GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 20 Oct 2018, 01:38

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2007
Posts: 142
GMAT ToolKit User
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 25 Aug 2017, 04:07
4
41
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  55% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (00:50) correct 51% (00:52) wrong based on 1129 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

(A) or
(B) nor
(C) or are
(D) nor are they
(E) nor are not

I am stuck between (B) and (D)..Does 'they' in option (D) refer to schools..i think 'nor are' is better than 'nor'

Originally posted by smashingpumpkins on 24 Jul 2009, 02:49.
Last edited by hazelnut on 25 Aug 2017, 04:07, edited 2 times in total.
Added OA
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3031
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Apr 2016, 01:16
1
6
robu wrote:
bigoyal wrote:
sanoasis wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

A) or
B) nor
C) or are
D) nor are they
E) nor are not

I am stuck between (B) and (D)..Does 'they' in option (D) refer to schools..i think 'nor are' is better than 'nor'

Agree with you. Correct answer should be D..

A and C are out for using "or", which should be replaced with "nor"
E is out for using "nor" and "not" together

B. is out for not maintaining parallelism. The first part is "many schools do not have", where "do" is the verb in simple present tense. Whereas the 2nd part "many schools... likely to have" have no verb, it just has "to have" which is in infinitive form.


D. Maintains parallelism. In the 2nd part - "nor are they likely to have" - "are" is the verb used in simple present.
"They" correctly refers to "many schools" as there is no other subject here, and "they" cannot refer to "one report".


In my view, nor is also correct because I can say that 'i do not have nor likely to have in future.
please some expert give opinion on this.


It is allowed to omit certain parts from the second element of a parralell structure only if that part has already been stated in the first element.

The original structure is:

many schools do not have nor they are likely to have

Here the first element of parallelism is: many schools do not have
Second element: they are likely to have.

Connector: nor

The verb in the first element is " do have"
The verb in the second element is "are"

Since the verb is different in the second element, it cannot be omitted.
Most Helpful Community Reply
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jun 2009
Posts: 741
Location: New Delhi
WE 1: 5.5 yrs in IT
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2009, 03:23
3
3
sanoasis wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

A) or
B) nor
C) or are
D) nor are they
E) nor are not

I am stuck between (B) and (D)..Does 'they' in option (D) refer to schools..i think 'nor are' is better than 'nor'

Agree with you. Correct answer should be D..

A and C are out for using "or", which should be replaced with "nor"
E is out for using "nor" and "not" together

B. is out for not maintaining parallelism. The first part is "many schools do not have", where "do" is the verb in simple present tense. Whereas the 2nd part "many schools... likely to have" have no verb, it just has "to have" which is in infinitive form.

D. Maintains parallelism. In the 2nd part - "nor are they likely to have" - "are" is the verb used in simple present.
"They" correctly refers to "many schools" as there is no other subject here, and "they" cannot refer to "one report".
_________________

ISB 2011-12 thread | Ask ISB Alumni @ ThinkISB
All information related to Indian candidates and B-schools | Indian B-schools accepting GMAT scores
Self evaluation for Why MBA?

General Discussion
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 05 Jun 2009
Posts: 635
WE 1: 7years (Financial Services - Consultant, BA)
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jul 2009, 02:54
1
1
With D, there will be ambiguity created between 'they' and 'them', used for computers in the last.
_________________

Consider kudos for the good post ... :beer
My debrief : http://gmatclub.com/forum/journey-670-to-720-q50-v36-long-85083.html

Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: He who asks is a fool for five minutes, but he who does not ask remains a fool forever
Joined: 20 Aug 2010
Posts: 89
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Jul 2011, 08:44
1
Agree with D.

A and C are out for using "or", which should be replaced with "nor"
E is out for using "nor" and "not" together

B. is out for not maintaining parallelism. The first part is "many schools do not have", where "do" is the verb in simple present tense. Whereas the 2nd part "many schools... likely to have" have no verb, it just has "to have" which is in infinitive form.

D. Maintains parallelism. In the 2nd part - "nor are they likely to have" - "are" is the verb used in simple present.
"They" correctly refers to "many schools" as there is no other subject here, and "they" cannot refer to "one report".
e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2706
Re: Gmat prep SC1  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2012, 11:01
1
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

Image

The sentence means that many schools neither have enough computers nor they are likely to have many computers to use them effectively.
Notice what follows “or” is not grammatically parallel to what precedes it. X = many schools do not have (clause) and Y = likely to have (adverb + to verb). So we have parallelism issue here as well.

POE:
Choice A: Incorrect as discussed.

Choice B: Same parallelism issue as A.

Choice C: With the use of “or”, what this sentence now means is that the schools do not have many computers but are likely to have many computers. This is a suggestion made in a very awkward manner which is not the logical intended meaning of the sentence. It is rather the contradictory suggestion. Hence usage of “or” is incorrect here. So the idiom error leads to meaning error also.

Choice D: Correct answer, presents the logical intended meaning of the sentence.

Choice E: There are two negative words together in this choice.

Image
1. First understand the logical intended meaning of the sentence. Then choose the answer choice that conveys that logical intended meaning.
2. In a parallel list what follows the marker should be logically as well as grammatically parallel to what precedes the marker.

Hope this helps.
Shraddha
Image
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Dec 2014
Posts: 106
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
GMAT 1: 620 Q48 V27
GPA: 1.9
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 Apr 2016, 21:05
bigoyal wrote:
sanoasis wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

A) or
B) nor
C) or are
D) nor are they
E) nor are not

I am stuck between (B) and (D)..Does 'they' in option (D) refer to schools..i think 'nor are' is better than 'nor'

Agree with you. Correct answer should be D..

A and C are out for using "or", which should be replaced with "nor"
E is out for using "nor" and "not" together

B. is out for not maintaining parallelism. The first part is "many schools do not have", where "do" is the verb in simple present tense. Whereas the 2nd part "many schools... likely to have" have no verb, it just has "to have" which is in infinitive form.


D. Maintains parallelism. In the 2nd part - "nor are they likely to have" - "are" is the verb used in simple present.
"They" correctly refers to "many schools" as there is no other subject here, and "they" cannot refer to "one report".


In my view, nor is also correct because I can say that 'i do not have nor likely to have in future.
please some expert give opinion on this.
Director
Director
User avatar
B
Joined: 04 Jun 2016
Posts: 569
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V43
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2016, 02:55
1
smashingpumpkins wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

A) or
B) nor
C) or are
D) nor are they
E) nor are not

I am stuck between (B) and (D)..Does 'they' in option (D) refer to schools..i think 'nor are' is better than 'nor'


One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

Simple of coordinating conjunctions :- FANBOYS - for, and, nor, because, or, yet ,so
A Coordinating conjunction introduces 2 independent clauses.
Clauses by definition should have independent subjects. and also independent verb(although not parallel but still a verb is present in the second clause)

Therefore the problem is that there should be a PROPER SUBJECT in the second clause.


Only D has the proper subject "THEY". "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part refers back to "THEY"

REST ALL OPTIONS A,B,C,E are missing the subject. "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part has no subject to refer back to.

ANSWER IS D
_________________

Posting an answer without an explanation is "GOD COMPLEX". The world doesn't need any more gods. Please explain you answers properly.
FINAL GOODBYE :- 17th SEPTEMBER 2016. .. 16 March 2017 - I am back but for all purposes please consider me semi-retired.

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 277
GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.5
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2017, 05:21
LogicGuru1 wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

Simple of coordinating conjunctions :- FANBOYS - for, and, nor, because, or, yet ,so
A Coordinating conjunction introduces 2 independent clauses.
Clauses by definition should have independent subjects. and also independent verb(although not parallel but still a verb is present in the second clause)

Therefore the problem is absence of a PROPER SUBJECT in the second clause.


Only D has the proper subject "THEY". "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part refers back to "THEY"

REST ALL OPTIONS A,B,C,E are missing the subject. "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part has no subject to refer back to.

ANSWER IS D


Hi,
Are you sure 'them' is referring to 'they' here. As per the meaning of the sentence 'them' should refer to the 'computers' .
_________________

#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos :)

e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2706
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2017, 19:28
anje29 wrote:
LogicGuru1 wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

Simple of coordinating conjunctions :- FANBOYS - for, and, nor, because, or, yet ,so
A Coordinating conjunction introduces 2 independent clauses.
Clauses by definition should have independent subjects. and also independent verb(although not parallel but still a verb is present in the second clause)

Therefore the problem is absence of a PROPER SUBJECT in the second clause.


Only D has the proper subject "THEY". "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part refers back to "THEY"

REST ALL OPTIONS A,B,C,E are missing the subject. "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part has no subject to refer back to.

ANSWER IS D


Hi,
Are you sure 'them' is referring to 'they' here. As per the meaning of the sentence 'them' should refer to the 'computers' .



Hello anje29,

I will glad to answer this one.

The plural pronoun them in the non-underlined portion of the sentence refers to plural computers and not to many schools.

It is the computers that are not used effectively.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 999
Location: Bangalore, India
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Aug 2017, 23:46
anje29 wrote:
Are you sure 'them' is referring to 'they' here. As per the meaning of the sentence 'them' should refer to the 'computers' .

Hi anje29, you are correct.

them refers to computers, while they refers to schools.
_________________

Thanks,
Ashish
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Now! Preview the entire Grammar Section of Sentence Correction Nirvana at pothi.com

Director
Director
User avatar
G
Joined: 26 Oct 2016
Posts: 642
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, International Business
Schools: HBS '19
GMAT 1: 770 Q51 V44
GPA: 4
WE: Education (Education)
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Aug 2017, 10:57
anje29 wrote:
LogicGuru1 wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

Simple of coordinating conjunctions :- FANBOYS - for, and, nor, because, or, yet ,so
A Coordinating conjunction introduces 2 independent clauses.
Clauses by definition should have independent subjects. and also independent verb(although not parallel but still a verb is present in the second clause)

Therefore the problem is absence of a PROPER SUBJECT in the second clause.


Only D has the proper subject "THEY". "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part refers back to "THEY"

REST ALL OPTIONS A,B,C,E are missing the subject. "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part has no subject to refer back to.

ANSWER IS D


Hi,
Are you sure 'them' is referring to 'they' here. As per the meaning of the sentence 'them' should refer to the 'computers' .


@Anje

(A) and (B) are incorrect because of their poor parallelism. In this "or" construction, the first half is "do not have", a tensed verb. Therefore, the second half of the construction must also contain a tensed verb.
(A) and (B) don't have a tensed verb ("likely to have" contains only an infinitive - not what we want here).

(option E) contains a double negative, so it's out.

(option C) is, as far as i can tell grammatically correct (although the commas are superfluous in such a construction), but it's simply absurd. The use of "or" here creates a sentence that is weirdly self-contradictory.

The clear point of the sentence is that the schools don't have enough computers, so you need to select the choice that's grammatically correct but also in line with that meaning. (option D) is the only choice that satisfies both criteria.
_________________

Thanks & Regards,
Anaira Mitch

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2084
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2017, 12:46
egmat wrote:
anje29 wrote:
LogicGuru1 wrote:
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, enough computers to use them effectively.

Simple of coordinating conjunctions :- FANBOYS - for, and, nor, because, or, yet ,so
A Coordinating conjunction introduces 2 independent clauses.
Clauses by definition should have independent subjects. and also independent verb(although not parallel but still a verb is present in the second clause)

Therefore the problem is absence of a PROPER SUBJECT in the second clause.


Only D has the proper subject "THEY". "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part refers back to "THEY"

REST ALL OPTIONS A,B,C,E are missing the subject. "THEM" in the NON-Underlined part has no subject to refer back to.

ANSWER IS D


Hi,
Are you sure 'them' is referring to 'they' here. As per the meaning of the sentence 'them' should refer to the 'computers' .



Hello anje29,

I will glad to answer this one.

The plural pronoun them in the non-underlined portion of the sentence refers to plural computers and not to many schools.

It is the computers that are not used effectively.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha


GMATNinja , RonPurewal , sayantanc2k ,mikemcgarry ,daagh ,egmat ,EMPOWERgmatRichC ,AjiteshArun ,ChiranjeevSingh -- is it okay to have plural pronouns refer to two different antecedents?
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

e-GMAT Representative
User avatar
G
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Posts: 2706
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2017, 15:45
Skywalker18 wrote:

GMATNinja , RonPurewal , sayantanc2k ,mikemcgarry ,daagh ,egmat ,EMPOWERgmatRichC ,AjiteshArun ,ChiranjeevSingh -- is it okay to have plural pronouns refer to two different antecedents?



Hello Skywalker18,

I will be glad to help you with this one. :-)


A pronoun must have a just one logical antecedent in the sentence.

If a sentence uses multiple pronouns, all of them must have clear logical antecedents.

It is absolutely okay to use two plural pronouns that CLEARLY refer to their respective plural noun antecedents. After all, we have this usage in the correct answer choice of an official sentence. So this usage is absolutely acceptable.


The only logic by which the usage of pronouns is governed is that they must have clear logical antecedents.


In the official sentence in question, the plural pronoun they logically refers only to many schools and plural pronoun them in the non-underlined portion of the sentence refers to plural computers.


Hope this helps. :-)
Thanks.
Shraddha
_________________












| '4 out of Top 5' Instructors on gmatclub | 70 point improvement guarantee | www.e-gmat.com

Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4493
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Nov 2017, 18:08
1
Skywalker18 wrote:
is it okay to have plural pronouns refer to two different antecedents?

Dear Skywalker18,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

With all due respect to Shraddha, I will disagree. I will say that, under certain circumstance, it is 100% fine for a single plural pronoun to refer to two different antecedents.
1) John Adams and Thomas Jefferson were bitter political rivals at the beginning of the nineteenth century, but they became the dearest of friends in their old age.
That sentence is 100% correct, and the pronoun "they" clear refers to the two subject nouns in parallel. This would be the most common case: if two single nouns are in parallel, right next to each other, this setup makes it very easy to include them together in a single pronoun.

It's possible, though, that the two nouns would be separated or in different roles. If the two nouns are separate, the pronoun "they" is often followed by the word "both" for clarity.
2) Diamond is the hardest substance in the natural world while graphite is so soft that it's smearable, and yet they both are forms of the element carbon.
3) T.S. Eliot was as much a staunch conservative as e e cummings was a non-conformist liberal, but they both broke substantial new ground in the modernist expansion of the poetic canon.
Both of those sentences are 100% correct. Both of these are of the general logical form "P and Q are different but they're also similar." The grammatical construction of #3 is particularly sophisticated, but it's 100% correct.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
_________________

Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)

GMAT Tutor
User avatar
B
Joined: 15 Nov 2013
Posts: 65
Re: One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Dec 2017, 02:17
1
Skywalker18 wrote:
-- is it okay to have plural pronouns refer to two different antecedents?


^^ this is an official problem. if something happens in the correct answer to an official problem, then ... well ... you have your answer to "is it okay?".
EVERYTHING in OFFICIALLY correct sentences is correct and acceptable!

__

in fact — in the problem at hand here, these two pronouns MUST refer to different things.
"they" is a subject, and "them" is an object in the same clause / part of the sentence. if both of these were intended to refer to the same noun, then they'd have to be "they" and "themselves", not just "they" and "them".
_________________

Please visit my corners of the web:
http://www.RonPurewal.com
http://www.facebook.com/RonPurewalGMAT
__

Pueden hacerle preguntas a Ron en castellano
Potete fare domande a Ron in italiano
On peut poser des questions à Ron en français
Voit esittää kysymyksiä Ron:lle myös suomeksi
__

Un bon vêtement, c'est un passeport pour le bonheur.
—Yves Saint-Laurent

Retired Moderator
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 3031
Location: Germany
Schools: HHL Leipzig
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Dec 2017, 08:34
Skywalker18 wrote:


GMATNinja , RonPurewal , sayantanc2k ,mikemcgarry ,daagh ,egmat ,EMPOWERgmatRichC ,AjiteshArun ,ChiranjeevSingh -- is it okay to have plural pronouns refer to two different antecedents?


In general no because a pronoun ambiguity would arise, but in case the subject and object are "they" and "them" (as in this case), such ambiguity does not arise, since if the object referred to the same antecedent, it would be the reflexive form "themsleves" rather than "them".
GMAT Club Bot
One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have, &nbs [#permalink] 07 Dec 2017, 08:34
Display posts from previous: Sort by

One report concludes that many schools do not have, or likely to have,

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


Copyright

GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.