Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 08:57 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 08:57
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
djhouse81
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 30 May 2007
Last visit: 13 Aug 2009
Posts: 485
Own Kudos:
72
 [3]
Posts: 485
Kudos: 72
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
bsd_lover
Joined: 17 May 2007
Last visit: 15 Mar 2020
Posts: 2,432
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 210
Posts: 2,432
Kudos: 1,735
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
3underscore
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 11 Dec 2006
Last visit: 16 Mar 2016
Posts: 1,428
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6
Location: New York, NY
Concentration: Finance (Corp Fin, Financial Instruments)
Schools:NYU Stern 2009
Posts: 1,428
Kudos: 234
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
bsd_lover
dj that was some awesome info. Would you have any further info on recruiting for non-IB functions (e.g. S&T ?)

I think kwam and I might be able to put something together on that (me from the sidelines of being on recruiter side at events, he from the heart of the beast). Not wishing to give the game away in two words, but it can be summarized by "not pretty".
User avatar
Audio
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Last visit: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 408
Own Kudos:
87
 [2]
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Booth, Stern
Posts: 408
Kudos: 87
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Jut discovered this forum, good stuff in here!

As mentioned in another post, I have managed to land an internship at DB in London. Here's a quick summary of my process (sorry if it's a repetition of what you've already heard)

I'll start off with the most important element: it's been a bloodbath. I never ever suspected how hard it would be to get a simple internship in such a market. Most banks have recruited AT MOST 3 people from our school - some only one, none. It's tough to say how it's going to be in the future, but most probably not much better. I'm not sure I can give exact figures, but I can tell you that we are talking about a 75% decrease roughly.

I had 8 interview invitations, with all the top BB banks (except ML), so I thought that it was going to be a piece of cake - after all, some people had 0 invitations (yes it did happen). How naive that thought turned out to be. My first interview was with MS, and when I think about it, I can only be embarrassed by my lack of preparation. MS was one of the banks that organized only 1 round of interviews, so I had 4 30 minute interviews. In the first interview this really nice banker told me he thought getting an internship was going to be tough this year; still the alarm bells didn't ring - what was I thinking. In that process, long story short, I got destroyed in the technical (severe lack of preparation didn't help).

I had 5 second / final round interviews (including banks like MS who only had a 1 round interview), which was a pretty good result, but at that point the alarm bells did start ringing: I started seeing the same faces at these second rounds (and they were all pretty good), alarming rumours about the terrible recruiting year were circulating, etc. I was this time much more prepared for the technical stuff, and that usually went on well.

At the end of the road I was one of the very fortunate few to get an offer (how good it felt when I got that phone call! Almost had an orgasm :-D )

My biggest lesson from this process is quite easy to figure out: in this kind of market, I completely underestimated the importance of networking. YES I KNOW, it's one of first things they tell you; but I thought that recruiting for Europe was "different"; yeah right. Plus I went to the London Banking Days, so that certainly should be enough. Sure, genius. To be fair though, in good years it probably didn't matter THAT much, but in this environment it is CRUCIAL. The banks I did the best with were the ones where I made the most contacts.

I can't believe how stupid and almost irresponsible I was when it came down to recruiting, it was ridiculous. DO NOT follow my example: call alums, do follow up with people you meet, etc. The most successful people in recruiting for NY were those who EVERY FRIDAY were in the city meeting up with banks. That's an important commitment in terms of time, but it certainly paid off.

Anyway, all this is certainly no ground-breaking stuff, I feel almost sorry I can't give you more insight. The conclusion here is that in this type of market, you have to focus on the basics even more, wherever you're recruiting. Also, if you're still interested in banking, choose your school with extreme precaution: I feel fortunate that I'm at Wharton, and so should those at Booth. Top banks still recruit a bit from some other selected schools, but really not too many (HBS, and maybe Columbia; I'm not even sure for Stern).
avatar
Stern10
Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Last visit: 10 May 2010
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Posts: 2
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
hi all, I've been lurking on this site for a while and thought I'd shed some light on Stern recruiting for IB this fall.

It was as Audio and DJ described, a blood bath this year. Here are some unofficial numbers from recruiting for offers extended this fall for NY (and last fall for NY for a perspective):

JP Morgan - 7 (12)
Credit Suisse - 6 (10)
Morgan Stanley - 1 (2 or 3)
Goldman Sachs - 3 (4)
Bank of America (Merrill Lynch) - 2 (?)
Barclays - 6 (14 Lehman offers)
UBS - 3 (?)
Citi - 4 (8)

DB decided to pull recruiting from campus. I think this was mainly due to the fact they have such a low presence at Stern (no MBA2) and a few MBA3 (first year bankers).

Merrill was traditionally a huge Stern recruiter as were Lehman and Bear (typically 10 offers each). Bank of America hosted interviews at Stern while Merrill hosted at Columbia which put us at a disadvantage given our Merrill network.

Stern placed about 25 people in NY and another 12 overseas. Last year there were 45 Sternies going to NY BB, don't know about overseas. 100 people started recruting in the fall but that number quickly dropped to 60. Of the people who wanted banking, only about 10 (deserving) people ended up with nothing but still have shots as some smaller boutiques later in the spring.

I ended up at a BB in New York. And like Audio, I had pretty much all the BB as first round interviews but converting those to offers was especially tough this year since the banks expected 80-100% yeild. Networking definitly played a part as I ended up at the bank where I networked the most. All be said, however, networking only gets you so far as each process (corporate presentations, target events, closed list) is totally different.

Also as a side note, a lot of stern IB candidates are career switchers. I think less than a handful of people were prior analyst and only 3 went bank into banking. Just wanted to put that out there since it is a common misconception.
User avatar
Audio
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Last visit: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 408
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Booth, Stern
Posts: 408
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stern10
hi all, I've been lurking on this site for a while and thought I'd shed some light on Stern recruiting for IB this fall.

It was as Audio and DJ described, a blood bath this year. Here are some unofficial numbers from recruiting for offers extended this fall for NY (and last fall for NY for a perspective):

JP Morgan - 7 (12)
Credit Suisse - 6 (10)
Morgan Stanley - 1 (2 or 3)
Goldman Sachs - 3 (4)
Bank of America (Merrill Lynch) - 2 (?)
Barclays - 6 (14 Lehman offers)
UBS - 3 (?)
Citi - 4 (8)

DB decided to pull recruiting from campus. I think this was mainly due to the fact they have such a low presence at Stern (no MBA2) and a few MBA3 (first year bankers).

Merrill was traditionally a huge Stern recruiter as were Lehman and Bear (typically 10 offers each). Bank of America hosted interviews at Stern while Merrill hosted at Columbia which put us at a disadvantage given our Merrill network.

Stern placed about 25 people in NY and another 12 overseas. Last year there were 45 Sternies going to NY BB, don't know about overseas. 100 people started recruting in the fall but that number quickly dropped to 60. Of the people who wanted banking, only about 10 (deserving) people ended up with nothing but still have shots as some smaller boutiques later in the spring.

I ended up at a BB in New York. And like Audio, I had pretty much all the BB as first round interviews but converting those to offers was especially tough this year since the banks expected 80-100% yeild. Networking definitly played a part as I ended up at the bank where I networked the most. All be said, however, networking only gets you so far as each process (corporate presentations, target events, closed list) is totally different.

Also as a side note, a lot of stern IB candidates are career switchers. I think less than a handful of people were prior analyst and only 3 went bank into banking. Just wanted to put that out there since it is a common misconception.

Stern, those figures look all right! Only a 50% decrease (more or less), that's pretty good. Seems also like you guys are going to place most of your people, that's pretty remarkable. No such luck here, although maybe because the guys who got offers already usually had banking experience (80% - 100% yield expectation helped I guess), but those without experience still kept on applying (at least that's my analysis). Weirdly enough that didn't matter at your school, funny that.
User avatar
jb32
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Last visit: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 773
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Texas
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2011
Posts: 773
Kudos: 155
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great stuff guys, please keep it up!
avatar
Stern10
Joined: 15 Feb 2009
Last visit: 10 May 2010
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Posts: 2
Kudos: 5
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Audio,

Keep in mind that a lot people dropped out of the process who may have stayed in normal years. It was still a very rough year and not many people got multiple offers. Last year several people got 3+ offers. This year there may have been 2 or 3 that got more than 3 offers. Most people only got 1 offer, which helped out with placement. Lehman was a huge blow as it was our biggest recruiter (Dick Fuld was an NYU grad).

All other industries were down significantly as well.

Luckily for the bankers, there are still all the little NY boutiques out there. They will have to do a lot of extra work to get those internships but at least the firms are close.

Good luck in London. I hope full time offer rates are high this summer.
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great information guys.

Good news for career switchers trying to break into IB at NYU.
User avatar
ozzie123
Joined: 11 Nov 2008
Last visit: 21 Jan 2018
Posts: 101
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Indonesia
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.64
WE:Asset Management (Finance: Investment Banking)
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Great info everyone, keep'em coming.

My kudos flying everywhere :wink:
User avatar
lanter1
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 08 Feb 2007
Last visit: 02 Jun 2009
Posts: 520
Own Kudos:
Location: New Haven, CT
Posts: 520
Kudos: 26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
djhouse81
lanter1
Fellow GMATclubbers,

I wonder how the rest of you aspiring IB professionals are doing in IB recruiting. At Yale, we still have 8 bulge banks coming to campus with 2 middle market and a few small firms. We are hearing they are still hiring about 15 with about 20 to 25 total offers from the class out of 25 interested in Corp Fin (class size only 190). This number seems high considering the market.

How are other members/schools doing?

Lanter,
IB interviews are going on this week. We had a lot of firms on campus, but I'm hearing fewer numbers. Are you sure you're not confusing what they mean by class. 20-25 sounds about right for one bank's class of interns, but that means the class is made up of interns from various schools. At CBS, I think the number of offers that will actually go to CBS students is about 1 for every 10-15 on the closed list. Not a lot, and less than last year.

I meant my specific class at SOM. Our total offers were down over 50% from 2008 recruiting. I didn't receive an offer yet, but I am still actively looking for banks outside of the normal recruiting process.
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Are most going for BB or are there a good portion of students interested in boutique firms? From what I have been learning about the differences between the two, boutiques sound more interesting, work wise, and I was wondering if anyone could shed more light why it seems more are interested in BB internship experience?
User avatar
nink
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
782
 [1]
Given Kudos: 548
Status:Burning mid-night oil....daily
Schools:Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Products:
GMAT 1: 770 Q44 V50
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 782
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
89nk
Are most going for BB or are there a good portion of students interested in boutique firms? From what I have been learning about the differences between the two, boutiques sound more interesting, work wise, and I was wondering if anyone could shed more light why it seems more are interested in BB internship experience?

Compared to BBs, internship or work experience at boutique firms will give one more exposure/face time with clients. Since boutique firms tend to be smaller, one might get more meaningful assignment compared to BBs.

In addition, boutique firms are the ones that are hiring right now.

However, BBs have more structured training/entry programs for MBAs whether its summer internship position or post MBA career. Therefore, if you don't have any relevant experience, BBs are better option for you since you will be assigned to a group of about 35 to 40 individuals to begin your training/entry program together.

Boutique firms are more likely to hire MBAs with prior work experience in relevant field.
User avatar
jb32
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Last visit: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 773
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Texas
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2011
Posts: 773
Kudos: 155
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I'm going for BB for a few personal reasons. First, I want to work with a lot of people my own age. I have always worked in companies where everyone is much older than me, and it sucks. I'm looking forward to being friends with some of my co-workers. Second, boutique's workflow can be highly dependent on whether or not the MD is successful in bringing interesting assignments, aka is he a 'rainmaker'. BBs in good times tend to get more constant deal flow because they are more of a one stop shop for financing. For instance, if you need to issue some debt to fund an acquisition, the BB can do that and provide M&A advice.

Now, if the opportunity to go to Moelis, Greenhill, or Evercore comes up as the boutique vs. some no name New York boutique, then I would probably go boutique over bulge bracket. Well, I guess that depends on the BB and how much I like the people I was going to work with.
User avatar
89nk
Joined: 05 Feb 2008
Last visit: 16 Dec 2012
Posts: 321
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 10
Location: Texas
Posts: 321
Kudos: 59
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ninkorn
89nk
Are most going for BB or are there a good portion of students interested in boutique firms? From what I have been learning about the differences between the two, boutiques sound more interesting, work wise, and I was wondering if anyone could shed more light why it seems more are interested in BB internship experience?

Compared to BBs, internship or work experience at boutique firms will give one more exposure/face time with clients. Since boutique firms tend to be smaller, one might get more meaningful assignment compared to BBs.

In addition, boutique firms are the ones that are hiring right now.

However, BBs have more structured training/entry programs for MBAs whether its summer internship position or post MBA career. Therefore, if you don't have any relevant experience, BBs are better option for you since you will be assigned to a group of about 35 to 40 individuals to begin your training/entry program together.

Boutique firms are more likely to hire MBAs with prior work experience in relevant field.

Thank you for clearing that up. I wanted to make sure I was reading the differences correctly, and was in line with what others were thinking.
User avatar
Audio
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 13 Jun 2007
Last visit: 31 Jul 2012
Posts: 408
Own Kudos:
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Wharton, Booth, Stern
Posts: 408
Kudos: 87
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
89nk
Are most going for BB or are there a good portion of students interested in boutique firms? From what I have been learning about the differences between the two, boutiques sound more interesting, work wise, and I was wondering if anyone could shed more light why it seems more are interested in BB internship experience?

Couple of reasons actually. First of all in terms of types of deals you are going to work on, it's going to be larger deals (which I like). The learning process is better too I think: these banks are used to have a lot of new associates to come in and they know how to integrate them fast. You will learn how to execute a deal properly and you'll learn every facet of the job, fast.

I'm not saying that you won't have that kind of experience in a boutique, but there is a chance that they'll not tick all those boxes. Plus, since they have less resources in terms of manpower and access to information (and the deals are typically smaller), you might skip some processes that are important in larger deals.

Finally, to be very pragmatic, BB looks better on your CV too.

I think it makes a lot of sense to go from BB to boutique, but I would defo start in a BB for the reasons stated above - if you have the choice that is, which does not seem to be the case nowadays. Making the move in the other direction is definitively tougher.
User avatar
nink
Joined: 07 Nov 2008
Last visit: 05 Jun 2014
Posts: 2,395
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 548
Status:Burning mid-night oil....daily
Schools:Yale SOM 2011 Alum, Kellogg, Booth, Tuck
WE 1: IB - Restructuring & Distressed M&A
Products:
GMAT 1: 770 Q44 V50
Posts: 2,395
Kudos: 782
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Audio

Plus, since they have less resources in terms of manpower and access to information (and the deals are typically smaller), you might skip some processes that are important in larger deals.

Most boutiques specialize in specific areas. It's not a full bank with all the services like Audio mentioned. For example, if a firm hires a boutique to carry out an IPO (let's use Lazard as example), the firm might not be able to distribute or sell all the shares by themselves. They bring in a second bank to help them out as secondary underwriter while the first firm stays on as lead underwriter.

Other services that BBs might offer to boutiques might be back office operations/clearance. Smaller firms might outsource this function to bigger banks where they can do this cheaper and have seasoned veterans with experience.
User avatar
jb32
Joined: 20 Feb 2008
Last visit: 06 Jun 2010
Posts: 773
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Location: Texas
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2011
Posts: 773
Kudos: 155
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ninkorn
For example, if a firm hires a boutique to carry out an IPO (let's use Lazard as example), the firm might not be able to distribute or sell all the shares by themselves. They bring in a second bank to help them out as secondary underwriter while the first firm stays on as lead underwriter.
Just to be clear, almost no bank will take on an IPO by themselves (there may be exceptions for small IPOs that I am unaware of). The number of firms can range from 2-25+ depending on the size. Most likely it will be 3-10 with one or two acting as lead underwriters. However, in Visa's offering, which I believe is still the largest in US history, there were 37 underwriters. Goldman and JP Morgan were the Co-leads with JP Morgan taking the coveted left hand spot on the S-1 document. Where the difference in boutiques and BBs come in with capital raising is the salesforce. BB firms will have much larger salesforces, and subsequently many more institutional investors to sell the shares of an IPO. Therefore, when it comes to working at BBs, one other advantage would be that you'll see a much greater range of assignments, and thus gain experience in more areas. You might raise debt, raise equity, work on recaps, restructures, M&A, or anything else a client wants to do.
User avatar
maverick2011
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 27 Feb 2008
Last visit: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 296
Own Kudos:
71
 [1]
Given Kudos: 15
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Schools:Kellogg Class of 2011
Posts: 296
Kudos: 71
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ninkorn
Most boutiques specialize in specific areas. It's not a full bank with all the services like Audio mentioned. For example, if a firm hires a boutique to carry out an IPO (let's use Lazard as example), the firm might not be able to distribute or sell all the shares by themselves. They bring in a second bank to help them out as secondary underwriter while the first firm stays on as lead underwriter.

Other services that BBs might offer to boutiques might be back office operations/clearance. Smaller firms might outsource this function to bigger banks where they can do this cheaper and have seasoned veterans with experience.

Just to clarify, see below (from the FAQ ninkorn posted earlier):

https://www.ibankingfaq.com/about-invest ... ique-bank/

Quote:
Pretty much all banks that are not considered “bulge bracket” are referred to as being boutiques. Boutiques, while ranging in size from a few professionals to hundreds or even thousands of professionals, can generally be categorized into three types: (1) those that specialize in one or more products, (2) those that specialize in one or more industries and (3) those that specialize in small or mid-sized deals and small or mid-sized clients (generally less than $500 million).

There are boutiques that specialize in any number of the products that bulge bracket banks offer. Boutiques known for M&A, for example, often compete with the bulge bracket banks for M&A transactions. A few examples include Lazard, Greenhill, Evercore and Gleacher. Other boutiques offer many different products but specialize in one or more industries. Such boutiques often compete with the bulge bracket banks on the basis of their industry knowledge and expertise. A few examples include Cowen & Co. (healthcare), Allen & Co. (media) and Thomas Weisel Partners (technology). The third type of boutique, those that offer many products and cover many industries but compete only for “middle market” or smaller deals include Jefferies & Co., Piper Jaffray, Raymond James and Robert W. Baird. Many of these middle market boutiques are regionally focused. Some boutiques, including several of the M&A focused banks, are considered to be as (or even more) prestigious as the bulge bracket banks.
   1   2   3   4   5   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105389 posts
GMAT Tutor
1924 posts