BradyMVP wrote:
EMPOWERgmatVerbal wrote:
Hello Everyone!
Let's tackle this question, one thing at a time, and narrow down our options quickly so we know how to answer questions like this when they pop up on the GMAT! To begin, let's take a quick look at the question and highlight any major differences between the options in orange:
Many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries.
(A) Many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries.
(B) Chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with many hundreds of monasteries.
(C) Hundreds of monasteries, many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, are dotting the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia.
(D) The mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries, many of which are chiseled from solid rock centuries ago.
(E) The mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries, many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago.
After a quick glance over the options, there are a few things we can focus on:
1. Modifier Placement/Agreement
2. Verb Tense & Meaning: are dotted / are dotting ; chiseled / are chiseled
3. hundreds / many hundreds
Whenever you see an entire sentence underlined, it's a good sign that modifiers are one of the major problems! Let's make sure the modifier is placed next to its antecedent. To start, we need to ask ourselves the following question:
WHAT was chiseled out of solid rock centuries ago? --> Monasteries
Let's see how our options stack up:
(A) Many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries.
(B) Chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with many hundreds of monasteries.
(C) Hundreds of monasteries, many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, are dotting the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia.
(D) The mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries, many of which are chiseled from solid rock centuries ago.
(E) The mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries, many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago.
We can eliminate options A & B because the modifier is modifying "the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia" rather than the monasteries.
Now that we have it down to 3 options, let's tackle #2 on our list, which focuses mainly on verb tense/usage:
(C) Hundreds of monasteries, many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago, are dotting the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia.
This is INCORRECT because "are dotting" means that monasteries are still being built today, which isn't true.
(D) The mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries, many of which are chiseled from solid rock centuries ago.
This is also INCORRECT because the present tense "are chiseled" doesn't work when talking about something that happened centuries ago!
(E) The mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are dotted with hundreds of monasteries, many of them chiseled from solid rock centuries ago.
This is CORRECT because it's okay to say that Ethiopia is still dotted with monasteries, and it also clearly shows that they were "chiseled" in the past.
There you have it - option E is the correct choice! By focusing on common problems you find on the GMAT when the entire sentence is underlined, we were able to eliminate problematic options quickly and get to the correct one even quicker!
Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
Maybe I’m over analyzing but isn’t it somewhat difficult to tell what “them” is referencing here? Is them referencing the “mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia“ or the “hundreds of monasteries”. I know that since monasteries is the closest plural noun it is still grammatically correct but it does seem like a bit of pronoun ambiguity for an official question. That said, no other answer choice conveys a grammatically logical answer. D comes close however!
Thoughts on the usage of “them” here?
Hello,
Thank you for posting the question. Let me try and help you out!
The Important thing first. Let’s start by looking at the intended logical meaning.
The sentence starts by talking about somethings that are chiseled from solid rock centuries ago. From the way the sentence is formed it seems that the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are chiseled from solid rock. These regions also have many scattered monasteries.
Now, what does chiseled mean? It means to cut in shape. It is illogical to say that the mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are cut out in shape from solid rock. The regions cannot be shaped from rocks. This meaning is nonsensical. In fact the logical intended meaning is that the monasteries are cut out in shape from these solid rocks.
Before answering your doubt lets talk a little about pronoun ambiguity.
Let's take one example
In the accident, the car hit the tree, but its engine was not damaged.
Now here grammatically 'it' can refer to both car and tree. But can we say the engine of the tree was not damaged? No, this is nonsensical. Only the car can have an engine right?
So its true that the pronoun should have one antecedent but it must be logical also. Hence when a pronoun is used you can replace the possible antecedent with that pronoun and see if it is logical or not. If you have more than one logical antecedent for a pronoun, then it is said to be ambiguous.
As explained in the meaning analysis it is illogical to say mountainous regions of northern Ethiopia are chiseled from solid rock.
Therefore 'them' logically only refers to 'monstaries'. There is no ambiguity there.
I hope this helps
Thanks
Anmol