Last visit was: 23 Mar 2025, 01:30 It is currently 23 Mar 2025, 01:30
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
605-655 Level|   Science|   Short Passage|                     
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 521
Kudos: 113
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 07 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,503
Own Kudos:
7,219
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,503
Kudos: 7,219
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 07 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,503
Own Kudos:
7,219
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,503
Kudos: 7,219
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
woohoo921
Joined: 04 Jun 2020
Last visit: 17 Mar 2023
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 623
Posts: 521
Kudos: 113
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AndrewN
woohoo921
AndrewN
Thank you for this thorough response on this question. I have a clarifying question on what you mentioned (nonland wealth refers to other types of wealth such as the currency of the market economy...e.g., money). So does this part of the passage "nonland wealth was also associated with more adoption of both technologies" refer to the "villages with limited land that are tied to a market economy rather than on the relatively isolated, self-sufficient communities with ample land characteristic of rain forest regions" and NOT the Tawahka people? Or are the individuals who have "nonland wealth" different from both of these groups I just mentioned and in of itself is a third category?

If "nonland wealth" is referring again to the "villages with limited land...", why would the author mention that this group is associated with "associated with more adoption of both technologies" later on in the passage when the author already mentioned that this group is "more likely to adopt such technologies" at the beginning of the passage?
Hello, woohoo921. The passage conviently breaks at the highlighted portion from commenting on former studies to reporting the findings of a recent study of the Tawahka people, so any information found in the earlier half is understood to pertain to those other studies, while anything after to the more recent study. Learning to identify such passage breaks, particularly when there is a single block of text, can really help you answer RC questions with confidence.

Thank you for following up, and good luck with your studies.

- Andrew
AndrewN
Thank you for your prompt reply. I am now unfortunately more confused... oh no!

Why would the Tawahka people have wealth that is related to other forms such as the one you mentioned (market economy... e.g. money)? Doesn't the passage state that the market economy pertains to farmers in developing countries only?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 07 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,503
Own Kudos:
7,219
 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,503
Kudos: 7,219
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
woohoo921
AndrewN
Thank you for your prompt reply. I am now unfortunately more confused... oh no!

Why would the Tawahka people have wealth that is related to other forms such as the one you mentioned (market economy... e.g. money)? Doesn't the passage state that the market economy pertains to farmers in developing countries only?
The point is, woohoo921, look to keep matters simple in your interpretation of a passage. Yes, some Tawahka farmers in the recent study mentioned spoke Spanish and had non-land wealth, most likely because the market economy surrounds Tawahka society. Also, can we say for sure that Honduras is not a developing country? No. In fact, the difference mentioned between other studies and the one on the Tawahka people is that the latter are relatively isolated and have formed self-sufficient communities with ample land. This does not mean that all farmers in Tawahka society have nothing to do with the market economy, just that on the whole, there are differences between how this society functions and how the market economy functions.

- Andrew
User avatar
helsinkipro
Joined: 22 Sep 2020
Last visit: 11 Dec 2023
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 61
Location: India
GPA: 3.02
Posts: 9
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) evaluate the likelihood that a particular proposal, if implemented, would ultimately succeed in achieving its intended result
(B) question the assumption that certain technological innovations are the most effective means of realizing a particular environmental objective
(C) discuss the progress of efforts to encourage a particular traditional society to adopt certain modern agricultural methods
(D) present the results of new research suggesting that previous findings concerning one set of conditions may not be generalizable to another set of conditions
(E) weigh the relative importance of three factors in determining whether a particular strategy will be successful.

How to solve Q1 :dazed
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 14,570
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,976
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,570
Kudos: 43,640
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
helsinkipro
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) evaluate the likelihood that a particular proposal, if implemented, would ultimately succeed in achieving its intended result
(B) question the assumption that certain technological innovations are the most effective means of realizing a particular environmental objective
(C) discuss the progress of efforts to encourage a particular traditional society to adopt certain modern agricultural methods
(D) present the results of new research suggesting that previous findings concerning one set of conditions may not be generalizable to another set of conditions
(E) weigh the relative importance of three factors in determining whether a particular strategy will be successful.

How to solve Q1 :dazed

Thoroughly discussed in the post in the link below

https://gmatclub.com/forum/one-proposal ... l#p2500229

Cheers
User avatar
pintukr
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,424
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 1,424
Kudos: 994
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) evaluate the likelihood that a particular proposal, if implemented, would ultimately succeed in achieving its intended result
the passage is descriptive in nature; it lists out the major facets observed after the research pertaining to the proposal

(B) question the assumption that certain technological innovations are the most effective means of realizing a particular environmental objective
passage doesn't argue for the technological innovations towards environmental objective

(C) discuss the progress of efforts to encourage a particular traditional society to adopt certain modern agricultural methods
adoption or otherwise by various kinds of the residents is the focus

(D) present the results of new research suggesting that previous findings concerning one set of conditions may not be generalizable to another set of conditions
the descriptive passage does in fact present the results of the research, and argues for various findings depending on the particular set of people..CORRECT answer

(E) weigh the relative importance of three factors in determining whether a particular strategy will be successful
comparisons are not drawn in the passage 'in relative terms'


(D) is the correct answer
User avatar
pintukr
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,424
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 1,424
Kudos: 994
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
2. According to the passage, the proposal mentioned in line 1 is aimed at preserving rain forests by encouraging farmers in rain-forest regions to do each of the following EXCEPT

Reference from the passage. (Lines 1-5)

(A) adopt new agricultural technologies
listed as one of the techniques

(B) grow improved plant varieties
listed as one of the techniques

(C) decrease their use of chemical herbicides
contrary to the aforementioned is correct..one of the suggestions is in fact the increased use of chemical herbicides to increase the productivity; hence, the CORRECT answer

(D) increase their productivity
all measures point to achieve this

(E) reduce their need to clear new land for cultivation
overall aim of all suggestions/ techniques is reducing the need for new cropland


(C) is the correct answer
User avatar
pintukr
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,424
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 1,424
Kudos: 994
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
3. The passage suggests that in the study mentioned in line 27 the method for gathering information about security of land tenure reflects which of the following pairs of assumptions about Tawahka society?

Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household’s duration of residence in its village. They found that longer residence correlated with more adoption of improved plant varieties but less adoption of chemical herbicides.

(A) The security of a household’s land tenure depends on the strength of that household’s kinship ties, and the duration of a household’s residence in its village is an indication of the strength of that household’s kinship ties.

assumptions highlighted through underlined portions in the aforementioned extract of the passage..CORRECT answer

(B) The ample availability of land makes security of land tenure unimportant, and the lack of a need for secure land tenure has made the concept of legal property rights unnecessary.

research findings, not the assumptions about the Tawahka society

(C) The strength of a household’s kinship ties is a more reliable indicator of that household’s receptivity to new agricultural technologies than is its quantity of non land wealth, and the duration of a household’s residence in its village is a more reliable indicator of that household’s security of land tenure than is the strength of its kinship ties.

comparisons not drawn in the relevant portions of the passage

(D) Security of land tenure based on kinship ties tends to make farmers more receptive to the use of improved plant varieties, and security of land tenure based on long duration of residence in a village tends to make farmers more receptive to the use of chemical herbicides.

again, these are the research findings, not the assumptions about the Tawahka society

(E) A household is more likely to be receptive to the concept of land tenure based on legal property rights if it has easy access to uncultivated land, and a household is more likely to uphold the tradition of land tenure based on kinship ties if it possesses a significant degree of non-land wealth.

not implied through the contents of the passage..linkages of non-land wealth not drawn to the household's likelihood of upholding the tradition of land tenure

(A) is the correct answer
User avatar
pintukr
Joined: 03 Jul 2022
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 1,424
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 22
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 1,424
Kudos: 994
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
4. The findings of the study mentioned in the highlighted text, if valid for rain-forest regions in general, suggest that which of the following is an obstacle most likely to be faced by those wishing to promote rain-forest preservation by implementing the proposal mentioned in line 1?

Reference from the Passage. (Lines 17-22) Non-land wealth was also associated with more adoption of both technologies, but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies.

(A) Lack of legal property rights tends to discourage local farmers from investing the time and resources required to successfully implement new agricultural technologies.

time and resources aspect not discussed in the passage..Irrelevant option

(B) The ability to evaluate the wider economic ramifications of adopting new agricultural technologies depends on a relatively high level of formal education.

formal education --- a 'facilitator' factor, not an aobstacle

(C) Isolation from the market economy tends to restrict local farmers’ access to new agricultural technologies that could help them to increase their productivity.

No such linkage drawn in the passage

(D) Ready availability of uncultivated land tends to decrease local farmers’ incentive to adopt new agricultural technologies that would reduce their need to clear new land for cultivation.

duly highlighted through the aforementioned extract of the passage..CORRECT answer

(E) Traditions of self-sufficiency and reliance on kinship ties tend to diminish local farmers’ receptivity to new agricultural technologies introduced by people from outside the local community

reliance on kinship ties and associated land-tenure security in fact were corelated to more adoption of improved plant vaieties (as mentioned in the last 3-4 lines of the passage


(D) is the correct answer
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 21 Mar 2024
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 240
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Sajjad1994
One proposal for preserving rain forests is to promote the adoption of new agricultural technologies, such as improved plant varieties and use of chemical herbicides, which would increase productivity and slow deforestation by reducing demand for new cropland. Studies have shown that farmers in developing countries who have achieved certain levels of education, wealth, and security of land tenure are more likely to adopt such technologies. But these studies have focused on villages with limited land that are tied to a market economy rather than on the relatively isolated, self-sufficient communities with ample land characteristic of rain-forest regions. A recent study of the Tawahka people of the Honduran rain forest found that farmers with some formal education were more likely to adopt improved plant varieties but less likely to use chemical herbicides and that those who spoke Spanish (the language of the market economy) were more likely to adopt both technologies. Non-land wealth was also associated with more adoption of both technologies, but availability of uncultivated land reduced the incentive to employ the productivity-enhancing technologies. Researchers also measured land-tenure security: in Tawahka society, kinship ties are a more important indicator of this than are legal property rights, so researchers measured it by a household’s duration of residence in its village. They found that longer residence correlated with more adoption of improved plant varieties but less adoption of chemical herbicides.

1. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) evaluate the likelihood that a particular proposal, if implemented, would ultimately succeed in achieving its intended result
(B) question the assumption that certain technological innovations are the most effective means of realizing a particular environmental objective
(C) discuss the progress of efforts to encourage a particular traditional society to adopt certain modern agricultural methods
(D) present the results of new research suggesting that previous findings concerning one set of conditions may not be generalizable to another set of conditions
(E) weigh the relative importance of three factors in determining whether a particular strategy will be successful


2. According to the passage, the proposal mentioned in line 1 is aimed at preserving rain forests by encouraging farmers in rain-forest regions to do each of the following EXCEPT

(A) adopt new agricultural technologies
(B) grow improved plant varieties
(C) decrease their use of chemical herbicides
(D) increase their productivity
(E) reduce their need to clear new land for cultivation


3. The passage suggests that in the study mentioned in line 27 the method for gathering information about security of land tenure reflects which of the following pairs of assumptions about Tawahka society?

(A) The security of a household’s land tenure depends on the strength of that household’s kinship ties, and the duration of a household’s residence in its village is an indication of the strength of that household’s kinship ties.
(B) The ample availability of land makes security of land tenure unimportant, and the lack of a need for secure land tenure has made the concept of legal property rights unnecessary.
(C) The strength of a household’s kinship ties is a more reliable indicator of that household’s receptivity to new agricultural technologies than is its quantity of non land wealth, and the duration of a household’s residence in its village is a more reliable indicator of that household’s security of land tenure than is the strength of its kinship ties.
(D) Security of land tenure based on kinship ties tends to make farmers more receptive to the use of improved plant varieties, and security of land tenure based on long duration of residence in a village tends to make farmers more receptive to the use of chemical herbicides.
(E) A household is more likely to be receptive to the concept of land tenure based on legal property rights if it has easy access to uncultivated land, and a household is more likely to uphold the tradition of land tenure based on kinship ties if it possesses a significant degree of non-land wealth.


4. The findings of the study mentioned in the highlighted text, if valid for rain-forest regions in general, suggest that which of the following is an obstacle most likely to be faced by those wishing to promote rain-forest preservation by implementing the proposal mentioned in line 1?

(A) Lack of legal property rights tends to discourage local farmers from investing the time and resources required to successfully implement new agricultural technologies.
(B) The ability to evaluate the wider economic ramifications of adopting new agricultural technologies depends on a relatively high level of formal education.
(C) Isolation from the market economy tends to restrict local farmers’ access to new agricultural technologies that could help them to increase their productivity.
(D) Ready availability of uncultivated land tends to decrease local farmers’ incentive to adopt new agricultural technologies that would reduce their need to clear new land for cultivation.
(E) Traditions of self-sufficiency and reliance on kinship ties tend to diminish local farmers’ receptivity to new agricultural technologies introduced by people from outside the local community


KarishmaB MartyTargetTestPrep AndrewN egmat

Can you please explain question 3, why is option A correct?

My view: Passage states that kinship ties are"indicator" of land tenure security. However, option A staes the land tenure security "depends" on "strength" of kinship ties. How are someting being an indicator same as something depending on it?
secondly there is no mention of "strength" of kinship ties. It is not given how strength of kinship ties dictates.
your 2 cents, plz.
User avatar
MartyTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 24 Nov 2014
Last visit: 11 Aug 2023
Posts: 3,477
Own Kudos:
5,431
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,431
Status:Chief Curriculum and Content Architect
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 3,477
Kudos: 5,431
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
shanks2020
Can you please explain question 3, why is option A correct?

My view: Passage states that kinship ties are"indicator" of land tenure security. However, option A staes the land tenure security "depends" on "strength" of kinship ties. How are someting being an indicator same as something depending on it?
We could see "depends on" as meaning "is the result of" or "is correlated with."

You've heard of a "dependent variable," for example a y that "depends on" on x.

So, in this case, land tenure security is the dependent variable, and strength of kinship ties is the independent variable.

Quote:
secondly there is no mention of "strength" of kinship ties. It is not given how strength of kinship ties dictates.
your 2 cents, plz.
True, but we do need some kind of measure of "kinship ties." So, strength would be the measured quality.

Also, none of the other choices are correct at all. So, we can ignore this minor issue and choose (A).
User avatar
shanks2020
Joined: 02 Dec 2018
Last visit: 21 Mar 2024
Posts: 240
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 70
Posts: 240
Kudos: 36
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyTargetTestPrep
shanks2020
Can you please explain question 3, why is option A correct?

My view: Passage states that kinship ties are"indicator" of land tenure security. However, option A staes the land tenure security "depends" on "strength" of kinship ties. How are someting being an indicator same as something depending on it?
We could see "depends on" as meaning "is the result of" or "is correlated with."

You've heard of a "dependent variable," for example a y that "depends on" on x.

So, in this case, land tenure security is the dependent variable, and strength of kinship ties is the independent variable.

Quote:
secondly there is no mention of "strength" of kinship ties. It is not given how strength of kinship ties dictates.
your 2 cents, plz.
True, but we do need some kind of measure of "kinship ties." So, strength would be the measured quality.

Also, none of the other choices are correct at all. So, we can ignore this minor issue and choose (A).

MartyTargetTestPrep

Always appreciate your quick response?
A point to scratch my head is when some "minor" things become important to warrant a wrong answer and when they ought to be ignored.
User avatar
ROY13
Joined: 07 Oct 2023
Last visit: 21 Jan 2025
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 326
Posts: 7
Kudos: 3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can someone please explain why Option A is not correct for Question 1? The passage does talk about different studies to evaluate the likelihood of the proposal to be successful.
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 14,570
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5,976
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 14,570
Kudos: 43,640
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
ROY13
Can someone please explain why Option A is not correct for Question 1? The passage does talk about different studies to evaluate the likelihood of the proposal to be successful.
­Explained here
User avatar
einstein801
Joined: 23 Jan 2024
Last visit: 18 Feb 2025
Posts: 184
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 138
Posts: 184
Kudos: 110
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I have a problem with A being answer to Q3. Strong "indicator" does not = dependency... e.g. Rain is a strong indicator of the ground being wet, but it does not mean that wet ground is dependent on rain...
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Mar 2025
Posts: 7,261
Own Kudos:
67,255
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1,908
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,261
Kudos: 67,255
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post

Question 3



einstein801
I have a problem with A being answer to Q3. Strong "indicator" does not = dependency... e.g. Rain is a strong indicator of the ground being wet, but it does not mean that wet ground is dependent on rain...
True, but note the wording of the question itself: we're looking for something SUGGESTED by the passage, not something PROVEN by the passage.

The sound of raindrops falling on your roof suggests that it's raining outside, but maybe it's just a broken fire hydrant spraying massive quantities of water into the air and onto your roof. :dontknow: The fact that there are other possible explanations for the sound doesn't change the fact that a rainstorm is a pretty good guess.

For more on question 3, check out this post: https://gmatclub.com/forum/one-proposal ... l#p2375594
   1   2   3 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7261 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
233 posts
GRE Forum Moderator
14570 posts