GMAT Changed on April 16th - Read about the latest changes here

 It is currently 23 Apr 2018, 02:15

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Current Student
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 293
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 640 Q40 V37
GMAT 2: 650 Q43 V36
GMAT 3: 600 Q47 V27
GPA: 3.3
WE: Management Consulting (Consulting)
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2015, 05:57
3
KUDOS
14
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

25% (medium)

Question Stats:

65% (00:55) correct 35% (00:59) wrong based on 412 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n - 1)! is divided by n.

What is the value of 32~ ?

A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 8
E. 31
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

KUDO me plenty

Intern
Joined: 21 Aug 2013
Posts: 3
GPA: 2.9
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Nov 2015, 07:14
2
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
n~ = (n-1)!

so 32~ = (32-1)! = 31!

when 31!/32 we have 16*2 inside 31!

hence 32 gets cancelled and we get remainder as 0
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 12 Aug 2015
Posts: 2582
GRE 1: 323 Q169 V154
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Mar 2016, 01:57
2
KUDOS
Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 776
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Apr 2017, 13:39
1
KUDOS
Ok so I was initially not able to do this problem because I didn't understand how to divide 31!/32...

Now that you guys have made the problem more clear I have a question-

5!/15 must be an integer? Because 5x4x3x2x1 contains the factors of 15 (5 x 3)

When I do 17!/30 in a calculator the result is not an integer?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 44627
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2017, 01:27
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Nunuboy1994 wrote:
Ok so I was initially not able to do this problem because I didn't understand how to divide 31!/32...

Now that you guys have made the problem more clear I have a question-

5!/15 must be an integer? Because 5x4x3x2x1 contains the factors of 15 (5 x 3)

When I do 17!/30 in a calculator the result is not an integer?

First of all, 17!/30 = 11856247603200 = integer, but what 17!/30 has to do with this problem?
_________________
Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 776
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2017, 19:09
1
KUDOS
Bunuel wrote:
Nunuboy1994 wrote:
Ok so I was initially not able to do this problem because I didn't understand how to divide 31!/32...

Now that you guys have made the problem more clear I have a question-

5!/15 must be an integer? Because 5x4x3x2x1 contains the factors of 15 (5 x 3)

When I do 17!/30 in a calculator the result is not an integer?

First of all, 17!/30 = 11856247603200 = integer, but what 17!/30 has to do with this problem?

I trying to demonstrate the concept in this problem, which is new to me, in a different example- I think the calculator's notation just makes it appear as 1.something^e even though that doesn't necessarily mean it's not an integer. It's clear now.
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 44627
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

16 Apr 2017, 23:51
1
KUDOS
Expert's post
Nunuboy1994 wrote:
Bunuel wrote:
Nunuboy1994 wrote:
Ok so I was initially not able to do this problem because I didn't understand how to divide 31!/32...

Now that you guys have made the problem more clear I have a question-

5!/15 must be an integer? Because 5x4x3x2x1 contains the factors of 15 (5 x 3)

When I do 17!/30 in a calculator the result is not an integer?

First of all, 17!/30 = 11856247603200 = integer, but what 17!/30 has to do with this problem?

I trying to demonstrate the concept in this problem, which is new to me, in a different example- I think the calculator's notation just makes it appear as 1.something^e even though that doesn't necessarily mean it's not an integer. It's clear now.

For big numbers do not user calculator (unless it's not advanced) or Excell, use Wolframalpha: https://www.wolframalpha.com/

Hope it helps.
_________________
Director
Joined: 12 Nov 2016
Posts: 776
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2017, 16:09
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n - 1)! is divided by n.

What is the value of 32~ ?

A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 8
E. 31

Simple- all this question is asking is if you have 31!/32 then what is the remainder? You don't necessarily have to expand 31!- 32 fits in because you have 16 and 2 so there is no remainder

Thus
"A"
Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 19 Mar 2014
Posts: 977
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.5
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

09 Jul 2017, 04:12
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n - 1)! is divided by n.

What is the value of 32~ ?

A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 8
E. 31

$$= \frac{(32-1)!}{32}$$

$$= \frac{31!}{32}$$

Numbers $$8 * 4 = 32$$, will cancel out the denomintor and hence the reminder will be ZERO.

_________________

"Nothing in this world can take the place of persistence. Talent will not: nothing is more common than unsuccessful men with talent. Genius will not; unrewarded genius is almost a proverb. Education will not: the world is full of educated derelicts. Persistence and determination alone are omnipotent."

Best AWA Template: https://gmatclub.com/forum/how-to-get-6-0-awa-my-guide-64327.html#p470475

Study Buddy Forum Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 887
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

10 Nov 2017, 04:20
Bunuel VeritasPrepKarishma

32! has various multiples of 32 built in say 8 * 4, 16* 2. Will not various no of multiples affect my remainder?
For eg, even if 8*4 will cancel out 32 in denominator leaving remainder = 0, I still have one multiple of 16*2, correct?
Target Test Prep Representative
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Posts: 2273
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

14 Nov 2017, 07:08
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n - 1)! is divided by n.

What is the value of 32~ ?

A. 0
B. 1
C. 2
D. 8
E. 31

32~ = (32 - 1)!/32 = 31!/32 = 31!/2^5

Since we can safely say that there are at least five 2s in 31! (for example, 31! has the factors 16 = 2^4 and 8=2^3), the remainder is zero.

Alternate Solution:

32~ = (32 - 1)!/32 = 31!/32 = 31!/2^5

We want to know the remainder when 31! is divided by 2^5. If we can establish that there are at least 5 factors of 2 in 31!, then we will know that 2^5 evenly divides into 31!, which means that the remainder would be 0. Let’s determine if we can find at least 5 twos in 31!:

31! = 31 x 30 x 29 x 28 x 27 x 26 x 25 x 24 x … x 1

31! = 31 x (2 x 15) x 29 x (2 X 2 x 14) x 27 x (2 x 13) x 25 x (2 x 2 x 2 x 3) x … x 1

Notice that we have found seven 2s, which is two more than what we needed. Thus, we know that 2^5 will evenly divide into 31!, leaving a remainder of 0.

_________________

Jeffery Miller

GMAT Quant Self-Study Course
500+ lessons 3000+ practice problems 800+ HD solutions

Manager
Joined: 19 Jun 2017
Posts: 50
GMAT 1: 660 Q39 V40
GMAT 2: 700 Q45 V41
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Nov 2017, 23:24
Hi,

So basically as long as there are enough prime factor powers in the numerator to cancel out all the prime factor powers in the denominator, the remainder is 0 correct?
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 44627
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Dec 2017, 00:04
calappa1234 wrote:
Hi,

So basically as long as there are enough prime factor powers in the numerator to cancel out all the prime factor powers in the denominator, the remainder is 0 correct?

Yes. If the numerator contains the same (or more) primes as denominator and the (positive integer) powers of primes in the numerator are at least as big as the powers of the same primes in the denominator, then the result of the division will be an integer, so the remainder will be 0.
_________________
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/Co-Founder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 11500
Location: United States (CA)
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V49
GRE 1: 340 Q170 V170
Re: Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

06 Feb 2018, 12:12
Hi All,

This prompt is an example of a 'Symbolism' question - the prompt 'makes up' a math symbol, tells you what it means and asks you to perform a calculation using it. Based on the information in the prompt, we're told that....

32~ is the remainder when (32-1)! is divided by 32.

Now, there's no way that the GMAT would expect you to calculate the value of 31!, so we have to think in terms of what 31! actually is.

Here's an example that's a bit easier to deal with:

4! = (4)(3)(2)(1) = 24

What numbers divide EVENLY into 24?

1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12 and 24

You can clearly see why 1, 2, 3 and 4 divide in - they're in the 'chain' of numbers that are multiplied together.
6 divides in because (2)(3) = 6 - and you can see the (2) and the (3) in the 'chain'
Similarly, 8, 12 and 24 are also 'combinations' of the numbers in the 'chain', so they divide evenly in too.

31! has LOTS of numbers in it, so it's evenly divisibly by LOTS of different integers. If you were to write out 31!, you would see a (2) and a (16). This means that (2)(16) = 32 divides evenly into 31!, so there will be a remainder of 0.

[Reveal] Spoiler:
A

GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made,
Rich
_________________

760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels
Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com

# Rich Cohen

Co-Founder & GMAT Assassin

Special Offer: Save \$75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee
www.empowergmat.com/

***********************Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!***********************

Senior Manager
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Posts: 441
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n [#permalink]

### Show Tags

07 Feb 2018, 09:29
Bunuel wrote:
calappa1234 wrote:
Hi,

So basically as long as there are enough prime factor powers in the numerator to cancel out all the prime factor powers in the denominator, the remainder is 0 correct?

Yes. If the numerator contains the same (or more) primes as denominator and the (positive integer) powers of primes in the numerator are at least as big as the powers of the same primes in the denominator, then the result of the division will be an integer, so the remainder will be 0.

Hi Bunuel, long time no hear no see

Here is my solution.

to define if $$31!$$ is divisible by $$32$$ make prime factorization of $$32$$ so we get this --- > $$2^4$$

$$31!$$ certainly will have four $$2$$ as prime factors, hence $$\frac{31!}{32}$$ we get integer.

if this solution correct. What if similar question would have remainder - how could i find a remainder ?

thank you
Let n~ be defined for all positive integers n as the remainder when (n   [#permalink] 07 Feb 2018, 09:29
Display posts from previous: Sort by