donkadsw
Hi Mike,
Question #2 on the quiz on page 50:
Attributing the unprecedented drought to changes in the solar cycle, the research team failed to account for/take account of the influence of any terrestrial culprits, namely our destruction of rainforests and our unbridled consumption of gasoline.
The answer key says that 'account for' is the right one. I wonder how. The meaning of the sentence is that the terrestrial culprits too have caused changes in the solar cycle, a point missed to be noted by the research team. In that case, shouldn't the correct answer be 'take account of'?
'account for' means reason for an event. So by using 'account for' in that slot, the sentence wrongly conveys the meaning that the research team is after the reasons for the influence of the terrestrial culprits. Isn't it? Am I wrongly interpreting this? Please kindly help me see the difference between 'account for' and 'take account of'!
Thanks very much.
Dear
donkadsw,
I'm happy to help.
The answer given in the text is correct.
to take account of =
to notice, to acknowledgeto account for =
to give an explanation for, to include in one's explanatory schemeIf we said "...
the research team failed to take account of the influence of ..." , this means the team didn't notice the influence, was not aware its existence. This is not quite the intended meaning.
If we said "...
the research team failed to account for the influence of ..." , this means they did not include these influences as part of their explanation. This is the meaning of the sentence.
Does this make sense?
Mike