aditijain1507
egmat In option A, it tells us that the city does not any new label to identify recycled products, isn't that a good enough reason to strengthen the fact that the book will not increase sales?
GMATNinja GMATNinja2
ExpertsGlobal5 Let's start by nailing down the author's conclusion: "consumer advocates predict that the book will not lead to a significant
increase in Caliovia in the use of products containing
recycled materials."
Note that the author reaches this conclusion
despite some evidence to the contrary. More specifically, the following are some reasons we might
expect an increase in "the use of products containing recycled materials":
- "Many Caliovian consumers are committed to using products containing recycled materials"
- A book will be published with a comprehensive listing of the goods sold in Caliovia that "contain recycled materials."
Yet despite all that, the author still thinks there will NOT be an increase in the "use of products containing recycled materials." Our job is to strengthen this prediction.
Let's now consider (A):
Quote:
Which of the following, if true, provides the best grounds for the consumer advocates' prediction?
(A) Caliovia does not require product labels to specify whether the product contains recycled materials.
We are trying to
strengthen the conclusion that there will NOT be an increase in the "use of products containing recycled materials,"
despite the fact that a book will be published that lists all the products with recycled materials. How does (A) impact this conclusion?
Well, the book
on its own should allow consumers to identify products with recycled materials. So it doesn't matter whether or not the products have labels "to specify whether the product contains recycled materials," because these products should
already be listed in the book.
In other words, even if the consumer products don't have these special labels, we'd still expect the book to allow consumers to identify which products have recycled materials. And as a result, it would still be reasonable to expect that use of products with recycled materials would
increase. Since it doesn't strengthen the argument that use of products with recycled materials will NOT increase, we can eliminate (A).
Let's consider (B):
Quote:
(B) For the most frequently purchased product types listed in the book, all the brands available in Caliovia contain recycled materials.
If the most frequently listed products in the book all have recycled materials, then the book wouldn't provide a
reason to choose one brand over another. In other words, no matter what brand you choose, you'd still be buying something with recycled products.
So if (B) were true, the book would NOT affect what products consumers buy, since it would NOT provide a reason to buy one brand over another. And if the book does not affect consumers' behavior, it probably won't cause an
increase in the use of products containing recycled materials.
Because (B) strengthens the argument, it's correct.
I hope that helps!