Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 05:45 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 05:45
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
49,302
 [24]
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
 [24]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
21
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
navderm
Joined: 30 May 2019
Last visit: 26 May 2023
Posts: 152
Own Kudos:
31
 [4]
Given Kudos: 331
Location: United States
Concentration: Technology, Strategy
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3.6
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
Posts: 152
Kudos: 31
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dushyanta
Joined: 27 May 2015
Last visit: 06 Mar 2025
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 60
Kudos: 62
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
mggmat19
Joined: 25 Apr 2017
Last visit: 21 Aug 2024
Posts: 16
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 154
Posts: 16
Kudos: 10
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SajjadAhmad
Senator Strongwood reported that, contrary to a study cited by the administration, a thorough study by his own party concluded that a reduction in the capital gains tax would lead to an increase in the federal deficit. “Hooray for common sense,” he said. “Everyone knows that when you cut taxes you lose revenue.” He concluded that the administration’s plan for reducing the capital gains tax was now dead, because he could not imagine any senator voting to increase the deficit.

Which one of the following accurately describes something Senator Strongwood does in advancing his argument?

(A) He implies that increasing the capital gains tax would decrease the federal deficit.

(B) He assumes senators will believe his party’s report instead of the administration’s.

(C) He resorts to name-calling by expressly stating that his opponents lack common sense.

(D) He assumes that senators will rarely vote for unpopular legislation.

(E) He assumes that a study commissioned by his party must be more objective than one commissioned by the administration.

---

In the first line, it is written "contrary to the report of administration" The report of Senator's own party says "Reducing tax will lead to deficit".
He calls it conclusion drawn by common sense and Imagines that " No senator will ever vote for budget deficit".
He imagines that people will trust the common sense- his own party's report rather than that of administration.
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Sajjad1994
User avatar
GRE Forum Moderator
Joined: 02 Nov 2016
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 17,289
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,179
GPA: 3.62
Products:
Posts: 17,289
Kudos: 49,302
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Explanation

Hello sharathnair14 this is not an official explanation but i hope it will help.

Our tricky little senator employs a common political trick: He presents a view that contrasts that of the administration, but then proceeds to argue as if the administration’s view doesn’t exist. Even his rhetoric is a carefully constructed attempt to show that only his party’s view exists or matters: “Hooray for common sense . . .”; “Everyone knows that . . .” He then concludes that the tax is dead, because no senator would ever vote for something that will bring about such results—the results that his party predicts but that he now tries to put over as the only possible interpretation. Through all this, Strongwood is hoping that people, especially the voting senators, will forget about the other interpretation of the effects of the tax, namely, the administration’s interpretation. Clearly, in making his argument, he is assuming that the senators believe the report of his party, not that of the administration.

(A) Strongwood’s party believes that reducing the tax would increase the deficit. Nowhere does he or his party suggest what will happen if the tax is increased.

(C) The “common sense” comment is NOT expressly directed at his opponents. He may imply by this comment that the administration lacks common sense on this issue, but this is only a subtle jab, not nearly enough to qualify as “name-calling.”

(D) The notion of “popular” never arises—he simply believes the senators won’t vote for something that, at least in the view of his party, will have the negative effect of increasing the deficit.

(E) We don’t know why Strongwood feels his party’s study is superior to that of the administration’s. As far as we know, he assumes nothing about the relative “objectivity” of each. He simply announces the superiority of his party’s study, not the reasons for the superiority.

Answer: B

sharathnair14
OE SajjadAhmad
avatar
vikram1singh90
Joined: 15 Nov 2017
Last visit: 12 Jan 2020
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Schools: IIMA PGPX "21
Schools: IIMA PGPX "21
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Thanks bro nicely explained. In the first line, it is written "contrary to the report of administration" The report of Senator's own party says "Reducing tax will lead to deficit".
He calls it conclusion drawn by common sense and Imagines that " No senator will ever vote for budget deficit".
He imagines that people will trust the common sense- his own party's report rather than that of administration.
User avatar
CEdward
Joined: 11 Aug 2020
Last visit: 14 Apr 2022
Posts: 1,203
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 332
Posts: 1,203
Kudos: 272
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I think it's B.

Senator Strongwood reported that, contrary to a study cited by the administration, a thorough study by his own party concluded that a reduction in the capital gains tax would lead to an increase in the federal deficit. “Hooray for common sense,” he said. “Everyone knows that when you cut taxes you lose revenue.” He concluded that the administration’s plan for reducing the capital gains tax was now dead, because he could not imagine any senator voting to increase the deficit.

Which one of the following accurately describes something Senator Strongwood does in advancing his argument?

(A) He implies that increasing the capital gains tax would decrease the federal deficit.
We might infer this, but the senator doesn't actually do this.

(B) He assumes senators will believe his party’s report instead of the administration’s.
CORRECT

Key part of the passage: "He concluded that the administration’s plan for reducing the capital gains tax was now dead"

This is his conclusion and it must be true that he assumes the senators will believe him. If they didn't believe him, then there would be no reason for him to think this.

(C) He resorts to name-calling by expressly stating that his opponents lack common sense.

No.

(D) He assumes that senators will rarely vote for unpopular legislation.

No. He doesn't do this...we don't know whether the purportedly flawed legislation is popular or unpopular.

(E) He assumes that a study commissioned by his party must be more objective than one commissioned by the administration.

No. It's entirely possible that both studies were objective, it just so happens that the Senator's own studies contradict those other studies.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7443 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
231 posts
188 posts