Quote:
Scientists have found that
skin tissue is more resistant to toxic substances than lung tissue and uses sweat glands to protect the immune system from possible invaders.
A. skin tissue is more resistant to toxic substances than lung tissue and uses Ambigously implying that skin tissue is also more resistant to lung tissue.
IncorrectB. skin tissue is more resistant to toxic substances than is lung tissue and uses
KeepC. skin tissue is resistant to toxic substances, more so than lung tissue, using
KeepD. the resistance of skin tissue to toxic substances is more than that of lung tissue, and it uses
"it" is ambigousE. the resistance of skin tissue to toxic substances is more than that of lung tissue, using
better options available There is some confusion between B and C.
Scientists have found that
a) skin tissue is more resistant to toxic substances than is lung tissue
b) skin tissue uses sweat glands to protect the immune system from possible invaders
On thinking about the implied meaning, what I do understand that that skin tissue is more resistant to toxic susbtances than is lung tissue.
How? By using sweat glands to protect the immune system from possible invaders.
However the correct answer as per the source implies that both the premises are independent of each other i.e. skin tissue is more resistant to toxic susbtances
AND uses sweat glands to protect the immune system from possible invaders.
I am not sure if the implied meaning of the correct answer is correct.
Not sure between B & C
@veritasprepkarishma