1. What is the primary purpose of the passage?
A. Compare and contrast nuclear and new families
=> The passage did present a contrast between nuclear and new families in the first paragraph but not as the main idea. There is no contrast in the second half of the passage.
B. Describe and explain a societal change
=> CORRECT. The passage first describes "New family" as a societal change, then compares it with "nuclear family" and then explains "New family" attributes and provides an example to provide a further extension.
C. Illustrate the norm of new families by citing cultural examples
=>There is a discussion of cultural differences but a lot of examples on that, A movie has been used as an example.
D. Trace the origin and form of a recent societal phenomenon
=> The passage doesn't talk about origin and form of it as a whole and this is not a recent phenomenon. The passage starts by saying "Over the last several decades some significant shifts in the family have transformed"
E. Highlight the salient features of a revolutionary societal transformation
=> Some part of the passage does highlight the features but not as a whole main idea.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2. The author suggests that the film Under the Tuscan Sun exemplifies effective theories about the new family most probably because the film
A. traces the emergence of a multicultural and polysexual family whose members are biologically unrelated
=>CORRECT. The film shows people from different cultures - Polish, Asian, Italian, etc, and Gay, Lesbian, and singles.
B. departs from conventional film themes of heterosexual married couples
=> There is no mention of "conventional film themes".
C. portrays how a departure from traditional and familiar contexts can pose social challenges
=> No mention of any specific context or social challenges, instead the film provides more positive outcome towards the end of the film
D. depicts a series of singular families bound together by class and structure
=> Opposite of what paragraph says. The last line of the paragraph says "individual choices that go beyond the boundaries of class and structure."
E. challenges the idea of a nuclear family that is racially and sexually exclusionary
=> The film only brings out the possibility of a "new family" concept and doesn't explicitly present any contrast from the nuclear family.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3. It can be inferred from the passage that the author of the passage is most likely to describe the emergence of new families as
A. A much anticipated societal change
=> No mention of any anticipation, the passage is only concerned about explaining the societal change
B. An aberration from the accepted norm
=> It indeed an aberration from what is a nuclear family concept but it is not needed to infer as it is mentioned in the passage and no mention of "accepted norm"
C. A shift from a flexible and open social structure
=> Incorrect. The new family is a more flexible and open social structure, not a shift.
D. A deviance from the natural state of affairs
=> Similar to B
E. A celebration of individual choice
=> "Affective theory sees the new family as a series of singular families that are the product of the desires of individuals" as mentioned in the last para, hence as desires of individuals are achieved, it is indeed a matter of celebration.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
4. When referring to nuclear families, the author of the passage mentions the word “natural” within quotes most probably to
A. Censure the preservation of nuclear families as the ideal unit of society
=> Too extreme. It is not an attack or challenge by the author, the tone of the author is just skeptic and not-agreeing with the ideology
B. Indicate surprise at the displacement of nuclear families by new families
=> Author's tone is not surprising, just skeptic
C. Concur with the definition of nuclear families as the ideal societal unit
=> Same as A
D. Express scepticism about the perception that nuclear families are the universal norm
=> CORRECT. Author's tone suggests that he doesn't agree with or believe the ideology, hence the skepticism.
E. Disparage the nuclear family as a cultural and historical form specific only to the West
=> The author doesn't belittle anything. No tone of disparage is seen