Dear Friends,
Here is a detailed explanation to this question-
Bunuel
Many utilities obtain most of their electric power from large coal and nuclear operations at costs that are sometimes
two to three times higher as that of power from smaller, more efficient plants that can both make use of waste heat and take advantage of the current abundance of natural gas.
(A) two to three times higher as that of power from smaller, more efficient plants that can both
(B) higher by two to three times as that from smaller, more efficient plants that both can
(C) two to three times higher than those for power from smaller, more efficient plants that can both
(D) between two to three times higher as those for power from smaller, more efficient plants that both can
(E) between two to three times higher than from smaller, more efficient plants that they can both
(SC01077)
Meaning is crucial to solving this problem:Understanding the intended meaning is key to solving this question; the intended meaning of the crucial part of this sentence is that the costs of electric power from large coal and nuclear operations are two to three times higher than those for power from plants that are smaller and more efficient and can make use of waste heat and take advantage of the current abundance of natural gas.
Concepts tested here: Meaning + Pronouns + Parallelism + Idioms + Awkwardness/Redundancy• Comparison markers such as "more" and "less" ("higher" in this case) must have a logical sequence with "than"; in a comparison, "more/less...than" is the idiomatic construction.
• “both A and B" or "A as well as B" are the correct usages; A and B must be parallel and comparable.
A:1/ This answer choice incorrectly refers to the plural noun "costs" with the singular pronoun "that".
2/ Option A incorrectly uses the unidiomatic construction "higher as"; remember, comparison markers such as "more" and "less" ("higher" in this case) must have a logical sequence with "than"; in a comparison, "more/less...than" is the idiomatic construction.
B:1/ This answer choice incorrectly refers to the plural noun "costs" with the singular pronoun "that".
2/ Option B incorrectly uses the unidiomatic construction "higher...as"; remember, comparison markers such as "more" and "less" ("higher" in this case) must have a logical sequence with "than"; in a comparison, "more/less...than" is the idiomatic construction.
3/ Option B fails to maintain parallelism between A ("can make use of waste heat") and B ("take advantage of the current abundance of natural gas") in the idiomatic construction "both A and B"; remember, “both A and B" or "A as well as B" are the correct usages; A and B must be parallel and comparable.
4/ Option B uses the needlessly wordy phrase "higher by two to three times", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.
C: Correct.1/ This answer choice uses the phrase "plants that can both", conveying the intended meaning - that the costs of electric power from large coal and nuclear operations are two to three times higher than those for power from plants that are smaller and more efficient and can make use of waste heat and take advantage of the current abundance of natural gas.
2/ Option C correctly refers to the plural noun "costs" with the plural pronoun "those".
3/ Option C correctly uses the idiomatic construction "higher than".
4/ Option C maintains parallelism between A ("make use of waste heat") and B ("take advantage of the current abundance of natural gas") in the idiomatic construction "both A and B".
5/ Option C is free of any awkwardness or redundancy.
D:1/ This answer choice incorrectly uses the unidiomatic construction "higher as"; remember, comparison markers such as "more" and "less" ("higher" in this case) must have a logical sequence with "than"; in a comparison, "more/less...than" is the idiomatic construction.
2/ Option D fails to maintain parallelism between A ("can make use of waste heat") and B ("take advantage of the current abundance of natural gas") in the idiomatic construction "both A and B"; remember, “both A and B" or "A as well as B" are the correct usages; A and B must be parallel and comparable.
3/ Option D uses the needlessly wordy phrase "between two to three times higher", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.
E:1/ This answer choice alters the meaning of the sentence through the phrase "plants that they can both"; the construction of this phrase leads to an incoherent meaning; the intended meaning is that the costs of electric power from large coal and nuclear operations are two to three times higher than those for power from plants that are smaller and more efficient and can make use of waste heat and take advantage of the current abundance of natural gas.
2/ Option E uses the needlessly wordy phrase "between two to three times higher", leading to awkwardness and redundancy.
Hence, C is the best answer choice.All the best!
Experts' Global Team