It is currently 26 Jun 2017, 16:08

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

# List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics
Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 17
Location: london
Schools: cambridge, oxford
List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 01:27
11
This post received
KUDOS
168
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

34% (03:11) correct 66% (02:19) wrong based on 2075 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an integer, and the sum of the 30 decimals is S. The estimated sum of the 30 decimals, E, is defined as follows. Each decimal in T whose tenths digit is even is rounded up to the nearest integer, and each decimal in T whose tenths digits is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer. If 1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even, which of the following is a possible value of E - S ?

I. -16
II. 6
III. 10

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA
Intern
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Posts: 16
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 02:04
5
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
First let us find the value of E:
"1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even" => 10 numbers have an even tenths digit and remaining 20 numbers have an odd tenths digit.
=> E = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(1)-20(1) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)-10

Now let us come to "S":
The maximum possible value of S occurs when ten numbers have '8' as tenths digit and remaining 20 numbers have '9' as tenths digit.
Smax = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(0.8)+20(0.9) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)+26
The minimum possible value of S occurs when ten numbers have '2' as tenth digit and remaining 20 numbers have '1' as tenth digit.
Smin = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(0.2)+20(0.1) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)+4

E-S ranges between (E-Smax) to (E-Smin) = -36 to -14

IMO, the answer option "A" is correct, as -16 only lies in this range.
_________________

Ravi Sankar Vemuri

Intern
Joined: 12 May 2011
Posts: 17
Location: london
Schools: cambridge, oxford
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 05:07
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
vsrsankar wrote:
First let us find the value of E:
"1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even" => 10 numbers have an even tenths digit and remaining 20 numbers have an odd tenths digit.
=> E = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(1)-20(1) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)-10

Now let us come to "S":
The maximum possible value of S occurs when ten numbers have '8' as tenths digit and remaining 20 numbers have '9' as tenths digit.
Smax = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(0.8)+20(0.9) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)+26
The minimum possible value of S occurs when ten numbers have '2' as tenth digit and remaining 20 numbers have '1' as tenth digit.
Smin = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(0.2)+20(0.1) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)+4

E-S ranges between (E-Smax) to (E-Smin) = -36 to -14

IMO, the answer option "A" is correct, as -16 only lies in this range.

The answer I gave is the official guide answer. Plus I dont understand how you chose 0.8 and 0.9, can you elaborate on that? also the sum of E , shouldnt it be 10 ( x) +20(y) ....instead of minus as you indicated above. Perhaps I am missing something, and would appreciate further clarification.

thanks
Shamanth
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7443
Location: Pune, India
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 May 2012, 08:13
46
This post received
KUDOS
Expert's post
39
This post was
BOOKMARKED
shamanth25 wrote:
List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an integer, and the sum of the 30 decimals is S. The estimated sum of the 30 decimals, E, is defined as follows. Each decimal in T whose tenths digit is even is rounded up to the nearest integer, and each decimal in T whose tenths digits is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer. If 1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even, which of the following is a possible value of E - S ?

I. -16
II. 6
III. 10

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III

what is the best way to solve this question.

many thanks
S

This is how I would solve it:

Even tenth digit - Round up - 10 numbers
Odd tenth digit - Round down - 20 numbers

E - S can take many values so how do we figure which ones it cannot take? We need to find the range of E - S - the minimum value it can take and the maximum value it can take.

Minimum value of E - S => E is much less than S. How do we make E much less than S?
By doing 2 things:

1. When I round up, the difference between actual and estimate should be little. Say the numbers are something like 3.8999999 (very close to 3.9) and they will be rounded up to 4 i.e. the estimate gains 0.1 per number. Since there are 10 even tenth digit numbers, the estimate will be apprx .1*10 = 1 more than actual
2. When I round down, the difference between actual and estimate should be huge. Say the numbers are something like 3.999999 (very close to 4) and they will be rounded down to 3 i.e. the estimate loses apprx 1 per number. Since there are 20 such numbers, the estimate is 1*20 = 20 less than actual.
Overall, the estimate will be apprx 20 - 1 = 19 less than actual

E - S = -19

Maximum value of E - S => E is much greater than S. How do we make E much greater than S?
By doing 2 things:

1. When we round up, the difference between actual and estimate should be very high. Say the numbers are something like 3.000001 (very close to 3) and they will be rounded up to 4 i.e. the estimate gains 1 per number. Since there are 10 even tenth digit numbers, the estimate will be apprx 1*10 = 10 more than actual
2. When we round down, the difference between actual and estimate should be very little. Say the numbers are 3.1. They will be rounded down to 3 i.e. the estimate loses apprx 0.1 per number. Since there are 20 such numbers, the estimate is 0.1*20 = 2 less than actual.

Maximum value of E - S = 10 - 2 = 8

So 10 cannot be the value of E - S.
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for $199 Veritas Prep Reviews Manager Status: Preparing myself to break the sound( 700 )-barrier! Affiliations: IFC - Business Edge, Bangladesh Enterprise Institute Joined: 15 Feb 2011 Posts: 209 Location: Dhaka, Bangladesh Schools: Texas A&M - Mays; PennState - Smeal; Purdue - Krannert; JohnsHopkins - Carey; Vanderbilt - Owen; WakeForest - Babcock; UBC - Sauder WE 1: Financial Analyst/Financial Management Trainer - BRAC Afghanistan - 13 months WE 2: Business Proposal Coordinator - MiDS, Inc. (in Kabul, Afghanistan) - 4 Months (did quit the job bcoz of security concerns) WE 3: Readers For Readers (A Social Impact Generating Organization) - Co-Founder Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 30 May 2012, 17:45 37 This post received KUDOS 21 This post was BOOKMARKED IMO, the best solution is shown by M Dabral of GMAT Quantum in one of its video explanations. Here is the link: http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13/218-pro ... ition.html Although NOT most of GMAT Quantum's video explanations/solutions are up to the par, I found that this one along with some others (e.g., PS 178) is the best video explanation floating out there in the internet. Manager Joined: 12 May 2012 Posts: 83 Location: India Concentration: General Management, Operations GMAT 1: 650 Q51 V25 GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V38 GPA: 4 WE: General Management (Transportation) Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 May 2012, 04:30 2 This post received KUDOS 1 This post was BOOKMARKED Schawjibb wrote: IMO, the best solution is shown by M Dabral of GMAT Quantum in one of its video explanations. Here is the link: http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13/218-pro ... ition.html Although NOT most of GMAT Quantum's video explanations/solutions are up to the par, I found that this one along with some others (e.g., PS 178) is the best video explanation floating out there in the internet. good one when you consider in exam conditions MBA Section Director Joined: 19 Mar 2012 Posts: 3819 Location: India GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42 GPA: 3.8 WE: Marketing (Energy and Utilities) Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Jul 2012, 00:11 23 This post received KUDOS Expert's post 16 This post was BOOKMARKED Assume T = (1.a, 1.b,...etc) All units equal 1.xx. E = 40 (due to rounding of ten even and 20 odd) S max = 30 + 10(.8) + 20(.9) = 56 S min = 30 + 10(.2) + 20(.1) = 34 E-S min = 40 - 56 = -16 E-S max = 40 - 34 = 6 Thus, the min/max of E is -16 and 6, so I , II apply. For (III. 10) to be true, S min/max in our equation above needs to equal 30. This is impossible since the question states T consists of 30 positive decimals. Therefore eliminate III. _________________ Intern Joined: 25 Oct 2012 Posts: 6 Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 19 Dec 2012, 03:49 shamanth25 wrote: vsrsankar wrote: First let us find the value of E: "1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even" => 10 numbers have an even tenths digit and remaining 20 numbers have an odd tenths digit. => E = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(1)-20(1) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)-10 Now let us come to "S": The maximum possible value of S occurs when ten numbers have '8' as tenths digit and remaining 20 numbers have '9' as tenths digit. Smax = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(0.8)+20(0.9) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)+26 The minimum possible value of S occurs when ten numbers have '2' as tenth digit and remaining 20 numbers have '1' as tenth digit. Smin = (sum of all 30 integer parts) +10(0.2)+20(0.1) = (sum of all 30 integer parts)+4 E-S ranges between (E-Smax) to (E-Smin) = -36 to -14 IMO, the answer option "A" is correct, as -16 only lies in this range. The answer I gave is the official guide answer. Plus I dont understand how you chose 0.8 and 0.9, can you elaborate on that? also the sum of E , shouldnt it be 10 ( x) +20(y) ....instead of minus as you indicated above. Perhaps I am missing something, and would appreciate further clarification. thanks Shamanth I am not sure whether you´ll still need this explanation of how the values of 0.8 an 0.9 account into the equation, but I had the same question after I realized that 0.8 is the highest even value the decimals can have (smallest even is 0.2) and 0.9 is the highest odd value the decimal can have (smallest odd is 0.1). By using these figures in the equation one will be able to compute for highest /lowest possible value At leat thats how I understood it Manager Joined: 07 Jan 2010 Posts: 143 Location: So. CA WE 1: 2 IT WE 2: 4 Software Analyst Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 23 Mar 2013, 13:00 souvik101990 wrote: Assume T = (1.a, 1.b,...etc) All units equal 1.xx. E = 40 (due to rounding of ten even and 20 odd) S max = 30 + 10(.8) + 20(.9) = 56 S min = 30 + 10(.2) + 20(.1) = 34 E-S min = 40 - 56 = -16 E-S max = 40 - 34 = 6 Thus, the min/max of E is -16 and 6, so I , II apply. For (III. 10) to be true, S min/max in our equation above needs to equal 30. This is impossible since the question states T consists of 30 positive decimals. Therefore eliminate III. To clarify, when you got E = 40 1.xxx rounded up, 2 x 10 (even) = 20 1.xxx rounded down, 1 x 20 (odd) = 20 is that correct? Manager Joined: 07 Feb 2011 Posts: 105 Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 25 Mar 2013, 04:00 2 This post received KUDOS Damn this is OG. Seems fair once I read the solution but God forbid I get a problem like this on a test XD Key Deduction is to figure out this is a range problem and how to min and max like Karishma said _________________ We appreciate your kudos' Intern Joined: 15 Nov 2013 Posts: 2 Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 15 Nov 2013, 04:27 31 This post received KUDOS 29 This post was BOOKMARKED Ok, so I don't normally post here, but one of my private tutoring students pointed me to this thread. So yeah, there are a lot of words in this problem, and it looks complicated. And if you actually start thinking about "E" and "S" separately -- as most people on this thread seem to be doing -- then it becomes quite complicated indeed. But ... we don't care about E, and we don't care about S. We care about E - S. That's a HUGE difference. (Analogy: I drive my car 54 miles. Do you know the starting odometer mileage? Nope. Do you know the ending odometer mileage? Nope. Do you know the difference between them? Yep, 54 miles.) What affects E - S? To figure that out, temporarily forget that there are 30 numbers, and pretend there's just 1 number. * If the number is rounded up, then E - S is positive. It's the amount by which the number is rounded up. (If you round 14.87 up to 15, then E - S is 0.13.) * If the number is rounded down, then E - S is negative. It's the amount by which the number is rounded down. (If you round 14.77 down to 14, then E - S is -0.77.) Thinking this way, we can see that it's a waste of time to consider the "integer part" at all. If you round 14.87 up to 15, or 99.87 up to 100, or anything point 87 up to the next integer, you're still looking at +0.13. Now that we know that, things are more transparent. * 10 numbers are rounded up. The most by which they can be rounded up is just barely less than 1 each (if you start with x.00001 type thing). The least by which they can be rounded up is just barely more than 0.1 each (if you start with x.89999 type thing). * 20 numbers are rounded down. The most by which they can be rounded down is just barely less than 1 each (if you start with x.99999 type thing). The least by which they can be rounded down is 0.1 each (if you start with x.1). To make E - S as big as possible, make the positive contributions as big as possible: 10 * (approximately +1) = approximately +10. Make the negative contributions as small as possible: 20 * -0.1 = -2. So, the maximum value of E - S is somewhere around 8. To make E - S as small as possible, make the positive contributions as small as possible: 10 * (approximately 0.1) = approximately +1. Make the negative contributions as big as possible: 20 * (approximately 1) = approximately -20. So, the minimum value of E - S is somewhere around -19. There you go. The point here is that you should think about whatever the problem actually asks you for. In those terms, it sounds stupidly simple, but look at what's happening in this thread -- everyone is thinking separately about E and S, even though we only care about E - S. (Think about the odometer.) Oops. Focus! This idea is even more important on data sufficiency problems. (If a data sufficiency problem asks for something minus something else, and you try to find the individual values of "something" and "something else" rather than just finding the difference, you're practically certain to get the problem wrong, even if your math is all correct.) -- Ron Purewal ManhattanGMAT Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur. Yves Saint-Laurent Intern Joined: 02 Jan 2014 Posts: 12 Schools: INSEAD Jan '15 Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 15 Jan 2014, 18:39 5 This post received KUDOS 8 This post was BOOKMARKED I found the responses in this question very helpful, but I think I found another way to explain it that I can understand better... hopefully someone finds this useful someday. ** As the question ask for the difference between S and E, the actual "integer" portions are negligible as they will cancel each other out in the minus (-) operation (e.g. 15.9 - 15 = 0.9) . If it helps in understanding, we can also assume that all numbers in the list T are 0.xxxx (as the minus operation cancels the "integer" portion anyway). Let's recap: S = Real sum E = Estimated sum, 10 are rounded up, 20 are rounded down We can also first establish that there is only one value of E, as we are given in the question that 10 of them WILL be rounded up, and 20 WILL be rounded down. There is no Emax or Emin. To solve for E and assuming that numbers in list T are 0.xxx as per above point, E = 10 x (T values rounded up) + 20 x (T values rounded down) = 10 x (0.2) + 20 x (0.9) --> doesnt matter what the values are, they can be any even / odd combinations at the tenth = 10 x (1) + 20 x (0), after performing round up/down operations = 10 There are however Smax and Smin, as these are possible ranges prior to the round up/down operations. Smax = 10 x (maximum even tenth) + 20 x (maximum odd tenth) = 10 x (0.8) + 20 x (0.9) = 8 + 18 = 26 Smin = 10 x (minimum even tenth) + 20 x (minimum odd tenth) = 10 x (0.2) + 20 x (0.1) = 2 + 2 = 4 The largest range of E - S is therefore E - Smin = 10 - 4 = -6 The lowest range of E - S is therefore E - Smax = 10 - 26 = -16 Unlike some contributions here, I found it absolutely necessary to solve for E and S. The previous solution by RonPurewal looks sound, but when you look closer, it assumes that E - S = (10 round up values - 20 round down values), which is not true, and therefore the answers are not exactly to the range given by the question. The full algebraic equation of his solution should have been: - Largest range of E - S = (10x round up + 20x round down) - (10x Minimum round up + 20x minimum round down) - Lowest range of E - S = (10x round up + 20x round down) - (10x Maximum round up + 20x maximum round down) Essentially calling for the need to resolve for E and S individually, eventually. I apolgise if I sound rude - its 130am in the morning and I had just spent an hour just analyzing just this question alone, and my heart hurts! Irregardless, I have learn plenty just by analyzing everyone's solution to help me arrive to this way of looking into this problem. Many thanks! Intern Joined: 10 Jan 2014 Posts: 4 Location: India Concentration: General Management, Operations GMAT Date: 12-06-2014 GPA: 3.61 WE: Engineering (Computer Hardware) Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Jan 2014, 08:22 2 This post received KUDOS 1 This post was BOOKMARKED The two extremes can be calculated as: 1. Highest tenths place 0.9 and 0.8 so E = S +(10*0.2 - 20*0.9) >>>> Change from 0.1 to 1 is 0.2(increase) & 0.9 to 0 is 0.9(decreased) = S +(2-18) E-S = -16 2. Lowest tenths place 0.1 & 0.2 >>>> Change from 0.2 to 1 is 0.8 & 0.1 to 0 is 0.1 so E = S+(10*0.8 - 20*.2) E -S = (8-2) E-S = 6 Hence answer is B!! Intern Joined: 04 Feb 2014 Posts: 18 Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Mar 2014, 11:09 This question is pure evil Intern Joined: 04 Feb 2014 Posts: 18 Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Mar 2014, 11:31 Schawjibb wrote: IMO, the best solution is shown by M Dabral of GMAT Quantum in one of its video explanations. Here is the link: http://www.gmatquantum.com/og13/218-pro ... ition.html Although NOT most of GMAT Quantum's video explanations/solutions are up to the par, I found that this one along with some others (e.g., PS 178) is the best video explanation floating out there in the internet. it only explains the E i dont understand how he moved to S Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor Joined: 16 Oct 2010 Posts: 7443 Location: Pune, India Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink] ### Show Tags 31 Mar 2014, 20:40 1 This post received KUDOS Expert's post kedusei wrote: it only explains the E i dont understand how he moved to S Try out the solution given here: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/01 ... -the-gmat/ _________________ Karishma Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor My Blog Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 07 Aug 2013
Posts: 1
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, International Business
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

02 Sep 2014, 03:29
Let the number with even tenths place be denoted by x and the number with odd tenths place digit by y.

We can further split these decimals into their integer and decimal parts denoted by x(i) and x(d) respectively.
Similarly, y can be split and written as y(i) and y(d).

Now, according to question,
-------------->>>>> S = x(i) + x(d) + y(i) + y(d) ........................... (1)

And, since E comprises only of the integer values
-------------->>>> E = x(i) +10 + y(i) ............................(2) { because, the number with even tenths place digit is rounded up
and the number with odd tenths place digit is rounded down }

Now, from (1) and (2)
E - S = x(i) +10 + y(i) - { x(i) + x(d) + y(i) + y(d) }
= 10- { x(d) + y(d) }

Therefore, the final value is always going to be less than 10, and there are only two options in the question that support this result .

Please let me know if there is any problem with this approach.
Intern
Joined: 01 Jan 2014
Posts: 6
Location: United States
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2014, 15:45
shamanth25 wrote:
List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an integer, and the sum of the 30 decimals is S. The estimated sum of the 30 decimals, E, is defined as follows. Each decimal in T whose tenths digit is even is rounded up to the nearest integer, and each decimal in T whose tenths digits is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer. If 1/3 of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even, which of the following is a possible value of E - S ?

I. -16
II. 6
III. 10

A. I only
B. I and II only
C. I and III only
D. II and III only
E. I, II, and III

Please let me know if it is correct!
Thanks.
OA is B.
My approach:

a. Since 1./3rd of the decimals in T have a tenths digit that is even, those will be rounded "up" to the nearest integer.
Example: 3.67 will be rounded up to 4; 5.28 to 6.

b. But since each decimal in T whose tenths digits is odd is rounded down to the nearest integer, it will look like:
5.37 rounded down to 5.
7.99 to 7.

from point (a), it is clear that the estimated sum of 1/3rd (10) of the decimals in the list T will exceed by 10, thus increasing the actual summation by 10.
So, E is always greater that S (E>S) by 10, i.e. E-S>0 Always

This made me eliminate the negative result of E-S.
So, the answer can be 6 and 10. (B)
Veritas Prep GMAT Instructor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 7443
Location: Pune, India
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

03 Sep 2014, 21:55
Sen1120 wrote:

from point (a), it is clear that the estimated sum of 1/3rd (10) of the decimals in the list T will exceed by 10, thus increasing the actual summation by 10.
So, E is always greater that S (E>S) by 10, i.e. E-S>0 Always

This made me eliminate the negative result of E-S.
So, the answer can be 6 and 10. (B)

Not correct. E - S can be negative.
Answer can be -16 and 6 but not 10 which is (B).

Please look at the explanation given here: http://www.veritasprep.com/blog/2014/01 ... -the-gmat/
_________________

Karishma
Veritas Prep | GMAT Instructor
My Blog

Get started with Veritas Prep GMAT On Demand for \$199

Veritas Prep Reviews

Intern
Joined: 10 Sep 2014
Posts: 5
Schools: LBS '18
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an [#permalink]

### Show Tags

24 Sep 2014, 17:17
souvik101990 wrote:
Assume T = (1.a, 1.b,...etc) All units equal 1.xx.
E = 40 (due to rounding of ten even and 20 odd)
S max = 30 + 10(.8) + 20(.9) = 56
S min = 30 + 10(.2) + 20(.1) = 34

E-S min = 40 - 56 = -16
E-S max = 40 - 34 = 6
Thus, the min/max of E is -16 and 6, so I , II apply.

For (III. 10) to be true, S min/max in our equation above needs to equal 30. This is impossible since the question states T consists of 30 positive decimals. Therefore eliminate III.

You're missing something here, Souvik. First of all, I approached this differently than you, although that doesn't matter. I first looked at the differential irrespective of S. E is either going to be a net (+) or (-) based on the observations' tenth's-digits, and the magnitude of gain due to rounding.

BUT! (x.2) doesn't represent the maximum net gain from an even tenth's-digit rounded up to the nearest integer, (x.0) does.
Thus,
delta-E(max) = 10(1) - 20(.1) = 8 (=E-S max)
delta-E(min) = 10(.2) - 20(.9) = (-16) (=E-S min)

Inconsequential in the scheme of the answer choices, but something worth noting.

Cheers!
Re: List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an   [#permalink] 24 Sep 2014, 17:17

Go to page    1   2   3    Next  [ 60 posts ]

Similar topics Replies Last post
Similar
Topics:
7 A reading list for a certain course consists of 10 books, of which 4 a 10 31 May 2017, 19:02
17 Which of the following is/are terminating decimal(s)? 10 09 Nov 2016, 15:37
58 List S consists of 10 consecutive odd integers, and list T 19 23 Jun 2017, 09:52
17 The list shown consist of the times, in seconds, that it 14 13 Jul 2016, 18:24
8 The list shown consist of the times, in seconds, that it 7 22 Jan 2016, 07:54
Display posts from previous: Sort by

# List T consist of 30 positive decimals, none of which is an

 new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics

 Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group and phpBB SEO Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.