It is currently 24 Sep 2017, 18:08

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in June
Open Detailed Calendar

Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

4 KUDOS received
SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1508

Kudos [?]: 1401 [4], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2010, 12:28
4
This post received
KUDOS
31
This post was
BOOKMARKED
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

77% (00:41) correct 23% (00:40) wrong based on 3647 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Edit: This discussion has retired. Find the new thread HERE


Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

(A) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
(B) Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
(C) Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
(D) Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
(E) Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi
[Reveal] Spoiler: OA

_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings


Last edited by souvik101990 on 14 Jul 2017, 12:10, edited 7 times in total.
Original Sentence not underlined

Kudos [?]: 1401 [4], given: 2

8 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2008
Posts: 1469

Kudos [?]: 295 [8], given: 31

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2010, 13:01
8
This post received
KUDOS
3
This post was
BOOKMARKED
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


What really makes this sentence clearer is the "in the form of carbon dioxide". This modifies carbon not fungi and hence should be placed as close as possible to its noun, carbon.

Kudos [?]: 295 [8], given: 31

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 30 Jun 2010
Posts: 2

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jun 2010, 18:26
I think this question about parallelism.... "at acquiring carbon,..... and converting." both are participal

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 0

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Jan 2010
Posts: 70

Kudos [?]: 15 [2], given: 15

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2010, 07:11
2
This post received
KUDOS
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


C simply makes the sentence easiest to read;
grouping plants and fungi in the beginning of the sentence allows "acquiring carbon, in the form of carbon dioxide".
No other option does the same.
_________________

pls kudos if you're satisfied with the reply

Kudos [?]: 15 [2], given: 15

2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Apr 2010
Posts: 446

Kudos [?]: 107 [2], given: 157

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2010, 08:06
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


You need to look at the modifier following the underlined sentence, ... in refers to carbon and not fungi so the end of the main clause should be carbon.
_________________

If you found the reply to be helpful, give kudos.

Kudos [?]: 107 [2], given: 157

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 07 Nov 2009
Posts: 304

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 20

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2010, 10:49
Same as others have pointed .. Option C is the best

Kudos [?]: 666 [0], given: 20

SVP
SVP
avatar
Joined: 16 Jul 2009
Posts: 1508

Kudos [?]: 1401 [0], given: 2

Schools: CBS
WE 1: 4 years (Consulting)
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Apr 2011, 07:21
Let me ask something here:

"in the form of Carbon Dioxide" is a prep phrase acting as an adjective an because of that it has to be close to what is actually modifying, that is "carbon"?

Thanks.
_________________

The sky is the limit
800 is the limit


GMAT Club Premium Membership - big benefits and savings

Kudos [?]: 1401 [0], given: 2

Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2010
Posts: 80

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 2

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2011, 06:45
noboru wrote:
Let me ask something here:

"in the form of Carbon Dioxide" is a prep phrase acting as an adjective an because of that it has to be close to what is actually modifying, that is "carbon"?

Thanks.


The context dictates that only carbon can take form of carbon dioxide, whereas fungi are organic (and consist of carbon). From what i have learned, noun modifier must be next to the noun it modifies, whereas verb modifier do not have to be (MGMAT SC Advanced modifier)

Kudos [?]: 42 [0], given: 2

12 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4275

Kudos [?]: 7626 [12], given: 362

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2011, 07:49
12
This post received
KUDOS
5
This post was
BOOKMARKED
Let us clarify a few things first. ‘fungi’ are also a kind of lower level plants. It is plural and its singular form is ‘fungus’.

The real comparison is between plants and fungi, two different nouns.

The prepositional modifier ‘in the form of carbon dioxide’ must be close to its noun modifier ‘carbon’ , probably it is best to posit them next to next.

IMO, When you say ‘plants are’, then ther is no need to say ‘than are fungi’, since the comparison is straight between two nouns, rather than between what they do. However when you say ‘plants acquire’, then you have to also say ‘fungi acquire’ or ‘fungi do’ or some such appropriate form since, the comparison moves on to a dynamic action done by the two arms of comparison

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi---- two errors, wrong word order of carbon and use of ‘are fungi’
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi – wrong word order of carbon
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon- correct word order and comparison
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon – this is not a sentence but a fragment
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi --- two errors; one of wrong word order and not using the action word for fungi.
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7626 [12], given: 362

1 KUDOS received
VP
VP
avatar
S
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Posts: 1411

Kudos [?]: 153 [1], given: 916

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Feb 2013, 06:08
1
This post received
KUDOS
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


the more I study og question, the more I see that og question is great.

regarding oa c.

we do not need "fungi are" because there is ambiguity here. before "than" there is only one agent "plants" so, there is no ambiguity

if there are 2 agents before "than" , there is ambiguity and we have to add "do/dose" to avoid ambiguity. consider

plants like water more than fungi do.

there are 2 agents "plant" and "water" before "than" , so there is ambiguity. "do" clear the ambiguity.
_________________

visit my facebook to help me.
on facebook, my name is: thang thang thang

Kudos [?]: 153 [1], given: 916

Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 595

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 200

Location: Germany
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 580 Q46 V24
GPA: 3.88
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2015, 14:04
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon --> lacks a VERB
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

A,B,E are at the first sight out MODIFIER -in the form of carbon dioxide- MUST modify CARBON and not Fungi. D lacks a VERB - OUT. We are left with choice C.
_________________

When you’re up, your friends know who you are. When you’re down, you know who your friends are.

Share some Kudos, if my posts help you. Thank you !

800Score ONLY QUANT CAT1 51, CAT2 50, CAT3 50
GMAT PREP 670
MGMAT CAT 630
KAPLAN CAT 660

Kudos [?]: 434 [0], given: 200

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jun 2014
Posts: 39

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 184

GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2015, 17:46
What need to be changed in E to make it correct?
Quote:
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi


My opinion -
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi can do so
or
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi do so

Or is it cannot be corrected?

Kudos [?]: 29 [0], given: 184

Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Sep 2015
Posts: 145

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 74

Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 3.26
Reviews Badge
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2016, 07:39
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


D out for no proper sentence (Subject + Verb)
E out for improper parallelism
B out improper comparison (Seems plants acquire fungi but carbon is better)
A fungi is located to close to the 'in the form of carbon dioxide modifier. Wrong

C: X more .. than Y - Plants are being compared to Fungi. Correct.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 74

Retired Moderator
User avatar
P
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4275

Kudos [?]: 7626 [0], given: 362

Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jan 2016, 08:55
The plants and fungi are two types of organisms that absorb Carbon from the atmpospheric carbon-di-oxide. The essential factor is that the modifier ‘in the form of CO2’ must be placed just next to the word carbon, in order to avoid the absurd meaning of fungi being absorbed in the form of CO2. So confidently dump, A, B and E.

Left with C and D: D is an outright fragment. C wins.

P.S: fungi is plural; fungus is the singular form of fungi
_________________

“Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher” – a Japanese proverb.
9884544509

Kudos [?]: 7626 [0], given: 362

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 06 Apr 2015
Posts: 25

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 350

Concentration: Technology, Finance
Schools: Yale '18
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V38
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 09 Jan 2016, 20:23
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


Check for the middle clause "in the form of carbon dioxide". This middle clause should modify carbon. Also check for the third clause "converting it to energy-rich sugars", this should refer to carbon. So carbon should end the first clause. Also if we eliminate the middle clause then sentence should make sense. Given these premises option C seems the best fit --> "Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon and converting it to energy-rich sugars."

Kudos [?]: 8 [0], given: 350

Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 09 Mar 2013
Posts: 19

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 15

GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V35
GPA: 3.51
Reviews Badge
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 21 Jan 2016, 03:23
psychomath wrote:
OK i was down to A and C...My doubt is why not A?


In Option A there is a verb after than-- when using than, it's a comparative. We dont need a verb 'are'. We are comparing Plants and fungi. So eg. plants are better than Fungi.
Not plants are better than are fungi

Kudos [?]: [0], given: 15

Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 21 Jan 2016
Posts: 17

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 10 Feb 2016, 07:27
daagh wrote:
Let us clarify a few things first. ‘fungi’ are also a kind of lower level plants. It is plural and its singular form is ‘fungus’.

The real comparison is between plants and fungi, two different nouns.

The prepositional modifier ‘in the form of carbon dioxide’ must be close to its noun modifier ‘carbon’ , probably it is best to posit them next to next.

IMO, When you say ‘plants are’, then ther is no need to say ‘than are fungi’, since the comparison is straight between two nouns, rather than between what they do. However when you say ‘plants acquire’, then you have to also say ‘fungi acquire’ or ‘fungi do’ or some such appropriate form since, the comparison moves on to a dynamic action done by the two arms of comparison

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi---- two errors, wrong word order of carbon and use of ‘are fungi’
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi – wrong word order of carbon
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon- correct word order and comparison
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon – this is not a sentence but a fragment
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi --- two errors; one of wrong word order and not using the action word for fungi.


Hi there, I just want you to know that your motto "Better than a thousand days of diligent study is one day with a great teacher" is not actually a Japanese proverb. It is a Chinese proverb. Please feel free to check on it. In Chinese, it goes like "听君一席话,胜读十年书". Excuse me, but I just can't help telling you this.

Kudos [?]: 2 [0], given: 6

2 KUDOS received
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2013
Posts: 183

Kudos [?]: 33 [2], given: 19

GMAT ToolKit User
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Dec 2016, 12:17
2
This post received
KUDOS
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
source: Manhattan GMAT SC Navigator Explanation.

Split 1. Modifier: "in the form of carbon dioxide" is a prepositional phrase. Prepositional phrases can modify nouns or the main clause of the preceding sentence. In this case, the prepositional phrase is saying "in the form of carbon dioxide". What can be "in the form of carbon dioxide"? Logically, the answer is carbon. ...Let's take a look at the previous sentence, it says "Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi," .... there are 3 items: Plants, Carbon and Fungi. Plants and Fungi are the same species or the same type of subject while carbon is not. Logically, using the lego pieces you have, to be clear you need to compare Plants with Fungi and have carbon close to the noun modifier (the prepositional phrase). Following this logic you can eliminate A, B and E.

Split 2. Structure - Sentence Fragment. "Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon," No verb exist for the subject Plants. "more efficient..." and "in the form..." are modifiers. A verb would have to come before ",and converting" D is out.

Split3. Comparison. "X than Y" In B and E the comparison is illogical, ambiguous at best. B and E are in the form of "Cats hate dogs more than mice", this could mean that "cats hate dogs more than cats hate mice" or "cats hate dogs more than mice do". B and E are out.

Split4. Parallelism. "and converting it" at the end of the sentence must be in parallel to the prior parts. E does not follow parallelism because it misses an "ing" such as A, B, C and D have: "acquiring...and converting it" E is out.

Kudos [?]: 33 [2], given: 19

Manager
Manager
User avatar
S
Status: Preparing for GMAT!!
Joined: 11 Oct 2015
Posts: 127

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 108

Location: India
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, International Business
GMAT 1: 660 Q47 V34
GPA: 3.1
WE: General Management (Consumer Products)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Dec 2016, 03:58
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


in the form of carbon dioxide --> this must refer to carbon. So, A, B & E can be eliminated.
D -> 'Plants' doesn't have a verb.

C :)
_________________

Yours,
Siva Rama Krishna Meka :)

Kudos [?]: 18 [0], given: 108

Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 23 Dec 2013
Posts: 235

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 20

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 May 2017, 10:35
noboru wrote:
Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the form of carbon dioxide, and converting it to energy-rich sugars.

A. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi
B. Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than fungi
C. Plants are more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
D. Plants, more efficient than fungi at acquiring carbon
E. Plants acquire carbon more efficiently than fungi

[Reveal] Spoiler:
OA is C. However, it seems to compare "Plants" with "Fungi at acquiring carbon", which makes no sense. Trying to find I more logicall coparision, my take was A. After that I realized that "are" is plural which does not match with fungi, which is singular. And here is another question: If A were [...] than is fungi, that would be better?


A "Fungi" are not "in the form of carbon dioxide."
B "Fungi" are not "in the form of carbon dioxide."
C Correct.
D Sentence lacks a verb.
E "Fungi" are not "in the form of carbon dioxide." In addition, the phrase "and converting it..." is not parallel.

Kudos [?]: 10 [0], given: 20

Re: Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f   [#permalink] 14 May 2017, 10:35

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 21 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Plants are more efficient at acquiring carbon than are fungi, in the f

  post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.