GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 30 Mar 2020, 02:59

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 119
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2018, 13:37
Rocket7 wrote:
gmat4varun

That is referring to phenomena. Now Plural of Phenomena is Phenomena and that's why in option B, the use of the plural verb "are" is correct.

mcelroytutoring Could you please confirm if the above reasoning is correct for the use of plural verb are? Appreciate it.


Just searched and found that "Phenomenon" is singular and "Phenomena" is plural. I also had doubt about "that" referent in the question but then used number/count logic, a thing can have different (say, 1,2, 3...) Phenomena....so its plural.
Director
Director
User avatar
P
Status: Professional GMAT Tutor
Affiliations: AB, cum laude, Harvard University (Class of '02)
Joined: 10 Jul 2015
Posts: 725
Location: United States (CA)
Age: 40
GMAT 1: 770 Q47 V48
GMAT 2: 730 Q44 V47
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
GRE 1: Q168 V169
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Apr 2018, 14:50
Top Contributor
seed wrote:
Rocket7 wrote:
gmat4varun

That is referring to phenomena. Now Plural of Phenomena is Phenomena and that's why in option B, the use of the plural verb "are" is correct.

mcelroytutoring Could you please confirm if the above reasoning is correct for the use of plural verb are? Appreciate it.


Just searched and found that "Phenomenon" is singular and "Phenomena" is plural. I also had doubt about "that" referent in the question but then used number/count logic, a thing can have different (say, 1,2, 3...) Phenomena....so its plural.

Correct: "phenomenon" is singular and "phenomena" is plural. Similar to "criterion" and "criteria," as well as "medium" and "media."

"Something like a phenomenon..."

-L.L. Cool J.
EMPOWERgmat Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 23 Feb 2015
Posts: 831
Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 07 May 2019, 11:14
1
1
Hello Everyone!

Let's take a closer look at this question to see where we can narrow down wrong options to get to the correct answer quickly! To get started, here is the original question with major differences between each option highlighted in orange:

Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily response.

(A) private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable
(B) private, are social phenomena that are inseparable
(C) private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable
(D) private—are social phenomena but not separable
(E) also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable

After a quick glance over the options, a few key differences pop out right away:

1. What to do after the word "emotions"
2. What to do after the word "phenomenon/phenomena"


Let's get started with #1 on our list: what to do after the word "emotions." It's clear from the original sentence that the phrase, "including those deemed personal or private" is a MODIFIER that is also acting as a non-essential clause. It is giving us more information about the word "emotions," but doesn't NEED to be in the sentence.

Whenever we deal with non-essential clauses or modifiers, they MUST be offset from the rest of the sentence somehow.You can do this by either putting commas before and after it, dashes before and after it, or put it inside parentheses. To make this easier to spot, I'm going to include the entire sentence with the different options added in. Let's see which sentences handle this non-essential clause correctly or not:

(A) Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social
phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily response.


This option is INCORRECT for a few reasons. First, the phrase "including those deemed personal or private" isn't offset on both sides with commas. Second, the singular verb "is" doesn't match up to its plural subject "emotions."

(B) Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private, are social
phenomena that are inseparable from bodily response.


This option is CORRECT! It puts commas on both sides of the phrase to tell readers this is non-essential information! If you remove the non-essential clause, the rest of the sentence makes perfect sense without it!

(C) Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable from bodily response.

This option is INCORRECT because it doesn't have commas on both sides of the non-essential phrase "including those deemed personal or private." There's also a problem with the word "those" later on in the sentence. It's not clear if "those" is referring to emotions or phenomenon. When a pronoun is too vague, it's likely an incorrect choice.

(D) Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private—are social phenomena but not separable from bodily response.

This option is also INCORRECT. Remember when I said you can offset non-essential clauses with commas, dashes, or parentheses? You can only use ONE method for each clause, and this sentence uses two (comma and dash).

(E) Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable from bodily response.

This option is INCORRECT, though not because of punctuation. Yes, it properly utilizes commas on both sides of the non-essential phrase. However, the non-essential phrase is overly wordy. Why say "also as private emotions" when simply saying "private" will do? We also have a problem with the phrase "not inseparable" changing the intended meaning. This changes the meaning of the sentence from "emotions are inseparable from bodily response" to "emotions are not inseparable from bodily response."

There you have it! Option B is the correct answer because it uses correct punctuation with non-essential modifiers and doesn't confuse readers to the intended meaning.



Don't study for the GMAT. Train for it.
_________________
"Students study. GMAT assassins train."
Image


The Course Used By GMAT Club Moderators To Earn 750+

souvik101990 Score: 760 Q50 V42 ★★★★★
ENGRTOMBA2018 Score: 750 Q49 V44 ★★★★★

Originally posted by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 27 Aug 2018, 16:56.
Last edited by EMPOWERgmatVerbal on 07 May 2019, 11:14, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 29 Mar 2015
Posts: 91
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GPA: 3.1
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2018, 09:21
hi guys, I have a silly question regarding this sentence

that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon

emotions is a noun as per my understanding

and including is a verb-ing modifier but whenever V-ing modifier is modifying a noun it should not be separated by the comma


kindly correct me where i am wrong.
Senior SC Moderator
avatar
V
Joined: 22 May 2016
Posts: 3667
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2018, 17:10
1
shubham2312 wrote:
hi guys, I have a silly question regarding this sentence

that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon

emotions is a noun as per my understanding

and including is a verb-ing modifier but whenever V-ing modifier is modifying a noun it should not be separated by the comma


kindly correct me where i am wrong.

shubham2312 , your question is not at all silly!
In fact, it's a very good question.

"including" is an exception to the rules that govern what you call V-ing modifiers
V-ing modifiers are also called present participles, participial modifiers, verbING, and __ING modifiers

"including" always modifies a noun or noun-type word or phrase
(I cannot think of a single exception)

including in this context belongs to the "additive phrase" group.
Including is similar to the phrases as well as, in addition to, and along with

(1) Additive phrases modify nouns in that they add nouns to another noun.
-- In this sentence, including adds personal or private emotions to the general category emotions
-- Similar: Foods rich in the antioxidant lycopene, including tomatoes and apricots, have been studied extensively.

(2) Additive phrases are not part of the subject itself.
-- Because additive phrases are not part of the subject itself, they often make verbs sound odd.
-- Correct: Espen, along with Kristoffer, travels frequently from Norway to France.
[singular subject, singular verb, despite the presence of two people in the sentence]

(3) Additive phrases often are defined as prepositions
-- Do not worry about the part of speech. Just remember that
"including" is an odd and exceptional ____ING modifier.

The pattern in this sentence is typical.
". . . that emotions, including those deemed personal or private, are . . ."
plural noun + comma + INCLUDING + nouns/pronouns that belong to the same group as the plural noun

THIS post discusses additive phrases and uses "including" in one of the author's SC mock questions.

Hope that helps.
_________________
Visit SC Butler, here! Get two SC questions to practice, whose links you can find by date.

Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world; indeed, it's the only thing that ever has. -- Margaret Mead
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 25 Jul 2017
Posts: 92
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 25 Nov 2018, 17:27
AbdurRakib wrote:
Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily response.

(A) private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable
(B) private, are social phenomena that are inseparable
(C) private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable
(D) private—are social phenomena but not separable
(E) also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable

OG 2017 New Question


hi daagh / Other experts,

does not THAT in option B is modifying "Social Phenomenon" instead of intended "Emotions"
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5412
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Dec 2018, 10:52
Top Contributor
anuj

How can we conclude that intention of the pronoun 'that' is to only emotions? By referring to a broad spectrum word phenomena, it means that the pronoun antecedes not only the emotions but also many more such abstract feelings.

However, let me also point out one technical factor. There
Is a difference between modification and antecedence? 'That' is often a relative pronoun that can refer to a previous noun or at times a more logical proximate noun. Per se, a relative pronoun technically never modifies anything. When we say modification, it involves a change in the original perception of something by providing additional information.

In addition, 'that' may also act as a subordinate conjunction in which case it neither antecedes nor modifies anything.

We must not get confused between antecedence and modification. This confusion may lead us to seek a distant modifyee than a nearer noun as in the case of emotions vs. phenomena.
The 'that' in the context cannot intend to jump over a verb 'are' and refer to the emotions. The reference tp phenomena seems to be correct in the answer B.
_________________
One-to-one video private sessions on SC +91 98845 44509, <newnaren@gmail.com>
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 20 Apr 2019
Posts: 115
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 28 May 2019, 10:50
AbdurRakib wrote:
Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily response.


(A) private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable

(B) private, are social phenomena that are inseparable

(C) private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable

(D) private—are social phenomena but not separable

(E) also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable


OG 2017 New Question

It can only be B because of the comma
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 May 2019
Posts: 130
CAT Tests
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 22 Jun 2019, 02:36
AbdurRakib wrote:
Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily response.


(A) private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable

(B) private, are social phenomena that are inseparable

(C) private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable

(D) private—are social phenomena but not separable

(E) also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable


OG 2017 New Question


I have a query regarding the non-underlined portion. "Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument"
does this has SV pair?
Recent interdisciplinary studies: Subject
Advance:verb

if yes then studies are plural and advance is singular.

If its not a statement then what role is this playing?

I think I am missing something and not able to figure out. Can anyone clarify?
_________________
Pick yourself up, dust yourself off, and start again.

Success is the sum of all small efforts.

MAKE IT HAPPEN :)
CEO
CEO
User avatar
V
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Posts: 3151
Location: India
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2019, 01:54
1
CrackVerbal33 wrote:
I have a query regarding the non-underlined portion. "Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument"
does this has SV pair?
Recent interdisciplinary studies: Subject
Advance:verb

if yes then studies are plural and advance is singular.

If its not a statement then what role is this playing?

I think I am missing something and not able to figure out. Can anyone clarify?
You have identified the subject and verb correctly.

Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument...

The one correction to be made here is that advance (verb) is plural. Advances is the one that we'd normally think of as being singular. For example:
Both players advance to the next round.
He advances to the next round.

It's the opposite when we use advance as a noun. Then it is singular.
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 29 Jan 2019
Posts: 19
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Oct 2019, 22:07
4
668. Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily response.


(A) private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable

(B) private, are social phenomena that are inseparable

(C) private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable

(D) private—are social phenomena but not separable

(E) also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable

The errors in the sentence are:

“Emotions” is the main subject and it needs plural verb ‘are”

The phrase “including…private” needs an ending comma as it has a beginning comma.

The plural of "phenomenon" is "phenomena". So, the correct phrase is “are social phenomena”

In option C, “those” doesn’t refer to anything.

In option D, there is a punctuation error such as “including…private-

In option E, the use of “or also” doesn’t make sense. The meaning also distorts here.

B is the correct answer here.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Nov 2018
Posts: 165
Location: India
GMAT 1: 680 Q48 V35
GMAT 2: 640 Q48 V29
GMAT 3: 720 Q47 V42
GPA: 3.5
CAT Tests
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 30 Jan 2020, 23:49
1
I am still confused about the usage of 'that' in option B. If 'that' refers to social phenomena then is it correct to say that social phenomena are inseparable from bodily response?
_________________
Beautiful is the one who continues to try despite failure.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Posts: 209
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Feb 2020, 00:44
EducationAisle wrote:
gmat4varun wrote:
I got to option B in 57 seconds but got one doubt that what is "That" referring to? I feel it is referring to Emotions then isn't it should be those because plural of That is Those or something which means plural?

Hi gmat4varun, that is referring to social phenomena.

All relative pronouns (such as that in this case) can refer to both singular or plural nouns.

p.s. Our book EducationAisle Sentence Correction Nirvana discusses Relative pronouns, their application and examples in significant detail. If someone is interested, PM me your email-id; I can mail the corresponding section.


Hi
I have a silly doubt - i may be mixing two concepts but:
When we have "neither.. nor / either..or /or " we use the subject closest to nor/or to determine the verb. Would the same not be valid for statement A? "Private" is singular
eg neither the players nor the coach IS
SVP
SVP
User avatar
D
Joined: 27 Mar 2010
Posts: 1707
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GPA: 3.31
Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 Feb 2020, 00:58
1
Hi Kriti, including those deemed personal or private is just a modifier.

So, the core of the sentence (excluding the modifier) in option A is:

..emotions is a social phenomenon...
_________________
Thanks,
Ashish
GMAT-99th Percentile, MBA - ISB Hyderabad
EducationAisle, Bangalore

Sentence Correction Nirvana available on Amazon.in and Flipkart

Join us for a [color=#ed1c24]free GMAT Live Online Class from anywhere in the world[/color]
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 28 Jan 2020
Posts: 27
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2020, 09:41
Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily response.


(A) private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable
This is incorrect with both a subject-verb agreement issue and a sentence structure issue. First, the subject-verb issue: the answer choice uses the word "is" referring to "emotions." The word "emotions" is a singular noun, but the verb "is" is plural. The verb should be "are." Additionally, the modifier "including those deemed personal or private," is set off by a comma at the beginning after "emotions," so it should end with a comma after "Private, to ensure that the "emotions" are a social phenomenon." This creates a meaning issue.

(B) private, are social phenomena that are inseparable
This is correct. It resolves the issues pertaining to both subject-verb agreement and sentence structure. First, because the noun "emotions" is plural, it should be paired up with the plural verb "are," which this answer choice correctly does. Secondly, there is a comma after the word "private," which correctly seperates the "including..." modifier (modifying "emotions) from the rest of the sentence.

(C) private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable
This is incorrect due to a sentence structure issue creating a meaning problem. Since there is no comma after "private" to close out the "including modifier," the sentence doesn't make logical sense. Additionally, the sentence says that "emotions... are not those inseperable," which doesn't make any sense.


(D) private—are social phenomena but not separable


(E) also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Jul 2016
Posts: 14
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 05 Mar 2020, 10:08
TeamGMATIFY wrote:
Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions, including those deemed personal or private is a social phenomenon, though one inseparable from bodily temperature.

Meaning of the sentence:
Studies have supported an argument that emotions are a social phenomenon. The emotions include those deemed personal or private. These social phenomena are inseparable from Bodily Temperature

A) private is a social phenomenon,though one inseparable
1) Emotions -> are -> Subject Verb Agreement issue

B) private,are social phenomena that are inseparable -> Correctly conveyed

C) private are a social phenomenon but are not those inseparable
1) There are two nots -> Changes the meaning of the sentence
2) comma is required to specify that the modifier has ended.


D) private –are social phenomena but are not separable
1) Social phenomena is not separable from Bodily Temperature. It sounds as if
Emotions
a) are social Phenomena
but
b) are not separable from bodily Temperature

2) Comma is required to specify where the modifier ends


E) also as private emotions, are social phenomena not inseparable
1) Also as private emotions -> Removes the function of "or" and doesn't go well at all.


I couldn't understand the meaning of the sentence because of the use of the phrase "though one inseparable". Can someone please explain what this means? I assumed it to state a contrast to the prior clause

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
User avatar
B
Joined: 25 Sep 2018
Posts: 82
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 13 Mar 2020, 23:41
Hey guys,

For anyone looking for a detailed explanation, I have posted this on YouTube. Hope you find this useful.

youtu.be/6BkEIXEaWhE
_________________
“A teacher is one who makes himself/herself progressively unnecessary.”
— Thomas Carruthers


Listening Promotes Better Understanding and Learning. So, I am working hard to build a channel with the best GMAT Content.

My YouTube Channel

GrayMATter
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions   [#permalink] 13 Mar 2020, 23:41

Go to page   Previous    1   2   [ 37 posts ] 

Display posts from previous: Sort by

Recent interdisciplinary studies advance the argument that emotions

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne