Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 1912:30 PM EST
-01:30 PM EST
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2001:30 PM EST
-02:30 PM IST
Learn how Kamakshi achieved a GMAT 675 with an impressive 96th %ile in Data Insights. Discover the unique methods and exam strategies that helped her excel in DI along with other sections for a balanced and high score.
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2407:00 PM PST
-08:00 PM PST
Full-length FE mock with insightful analytics, weakness diagnosis, and video explanations!
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
souvik101990
Expert
Alum
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,321
Given Kudos: 2,326
Location: United States (WA)
Concentration: Leadership, General Management
Schools: Ross '20 (M)
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GMAT 2: 740 Q49 V42 (Online)
GMAT 3: 760 Q50 V42 (Online)
GPA: 3.8
WE:Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Products:
Expert reply
Updated on: 20 Jan 2020, 10:00
Originally posted by souvik101990 on 02 Apr 2015, 08:26.
Last edited by Bunuel on 20 Jan 2020, 10:00, edited 1 time in total.
Last edited by Bunuel on 20 Jan 2020, 10:00, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
15%
(low)
Question Stats:
80% (01:51) correct
20%
(02:32)
wrong
based on 768
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Some companies in fields where skilled employees are hard to find make signing an "agreement not to compete" a condition of employment. In such an agreement the employee promises not to go work for a competing firm for a set period after leaving his or her current employer. Courts are increasingly ruling that these agreements are not binding. Yet paradoxically, for people who signed such agreements when working for competing firms, many firms are unwilling to consider hiring them during the period covered by the agreement.
Which one of the following if true, most helps to resolve the paradox?
(A) Many companies will not risk having to become involved in lawsuits, even suits that they expect to have a favourable outcome.
(B) In some industries for example, the broadcast media, companies‟ main source of new employees tends to be people who are already employed by competing firms
(C) Most companies that require their employees to sign agreements not to compete are aware that these documents are not legally binding
(D) Many people who have signed agreements not to compete are unwilling to renege on a promise by going to work for a competing firm
(E) Many companies consider their employees established relationships with clients and other people outside the company to be valuable company assets
Which one of the following if true, most helps to resolve the paradox?
(A) Many companies will not risk having to become involved in lawsuits, even suits that they expect to have a favourable outcome.
(B) In some industries for example, the broadcast media, companies‟ main source of new employees tends to be people who are already employed by competing firms
(C) Most companies that require their employees to sign agreements not to compete are aware that these documents are not legally binding
(D) Many people who have signed agreements not to compete are unwilling to renege on a promise by going to work for a competing firm
(E) Many companies consider their employees established relationships with clients and other people outside the company to be valuable company assets
03 Apr 2015, 00:47
Kudos
Bookmarks
souvik101990
Time : 1:37
(A) Many companies will not risk having to become involved in lawsuits, even suits that they expect to have a favourable outcome. -Correct. Even though the company knows that the courts will rule in their favour, they still have to incur the costs of a lawsuit.
(B) In some industries for example, the broadcast media, companies‟ main source of new employees tends to be people who are already employed by competing firms - OFS. Doesnt tell us why cos do not hire employees during their non-compete contract period
(C) Most companies that require their employees to sign agreements not to compete are aware that these documents are not legally binding - We dont have to know about the previous company but the future company which doesnt hire the people during their non-compete period. Irrelevant
(D) Many people who have signed agreements not to compete are unwilling to renege on a promise by going to work for a competing firm - OFS. We are concerned about those people who sign the agreement but do go to other cos for employment
(E) Many companies consider their employees established relationships with clients and other people outside the company to be valuable company assets - I don't think any co would consider the relationship between its employees and their past cos as a valuable asset.
Answer: A
04 Apr 2015, 04:53
Kudos
Bookmarks
I dont understand how A.. According to agreement, the employee is signing it. So if the employer has to sue, it has to sue only the employee not the competing firm. But D states that the new employer will not hire the employee because they feel that the employee will not be reliable.. Please explain..
