Summer is Coming! Join the Game of Timers Competition to Win Epic Prizes. Registration is Open. Game starts Mon July 1st.

 It is currently 16 Jul 2019, 13:39

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Retired Moderator
Status: Long way to go!
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Posts: 1344
Location: Viet Nam
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2017, 03:13
1
00:00

Difficulty:

5% (low)

Question Stats:

86% (01:30) correct 14% (01:59) wrong based on 282 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

(B) Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital.

(C) The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from one hospital to another.

(D) Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered in the studies.

(E) Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the country to another.

_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 06 Jul 2016
Posts: 360
Location: Singapore
Concentration: Strategy, Finance
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2017, 04:13
nguyendinhtuong wrote:
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

(B) Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital.

(C) The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from one hospital to another.

(D) Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered in the studies.

(E) Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the country to another.

The Author assumes that people with the same degree of illness are treated in the hospitals mentioned in the argument.
B weakens the argument, by attacking that assumption.

A - Irrelevant to the argument.
C - Experience is not a factor in this argument.
D - Irrelevant, but maybe a trap answer, as it actually strengthens the author's argument.
E - Irrelevant
_________________
Put in the work, and that dream score is yours!
Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2016
Posts: 14
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2017, 04:30
nguyendinhtuong wrote:
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

(B) Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital.

(C) The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from one hospital to another.

(D) Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered in the studies.

(E) Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the country to another.

...

What we need to focus on is finding an alternative to care quality for the difference in deaths among hospitals.

(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.
Difference in degrees might/might not account for deaths. Definitely not a 100% valid reasoning.

(B) Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital.
This option looks good. More the average severity of the illness, more likely the increase in number of deaths. Another factor(other than care quality) found to be responsible for deaths.

(C) The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from one hospital to another.
More or less same as (A). The difference in experience does not qualify as a reason for different no. of avg deaths. Maybe a 2 year experienced doctor is better than 10 year experienced one.

(D) Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered in the studies.
Does not impact the conclusion. If not, further validates a possible error assumption. Not weakening for sure.

(E) Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the country to another.
eh! out of context!

_________________
Never give up!
Board of Directors
Status: QA & VA Forum Moderator
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Posts: 4512
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jun 2017, 09:52
Definitely (B) , only this option talks about the " severity of illness " weakening/attacking the conclusion about the " quality of care provided by hospital staff "...
_________________
Thanks and Regards

Abhishek....

PLEASE FOLLOW THE RULES FOR POSTING IN QA AND VA FORUM AND USE SEARCH FUNCTION BEFORE POSTING NEW QUESTIONS

How to use Search Function in GMAT Club | Rules for Posting in QA forum | Writing Mathematical Formulas |Rules for Posting in VA forum | Request Expert's Reply ( VA Forum Only )
SVP
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Posts: 1524
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

27 Jun 2017, 13:29
should it take more than 5 seconds to identify question type, negative words, and question stem?
VP
Status: Learning
Joined: 20 Dec 2015
Posts: 1032
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Marketing
GMAT 1: 670 Q48 V36
GRE 1: Q157 V157
GPA: 3.4
WE: Engineering (Manufacturing)
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

28 Jun 2017, 09:25
Imo E
A very simple question , gives us a different reason for the finding.
_________________
Verbal Forum Moderator
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2351
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Dec 2017, 21:43
broall wrote:
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

(B) Patient populations vary substantially in average severity of illness from hospital to hospital.

(C) The average number of years that staff members stay on at a given job varies considerably from one hospital to another.

(D) Approximately the same surgical procedures were performed in each of the hospitals covered in the studies.

(E) Mortality rates for hospital patients do not vary considerably from one region of the country to another.

-Patients are more likely to die in some hospitals than others
-Hospitals have about equal per-patient funding
-Mortality rate difference is because of differences in the quality of care

More people die at some people than others...it MUST BE because of the doctors' differing quality of care . Instead of thinking that way, maybe we should actually look more into the type of people that are going into these hospitals. Maybe some hospitals happen to be given more terminal cases than others. Maybe some hospitals that are in the inner-city typically get more cases of violence than those in rural communities. There are so many differences that we could attribute to the differing mortality rates. It seems that the patients would explain these differences; not the doctors.

(A) Yea okay this is decent. It shows that there are some hospitals that have personnel with more training or skills. However, does this necessarily equate to a difference in the quality of care? What if these advanced degrees were in philosophy and English? . The point is that having MORE advanced degrees does not equal MORE quality care. Even if it did, it would actually strengthen the argument rather than weaken it!

(B) gives us this alternate cause! What is it? It says that the average severity of illness varies from hospital to hospital. This means that some hospitals simply have more dire cases than other hospitals. A hospital that primarily deals with stuffy noses will not have more deaths than a hospital that primarily deals with ICU patients. (B) thus weakens the idea that it is the quality of care that leads to a difference in mortality rates by saying, "nope! It is actually the patients that lead to diverging mortality rates. We are all awesome! (okay I added that last part in)"

(C) This functions kind of like (A). It just gives us a random fact that doesn't seemingly have anything to do with debunking the quality of care conclusion. We don't know what affect the "average number of years that staff members stay on" has on the argument.

(D) This actually strengthens the argument just a bit. If we say that the same surgical procedures are being done then maybe the only differentiating factor IS actually the doctors/nurses performing the care. Thus maybe would COULD say that it is the doctors and nurses that provide that differing quality of care that leads to the differing mortality rates.

(E) This one is odd. It is kind of a premise de-booster because, while it shows that mortality rates DO vary, they don't "vary considerably." Now we don't really know how much they vary but none of this really matters. The point is that it says nothing about what actually affects the mortality rates. It just says that the mortality rates are different. Well okay then!

_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful
IIMA, IIMC School Moderator
Joined: 04 Sep 2016
Posts: 1360
Location: India
WE: Engineering (Other)
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2018, 00:04
GMATNinja generis ammuseeru nightblade354 KarishmaB pikolo2510

Is my reasoning of (A) valid?

Quote:
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Argument understanding:
Several studies have shown that all hospitals are not equally successful
Disproportionate patients die in few hospitals than in others.

Cause: Difference in quality of medical care provided by hospital staff
Effect: Variations in number deaths of people that are reported
Supporting premise: Same amount of patients care funded by hospitals.

Quote:
Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

A classic weaken q stem.

Quote:
(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

OK, so staff is better trained since they have advanced degrees. What will be the consequence of this?
Well , in ideal circumstances, staff should be able to provide better care to patients, enabling patients to recover earlier
and reduce mortality rates. So this option choice helps to further build up on fact that why the mortality rates
are different in few hospitals than others. Is my understanding valid?
_________________
It's the journey that brings us happiness not the destination.

Feeling stressed, you are not alone!!
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 05 Jul 2017
Posts: 512
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2018, 01:14
GMATNinja generis ammuseeru nightblade354 KarishmaB pikolo2510

Is my reasoning of (A) valid?

Quote:
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Argument understanding:
Several studies have shown that all hospitals are not equally successful
Disproportionate patients die in few hospitals than in others.

Cause: Difference in quality of medical care provided by hospital staff
Effect: Variations in number deaths of people that are reported
Supporting premise: Same amount of patients care funded by hospitals.

Quote:
Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

A classic weaken q stem.

Quote:
(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

OK, so staff is better trained since they have advanced degrees. What will be the consequence of this?
Well , in ideal circumstances, staff should be able to provide better care to patients, enabling patients to recover earlier
and reduce mortality rates. So this option choice helps to further build up on fact that why the mortality rates
are different in few hospitals than others. Is my understanding valid?

So are you saying that Option A is providing an alternate reason for the difference in mortality rates and hence A should be the answer? This is incorrect

Having advanced degrees cannot cannot guarantee better care for patients. It can also mean that worst care or best care. So this option doesn't talk about the difference in mortality rates at all. We will have to assume about the mortality difference. Hence this option should be straight away eliminated

Hope this helps
_________________
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 440
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2018, 06:17
1
GMATNinja generis ammuseeru nightblade354 KarishmaB pikolo2510

Is my reasoning of (A) valid?

Quote:
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Argument understanding:
Several studies have shown that all hospitals are not equally successful
Disproportionate patients die in few hospitals than in others.

Cause: Difference in quality of medical care provided by hospital staff
Effect: Variations in number deaths of people that are reported
Supporting premise: Same amount of patients care funded by hospitals.

Quote:
Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

A classic weaken q stem.

Quote:
(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

OK, so staff is better trained since they have advanced degrees. What will be the consequence of this?
Well , in ideal circumstances, staff should be able to provide better care to patients, enabling patients to recover earlier
and reduce mortality rates. So this option choice helps to further build up on fact that why the mortality rates
are different in few hospitals than others. Is my understanding valid?

Director
Joined: 08 Jun 2013
Posts: 560
Location: France
GMAT 1: 200 Q1 V1
GPA: 3.82
WE: Consulting (Other)
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Jul 2018, 11:14
GMATNinja generis ammuseeru nightblade354 KarishmaB pikolo2510

Is my reasoning of (A) valid?

Quote:
Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally successful: patients are much more likely to die in some of them than in others. Since the hospitals in the studies had approximately equal per-patient funding, differences in the quality of care provided by hospital staff are probably responsible for the differences in mortality rates.

Argument understanding:
Several studies have shown that all hospitals are not equally successful
Disproportionate patients die in few hospitals than in others.

Cause: Difference in quality of medical care provided by hospital staff
Effect: Variations in number deaths of people that are reported
Supporting premise: Same amount of patients care funded by hospitals.

Quote:
Which one of the following, if true, casts the most doubt on the conclusion drawn above?

A classic weaken q stem.

Quote:
(A) The staff in some of the hospitals studied had earned more advanced degrees, on average, than the staff in the other hospitals.

OK, so staff is better trained since they have advanced degrees. What will be the consequence of this?
Well , in ideal circumstances, staff should be able to provide better care to patients, enabling patients to recover earlier
and reduce mortality rates. So this option choice helps to further build up on fact that why the mortality rates
are different in few hospitals than others. Is my understanding valid?

YES. This answer choice strengthens the argument.
_________________
Everything will fall into place…

There is perfect timing for
everything and everyone.
Never doubt, But Work on
improving yourself,
Keep the faith and
It will all make sense.
Re: Several studies have shown that hospitals are not all equally   [#permalink] 15 Jul 2018, 11:14
Display posts from previous: Sort by