports the argument best.

Mistdew, whats the answer?

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Jun 2003
Posts: 144

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Location: India
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Aug 2003, 11:29
mistdew wrote:
The answer is E guys



Hmmmm.... guess can't argue with that... but would love to get your brains to tell me the flaw in my argument....

:wall

Kudos [?]: 3 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Oct 2003
Posts: 72

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Location: USA
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Oct 2003, 08:58
First, it is typical Gmat, and answer must be E.
D is also typical trap because it sound OK. It in fact provide the evidence BY ITSELF ALONE!!!
But why it wrong?
Here it is
Which of the following, if true, would, ***together with
the information above****
D has nothing to do with "information above" or if you base your judgement on D, you don't need the "above information"
idea? :shock:
_________________

I have 2 month for gmat.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2006
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2006, 19:11
mistdew wrote:
In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered
charred bone fragments dating back 1 million years.
Analysis of the fragments, which came from a vari-
ety of animals, showed that they had been heated to
temperatures no higher than those produced in
experimental campfires made from branches of
white stinkwood, the most common tree around
Swartkans.

Which of the following, if true, would, together with
the information above, provide the best basis for the
claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence
of the use of fire by early hominids?
(A) The white stinkwood tree is used for building
material by the present-day inhabitants of
Swartkans.
(B) Forest fires can heat wood to a range of
temperatures that occur in campfires.
(C) The bone fragments were fitted together by the
archaeologists to form the complete skeletons
of several animals.
(D) Apart from the Swartkans discovery, there is
reliable evidence that early hominids used fire
as many as 500 thousand years ago.
(E) The bone fragments were found in several
distinct layers of limestone that contained
primitive cutting tools known to have been
used by early hominids.


Basically its broken in 2 parts
The paragraphs concludes based on its reasoning that those animal fragments are from campfires.
now E , since they were found among with tools used by hominids.

Gmat concludes that himinids used fire.

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 24 Nov 2006
Posts: 349

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Dec 2006, 16:50
E stands out. A, B and C are discarded right away.

Kudos [?]: 28 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
User avatar
Joined: 22 Oct 2006
Posts: 1436

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 12

Schools: Chicago Booth '11
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2008, 07:19
E here

we need to relate hominids with the bone fragments

E does so because they are both fossilzed together with the tools the hominds used

D is wrong because it doesnt talk about charred bone fragments at all

Kudos [?]: 197 [0], given: 12

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2008
Posts: 205

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Concentration: Finance, Strategy
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2008, 07:59
Should be E, it is the best answer.
Passage -> charred bone fragments dating back 1 million years -> heated by campfires
E -> linking bone to hominids' usage
So can induce from there.
For D, it mentions 500,000 yrs < 1million yrs, which weakens the claim

Kudos [?]: 53 [0], given: 1

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 519

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2012, 19:33
I got confused between D and E. Although "E" link the tools found with the bones to early hominids, it does not explain the two inherent drawbacks:
1) Early hominids does not exactly mean those who lived a million years ago
2) How is tool related to fire

Compared to E, D is more suitable but the OA does not agree.
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 8

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 04-21-2013
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2012, 19:48
E tells us that that bone fragments were from the use of fire by the early hominids, which is the assumption in the passage....
_________________

KPV

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 8

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 519

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2012, 19:51
abhishekkpv wrote:
E tells us that that bone fragments were from the use of fire by the early hominids, which is the assumption in the passage....


Hi Abhishek
I did not get you
How come E tells us that that bone fragments were from the use of fire by the early hominids? There is no mention of fire ar anything even remotely linked to it.
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 02 Nov 2009
Posts: 41

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 8

Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Technology
GMAT Date: 04-21-2013
GPA: 4
WE: Information Technology (Internet and New Media)
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Sep 2012, 22:41
The bone fragments were found in several distinct layers of limestone that contained primitive cutting tools known to have been used by early hominids..

This statement tells us that the bone fragments belonged to hominids because they were found in the same layers...
_________________

KPV

Kudos [?]: 64 [0], given: 8

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 519

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2012, 01:51
abhishekkpv wrote:
The bone fragments were found in several distinct layers of limestone that contained primitive cutting tools known to have been used by early hominids..

This statement tells us that the bone fragments belonged to hominids because they were found in the same layers...


I am sorry but I am not convinced. Maybe an expert could help us here
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

1 KUDOS received
Board of Directors
User avatar
G
Joined: 01 Sep 2010
Posts: 3422

Kudos [?]: 9492 [1], given: 1203

Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2012, 02:27
1
This post received
KUDOS
I have to understand the situation

Here what we care about is this

Quote:
In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragments dating back 1 million years. Analysis of the fragments, which came from a variety of animals, showed that they had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood, the most common tree around Swartkans.


E show that in different layers we have the evidence that the fragments ARE the same of a campfire. So, if the fragments are the same (different place, time, heated temperature and so on......the hominidis used fire)

D only says that hominidis used fire at some date but nothing else. we DO NOT have correlation between bones and fire and the use of the latter.

Hope it is clear now :)
_________________

COLLECTION OF QUESTIONS AND RESOURCES
Quant: 1. ALL GMATPrep questions Quant/Verbal 2. Bunuel Signature Collection - The Next Generation 3. Bunuel Signature Collection ALL-IN-ONE WITH SOLUTIONS 4. Veritas Prep Blog PDF Version 5. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Quant Videos
Verbal:1. Verbal question bank and directories by Carcass 2. MGMAT Study Hall Thursdays with Ron Verbal Videos 3. Critical Reasoning_Oldy but goldy question banks 4. Sentence Correction_Oldy but goldy question banks 5. Reading-comprehension_Oldy but goldy question banks

Kudos [?]: 9492 [1], given: 1203

Expert Post
18 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4552

Kudos [?]: 8951 [18], given: 111

Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2012, 10:12
18
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
getgyan wrote:
I got confused between D and E. Although "E" link the tools found with the bones to early hominids, it does not explain the two inherent drawbacks:
1) Early hominids does not exactly mean those who lived a million years ago
2) How is tool related to fire

Compared to E, D is more suitable but the OA does not agree.


Dear getgyan,
I am responding to your pm
I agree this is not the best question --- in particular, it seems to requires some understanding of when "early hominids" lived or what constitutes "early hominids." It believe it's no coincidence that GMAC decided to drop this question in the move from OG12 to OG13. Nevertheless, the question has a clear answer.

Here are the facts of the argument:
We find these 1 million year old charred bone fragments. We don't know how they were charred.
The argument tells us -- simple campfires could have done the charring. OK, that's good --- that means, the charring is at least consistent with the possibility of early hominids using fire, but it's certainly not ironclad proof the the charring was done by early hominids.
By the end of the argument, we still don't know: how were the bone charred? Were they "cooked" by early hominids? Or were all those animals simply caught in a forest fire around the same time? We don't know what charred the bones, and we don't know whether humans were involved.

Now, the question: "Which of the following, if true, would, together with the information above, provide the best basis for the claim that the charred bone fragments are evidence of the use of fire by early hominids?" In other words, what would help us link the involvement of early human to the charring of the bones. Let's say for simplicity we have two possible hypotheses for how the bones were charred:
(a) forest fire
(b) use of fire by early hominids
What further piece of evidence supports choosing (b) over (a)?

Choices (A), (B), and (C) are ridiculous. Choice (D) is tempting --- if early hominids controlled fire 500,000 year ago, then at least it weakly suggests that maybe they could have controlled it 1M ya. Maybe. Evidence that early hominids had adopted any technology at Time #1 is strong evidence that they knew about this technology after Time #1, but it's very hard to make the argument that they definitely know about it long before Time #1. There's half a million years between 1M ya and 500K ya, and if mastery of fire were introduced any time in that half-million year span, that would mean that we couldn't deduce use of fire 1M ya from use of fire 500K ya. Choice (D) is, at best, weak, ambiguous, wishy-washy support for the argument.

Choice (E) --- where we found the charred bone, we also found hominid tools --- aha! That is compelling evidence that the animals weren't just running wild and happened to be killed in a forest fire. It's compelling evidence that they were intentionally killed and cut up by early hominids, and therefore the charring of the bones happened when the animal remains were in the possession of the early hominids, presumably in some kind of cooking process. That strongly suggests the early hominids were able to use control and use fire. This is powerful support for interpretation (b) over interpretation (a). That's why (E) is a clear choice for the answer.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8951 [18], given: 111

Director
Director
User avatar
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 519

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Sep 2012, 20:00
Hi Mike

Thanks for the explanation. :-D I have one more point of view

What if the hominids along with their pet-animals died in the forest fire and then again in subsequent fires? E will make total sense in that respect too but it will not support the use of fire by the hominids.

Thus the whole agenda boils down to prove that the charred bones were not burned in a forest fire.

If we look at the stem, it states that "temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood" which implies that only the branches were burned whereas in a forest fire the whole tree(branch+stem) would burn. Also the temperature produced would be different in a forest fire because of the presence of other kinds of trees. Are my assumptions correct?
_________________

First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Kudos [?]: 342 [0], given: 269

Expert Post
4 KUDOS received
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4552

Kudos [?]: 8951 [4], given: 111

Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Sep 2012, 13:04
4
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
getgyan wrote:
Hi Mike

Thanks for the explanation. :-D I have one more point of view

What if the hominids along with their pet-animals died in the forest fire and then again in subsequent fires? E will make total sense in that respect too but it will not support the use of fire by the hominids.

Thus the whole agenda boils down to prove that the charred bones were not burned in a forest fire.

If we look at the stem, it states that "temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood" which implies that only the branches were burned whereas in a forest fire the whole tree(branch+stem) would burn. Also the temperature produced would be different in a forest fire because of the presence of other kinds of trees. Are my assumptions correct?


Dear Getgyan

Part of the problem here is --- you are digging extra-deep into a question that is of questionable quality. Remember, this is one of the questions the OG decided to jettison.

First of all, the idea of "pets" I believe is not 1M ya, but something more recent in human history. Even herding of animals was a relatively recent innovation, compared to the earlier hunting and gathering societies that existed during most of humanid evolution. More to the point, if humans & animals died together, they would have found charred human bones along with the charred animals bones --- that would be too important a finding to omit from the description. In other words, if they found charred human & animals bones, and said only "charred animals bones were found", that omission would constitute a level of pure deceit that you simply are not going to find in GMAT CR passages.

Look at this statement "Analysis of the fragments ... showed that they had been heated to temperatures no higher than those produced in experimental campfires made from branches of white stinkwood." What this says is: there is some ceiling temperature T, and the bones never got hotter than that. As it happens, T is also the temperature at which stinkwood campfires would burn. We know nothing else. We don't know if T is 800 K or 5000 K. We don't know whether stinkwood is the coolest burning or hottest burning wood in the forest. If there were a forest fire --- of course, a forest fire is a big thing, and it has a middle and an edge. How does the temperature at the middle compare to T? How does the temperature at the edge compare to T? Presumably, at any forest fire, there are some animals who die in the center, and their bones are just incinerated to ash, but there are also some on the periphery, maybe which die largely of asphyxiation, whose bones might just be charred but not incinerated. ----- In short, there is a lot we don't know about this statement and its potential implications. Other than establishing a plausible link between the charred bones and stinkwood campfires, we can't necessarily use it to prove or disprove anything else.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep

Image

Image

Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

Kudos [?]: 8951 [4], given: 111

Re: In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen   [#permalink] 15 Sep 2012, 13:04

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 37 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

In Swartkans territory, archaeologists discovered charred bone fragmen

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.