Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 19:00 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 19:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
parkhydel
Joined: 03 Jun 2019
Last visit: 27 Mar 2025
Posts: 273
Own Kudos:
20,385
 [43]
Given Kudos: 60
Posts: 273
Kudos: 20,385
 [43]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
42
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,291
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,291
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
bM22
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 May 2016
Last visit: 17 Jul 2025
Posts: 717
Own Kudos:
784
 [4]
Given Kudos: 1,316
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 717
Kudos: 784
 [4]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Apt0810
Joined: 15 Jul 2018
Last visit: 24 Oct 2020
Posts: 327
Own Kudos:
622
 [1]
Given Kudos: 94
Posts: 327
Kudos: 622
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Here Most strengthen: Runoff from roads is often absorbed by farmland,since sand would absorb any amount of water that is runoff from road and if no salt is there then sufficient bacterias are there


Most weaken: Sand is much less
effective than salt at making roads safe to drive in winter conditions.
This statement clearly shows that sand cannot be good alternative when compared with salt

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
pranskius
Joined: 05 Jul 2021
Last visit: 19 Oct 2021
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Location: Lithuania
Posts: 7
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Could anyone expand on this explanation? "There is insufficient information to link drinking water to the agriculture official’s argument, therefore the third option is eliminated."

In what way is there insufficient information to link drinking water to the agriculture official's argument? Is it because information "chloride levels 11–160 times the level sufficient to inhibit bacteria growth in soil" is not sufficient to infer that these chloride levels are high? Therefore, it is impossible to link the choice C which talks about high chloride levels?
User avatar
kaladin123
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 06 Jul 2019
Last visit: 10 Jul 2022
Posts: 135
Own Kudos:
67
 [1]
Given Kudos: 747
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GMAT 1: 640 Q39 V39
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38 (Online)
GPA: 3.11
WE:Project Management (Computer Software)
Products:
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V38 (Online)
Posts: 135
Kudos: 67
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
pranskius
Could anyone expand on this explanation? "There is insufficient information to link drinking water to the agriculture official’s argument, therefore the third option is eliminated."

In what way is there insufficient information to link drinking water to the agriculture official's argument? Is it because information "chloride levels 11–160 times the level sufficient to inhibit bacteria growth in soil" is not sufficient to infer that these chloride levels are high? Therefore, it is impossible to link the choice C which talks about high chloride levels?

I fell for the same trap answer choice. It's quite cleverly written, actually.
If one reads carefully, it becomes clear that high chloride levels in drinking water are not relevant to the official's argument, which is about soil.
User avatar
AnishPassi
Joined: 16 Jul 2014
Last visit: 15 Nov 2025
Posts: 112
Own Kudos:
661
 [2]
Given Kudos: 18
Status:GMAT Coach
Affiliations: The GMAT Co.
Concentration: Strategy
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIMA  (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V41
Posts: 112
Kudos: 661
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The official's main point is: "sand, rather than road salts, should be used as a winter road treatment, thereby eliminating the need for salt yards"

Why should sand be used instead of road salts as a winter road treatment?

The official must be thinking:
1. Salt is bad for soil, we should not use it.
2. (Sand is a good substitute for winter road treatment), so we should use sand instead.


Statement D: "Sand is much less effective than salt at making roads safe to drive in winter conditions." attacks the assumption the official is making. If sand is significantly inferior, maybe we should not use sand instead of road salts. D weakens the official's case.

Statement E: "Runoff from roads is often absorbed by farmland."

The passage already mentions that soil samples from highway medians contain very dangerous levels of sodium and chloride. Often what drains away from the road is absorbed by farmland. If winter roads are treated with road salts, the salts probably carry to farmland. Bad for farmland. Bad for plant growth. We should look for a replacement. E strengthens the official's case.



runoff meaning: "the draining away of water (or substances carried in it) from the surface of an area of land, a building or structure, etc."


 
User avatar
playthegame
User avatar
Johnson Moderator
Joined: 19 Jan 2024
Last visit: 28 Mar 2025
Posts: 423
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 146
Location: Canada
Concentration: Operations, Leadership
Schools: Johnson '27
Products:
Schools: Johnson '27
Posts: 423
Kudos: 635
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello Sajjad1994, think this question is available in the OG question bank so not sure how come this is tagged GMAT Prep (Focus).
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,291
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
playthegame
Hello Sajjad1994, think this question is available in the OG question bank so not sure how come this is tagged GMAT Prep (Focus).
­There might be a chance this question showing up in both of the sources. 
User avatar
mkeshri185
Joined: 01 May 2025
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 89
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 89
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How can be E the answer for strengthener? Runoff is never discussed in the passage. We dont know whether it is negative or positive impact? And also how do we know that runoff problem is not solved by salt method and will be solved by sand?
bM22
1. A high number of road accidents are attributable to untreated roads in winter.
Neither of Both - since it neither weakens the use of sand as a winter road treatment nor strengthens the same.
So irrelevant for us.


2.The cost of removing salts from soil in abandoned salt yards is high.
Neither of Both - since it does help in strengthening the claim that use of salt for road treatment need to be replaced, but not specifically strength/weaken the claim by the official regarding the use of sand. So irrelevant for us.


3. High chloride concentrations in drinking water supplies have a negative impact on health.
Neither of Both - since it doesn't help in weakening/strengthening the claim, that the use of sand could either cause this effect, or prevent it.

?
4. Sand is much less effective than salt at making roads safe to drive in winter conditions.
Weakens - Now, this statement says that sand is less effective than salt, directly undermining the claim of the official, implying that sand cannot be a suitable replacement of salt, thus weakening the statement.

5. Runoff from roads is often absorbed by farmland.
Strengthens - This statement strengthens the claim of the official, since if sand is used, it would absorb any amount of water that is a runoff from road, as no salt means sufficient amount of bacteria, which in turn implies, plants, which is turn implies any runoff from roads will be absorbed.


So 4th one weakens the claim, and the 5th one strengthens it.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,355
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,964
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,355
Kudos: 778,081
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mkeshri185
How can be E the answer for strengthener? Runoff is never discussed in the passage. We dont know whether it is negative or positive impact? And also how do we know that runoff problem is not solved by salt method and will be solved by sand?

E strengthens because it supplies the missing link.

If road runoff (water that flows off roads into nearby soil and farmland) is absorbed by farmland, then the salts spread on roads end up in farm soils. The passage already states that high chloride and sodium inhibit soil bacteria and therefore plant growth, so carrying those salts onto farmland is harmful. That creates a direct agriculture impact from road salts, which supports switching away from salt. Sand does not add chloride or sodium, so it avoids this specific contamination even if runoff still occurs. Hence E strengthens the official’s case.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105355 posts
496 posts