May 20 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Practice the one most important Quant section  Integer Properties, and rapidly improve your skills. May 19 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Get personalized insights on how to achieve your Target Quant Score. Sunday, May 19th at 7 AM PT May 19 07:00 PM EDT  08:00 PM EDT Some of what you'll gain: Strategies and techniques for approaching featured GMAT topics. Sunday May 19th at 7 PM ET May 24 10:00 PM PDT  11:00 PM PDT Join a FREE 1day workshop and learn how to ace the GMAT while keeping your fulltime job. Limited for the first 99 registrants. May 25 07:00 AM PDT  09:00 AM PDT Attend this webinar and master GMAT SC in 10 days by learning how meaning and logic can help you tackle 700+ level SC questions with ease.
Author 
Message 
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Intern
Joined: 29 Dec 2011
Posts: 3
Concentration: Finance
GMAT 1: 710 Q48 V38 GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 3.3

On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Feb 2012, 14:32
Question Stats:
66% (02:04) correct 34% (02:05) wrong based on 707 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line? (1) xyz < 0 (2) xy < 0
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.




Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55169

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Feb 2012, 16:21
jj97cornell wrote: On a number line the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on a number line?
(1) xyz < 0 (2) xy < 0 On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?The distance between x and y is greater than the distance between \(x\) and \(z\), means that we can have one of the following four scenarios: A. yzx (YES case); B. xzy (YES case); C. yxz (NO case); D. zxy (NO case)' The question asks whether we have scenarios A or B (\(z\) lies between \(x\) and \(y\)). (1) \(xyz <0\) > either all three are negative or any two are positive and the third one is negative. If we place zero between \(y\) and \(z\) in case A (making \(y\) negative and \(x\), \(z\) positive), then the answer would be YES but if we place zero between \(y\) and \(x\) in case C, then the answer would be NO. Not sufficient. (2) \(xy<0\) > \(x\) and \(y\) have opposite signs. The same here: We can place zero between \(y\) and \(x\) in case A and the answer would be YES but we can also place zero between \(y\) and \(x\) in case C and the answer would be NO. Not sufficient. (1)+(2) Both case A (answer YES) and case C (answer NO) satisfy the statements. Not sufficient. A. y0zx (YES case) > \(xyz<0\) and \(xy<0\); C. y0xz (NO case) > \(xyz<0\) and \(xy<0\). Answer: E. Hope it's clear.
_________________




Manager
Status: Employed
Joined: 17 Nov 2011
Posts: 80
Location: Pakistan
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GPA: 3.2
WE: Business Development (Internet and New Media)

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 03 Feb 2012, 17:04
1. Statement 1 tells us that \(xyz<0\) Which basically means that either all 3 are negative or one of them is negative. We can draw two scenarios of a number line where z is between \(x\) and \(y\) and where \(z\) is on the right of \(x\) and \(y\) on the left of \(x\) and maintain the condition that all three are negative. Hence Insufficient. 2. Statement 2 tells us that \(xy<0\) Which basically means that either \(x\) is negative or \(y\) is negative. No statement about \(z\) so obviously insufficient. Now together we know that if either \(x\) or \(y\) are negative, and one of them is positive, \(z\) has to be positive. So again we draw two scenarios on the number line and we find that two cases are possible, one where \(z\) is in the middle and one where it is not. Hence both statements combined are insufficient as well. Answer. E .. I am attaching a diagram to illustrate. [img] Attachment: Number%20Line.jpg [/img]
Attachments
Number Line.jpg [ 105.17 KiB  Viewed 84939 times ]
_________________
"Nowadays, people know the price of everything, and the value of nothing." Oscar Wilde
Originally posted by omerrauf on 03 Feb 2012, 16:36.
Last edited by omerrauf on 03 Feb 2012, 17:04, edited 1 time in total.




Senior Manager
Joined: 13 Aug 2012
Posts: 418
Concentration: Marketing, Finance
GPA: 3.23

On a number line the distance between x and y is greater than th
[#permalink]
Show Tags
17 Jan 2013, 04:24
Best technique is to draw and visualize their positions in the numberline... 1. xyz < 0 Try x and y and z as all negative... <(z)x(z)y0>Just this scenario is already giving us two possibilities...INSUFFICIENT 2. xy < 0 This means x and y has opposite signs...<(z)x(z)0y> Just this scenario is already giving us two possibilities...INSUFFICIENT Now, let us combine... If x and y has opposite signs then for xyz to be negative z must be positive...scenario 1: <x0(z)y> YES z is in between scenario 2: <y0(z)x(z)> NO z is not in between STILL INSUFFICIENT Answer: E
_________________
Impossible is nothing to God.



Manager
Joined: 03 Dec 2012
Posts: 195

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2013, 02:12
Bunuel, I have a question. Among the 4 cases why are C & D a "no case".



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55169

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2013, 03:25
mohnish104 wrote: Bunuel, I have a question. Among the 4 cases why are C & D a "no case". Because in cases C and D z does not lie between x and y. Remember that the questions asks whether z lies between x and y on a number line.
_________________



Manager
Joined: 07 Aug 2011
Posts: 51
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Finance
GPA: 3.87

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Oct 2013, 21:41
Bunuel, couldn't it also be possible that the variables are arranged so x is between z and y? For example z>x>y, instead of only x>y>z? It's kind of an incidental point because I got it right, but I want to make sure I am figuring it up the proper way.
Also, when the statements xyz or xy, is that to say how the numbers are located with reference to zero, or is it saying to multiply the numbers?



Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 55169

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Oct 2013, 01:40
Stoneface wrote: Bunuel, couldn't it also be possible that the variables are arranged so x is between z and y? For example z>x>y, instead of only x>y>z? It's kind of an incidental point because I got it right, but I want to make sure I am figuring it up the proper way.
Also, when the statements xyz or xy, is that to say how the numbers are located with reference to zero, or is it saying to multiply the numbers? We know that the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. This can happen in 4 ways, shown in my post. You can see there that x CAN be between z and y in cases C and D. As for xyz it means x*y*z.
_________________



Intern
Joined: 08 Feb 2016
Posts: 37

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
20 Apr 2016, 06:18
Using (I) and (II) alone, it is easy to figure that each statement alone is not sufficient. Combining (I) and (II), we have xyz < 0 and xy < 0, this implies that z is positive (if z is negative then xyz is > 0 [since xy < 0 as per (II)] and xyz > 0 violates (I). Hence z cannot be negative). When combining (I) and (II) we can take two cases x is ve or y is ve [both cannot have the same sign as this violates (II)]. We will have the below 3 cases for x is ve and y is ve. No single solution exists and hence both together not sufficient. Answer is E. Thanks
Attachments
z between x and y.jpg [ 47.42 KiB  Viewed 46612 times ]
_________________
Once you know the answer, it is easy to justify.



Director
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 633
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jan 2017, 22:10
Scenario A ) where XYZ < 0. 2 positives 1 negative 3 negatives. For three negatives on the number the order can be z, x, y, 0...or x, z, y, 0. So A is insufficient. Scenario B) hwere XY < 0. One negative one positive. So the order can go. x 0 z y...or z x 0 y. So B is insufficient. Scenario A+B. If X and Y are both of oppositie signs (XY<0)..then Z has to be postive in order for XYZ < 0. So One Negative and two positives. Order can be.....x 0 z y...or y 0 x z. Thus E.
_________________
Thanks & Regards, Anaira Mitch



Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2010
Posts: 23

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
31 Jul 2017, 16:43
Here is another way to look at the problem. According to the question, the distance on x and y is greater than x and z, since we have x as the reference point for calculating the distance. We can only have two cases. Case 1  When x is in the middle of y and z Case 2  When x is at the extreme end i.e. on one side. Statement 1 and Statement 2 doesn't provide us the exact values of x,y,z, therefore, Answer is E
Attachments
numberline_11.JPG [ 26.34 KiB  Viewed 25015 times ]



Target Test Prep Representative
Status: Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Posts: 6152
Location: United States (CA)

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater
[#permalink]
Show Tags
08 Dec 2017, 11:45
uvs_mba wrote: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. Does z lie between x and y on the number line?
(1) xyz<0 (2) xy< 0 We are given that on the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the distance between x and z. We need to determine whether z lies between x and y on the number line. Statement One Alone: xyz < 0 Using the information in statement one, we have two possible cases: Case 1: Exactly one variable (either x, y, or z) is negative Case 2: All three variables are negative. Even with this information, we cannot determine whether z lies between x and y. For example, for Case 1, if x = 1, y = 2, and z = 1, then z falls between x and y. However, for Case 2, if x = 1, y = 4, and z = 1, then z does not fall between x and y. Statement one alone is not sufficient. We can eliminate answer choices A and D. Statement Two Alone: xy < 0 Using the information from statement two, we know that exactly one of the values x or y is negative and the other is positive. However, without knowing anything about z, we cannot determine whether z falls between x and y. Statement two alone is not sufficient. We can eliminate answer choice B. Statements One and Two Together: From the information in statements one and two, we know that z must be positive and exactly one of the values x or y is negative. However, we still we cannot determine whether z falls between x and y or outside x and y. For example, if x = 1, y = 2, and z = 1, then z falls between x and y. However, if x = 1, y = 2, and z = 2, then z does not fall between x and y. The two statements together are still not sufficient. Answer: E
_________________
5star rated online GMAT quant self study course See why Target Test Prep is the top rated GMAT quant course on GMAT Club. Read Our Reviews If you find one of my posts helpful, please take a moment to click on the "Kudos" button.



EMPOWERgmat Instructor
Status: GMAT Assassin/CoFounder
Affiliations: EMPOWERgmat
Joined: 19 Dec 2014
Posts: 14154
Location: United States (CA)

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater
[#permalink]
Show Tags
19 Feb 2018, 13:07
Hi All, We're told that, on a number line, the distance between X and Y is GREATER than the distance between X and Z. We're asked if Z is BETWEEN X and Y on the number line. This is a YES/NO question. This question can be solved in a number of different ways. You can use a combination of TESTing VALUES and Number Properties to get to the solution: Fact 1: (X)(Y)(Z) < 0 This tells us that the three variables are either all negative OR 1 negative and 2 positives. IF... X = 1 Y = 2 Z = 2 Then the answer to the question is NO. IF... X = 2 Y = 2 Z = 1 Then the answer to the question is YES. Fact 1 is INSUFFICIENT Fact 2: (X)(Y) < 0 This tells us that one variable is positive and the other is negative. Unfortunately it tells us NOTHING about Z. As it stands though, the TESTs that I did in Fact 1 fit Fact 2 as well.... IF... X = 1 Y = 2 Z = 2 Then the answer to the question is NO. IF... X = 2 Y = 2 Z = 1 Then the answer to the question is YES. Fact 2 is INSUFFICIENT Combined, we already have two TESTs that fit BOTH Facts and produce different answers (a NO and a YES), so there's no more work needed. Combined, INSUFFICIENT Final Answer: GMAT assassins aren't born, they're made, Rich
_________________
760+: Learn What GMAT Assassins Do to Score at the Highest Levels Contact Rich at: Rich.C@empowergmat.com*****Select EMPOWERgmat Courses now include ALL 6 Official GMAC CATs!*****
Rich Cohen
CoFounder & GMAT Assassin
Special Offer: Save $75 + GMAT Club Tests Free
Official GMAT Exam Packs + 70 Pt. Improvement Guarantee www.empowergmat.com/



NonHuman User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Posts: 10948

Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
Show Tags
26 Feb 2019, 13:23
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot! Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up  doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos). Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
_________________




Re: On the number line, the distance between x and y is greater than the
[#permalink]
26 Feb 2019, 13:23






