varotkorn wrote:
May I quote content, which is very similar to this question, from
MGMAT? No judgment or bias here. I just would like to invite GMATClub verbal experts to discuss the content subjectively and fruitfully.
According to P.100 Chapter 6 Comparisons
MGMAT SC book
Quote:
According to the GMAT, there is no difference in meaning between Like her brother, Ava aced the test and As her brother did, Ava aced the test.
First, let me vent a bit about the wording above, which I see all the time on this forum and in prep company materials, and which is profoundly misleading. Any time someone says "According to the GMAT..." you should replace that phrase in your mind with "According to everyone...". There are no mathematical or grammatical rules that are true "according to the GMAT" that are not also true in mathematics or grammar generally. I've seen people write things like "according to the GMAT, zero is an even number." No, that's not true -- according to
mathematics, zero is an even number. There are no special "rules" you need to learn that are true on the GMAT but that are false outside of the GMAT, so this phrase "according to the GMAT" always implies something nonsensical. In the quote above, the sentences "Like her brother, Ava aced the test" and "As her brother did, Ava aced the test" mean the same thing according to everyone who understands the meaning of those two sentences (though the 'did' should usually immediately follow 'as'). They don't mean the same thing only "according to the GMAT".
There's a difference though between that example and the sentence in the question above. The two sentences about Ava acing the test both describe a single past event. They mean the same thing. The sentence discussed in this thread is different. It discusses one past event (Gillespie played many instruments) and one continuing event (jazz musicians play many instruments). When that's the case, you can't use "as did" to describe the continuing event, since "as did" suggests that event is completed.