Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
20 Dec 2022, 02:03
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 out of 6
Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 4/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 4/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
Coherence and connectivity: 5/5
This rating corresponds to the flow of ideas and expressions from one paragraph to another. The effective use of connectives and coherence of assertive language in arguing for/against the argument is analyzed. This is deemed as one of the most important parameters.
Paragraph structure and formation: 4/5
The structure and division of the attempt into appropriate paragraphs are evaluated. To score well on this parameter, it is important to organize the attempt into paragraphs. Preferable to follow the convention of leaving a line blank at the end of each paragraph, to make the software aware of the structure of the essay.
Vocabulary and word expression: 4/5
This parameter rates the submitted essay on the range of relevant vocabulary possessed by the candidate basis the word and expression usage. There are no extra- points for bombastic word usage. Simple is the best form of suave!
Good Luck
shivangibansal
27 Apr 2023, 07:26
Kudos
Bookmarks
Hi Sajjad1994, my GMAT is coming in a few days. I would be grateful if you could rate my AWA below.
Thank you in advance!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The argument states that Windfall Ltd should implement a policy to check all purchasing invoices for errors so that the company can reduce overpayments, which contributes to overall net gains. The member of the consulting firm also alleged that this recommendation can demonstrate the rigorousness of the firm’s method. However, this argument has a number of problems. It does not consider the time costs of staff that would be incurred in full population checking, the possibility that underpayments in other invoices could in turn reduce net gains, and the underlying reason of the errors and consistencies might be caused by computer error.
First, carrying out full population check for all the purchasing invoices will significantly increase the workload of the staff. For example, time for accounting team members that could be spent on cost control measures, which is crucial to monitoring the costs of business, is taken up for the time-consuming checking exercise. In this case, the time costs incurred by the accounting team outweigh the benefits of locating invoices errors and inconsistencies.
Second, there might be underpayments that actually reduce the net gain of Windfall Ltd. Since the checking exercise last month only focused on 10% of the purchase invoice, the other 90% might involve invoices of underpayments. In the event that the aggregate amount of underpayments is larger than that of the overpayments, it not only wastes time but also reduces the net gains for the company.
Additionally, instead of merely extending the population of checking, the company should focus on investigating the underlying cause of the errors and inconsistencies. In some cases, a recurring error might be caused by an undetected programming error inherent in the accounting system. Hence, the only solution to the problem would be to adjust the setting of the system, instead of mindlessly extending the sample size and manually correcting the invoice amounts.
In conclusion, the consulting firm’s argument has a number of holes detailed above. Without first considering what is the underlying cause of the errors, full checking does not necessarily reduce the net gains of Windfall Ltd. However, if the investigation concludes that the errors are purely manual and the time costs spend on full checking can lead to an overall net gain for Windfall, these factors might strengthen the argument.
Thank you in advance!
_____________________________________________________________________________________________________
The argument states that Windfall Ltd should implement a policy to check all purchasing invoices for errors so that the company can reduce overpayments, which contributes to overall net gains. The member of the consulting firm also alleged that this recommendation can demonstrate the rigorousness of the firm’s method. However, this argument has a number of problems. It does not consider the time costs of staff that would be incurred in full population checking, the possibility that underpayments in other invoices could in turn reduce net gains, and the underlying reason of the errors and consistencies might be caused by computer error.
First, carrying out full population check for all the purchasing invoices will significantly increase the workload of the staff. For example, time for accounting team members that could be spent on cost control measures, which is crucial to monitoring the costs of business, is taken up for the time-consuming checking exercise. In this case, the time costs incurred by the accounting team outweigh the benefits of locating invoices errors and inconsistencies.
Second, there might be underpayments that actually reduce the net gain of Windfall Ltd. Since the checking exercise last month only focused on 10% of the purchase invoice, the other 90% might involve invoices of underpayments. In the event that the aggregate amount of underpayments is larger than that of the overpayments, it not only wastes time but also reduces the net gains for the company.
Additionally, instead of merely extending the population of checking, the company should focus on investigating the underlying cause of the errors and inconsistencies. In some cases, a recurring error might be caused by an undetected programming error inherent in the accounting system. Hence, the only solution to the problem would be to adjust the setting of the system, instead of mindlessly extending the sample size and manually correcting the invoice amounts.
In conclusion, the consulting firm’s argument has a number of holes detailed above. Without first considering what is the underlying cause of the errors, full checking does not necessarily reduce the net gains of Windfall Ltd. However, if the investigation concludes that the errors are purely manual and the time costs spend on full checking can lead to an overall net gain for Windfall, these factors might strengthen the argument.
28 Apr 2023, 13:02
Kudos
Bookmarks
AWA Score: 5.5 - 6 out of 6
Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized and flows logically from one point to the next. The writer effectively uses transitional phrases to connect ideas and maintain coherence.
Word structure: 6/6
The writer employs a wide range of vocabulary and constructs clear and concise sentences.
Paragraph structure and formation: 5.5/6
The paragraphs are well-structured, with clear topic sentences and supporting evidence. However, some paragraphs could have been more focused on a single main point.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay demonstrates a high level of proficiency in English language and grammar.
Vocabulary and word expression: 5.5/6
The writer uses a varied and sophisticated vocabulary, but there are a few instances where word choice could have been improved for clarity and precision.
Overall, the essay is well-written, well-organized, and effectively analyzes the argument presented in the memorandum. The writer presents several valid counterarguments and suggests improvements to the proposed recommendation. The essay's only weakness is that some paragraphs could have been more focused, but this does not detract significantly from the overall quality of the writing. Therefore, I would rate this essay 5.5 out of 6, with minor deductions in Coherence and connectivity and Vocabulary and word expression.
Coherence and connectivity: 5.5/6
The essay is well-organized and flows logically from one point to the next. The writer effectively uses transitional phrases to connect ideas and maintain coherence.
Word structure: 6/6
The writer employs a wide range of vocabulary and constructs clear and concise sentences.
Paragraph structure and formation: 5.5/6
The paragraphs are well-structured, with clear topic sentences and supporting evidence. However, some paragraphs could have been more focused on a single main point.
Language and Grammar: 6/6
The essay demonstrates a high level of proficiency in English language and grammar.
Vocabulary and word expression: 5.5/6
The writer uses a varied and sophisticated vocabulary, but there are a few instances where word choice could have been improved for clarity and precision.
Overall, the essay is well-written, well-organized, and effectively analyzes the argument presented in the memorandum. The writer presents several valid counterarguments and suggests improvements to the proposed recommendation. The essay's only weakness is that some paragraphs could have been more focused, but this does not detract significantly from the overall quality of the writing. Therefore, I would rate this essay 5.5 out of 6, with minor deductions in Coherence and connectivity and Vocabulary and word expression.
Jaassoon
