Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 20:11 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 20:11
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
shoonya
Joined: 06 Jul 2004
Last visit: 18 Mar 2008
Posts: 164
Own Kudos:
1,064
 [330]
Location: united states
Posts: 164
Kudos: 1,064
 [330]
18
Kudos
Add Kudos
310
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
daagh
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Last visit: 16 Oct 2020
Posts: 5,264
Own Kudos:
42,417
 [49]
Given Kudos: 422
Status: enjoying
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 5,264
Kudos: 42,417
 [49]
35
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ashkrs
Joined: 08 Jun 2007
Last visit: 21 Feb 2019
Posts: 282
Own Kudos:
340
 [33]
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
Posts: 282
Kudos: 340
 [33]
13
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
michaelny2001
Joined: 02 Feb 2007
Last visit: 18 Apr 2008
Posts: 65
Own Kudos:
40
 [27]
Posts: 65
Kudos: 40
 [27]
25
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i think the best explanation for this question is to look at the meaning of the sentence. Requirements and application cannot be costly. Only the irrigation can, therefore right away you eliminate A, B, C and D, leaving you with E, which is the correct answer.
General Discussion
User avatar
stringworm
Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Last visit: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
104
 [1]
Posts: 48
Kudos: 104
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.

(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties

(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation

(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties

(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties

(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties

OA=E

Q: I understand "and" is a conjunction joining the two, but still everything I've read says that "that," "which," and "who," refer back to the noun or noun phrase directly preceding it. Therefore, allowing the plural "were" means this whole idea of the relative pronoun only being able to encapsulate the directly proceeding noun or noun phrase is totally out the window is it not???
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 610
Own Kudos:
682
 [9]
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 610
Kudos: 682
 [9]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stringworm
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties.

(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high-yielding varieties

(B) requirements by earlier high-yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation

(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high-yielding varieties

(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high-yielding varieties

(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high-yielding varieties

OA=E

Q: I understand "and" is a conjunction joining the two, but still everything I've read says that "that," "which," and "who," refer back to the noun or noun phrase directly preceding it. Therefore, allowing the plural "were" means this whole idea of the relative pronoun only being able to encapsulate the directly proceeding noun or noun phrase is totally out the window is it not???
A relative pronoun can refer to the noun, or the noun phrase, before it. Occasionally, it's not clear whether a modifier is referring to the single noun or to the entire noun phrase that precedes it. For instance,

"The policies of the so-called 'purple' faction of the government, renowned for byzantine complexity..." would probably not be correct on the GMAT because it's unclear whether the modifier 'renowned for corruption' could be modifying the policies, faction, or government.

However, if a modifier can only apply grammatically to a single part of the noun phrase, then there is no ambiguity. "The policies of the so-called 'purple' faction of the government, renowned for their byzantine complexity..." could be considered right, because the word 'their' in the modifier unmistakably refers to the plural noun 'policies' at the very beginning of the long prepositional noun phrase. We can't possibly be confused into thinking 'their' refers to a single faction or a single government.

In choice E, the word 'were' following the word 'that' means that the relative clause MUST refer back to the plural noun at the beginning of the noun phrase--in this case, the compound subject "requirements and application."

Note that "Application.... and requirements...that were" would probably NOT be okay! In this hypothetical case, the were could refer to 'requirements' or to 'application and requirements'.

Hope this helps!
User avatar
stringworm
Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Last visit: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
Posts: 48
Kudos: 104
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thank you, that is helpful, but it leads me more to this Sentence Correction Catch-22 dilemma I constantly find myself in. Although here, I mainly want to address subject/verb agreement; you do bring up that which I also wonder about in reference to ambiguous pronouns. Often times, we say a pronoun is not ambiguous because it would not make sense otherwise. And then in another occasion, the pronoun is ambiguous because it does not make sense. I believe I have resolved this for the most part. But here, what is wrong with choice D? And based on your explanation; so can we never eliminate answer choices due to subject/verb disagreement in the presence of a "which," "that," or "who." I know that a relative pronoun can modify a noun or the whole noun phrase, but I'm very surprised that here it reaches out to two separate nouns just because it has a coordinated conjunction...but I guess that's allowed so I'll shut up now.
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 610
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 610
Kudos: 682
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
In (D), the modifier "that was required" has the singular verb 'was', so it CANNOT refer to the compound subject "Application...and irrigation." This messes up the meaning of the sentence. Also, the 'that was is still ambiguous' because the 'and' is ambiguous; in (D), it's not clear whether we're talking about the "application of [commercial fertilizer and irrigation]" or the "[application of commertical fertilizer] and irrigation.
User avatar
stringworm
Joined: 26 Apr 2011
Last visit: 25 Feb 2012
Posts: 48
Own Kudos:
104
 [2]
Posts: 48
Kudos: 104
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Take for example:

The application of red, white, and blue, which were patriotic, my mom loved.

-Here we can use the plural tense "were" to know that the author finds the colors patriotic.
(Let's just assume the country is taken over by foreigners and those colors are indeed patriotic colors as opposed to colors being patriotic).

or

The application of red, white, and blue, which was patriotic, my mom loved.

-Here we can use the singular tense "was" to know that the author found the application itself to be patriotic.

This is why I don't believe (D) is guilty of being ambiguous as you say it is. Sometimes, we use the tense to clear ambiguity and other times we say it's the cause of it...hence the grammar catch-22 I want to be debunked.
User avatar
KapTeacherEli
User avatar
Kaplan GMAT Instructor
Joined: 25 Aug 2009
Last visit: 03 Oct 2013
Posts: 610
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: Cambridge, MA
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 610
Kudos: 682
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stringworm
Take for example:

The application of red, white, and blue, which were patriotic, my mom loved.

-Here we can use the plural tense "were" to know that the author finds the colors patriotic.
(Let's just assume the country is taken over by foreigners and those colors are indeed patriotic colors as opposed to colors being patriotic).

or

The application of red, white, and blue, which was patriotic, my mom loved.

-Here we can use the singular tense "was" to know that the author found the application itself to be patriotic.

This is why I don't believe (D) is guilty of being ambiguous as you say it is. Sometimes, we use the tense to clear ambiguity and other times we say it's the cause of it...hence the grammar catch-22 I want to be debunked.
You second sentence would not be correct on the GMAT, because 'was' could refer to 'blue' or to 'application'. It would probably not be a correct answer to a GMAT question.

-Eli
User avatar
DmitryFarber
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 08 Nov 2025
Posts: 3,020
Own Kudos:
8,563
 [4]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,020
Kudos: 8,563
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
There's another problem with D. Irrigation isn't being applied. If you look at the full range of choices, "irrigation" and "application of comemrcial fertilizer" are treated as distinct elements. In both A (original) and E (correct), "irrigation" comes first. Two things are required: 1) irrigation and 2) application of commercial fertilizer, so we need "were" even without the ambiguity issue.
User avatar
alwaysnewbie
Joined: 08 Feb 2016
Last visit: 05 Nov 2016
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
183
 [9]
Given Kudos: 14
Posts: 31
Kudos: 183
 [9]
6
Kudos
Add Kudos
3
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties – this should be applicable to both "irrigation" and "application of commercial fertilizer". There is ambiguity on applicability to both the aspects
B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation – illogical meaning
C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties. – changes meaning. this should be applicable to both irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer
D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties. – "application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation", plural "were" should be used. "earlier high yielding varieties" now correctly applies to both the aspects.
E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties. – "earlier high yielding varieties" now correctly applies to both the aspects.

Thanks
User avatar
mihir0710
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 17 Jun 2016
Last visit: 23 Jan 2023
Posts: 472
Own Kudos:
994
 [1]
Given Kudos: 206
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q49 V39
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
GPA: 3.65
WE:Engineering (Energy)
Products:
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V37
Posts: 472
Kudos: 994
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties.

(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties
this option says that application of CF was done by earlier high yielding rice varieties ... This is definitely not the meaning intended...

(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
this option says "application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation" again not the intended meaning ...

(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties
Again similar to option B...application of commercial fertilize and irrigation !!!!"

(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties
"Was" is grammatically incorrect ...we need a plural verb

(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties
Was replaced by Were and Bingo ..no other errors...
avatar
neptune28
Joined: 04 Apr 2014
Last visit: 26 Sep 2023
Posts: 12
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 16
Posts: 12
Kudos: 31
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Choice E) seems kind of ambiguous as well, using costly directly in front of irrigation. That could easily mean that only the irrigation is costly, not the application of fertilizer—a change in the original meaning.

I think this is a rather poor question.
User avatar
aniket16c
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 20 Oct 2018
Last visit: 05 Feb 2024
Posts: 180
Own Kudos:
154
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: India
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GPA: 4
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 180
Kudos: 154
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shoonya
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties.

Meaning - New varieties show promise of producing high yields --> they can produce high yields without the costly required that were required by high yielding varieties. The yields were - irrigation + application of commercial fertilizer

(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties
- "requirements of irrigation" + "application ... fertilizer" = parallelism is correct
- application by earlier varieties - this gives a very funny meaning. It presents meaning as though the fertilizer is getting applied using high yielding varieties.
- Wrong

(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation
- application of (commercial fertilizer + irrigation) - ambiguity in parallelism
- "requirements of" would have been a better option
- Wrong

(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties
- "application of commercial fertilizer" is separated from "high yielding varieties" and the latter only modifies "irrigation" - Change in meaning
- Wrong

(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties
- application of (commercial fertilizer + irrigation) - ambiguity in parallelism
- If application and irrigation are considered as separate entities then "high yielding varieties" modifies only irrigation - Change in meaning
- Wrong

(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties
- "requirements of irrigation" + "application ... fertilizer" = parallelism is correct
- Both were required by "varieties" - correct modification
- Correct
User avatar
sampriya
User avatar
ISB School Moderator
Joined: 23 Nov 2018
Last visit: 25 Nov 2022
Posts: 302
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 358
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V39
GPA: 2.88
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shoonya
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties.

(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties

(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation

(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties

(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties

(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties


when we expand the option C we get

without the costly requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and application of irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties.-----> why is this wrong

why is the "requirements for application of A and application of B - of C" wrong construction? there is no ambiguity and no verb tense issue either

option C clearly states that irrigation and application of fertilizer are no more expensive requirements to the present varieties

why is option C wrong? please comment

generis, daagh, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, GMATNinja, DmitryFarber.
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [3]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sampriya
when we expand the option C we get

without the costly requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and application of irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties.-----> why is this wrong

why is the "requirements for application of A and application of B - of C" wrong construction? there is no ambiguity and no verb tense issue either

option C clearly states that irrigation and application of fertilizer are no more expensive requirements to the present varieties

why is option C wrong? please comment

generis, daagh, EMPOWERgmatVerbal, GMATNinja, DmitryFarber.
Hi sampriya,

Here is one way to take C out. Have a look option E:

the X and Y that were required by earlier varieties

This quite clearly tells us that earlier varieties required both X (costly irrigation) and Y (application of commercial fertilizer). Option C, on the other hand, leads to:

application of fertilizer and irrigation of earlier varieties

There is no to after fertilizer, so we don't have any connection between application and earlier varieties. That is, we end up with

application of fertilizer and irrigation of earlier varieties

instead of

application of fertilizer to and irrigation of earlier varieties
avatar
jayarora
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Oct 2016
Last visit: 26 Apr 2025
Posts: 163
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
GPA: 3.61
Products:
GMAT 2: 760 Q50 V44 (Online)
Posts: 163
Kudos: 237
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shoonya
New hardy varieties of rice show promise of producing high yields without the costly requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties.

(A) requirements of irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer by earlier high yielding varieties

(B) requirements by earlier high yielding varieties of application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation

(C) requirements for application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation of earlier high yielding varieties

(D) application of commercial fertilizer and irrigation that was required by earlier high yielding varieties

(E) irrigation and application of commercial fertilizer that were required by earlier high yielding varieties


https://www.nytimes.com/1984/08/14/science/new-varieties-of-hardy-rice-hold-promise.html

The new varieties promise to give high yields without the costly irrigation required by the earlier ''miracle'' rice strains developed at the International Rice Research Institute here. The new strains have not yet been tested in farmers' fields, but one particularly promising variety has produced test yields more than twice as large as those from traditional varieties.

So in the 1970's the mission of rice scientists became to develop high-yielding strains that were also resistant to disease and insect pests. That second frontier, too, was crossed, and once again the institute led the way. A strain called IR-36, the progeny of 13 different varieties from six countries, is the best example of that effort. First planted by farmers in the Philippines in 1976, IR-36 is now grown on more than 24.7 million acres of rice lands throughout the world.

Progress is likely to proceed gradually for two main reasons. First, breakthroughs inevitably become harder to come by as the work advances. Second, while the irrigated environments for earlier high-yielding varieties tend to be uniform, the adverse conditions of rain-fed areas vary tremendously. Some areas are drought-prone, but others are frequently flooded.


Choice A: Requirements were not costly. If we read literally, it sounds as if application of fertilizers was done by the high yielding varieties (HYV) themselves.
Choice B: Requirements were not costly. Application of irrigation does not make sense. One can apply fertilizer. One cannot apply irrigation.
Choice C: Requirements were not costly. 'Requirements for' seems as if the requirements were gathered to present them to the HYV. Again, Application of irrigation does not make sense.
Choice D: Again, Application of irrigation does not make sense. 'Was' does not make sense with the compound subject.
Choice E: Fixes all the problems.
avatar
saro
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 18 Apr 2015
Last visit: 31 May 2021
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 108
Location: India
Posts: 23
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Please explain option e. New varieties show promise of high yield without A and B those were required by old varieties.

That can refer to compound subject?
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,779
 [1]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,779
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
saro
Please explain option e. New varieties show promise of high yield without A and B those were required by old varieties.

That can refer to compound subject?
Check out this post and then let us know if you still have questions!
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts