GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 18 Oct 2018, 19:46

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4464
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2016, 09:15
2
5
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

72% (01:35) correct 28% (02:05) wrong based on 341 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.

Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?

A)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.

B)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.

C)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.

D)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.

E)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.

Day 9 Question of the Verbal Contest:GMAT Club RATT Race
Please make sure to post a brief reply without revealing your solution to enter the contest!


Image

_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
How I got into five schools from zero - Applicant Lab Review
Veritas Prep Live Online

Board of Directors
User avatar
P
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4094
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE: Business Development (Commercial Banking)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Apr 2016, 13:11
souvik101990 wrote:
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.

Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?

A)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.

B)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.

C)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.

D)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.

E)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.



No doubt its (D)

Goals of introducing additional Tax

1. Meeting education Budget & restoring stalled projects
2. Improving health as higher price of Cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke.


If people start consumes less Cigarettes then how can the Government gain additional 5 billion dollars in revenue ?


The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals ( Reducing Smoking ) would negatively impact the success of the other (Meeting education Budget & restoring stalled projects).
_________________

Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )

Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 18 Sep 2014
Posts: 1132
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2016, 02:12
1
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals.

First The additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to do some good things..............
Assumption: additional tax gives additional money i.e., the sales will not get impacted negatively or reduce

Second The higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke,
Assumption: the sales will get impacted negatively or reduce

Both the statements contradict with each other......only one of them can result.
In other words Occurrence of one will rule out the possibility of the other one.

only choice D expresses the reason for failure as above.

Quote:
D)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.
SVP
SVP
avatar
B
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Posts: 1883
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2016, 03:26
souvik101990 wrote:
It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes are smoked in the United States every year. An additional tax of 50 cents on every pack of cigarettes sold would achieve two desirable goals. First, the additional 5 billion dollars in revenue could be used to supplement the nation’s education budget and restore many programs that have been cut back or eliminated, such as vocational training and art education. In addition, the higher prices of buying cigarettes will encourage smokers to reduce the numbers of cigarettes that they smoke, which would help to improve the health of both the smokers and the bystanders who inhale their second-hand smoke.

Which of the following describes a flaw in the argument’s reasoning?

A)The author overlooks the possibility that education programs can be funded by means other than taxing cigarettes.

B)The author assumes that something that is sufficient to achieve one goal may be necessary to achieve another.

C)The author ignores the beneficial results already achieved through public smoking bans to reduce the effects of second-hand smoke.

D)The author fails to consider that success in achieving one of the proposal’s goals would negatively impact the success of the other.

E)The author presumes a correlation between artificially low cigarette taxes and cutbacks in education programs.



The argument says that by introducing new taxes, the revenue will be increased. And this will have following two effects:

1. Money obtained for other purposes
2. Reduce the number of smokers.

We need to find out a flaw in the reasoning.

The point 2 is in direct contradiction with the increasing of taxes. If people reduce the number of cigarettes they smoke, the revenues will not increase.
Of the given options, only D talks on the same lines.

Correct Option: D
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
S
Joined: 08 Jun 2015
Posts: 451
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38
GPA: 3.33
Premium Member
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2016, 06:22
A very good question. Took a little longer than usual to answer it though ! What should be the difficulty level of this question ? Looks like a 700+ candidate to me ?
_________________

" The few , the fearless "

Current Student
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 4464
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Apr 2016, 08:59
Correct Answer: (D)
The question stem identifies this as a Flaw question. The correct answer will describe an error in the author’s reasoning.
The conclusion of the argument is a recommendation to charge a fifty-cent tax on each pack of cigarettes sold. The evidence presents two benefits to be gained from the tax: extra money (5 billion) for educational programs and a reduction in smoking, which benefits both the smokers and bystanders. What the author overlooks is that these benefits rest on opposing assumptions. A gain of 5 billion dollars for education rests on the assumption that people will continue smoking at the same rate and pay the tax. A reduction in smoking requires that people buy fewer packs of cigarettes to avoid paying the tax. So the two predicted benefits in support of the recommendation are contradictory; achieving one will undermine the other.

The correct answer should point out that the author is overlooking the mutually contradictory nature of the goals.

Choice (D) fits the prediction. “Fails to consider” means that the author overlooks something, and what he overlooks is that one of the goals justifying the recommendation would have a negative impact on achieving the other goal. This is the correct answer.

Choice (A) is outside the scope of the argument. The argument is not about ways to fund the educational programs, but rather about the potential benefits of a proposed cigarette tax. Even if there are many ways that the programs could be funded, the author is using this possibility as a means of justifying a cigarette tax.

Choice (B) is a distortion of the author’s logic. The two benefits are not conditioned on each other. The author presents them as two independent benefits to be gained from the imposition of the tax, although he overlooks the fact that they could affect each other. There is no necessary-sufficient relationship between them.

Choice (C) is outside the scope. Other means of reducing smoking are not relevant to the fact that this recommendation might help to reduce smoking further. The argument is about the benefits of imposing a cigarette tax, not on ways to reduce smoking.

Choice (E) distorts the argument. The author is arguing that an increased cigarette tax will help to fund programs, but he in no way relies on a claim that the programs were cut back because cigarette taxes were too low.
_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
How I got into five schools from zero - Applicant Lab Review
Veritas Prep Live Online

Kaplan GMAT Instructor
User avatar
B
Joined: 08 Oct 2015
Posts: 41
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2016, 14:02
spetznaz wrote:
A very good question. Took a little longer than usual to answer it though ! What should be the difficulty level of this question ? Looks like a 700+ candidate to me ?


This item is hot off the presses, as it were, and our learning science team has not yet assigned a difficulty level to it, so we can't provide you with an exact answer. However, we intended it to be challenging; we wrote it to come in at a 650+ level.
_________________

Kaplan GMAT Faculty
In Person & Live Online

Kaplan Exclusive: The Official Test Day Experience

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 16 Feb 2016
Posts: 52
Concentration: Other, Other
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2016, 00:54
Prethinking gives us that there is benefit : more money from taxes; and at the same time the 2nd benefit is that people would smoke less. This contradicts the first benefit - i.e. smoke less, then less money.

Would rank it at 600 level.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Jul 2017, 03:51
this is one common pattern in CR question, test takers should know this and recognize this in real gmat
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1710
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Dec 2017, 15:36
if fewer people smoke, fewer tax revenues on selling cigarettes, ....=> D
B seems a pattern in LSAT.
A and C are out of scope.
E sounds like a familiar pattern, but E is actually out of scope.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes &nbs [#permalink] 02 Dec 2017, 15:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

RATT RACE: It is estimated that over 10 billion packs of cigarettes

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.