It is currently 24 Nov 2017, 04:39

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2228

Kudos [?]: 386 [0], given: 0

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2005, 22:29
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

(N/A)

Question Stats:

0% (00:00) correct 0% (00:00) wrong based on 0 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-rays emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, is finding uses in medicine, archaeologyl and criminorlogy.

(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-rays emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it
(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced x-rays emission
(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-rays emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it
(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-rays emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly without destroying it,
(E) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-rays emission,

Kudos [?]: 386 [0], given: 0

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 367

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2005, 22:57
Though I don't find any of the sentences well written but I think inthis case I will go with A.

Saurabh Malpani

Kudos [?]: 6 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2004
Posts: 554

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Location: SF Bay Area, USA
 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2005, 23:21
(A) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a technique called proton-induced x-rays emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it

OK. Use of correct modifier. 'Originally developed for detecting air pollutants modifies' 'a technique'

(B) Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, having the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it, a technique called proton-induced x-rays emission

Modifier problem. 'Originally developed for detecting air pollutants' needs to modify a noun that follows it. Here having follows the modifier.

(C) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-rays emission, which can quickly analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance without destroying it

Modifier problem. A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutantsneeds to modify a noun that follows it. Here it is modifying called

(D) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants, called proton-induced x-rays emission, which has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly without destroying it,

Modifier problem. A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutantsneeds to modify a noun that follows it. Here it is modifying called

(E) A technique originally developed for detecting air pollutants and has the ability to analyze the chemical elements in almost any substance quickly and without destroying the substance, called proton-induced x-rays emission,

Use of has is wrong

Kudos [?]: 281 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 21 Sep 2004
Posts: 601

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2005, 07:11
A seems fine. though i want to know why is E incorrect?

Kudos [?]: 37 [0], given: 0

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 02 Dec 2004
Posts: 224

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2005, 08:23
my choice is A with proper modifier (originally develop... technique...) and proper reference (substance and it). nonetheless, i think the proximity of it with substance and elements are a bit confusing. It can be argued as unclear reference.

nonetheless, I think e can be correct too. The biggest proper is proper modification. I think the uage of has is okay.

Any opinion

Kudos [?]: 44 [0], given: 0

VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Posts: 1430

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2005, 09:06
I think even "A" has an issue of pronoun reference "it"...is the "it" refering to the substance or the chemical elements ??? Thoughts plz... :?:

Kudos [?]: 49 [0], given: 0

SVP
SVP
User avatar
Joined: 03 Jan 2005
Posts: 2228

Kudos [?]: 386 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 Jan 2005, 09:25
OA is (A). I'd like to see more discussion about why the others are wrong.

Kudos [?]: 386 [0], given: 0

Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 27 Dec 2004
Posts: 894

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

 [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 Feb 2005, 17:01
I agree with why (A) could be right but i don't see anything wrong with (E). We need the experts to break this down pls

Kudos [?]: 54 [0], given: 0

  [#permalink] 01 Feb 2005, 17:01
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Originally developed for detecting air pollutants, a

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: GMATNinjaTwo, GMATNinja



GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.