Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 22:17 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 22:17
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
stardustsparklin
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Last visit: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
12
 [10]
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 3
Kudos: 12
 [10]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
stardustsparklin
Joined: 07 Jan 2005
Last visit: 08 Jan 2005
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
12
 [2]
Location: Chapel Hill, NC
Posts: 3
Kudos: 12
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gayathri
Joined: 07 Nov 2004
Last visit: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 364
Own Kudos:
502
 [4]
Posts: 364
Kudos: 502
 [4]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
banerjeea_98
Joined: 18 Nov 2004
Last visit: 17 May 2012
Posts: 676
Own Kudos:
Posts: 676
Kudos: 201
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
vprabhala
Set T is an infinite sequence of positive integers. A "superset" is a sequence in which there is a finite number of multiples of three. Is T a superset?


(1) The first six integers in T are multiples of three.
(2) An infinite number of integers in T are multiples of four.

I know that this has been discussed earlier. still not very clear..


"E"

Superset = finite number of multiples of 3

state 1: T={3,6,9,12,15,18......}...can go on with infinite number of multiples of 3 or can be just first 6 numbers....so ans can be NO or YES...insuff

state 2: T={4,8,12,16.....}....may have finite multiples of 3 also or may not...insuff

combine......insuff.....again we can have infinite number of multiples of 3 or may be not
User avatar
ywilfred
Joined: 07 Jul 2004
Last visit: 06 Mar 2012
Posts: 1,989
Own Kudos:
Location: Singapore
Posts: 1,989
Kudos: 2,031
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
St1:
We have no knowledge if there are other multiples of three after the first 6 integers. So T could or could not be a superset. Insufficient.

St2:
Useless information. We need to know if there are a finite number of multiples of 3 in order to determine if T is a superset. Insufficient.

Using st1 and st2:
No further useful information. Insufficient.

Ans E
User avatar
IrinaOK
Joined: 22 Aug 2007
Last visit: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 276
Own Kudos:
Posts: 276
Kudos: 502
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
ywilfred
St1:
We have no knowledge if there are other multiples of three after the first 6 integers. So T could or could not be a superset. Insufficient.

St2:
Useless information. We need to know if there are a finite number of multiples of 3 in order to determine if T is a superset. Insufficient.

Using st1 and st2:
No further useful information. Insufficient.

Ans E


The OA is E, and the explanation is clear. Ywilfred, thank you once again.

But I still can not understand the question text. It says set T is infinite, and 'superset' is finite. Then how can T be ever superset....

Gmat probably doesn`t ask ambigous questions like this one.. it is from PrincetonReview.
User avatar
anulfc
Joined: 21 Dec 2014
Last visit: 24 Jul 2019
Posts: 67
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Doesn't the word sequence mean that the order is related in some manner?
So, in statement 1, if the first 6 number are multiples of 3, then we can assume that the rest are related as well in some way(can be AP/GP/HP) and therefore statement 1 is sufficient?
User avatar
Harley1980
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 06 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jun 2024
Posts: 1,001
Own Kudos:
6,688
 [1]
Given Kudos: 178
Location: Ukraine
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, Technology
GMAT 1: 660 Q48 V33
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
GMAT 2: 740 Q50 V40
Posts: 1,001
Kudos: 6,688
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnubhavRao
Bunuel
Doesn't the word sequence mean that the order is related in some manner?
So, in statement 1, if the first 6 number are multiples of 3, then we can assume that the rest are related as well in some way(can be AP/GP/HP) and therefore statement 1 is sufficient?

Hello AnubhavRao

According to this article: math-sequences-progressions-101891.html
"sequence is an ordered list of objects. It can be finite or infinite. The elements may repeat themselves more than once in the sequence, and their ordering is important unlike a set"

So in task should be specified what kind of sequence we have: arithmetic, geometric, multiple of some number and so on. Sometimes sequences can be described by some rule and you need to calculate each element individually to find the pattern.

In our case we have only information that this sequence consists from positivie integers so it can be [1, 2, 3] or [1, 1, 2, 2, 3, 3] or [3, 2, 1, 0] (order is important but doesn't mean that it should be increasing order)
So, first six element can't determine all sequence.
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 6,839
Own Kudos:
16,354
 [1]
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,839
Kudos: 16,354
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnubhavRao
Bunuel
Doesn't the word sequence mean that the order is related in some manner?
So, in statement 1, if the first 6 number are multiples of 3, then we can assume that the rest are related as well in some way(can be AP/GP/HP) and therefore statement 1 is sufficient?


Sequesnce : In mathematics, a sequence is an ordered collection of objects

Statement 1: The first six integers in T are multiples of three

Case 1: But T may have first 6 numbers multiple of 3 and then next six multiple of 5 and then next six multiple of 7 etc.

i.e. There is a possibility that there are only 6 multiples of 3 [Limited Multiples of 6]

Case 2: But T may have first 6 numbers multiple of 3 and then next six multiple of 6 and then next six multiple of 9 etc.

i.e. There is a possibility that there are Infinite multiples of 3 [Infinite Multiples of 6]

Hence, NOT SUFFICIENT

I hope it clears your doubt!!!
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,394
 [1]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,394
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AnubhavRao
Set T is an infinite sequence of positive integers. A "superset" is a sequence in which there is a finite number of multiples of three. Is T a superset?

(1) The first six integers in T are multiples of three.
(2) An infinite number of integers in T are multiples of four.

Bunuel
Doesn't the word sequence mean that the order is related in some manner?
So, in statement 1, if the first 6 number are multiples of 3, then we can assume that the rest are related as well in some way(can be AP/GP/HP) and therefore statement 1 is sufficient?

A sequence, by definition, is an ordered list of terms. While a set, is a collection of elements without any order.

Note, that it's not necessary for the terms of a sequence to form any kind of progression, or to be related by some formula. For example, {1, 2.8, \(\sqrt{3}\), \(\pi\), -17.4} is a sequence.

As for the question: the answer is straight E. Consider the following two sequences:
{12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, ...}: the sequence has infinite number of multiples of 3.
{12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 12, 4, 4, 4, 4, ...}: the sequence has finite number of multiples of 3.

Hope it helps.
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 6,839
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,839
Kudos: 16,354
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
draditya
Set T is an infinite sequence of positive integers. A "superset" is a sequence in which there is a finite number of multiples of three. Is T a superset?
(1) The first six integers in T are multiples of three.
(2) An infinite number of integers in T are multiples of four.


Statement 1: The first six integers in T are multiples of three.
After the First six number in T, rest of the numbers may or may not have finite multiples of 3. Hence,
NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: An infinite number of integers in T are multiples of four.[/quote]
Multiples of 4 has nothing to do with Number of Multiples of 3 hence, nothing can be concluded about set T being a Superset
NOT SUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements
After the First six number in T, rest of the numbers may or may not have finite multiples of 3 and Multiples of 4 has nothing to do with Number of Multiples of 3 hence, nothing can be concluded about set T being a Superset
NOT SUFFICIENT

Answer: Option E
User avatar
itwarriorkarve
Joined: 09 Jun 2015
Last visit: 31 Oct 2015
Posts: 7
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Statistics, Technology
Posts: 7
Kudos: 60
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
draditya
Set T is an infinite sequence of positive integers. A "superset" is a sequence in which there is a finite number of multiples of three. Is T a superset?
(1) The first six integers in T are multiples of three.
(2) An infinite number of integers in T are multiples of four.


How come A is not the answer for this? See the question mentions that a "superset" will contain finite number of multiples of three. The first condition proves that the set indeed does contain a finite number of multiples of T. Then irrespective of what else it contains, it should be a superset according to the question right?
avatar
OptimusPrepJanielle
Joined: 06 Nov 2014
Last visit: 08 Sep 2017
Posts: 1,779
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 1,779
Kudos: 1,483
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
itwarriorkarve
draditya
Set T is an infinite sequence of positive integers. A "superset" is a sequence in which there is a finite number of multiples of three. Is T a superset?
(1) The first six integers in T are multiples of three.
(2) An infinite number of integers in T are multiples of four.


How come A is not the answer for this? See the question mentions that a "superset" will contain finite number of multiples of three. The first condition proves that the set indeed does contain a finite number of multiples of T. Then irrespective of what else it contains, it should be a superset according to the question right?

Hi itwarriorkarve,

The statement 1 simply says that the first 6 integers are multiple of 3, it does not tell us about
1. Are there any more integers in the set
2. If yes, are they multiples of 3 or not.

From the definition of the "superset", it should be a finite set. But we cannot tell this by statement 1.
Does this help?
User avatar
Gmat860sanskar
Joined: 05 May 2023
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Schools: ISB '26
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V78 DI80
Schools: ISB '26
GMAT Focus 1: 605 Q82 V78 DI80
Posts: 23
Kudos: 7
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
We need to know if T has only a finite number of multiples of 3.

(1) First six are multiples of 3 → not sufficient (could be only six, or infinitely many).

(2) Infinitely many multiples of 4 → not sufficient (they may or may not overlap with multiples of 3).

(1) + (2) Together still not sufficient (could be finite multiples of 3 or infinite).

Final Answer: (E) Not sufficient.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105390 posts
496 posts