Last visit was: 14 Jul 2025, 20:41 It is currently 14 Jul 2025, 20:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
RashedVai
Joined: 24 Feb 2017
Last visit: 03 Apr 2025
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
436
 [191]
Given Kudos: 114
Status:wake up with a purpose
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting, Entrepreneurship
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
183
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MahmoudFawzy
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Last visit: 20 Feb 2021
Posts: 661
Own Kudos:
2,070
 [28]
Given Kudos: 200
Status:Manager
Location: Egypt
Concentration: Strategy, International Business
GPA: 3.67
WE:Pharmaceuticals (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 661
Kudos: 2,070
 [28]
16
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
BelalHossain046
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Last visit: 05 Apr 2023
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
311
 [19]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
Posts: 200
Kudos: 311
 [19]
11
Kudos
Add Kudos
8
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
BelalHossain046
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Last visit: 05 Apr 2023
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
311
 [9]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
Posts: 200
Kudos: 311
 [9]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In this question,
|a-c| + |a| = |c|?
or |a-c| = |c| - |a|?
or |c-a| = |c| - |a|?
That is (ii) situation of my previous post.

Thus, the question is asking : IS a & c in same direction & is the absolute value of a is greater than that of C?

statement 1 & 2 don’t guarantee anything about same direction of a&c.
Only combination of of c says the both requirement (same direction & absolute value of c).
So I would go for C.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
BelalHossain046
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Last visit: 05 Apr 2023
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
311
 [3]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
Posts: 200
Kudos: 311
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Number picking (I think better approach).

Statement 1: Insufficient
Case 1: a=1, b=-2 & c=3 (yes to main question)
Case 2: a=-1, b=2, &c=-3 (yes to main question)
Case 3: a=1,b=2 & c=-3 (no to main question)

Statement 2: insufficient. Coz no info about c.

Combined:
Case 3 from statement 1 is out coz statement 2 says ab is negative.
So remaining case 1&2 say YES to main question.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
BelalHossain046
Joined: 11 Feb 2013
Last visit: 05 Apr 2023
Posts: 200
Own Kudos:
311
 [9]
Given Kudos: 60
Location: United States (TX)
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 490 Q44 V15
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
GPA: 3.05
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GRE 1: Q165 V155
Posts: 200
Kudos: 311
 [9]
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Absolute value concept.

Absolute always says about distance.
|a| or |a-0| is the distance between 0 and a.

|a-c| is same thing as |c-a| which means the distance between a and c.

|c| is the distance between 0 and c.

Thus the question says
Is the sum of (I) DISTANCE between (0&a) & (ii) DISTANCE between (a&c) is EQUAL to DISTANCE between (0 &c)?

This is only possible if
I) a&c are on the same side of zero and
(ii) a is closer to zero and c is distant from zero.
[this is possible in positive and negative sides, as shown in attached photo.]

Posted from my mobile device
Attachments

image.jpg
image.jpg [ 1.07 MiB | Viewed 21260 times ]

User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 771
Own Kudos:
413
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 771
Kudos: 413
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
to have /a-c/+/a/=/c/
we have /a-c/=/c/-/a/
c and a must be the same sign

from both condition
b(a-c)>0
ab<0

case 1
b<0 and a<c
b<0 then a>0, this mean c also >0
this is good
case 2
b>0 and a>c
b>0 the a<0 , the mean c also < 0
this is good

answer C.
User avatar
PriyankaPalit7
Joined: 28 May 2018
Last visit: 13 Jan 2020
Posts: 124
Own Kudos:
545
 [1]
Given Kudos: 883
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 640 Q45 V35
GMAT 2: 670 Q45 V37
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 3: 730 Q50 V40
Posts: 124
Kudos: 545
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Mahmoudfawzy83
|a-c| + |a| = |c|
|a-c| = |c| - |a|
to satisfy "|a-c| = |c| - |a|", there are 3 options:
1. a = c
2. a = 0
3. |c| > |a| (c>a in magnitude) but have similar signs.

statement 1: ab > bc
eliminates option 1 and 2, but leaves us with option 3 which can't be known as the sign of b is unknown.

statement 2: ab < 0
gives no information except that a and b \(\neq{0}\) and that a and b has different signs.

by combining statement 1 and 2: (see the testing table)
0>ab>bc while a and b have different signs, so a and c must have similar signs
so if b>0, then both a and b are negative and c>a in magnitude (|c| > |a|)
so if b<0, then both a and b are positive and c>a in magnitude (|c| > |a|)
these criteria satisfies the tested equation

so C

Small correction here.
so if b>0, then both a and c are negative and c>a in magnitude (|c| > |a|)
so if b<0, then both a and c are positive and c>a in magnitude (|c| > |a|)
User avatar
dcummins
Joined: 14 Feb 2017
Last visit: 17 Jun 2025
Posts: 1,069
Own Kudos:
2,282
 [2]
Given Kudos: 368
Location: Australia
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 560 Q41 V26
GMAT 2: 550 Q43 V23
GMAT 3: 650 Q47 V33
GMAT 4: 650 Q44 V36
GMAT 5: 600 Q38 V35
GMAT 6: 710 Q47 V41
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
This question follows the rules of the general form:
|x-y|=|x| - |y|
if:
a. y = 0; or
b. x and y have the same sign, and x>y

So reorganising the stem.
is |a-c| + |a| =|c|

is |a-c| =|c| - |a|
reshuffle by multiply by -1

is -|a-c| = |a| - |c|

For this to be true c must equal 0 or a and c must have the same sign and a must be greater than c
(1) ab > bc
++ >+(-) a and c could have different signs; or--> No
++>++ a and c could have the same signs; or -->Yes
++>+(0) c could be equal to zero -->Yes

Insufficient

(2) ab<0
could be +- or -+
either way we knowing about c
Insufficient

Combined (1+2)
ab<0
therefore
ab > bc
(-) > bc

Possible cases:
ab > bc
(-)+> +(-) a and c are both negative, but a must be greater than c to satisfy the constraint
+(-)>(-)+ a and c are both positive, but a must be greater than c to satisfy the constraint

In either case, a must be greater than c and must have the same sign as c, therefore combined statements are sufficient.

We can test numbers to validate the theory.
-|a-c| = |a| - |c|

condition 1: a and c are both negative and a > c
-|-2-(-3)| = |-2|-|-3|
-|1| = 2-3
-1 = -1

condition 2: a and c are both positive and a > c
-|3-2|=|3|-|2|
-|1| = |3|-|2|
-1 = 1 is not possible, therefore a and c must both be negative

Bunuel, sorry to pester but is my working out correct?
User avatar
Kinshook
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 14 Jul 2025
Posts: 5,701
Own Kudos:
5,222
 [4]
Given Kudos: 161
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
WE:Engineering (Transportation)
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V34
Posts: 5,701
Kudos: 5,222
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RashedVai
Is |a-c| + |a| = |c|?

(1) ab > bc
(2) ab < 0

Posted from my mobile device

Is |a-c| + |a| = |c|?
Q. |c-a| = |c|-|a|

(1) ab > bc
ab - bc > 0
b (a-c) > 0
If b>0; a-c>0; a>c
If b<0; a-c<0; a<c
NOT SUFFICIENT

(2) ab < 0
If b>0; a<0
If b<0; a>0
No information provided for c
NOT SUFFICIENT

(1) + (2)
(1) ab > bc
ab - bc > 0
b (a-c) > 0
If b>0; a-c>0; a>c
If b<0; a-c<0; a<c
(2) ab < 0
If b>0; a<0
If b<0; a>0
If b>0; a-c>0; a>c; c<a<0; |c-a| = |c| - |a|
c------a-----------0
If b<0; a-c<0; a<c; c>a>0; |c-a| = |c| - |a|
0-------a------------c
SUFFICIENT

IMO C
User avatar
LoneSurvivor
Joined: 23 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Jul 2021
Posts: 305
Own Kudos:
744
 [2]
Given Kudos: 156
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Products:
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 305
Kudos: 744
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Is |a-c| + |a| = |c|?

Is |a-c|=|c|-|a|

Square both side ,

Is a^2+c^2-2ac=c^2+a^2- 2|a|*|c|

Is ac=|a||c|

Now actually the question is asking whether a*c=>0 ? [ as |a|*|c|=>0]

(1) ab > bc

b(a-c)>0

either b>0 and a>c
or b<0 and a<c

Clearly not sufficient as we do not have any info on the sign of a and c

(2) ab < 0

this tell that a and b are of different sign , no info on c so not sufficient

(1)+ (2)

either b>0 and a>c ,as b>0 so a<0 (from s2)
now as a>c so if a<0 then c <0 so ac>0 (sufficient )

or b<0 and a<c, as b<0 so a>0(from s2)
now as a<c, so if a>0 then c>0 so ac>0 (sufficient )

On both the cases sufficient hence C
User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
3,664
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,664
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RashedVai
Is |a-c| + |a| = |c|?

(1) ab > bc
(2) ab < 0

Posted from my mobile device

Statement 1: ab > bc
Case 1: b=1, with the result that a>c, allowing a=2 and c=1
If we plug a=2 and c=1 into |a-c| + |a| = |c|, we get:
|2-1| + |2| = |1|
3 = 1
NO

Case 2: b=-1, with the result that a<c, allowing a=1 and c=2
If we plug a=1 and c=2 into |a-c| + |a| = |c|, we get:
|1-2| + |1| = |2|
2 = 2
YES
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: ab < 0
Case 2 also satisfies Statement 2.
In Case 2, the answer to the question stem is YES.

Case 3: b=-1, a=2 and c=1
If a=2 and c=1, the answer to the question stem is NO, as shown in Case 1 above.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined:
Case 2 satisfies both statements.
In Case 2, the answer to the question stem is YES.

Case 4: b=1, with the result that a<0 in Statement 2 and a>c in Statement 1
If we plug a=-1 and c=-2 into |a-c| + |a| = |c|, we get:
|-1-(-2)| + |-1| = |-2|
2 = 2
YES

Cases 2 and 4 illustrate the only two scenarios that will satisfy both statements:
b<0, with the result that a>0 in Statement 2 and a<c in Statement 1
b>0, with the result that a<0 in Statement 2 and a>c in Statement 1
Since the answer is YES in both cases, SUFFICIENT.

User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,664
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
LoneSurvivor
Is |a-c| + |a| = |c|?

Is |a-c|=|c|-|a|

Square both side ,

Is a^2+c^2-2ac=c^2+a^2- 2|a|*|c|

Is ac=|a||c|

Now actually the question is asking whether a*c=>0 ? [ as |a|*|c|=>0]

Careful!
This line of reasoning is faulty.
If |a-c|=|c|-|a|, then we can conclude that ac=|a||c|.
But the reverse is not necessarily true.
If ac=|a||c|, we CANNOT conclude that |a-c|=|c|-|a|.
For example:
Plugging a=2 and c=1 into |a-c|=|c|-|a|, we get:
|2-1|=|1|-|2|
1 = -1
Thus, the rephrase in red -- is ac≥0? -- is invalid.
User avatar
h31337u
Joined: 26 Jul 2014
Last visit: 10 May 2023
Posts: 84
Own Kudos:
89
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 84
Kudos: 89
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I would firstly create 4 cases from the question in order to rephrase the question.

1. A>0 C>0
2. A>0 C<0
3. A<0 C>0
4. A<0 C<0

Let’s apply each case to the question.

1. A - c + a = c
2a = 2c
A=c
Therefore, with the 1st case, we can answer that |a-c| + |a| = |c|.

2. A + c + a = -c
2a = -2c
A=-c
A and c are not same. So we can’t answer.

3. -a -c - a = c
-2a = 2c
-a = c
A and c are not the same. So we can’t answer.

4. It is the same as the 1st. So we can answer.

So if we rephrase the question, we know that we are asked to answer whether “A and C have the same sign”.

Now, look at the each statement.

(1) ab>bc
B(a-c) > 0
If b>0, then a>c. For a, even if A is negative we can still answer because c is always smaller than a. Therefore c is negative. So A and C have the same sign.
If b<0, then a<c, this one, a and c can have different sign. So this is not valid.
We have 2 different cases from statement 1, so statement 1 is not itself sufficient to answer the question.

(2) ab<0
A and b have different sign.
Obviously, we do not know what c is.

(1+2) together,
From statement 2, we know that,
A and b have different sign. Now, we see the statement 1, knowing that a and b have differenet sign.
Only the first case from the statement 1 is possible.
There, a and c have the same sign.

My answer is C.
User avatar
AntrikshR
Joined: 26 Jan 2019
Last visit: 13 Jun 2025
Posts: 125
Own Kudos:
202
 [1]
Given Kudos: 333
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 590 Q47 V24
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V33
GRE 1: Q169 V151
GMAT 2: 670 Q49 V33
GRE 1: Q169 V151
Posts: 125
Kudos: 202
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Posted from my mobile device
Attachments

IMG_20200828_182518__01.jpg
IMG_20200828_182518__01.jpg [ 2.05 MiB | Viewed 12245 times ]

User avatar
GMATGuruNY
Joined: 04 Aug 2010
Last visit: 08 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,345
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Schools:Dartmouth College
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,345
Kudos: 3,664
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Note:
|x-y| = |y-x| = the distance between y and x
|x| = |x-0| = the distance between x and 0

RashedVai
Is |a-c| + |a| = |c|?

(1) ab > bc
(2) ab < 0

Question stem, rephrased:
Is |c-a| + |a-0| = |c-0| ?
In words:
If the distance between c and a is added to the distance between a and 0, is the result equal to the distance between c and 0?

The answer will YES if a is between c and 0, as in the following cases:
c.....a.....0 --> (distance between c and a) + (distance between a and 0) = distance between c and 0
0.....a.....c --> (distance between c and a) + (distance between a and 0) = distance between c and 0

The answer will NO if a is NOT between c and 0, as in the following cases:
a.....c.....0 --> (distance between c and a) + (distance between a and 0) > distance between c and 0
0.....c.....a --> (distance between c and a) + (distance between a and 0) > distance between c and 0

Statement 1: ab>bc
If b=1, a=2 and c=1, then a is NOT between c and 0, so the answer to the question stem is NO.
If b=1, a=-1 and c=-2, then a IS between c and 0, so the answer to the question stem is YES.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statement 2: ab<0
No information about c.
INSUFFICIENT.

Statements combined: ab>bc and ab<0
Case 1: b>0, implying in Statement 1 that a>c and in Statement 2 that a<0
Linking together c<a and a<0, we get:
c<a<0
Since a is between c and 0, the answer to the question stem is YES.

Case 2: b<0, implying in Statement 1 that a<c and in Statement 2 that a>0
Linking together 0<a and a<c, we get:
0<a<c
Since a is between c and 0, the answer to the question stem is YES.

In both cases, the answer to the question stem is YES.
SUFFICIENT.

avatar
Sajal12
Joined: 15 Jun 2021
Last visit: 06 Aug 2022
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
GPA: 3.94
WE:Analyst (Consulting)
Posts: 12
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Experts,

Since the question does not have "b" but answer options have "b", isn't the question wrong?
User avatar
kaladin123
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Jul 2019
Last visit: 10 Jul 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 747
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q39 V39
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38 (Online)
GPA: 3.11
WE:Project Management (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38 (Online)
Posts: 135
Kudos: 63
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The question stem can be re-written as follows:
Is \(|a-c|=|c|-|a|\)?

Inferences:
1) \(|a-c|\) can't be negative.
2) \(|c| \ge |a|\)
<--------c-----a----0-----a------c------->

3) \(a\) & \(c\) should be on the same side of the number line.

Restating #3: is \(ac>0\)?

From S1: \(ab>bc\)
Insufficient

From S2: \(ab<0\)
Insufficient

S1 & S2:
\(0>ab>bc\)
Or, \(bc<ab<0\)

Inferences:
1) \(b\) & \(c\) are on the opposite sides of zero on the number line.
2) \(a\) & \(b\) are on the opposite sides of zero.
3) Hence, \(a\) & \(c\) are on the same side of the number line (both should have the same sign).
Restating #3: \(ac>0\)
Sufficient.
Hence C.
User avatar
avigutman
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 1,294
Own Kudos:
1,893
 [1]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Posts: 1,294
Kudos: 1,893
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Video solution from Quant Reasoning:
Subscribe for more: https://www.youtube.com/QuantReasoning? ... irmation=1
User avatar
Vasu49
Joined: 12 Jul 2022
Last visit: 16 Mar 2023
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 32
Location: India
Posts: 29
Kudos: 29
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
RashedVai
Is |a-c| + |a| = |c|?

(1) ab > bc
(2) ab < 0

Statement A:
ab > bc
ab - bc > 0
b(a-c) > 0
=> Either b > 0 & (a - c) > 0,
or b < 0 & (a - c) < 0.
Depending on sign of (a - c), respective signs of a & c will differ. So we don't have a definite Yes or a definite No.
So, Not sufficient.

Statement B:
ab<0
=> Either a < 0 & b > 0,
or a >0 & b < 0.
Here we are not sure what sign c holds.
Not sufficient.

Statement C: [1] + [2]
ab>bc
ab < 0
=> bc is also < 0.
Now we have something.
bc < ab < 0
=>
Either a > 0, b < 0, c > 0, (One explanation for bc < 0 & ab < 0)
or a < 0, b > 0, c < 0, (Another explanation for bc < 0 & ab < 0)
Now we know that a & c share the same sign, and whatever it is, b has the opposite.

when b < 0, a-c <0 => a < c {from statement a} & a, c > 0 {from statement b}
=> |a-c| +|a| i.e (L.H.S of original statement that is to be proved)
=> |a-c| +|a| = c - a + a (Opening modulus w.r.t to signs)
=> |a-c| +|a| = c
=> |a-c| +|a| = c = |c| (since c > 0, |c| opens up with + ve sign, we did the reverse here.)
L.H.S = R.HS

when b > 0, a-c >0 => a > c {from statement a} & a, c < 0 {from statement b}
=> |a-c| +|a| i.e (L.H.S of original statement that is to be proved)
=> |a-c| +|a| = a - c - a (Opening modulus w.r.t to signs)
=> |a-c| +|a| = -c
=> |a-c| +|a| = -c = |c| (since c < 0, |c| opens up with - ve sign, we did the reverse here.)
L.H.S = R.HS
Hence C.
 1   2   
Moderator:
Math Expert
102570 posts