GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

It is currently 26 May 2018, 08:35

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 25 Aug 2007
Posts: 844
WE 1: 3.5 yrs IT
WE 2: 2.5 yrs Retail chain
Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 30 Apr 2018, 23:41
10
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (01:17) correct 29% (01:25) wrong based on 684 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of Bellam came into power. Each year since then, about thirty journalists have been imprisoned for printing articles that criticize the government. In 1994, under the old government, only six journalists were imprisoned for criticizing the government. So the old government was more tolerant of criticism by the press than the new one is.

Politician: But in 1994 only six journalists criticized the government, and now journalists routinely do.

The politician challenges the journalist’s argument by doing which of the following?

(A) Presenting data that extend further into the past than the journalist’s data

(B) Introducing evidence that undermines an assumption of the journalist’s argument

(C) Questioning the accuracy of the evidence presented in support of the journalist’s conclusion

(D) Pointing out that the argument illegitimately draws a general conclusion on the basis of a sample of only a few cases

(E) Stating that the argument treats information about some members of a group as if it applied to all members of that group

_________________

Want to improve your CR: http://gmatclub.com/forum/cr-methods-an-approach-to-find-the-best-answers-93146.html
Tricky Quant problems: http://gmatclub.com/forum/50-tricky-questions-92834.html
Important Grammer Fundamentals: http://gmatclub.com/forum/key-fundamentals-of-grammer-our-crucial-learnings-on-sc-93659.html


Originally posted by ykaiim on 13 May 2010, 01:00.
Last edited by hazelnut on 30 Apr 2018, 23:41, edited 2 times in total.
Added the OA
VP
VP
User avatar
Status: mission completed!
Joined: 02 Jul 2009
Posts: 1350
GPA: 3.77
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 13 May 2010, 01:43
Reasons are:
draws a general conclusion - which is "So the old government was more tolerant of criticism by the press than the new one is." This may be a case that old goverment had prisoned even more than 30 journalist before 1994, but at the end of term of old party ( beginning of the 1994) most of them had been already afraid of the strict goverment regulations that has stop to criticize it and only 6 of them were imprisoned.
So, the old Gov may not be more tolerant of the criticism than the new one. Thus, the journalist's conclusion is general.

on the basis of a sample of only a few cases - the new goverment came recently [ so many cases could not occur since then] even if those cases count for 30 journalists.
_________________

Audaces fortuna juvat!

GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings


Originally posted by PTK on 13 May 2010, 01:30.
Last edited by PTK on 13 May 2010, 01:43, edited 4 times in total.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 24 Jul 2009
Posts: 258
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2010, 01:31
ykaiim wrote:
Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of Bellam came into power. Each year since then, about thirty journalists have been imprisoned for printing articles that criticize the government. In 1994, under the old government, only six journalists were imprisoned for criticizing the government. So the old government was more tolerant of criticism by the press than the new one is.

Politician: But in 1994 only six journalists criticized the government, and now journalists routinely do.

The politician challenges the journalist’s argument by doing which of the following?
(A) Presenting data that extend further into the past than the journalist’s data
(B) Introducing evidence that undermines an assumption of the journalist’s argument
(C) Questioning the accuracy of the evidence presented in support of the journalist’s conclusion
(D) Pointing out that the argument illegitimately draws a general conclusion on the basis of a sample of only a few cases
(E) Stating that the argument treats information about some members of a group as if it applied to all members of that group



For Me the contenders are B and C.

E) The given stem is not an example of generalization.
A) Out of scope
D) The given stem is not an example of generalization.

Now B and C

C) Journalist's data "In 1994, under the old government, only six journalists were imprisoned for criticizing the government" are correct.

B) is OK. Journalist assumes that number of arrest is directly proportional to the intolerance of the government.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 04 Feb 2009
Posts: 211
Location: Ukraine
Schools: Ross 2013
WE 1: Pharmaceutical industry 5 years, C level
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2010, 04:48
the politician provides new evidence, so it is B
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 17 Feb 2010
Posts: 1308
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 May 2010, 12:33
i would pick (B).

Introducing evidence that undermines an assumption of the journalist’s argument

The politican says only six journalists criticized the government and now journalists routinely do....which means he introduces new evidence (only six journalists criticized and all were imprisoned) which sabotages journalist's argument that old government was more tolerant than the new one.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 16 Feb 2010
Posts: 158
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 May 2010, 05:02
B is the ans. as the assumption of the journalist depends upon the imprisonment of 30 journalist , that the govt is intolerant, but the politician presented an evidence that undermined this assumption.
C - out of scope as the politician the does not doubt the accuracy of the imprisonment of 30 journalist
D- wrong as the politician did not imply that journalist is taking very few cases.
A,E -out of scope
1 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Jul 2010
Posts: 528
GPA: 3.4
WE: General Management (Non-Profit and Government)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Nov 2013, 06:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Mar 2012
Posts: 338
Schools: Schulich '16
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Jul 2016, 00:32
it is actually a new evidence the politician provided.

So B.
SVP
SVP
avatar
P
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1905
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 Nov 2017, 20:36
Undoubtedly, A and C are out.
Next, both D and E are unlikely to hold b/c they talk about the general and specific samples of cases.
B seems correct. Indeed, B is a right answer.
Re: Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of   [#permalink] 12 Nov 2017, 20:36
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Journalist: In late 1994, the present government of the Republic of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.