Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 13:53 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 13:53
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,061
 [85]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
77
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,061
 [55]
23
Kudos
Add Kudos
30
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Mo2men
Joined: 26 Mar 2013
Last visit: 09 May 2023
Posts: 2,439
Own Kudos:
1,478
 [42]
Given Kudos: 641
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Products:
Schools: Erasmus (II)
Posts: 2,439
Kudos: 1,478
 [42]
37
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
avatar
mvrravikanth
Joined: 08 Apr 2014
Last visit: 05 Dec 2017
Posts: 15
Own Kudos:
63
 [18]
Location: United States
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GPA: 4
Posts: 15
Kudos: 63
 [18]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello,

I solved the question via A.P(Arithmetic progression)

The minimum three digit number divisible by 7 is 105 and maximum number is 994.
Hence,a=105,d=7,l=994
l=a+(n-1)d;
994=105+(n-1)7
by solving,we get
n=128.

Hope it helps!

Thanks.
avatar
DudeYou
Joined: 05 Dec 2013
Last visit: 17 Jun 2016
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2
Products:
Posts: 17
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I see most of the folks have quickly calculated 105 and 994 to be divisible by 7. I understand that its doable by simply checking numbers one by one, but is there an alternate way to do this ?
For example -- Find the first number divisible by 7 between 211 and 300 ?
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
778,061
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,061
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Randude
I see most of the folks have quickly calculated 105 and 994 to be divisible by 7. I understand that its doable by simply checking numbers one by one, but is there an alternate way to do this ?
For example -- Find the first number divisible by 7 between 211 and 300 ?

210 = 7*30, so the next number divisible by 7 is 210 + 7 = 217.
User avatar
itisSheldon
Joined: 03 Mar 2018
Last visit: 26 Jan 2022
Posts: 161
Own Kudos:
669
 [2]
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 161
Kudos: 669
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rohitsaxena00
Bunuel
Official Solution:

How many of the three-digit numbers are divisible by 7?

A. 105
B. 106
C. 127
D. 128
E. 142


Approach One: Divide all of the three-digit numbers \(999 - 100 + 1 = 900\)(Don't forget to add 1 to get the number of all the 3-digit numbers) by 7, which is 128.57, and then round it off to 128.

Approach Two: Find the first and the last multiples of 7 WITHIN the range (which is between 105 and 994). Find the positive difference, divide by 7, and add 1:
\(\frac{994-105}{7}+1=128\)


Answer: D

Hi Bunuel,

Although I solved this question using approach 2 and got it correct, I would prefer to use the Approach 1 as advised by you as it is a shorter method to solve the same.

But I have a doubt regd Approach 1:
1) In approach 1 should we ALWAYS first add 1 and then divide by 7 (or whatever number's multiple we have to find out)?
2) In approach 1 should we ALWAYS round off the resultant number to a smaller number as done in this case or does it change in certain cases?

Basically will approach one work the same way in all such type of questions no matter what range and what number's multiple we have to find out?
I have the same doubt as rohit. Approach 2 works all the time, there is no doubt on its credibility. But approach 1 is much more quicker than approach 2(since we dont need to find 1st and last terms). If the answer choices are not close we can safely use Approach 1(if 127 is not given as an option). Due to the glitches in approach 1, as explained by kyles in this thread, we cannot always use Approach 1.

chetan2u / Bunuel
Please corroborate my opinion regarding approach 1
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 11,238
Own Kudos:
43,696
 [4]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,238
Kudos: 43,696
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
itisSheldon
rohitsaxena00
Bunuel
Official Solution:

How many of the three-digit numbers are divisible by 7?

A. 105
B. 106
C. 127
D. 128
E. 142


Approach One: Divide all of the three-digit numbers \(999 - 100 + 1 = 900\)(Don't forget to add 1 to get the number of all the 3-digit numbers) by 7, which is 128.57, and then round it off to 128.

Approach Two: Find the first and the last multiples of 7 WITHIN the range (which is between 105 and 994). Find the positive difference, divide by 7, and add 1:
\(\frac{994-105}{7}+1=128\)


Answer: D

Hi Bunuel,

Although I solved this question using approach 2 and got it correct, I would prefer to use the Approach 1 as advised by you as it is a shorter method to solve the same.

But I have a doubt regd Approach 1:
1) In approach 1 should we ALWAYS first add 1 and then divide by 7 (or whatever number's multiple we have to find out)?
2) In approach 1 should we ALWAYS round off the resultant number to a smaller number as done in this case or does it change in certain cases?

Basically will approach one work the same way in all such type of questions no matter what range and what number's multiple we have to find out?
I have the same doubt as rohit. Approach 2 works all the time, there is no doubt on its credibility. But approach 1 is much more quicker than approach 2(since we dont need to find 1st and last terms). If the answer choices are not close we can safely use Approach 1(if 127 is not given as an option). Due to the glitches in approach 1, as explained by kyles in this thread, we cannot always use Approach 1.

chetan2u / Bunuel
Please corroborate my opinion regarding approach 1


Hi...
ADDING 1 is an important aspect and can give you a wrong answer at times..
Rounding off is to lower INTEGER..
What are these DECIMALS- they give you the remainder..

Why adding 1 is important?
Say we have to find multiples of 10 in 3-digit numbers.
If you write 999-100=899.. divide by 10 --- 89.9, so 89..
But that's not correct.. Ans is 90.... 999-100+1=900

Now where can you go WRONG by using approacch 1..
When the numbers on either end are div by that number..
Say number of multiple of 10 between 100 and 200..
Approach 1 ..
200-100+1=101....
. 101/10=10.1~10
But multiples are 100,110,120,130,140,150,160,170,180,190,200=11
Here actually approach 1 becomes 2 and answer should be (200-100)/10 +1=10+1=11
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
7,510
 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,510
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
How many of the three-digit numbers are divisible by 7?

A. 105
B. 106
C. 127
D. 128
E. 142
Another approach: This one starts with the realization that there are 900 three-digit numbers. After that, mental math can get us the answer quickly and cleanly. It may not be evident how many times 7 goes into 900 evenly, but we should know that 7 goes into 700 exactly 100 times. With the bulk of the 900 numbers out of the way, we just have to figure out how many times 7 goes into the remaining 200 numbers evenly. Rather than labor over the exact answer, we can see that 7 would fit into 210 exactly 30 times. But 700 (100 sevens) + 210 (30 sevens) = 910 (130 sevens), and we have no more than 900 numbers to work with instead. From 910, just subtract one 7 at a time until the number falls at or below 900: 910 - 7 = 903; 903 - 7 = 896. Since we had 130 sevens that fit into 910 numbers and needed to take away two sevens to give us a valid number, we know that 130 - 2 sevens, or 128 sevens, will be our answer. (D) it is, then. To recap:

* There are 900 three-digit numbers.

\(700/7=100\) (sevens)

\(210/7=30\) (sevens)

\(700+210=910\) (100 + 30 = 130 sevens)

\(910-2(7)=896\) (130 - 2 = 128 sevens)

This problem (or one similar to it, asking about a different divisor) can be broken down easily in under a minute, and nothing beats knowing your answer is correct.

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
User avatar
EyeSeaMe
Joined: 19 May 2021
Last visit: 09 Jun 2025
Posts: 8
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Given Kudos: 214
Location: India
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
WE:Operations (Transportation)
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V27
Posts: 8
Kudos: 2
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
Bunuel
How many of the three-digit numbers are divisible by 7?

A. 105
B. 106
C. 127
D. 128
E. 142
Another approach: This one starts with the realization that there are 900 three-digit numbers. After that, mental math can get us the answer quickly and cleanly. It may not be evident how many times 7 goes into 900 evenly, but we should know that 7 goes into 700 exactly 100 times. With the bulk of the 900 numbers out of the way, we just have to figure out how many times 7 goes into the remaining 200 numbers evenly. Rather than labor over the exact answer, we can see that 7 would fit into 210 exactly 30 times. But 700 (100 sevens) + 210 (30 sevens) = 910 (130 sevens), and we have no more than 900 numbers to work with instead. From 910, just subtract one 7 at a time until the number falls at or below 900: 910 - 7 = 903; 903 - 7 = 896. Since we had 130 sevens that fit into 910 numbers and needed to take away two sevens to give us a valid number, we know that 130 - 2 sevens, or 128 sevens, will be our answer. (D) it is, then. To recap:

* There are 900 three-digit numbers.

\(700/7=100\) (sevens)

\(210/7=30\) (sevens)

\(700+210=910\) (100 + 30 = 130 sevens)

\(910-2(7)=896\) (130 - 2 = 128 sevens)

This problem (or one similar to it, asking about a different divisor) can be broken down easily in under a minute, and nothing beats knowing your answer is correct.

Good luck with your studies.

- Andrew

I completely concur with your method AndrewN, it is a foolproof method. Folks, if you understand this method, then this method will also help you to gain confidence in the Number Properties topic.

I followed the same reasoning, with a slightly different approach as follows -

Last 2 digit number which is divisible by 7 = 98 (14 x 7)

First 3 digit number which is divisible by 7 = 105 (15 x 7) OR (98 + 7)

To find the last 3 digit number without multiple trials and errors, we know that it will be some number between 990 - 999

So, by splitting a value greater than 900 and between 990 - 999 that is divisible by 7, we get -

700 + 98 + 98 + 98 = 994 (Last number)

We can then solve the remaining part using Bunuel method OR we can reason as follows-

The last 3 digit number which is divisible by 7 = 994,

So 994/7 = 142. This means that the number 7 is added 142 times.

This also means that the first number in this series will be the number 7, which is a one-digit number as well as, other 2-digit numbers which are multiples of 7. But the question stem specifically asks for 3-digit numbers.

So, excluding all 1-digit and 2-digit numbers i.e numbers less than 100. There are 14 such numbers (14 x7 = 98).

Hence, 142 (Multiples of 7 less than 1000) - 14 (Multiples of 7 less than 100) = 128.

This reasoning looks difficult to comprehend at first, but it will definitely help us in getting better with our intuition while solving number property questions.

I hope it helps!
User avatar
BottomJee
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2019
Last visit: 09 Jun 2025
Posts: 996
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,009
Affiliations: GMAT Club
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 1: 430 Q31 V19
GMAT 2: 570 Q44 V25
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
GPA: 3.26
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V81 DI82
GMAT 3: 660 Q48 V33
Posts: 996
Kudos: 1,326
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,061
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have edited the question and the solution by adding more details to enhance its clarity. I hope it is now easier to understand.
avatar
MT1302
Joined: 10 Jan 2023
Last visit: 05 Dec 2024
Posts: 95
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 36
Location: India
Posts: 95
Kudos: 719
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
User avatar
ShenotShih1017
Joined: 24 Jun 2024
Last visit: 12 Dec 2024
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 17
Location: United States
Posts: 14
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There’s a formula for questions like this: #of multiples of X in a given range = [(largest multiple X in range - least multiple X in range)/ X] + 1

In this case [(994-105)/7]+1 = 128

If you didn’t know the formula this becomes much more difficult, but you could still divide 1000 by 7, and ignore the remainder to get the # of multiples of 7 <1000 = 142, then subtract the number of multiples of 7 <100 (14) to get 128.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
vn049636
Joined: 23 Dec 2021
Last visit: 17 Feb 2025
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 114
Location: India
Posts: 23
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation.
User avatar
GMAToverSanity
Joined: 17 Aug 2024
Last visit: 30 Nov 2024
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 3
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. 7 ⋅ 15 = 105 (1st term) (just by knowing multiples of 15)
2. 999/7 = 142 w/ some irrelevant remainder ⇾ 7 ⋅ 142 = last term
3. 7 ⋅ 15, 7 ⋅ 16, 7 ⋅ 17, ... 7 ⋅ 142 are all of the 3 digit multiples of 7 inclusive
4. 142-15 +1(bc/ inclusive) = 128
User avatar
satish_sahoo
Joined: 02 Jul 2023
Last visit: 21 Jul 2025
Posts: 156
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 162
Posts: 156
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Arithmetic Progression will also be an elegant solution here, we just need to realize that this will be a AP sequence

The set: \(105,...,994\)

\(\\
a_n=a+(n-1)d\\
994=105+(n-1)7\\
n=128\\
\)
User avatar
Borrat
Joined: 30 Dec 2024
Last visit: 26 Jan 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
How many positive three-digit integers are multiples of 7?

A. 105
B. 106
C. 127
D. 128
E. 142

Only on divisible by 7 is D : 12+ 2*8 = 28.
User avatar
Zosima08
User avatar
Cornell Moderator
Joined: 18 Mar 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 295
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 217
Location: United States
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q80 V84 DI81
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution - it’s helpful.
User avatar
akshayjain0927
Joined: 18 Oct 2024
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 8
Location: India
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I like the solution - it’s helpful.
 1   2   
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
Founder
42382 posts