Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax.

Question

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax. Copeland's cigarette prices will still be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase.

Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland's cigarette prices will still not be high. They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

Raoul responds to Sonya's argument by doing which of the following?

A. Questioning the support for Sonya's conclusion by distinguishing carefully between No change and no decrease 
B. calling Sonya's conclusion into question by pointing to a possible effect of a certain change. 
C. Arguing that Sonya's conclusion would be better supported if Sonya could cite a precedent for what she predicts will happen.
D. showing that a cause that Sonya claims will be producing a certain effect is not the only cause that could produce that effect 
E. pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the effect that Soniya predicts it will have

GMATNinja · Accepted Answer

Well, choice (E) appears to have a transcription error ("seems to have the  predicts  it will have"??), so if someone encounters this question in the software, please let us know what it says.

Choice (E) probably says, "E: pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the  effect that Sonya  predicts it will have." The reason (E) is incorrect is that both Sonya and Raoul agree that the tax will have little if any effect on cigarette consumption. Raoul doesn't claim that the plan isn't  bold  enough to increase government revenue. Instead, Raoul introduces an effect that Sonya does not mention (that illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes will increase). This effect would weaken Sonya's conclusion, so choice (B) is more accurate. If anything, Raoul would agree that the plan is TOO bold (i.e. that the modest increase in price WILL have negative consequences that lower tax revenue).

I hope that helps!

shahnandan · Answer

Raoul agrees with the fact that cigarette sales are unlikely to decrease but doesnt quite agree that government revenues are going to increase as well. He points to smuggling of lower priced cigarettes as a pointer to decreased government revenues.  B .

jaynayak · Answer

B is the best.

Sonya's conclusion is called into question as smuggled cigs will not increase the goverment's revenue.

WaterFlowsUp · Answer

Nine years since anyone touched this question!!!!Bumping this thread up. @@jarvisR  PathFinder007

Divyadisha · Answer

Sonya's Conclusion:- government revenue from the tax will increase.

Raoul- Cigarette smoking will not decrease, but the cigarettes will be imported from some other place.

Inference:- If these are exported then government will not be benefitted from tax.

Basically, the change/ increase in tax will lead to alternate effect (getting cigarettes from other place). And, sonya's conclusion is not supported.
only option B mentioned this correctly.

Poorvasha · Answer

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax. Copeland's cigarette prices will still be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase.

Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland's cigarette prices will still not be high. They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

Raoul responds to Sonya's argument by doing which of the following?

Sonia states that the cigarette tax has not reduced the consumption of cigarettes but she concludes that because of the tax increase, and the constant consumption, the revenue for the government will increase. Raoul refutes this conclusion by stating that though the consumption might not decrease but even despite that the government might not earn any additional revenue because the a lot of sales will be illegal and those sales can't be taxed. Thus, Raoul is calling Sonya's conclusion into question by pointing out an effect of the change she did not consider. (B)

aceGMAT21 · Answer

Raoul-Sonya-CR.png

chesstitans · Answer

Why E is not the answer? In other words, what is the difference between B and E?

Rahul5843 · Answer

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax. Copeland's cigarette prices will still be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase.

Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland's cigarette prices will still not be high. They will, however, no longer be the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

Raoul responds to Sonya's argument by doing which of the following?

A: Questioning the support for Sonya's conclusion by distinguishing carefully between No change and no decrease 
B: calling Sonya's conclusion into question by pointing to a possible effect of a certain change. 
C: Arguing that Sonya's conclusion would be better supported if Sonya could cite a precedent for what she predicts will happen.
D: showing that a cause that Sonya claims will be producing a certain effect is not the only cause that could produce that effect 
E: pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the predicts it will have
 
Hi, let's focus at the conclusion of the argument by Sonya.
The conclusion is that 
"so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. Consequently, government revenue from the tax will increase."

R agrees that consumption won't be affected but also points out another effect of the increase in the price of cig.'s i.e since prices are no longer the lowest in the region, so we might begin to see substantial illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes in Copeland.

Now if there is SUBSTANTIAL illegal sales of smuggled cig's than the Sonya's conclusion that govt. revenue from tax will increase is affected.

With this pre thinking let's look for the correct choice.

A. says R is questioning the support of S's conclusion that govt's revenue will increase. The support for this conclusion is that the consumption won't decrease and hence the govt.'s tax revenue will increase.

Now R is not questioning the support .He is actually questioning the conclusion that Govt.s revenue will increase by providing an alternate effect of the increase in tax.

Hence A is wrong.

B is in line with our pre thinking. Let's keep it and move on.

C is definitely not the answer because nowhere has R asked for a precedent.

D is wrong because R is arguing by showing an alternate effect(increase in the illegal sale)of an cause(increased taxes) which is questioning the S's conclusion (govt.s revenue will increase).

E. is interesting.
R is not questioning the boldness of the initiative(increase in taxes) but merely bringing in another effect of this initiative which might hinder the main conclusion that Govt.s 
revenue will increase.

So B is the correct answer.

Hope it helps

adkikani · Answer

GMATNinja The typo is corrected, thanks for pointing out the discrepancy.

sagarsangani123 · Answer

Dear Experts,
How do we know for sure whether Sonya's conclusion is  'cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much'  or  'government revenue from the tax will increase' ?

St123Kt · Answer

It talks about the 'SIDE effect/alternative consequence' of raising the tax ===> cigarette from other sources increased.

krndatta · Answer

AjiteshArun  sir, 
Please evaluate my reasoning for option E.

Raoul's response that a certain initiative is not bold enough is incorrect because the initiative is the increase in cigarette tax. Raoul does not mention anywhere that they should increase the cigarette tax further to reduce the cigarette consumption. He merely provides an additional reason that what Sonya predicts will not happen. 
Let me know whether my reasoning is correct or incorrect?

Thanks

YuktiMaheshwari · Answer

Why D is incorrect?
 GMATNinja   Veritas

Posted from my mobile device

KarishmaB · Answer

Sonya: Even with the increase in cigarette tax, the prices will be reasonably low, so cigarette consumption will probably not be affected much. So, revenue from the tax will increase. Raoul: True, smoking is unlikely to decrease, because Copeland's cigarette prices will still not be high though with increased prices, illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes (from countries with lower prices) may start. Sonya and Raoul have opposing views. Sonya claims that revenue from tax will increase. Raoul feels that revenue may not increase (though he doesn’t say it explicitly). Raoul presents an additional consideration (illegal sales of smuggled cigarettes may start) that weakens Sonya’s conclusion (revenue from the tax will increase). So, the ‘method of disagreement’ here is (iv) One can provide additional data that weakens the conclusion. (A) Questioning the support for Sonya's conclusion by distinguishing carefully between no change and no decrease Raoul does not question Sonya’s support (premises). He questions Sonya’s conclusion by bringing in an additional factor. (B) Calling Sonya's conclusion into question by pointing to a possible effect of a certain change. Correct. He points out the possible effect (smuggling) of tax increase to question Sonya’s conclusion.   (C) Arguing that Sonya's conclusion would be better supported if Sonya could cite a precedence for what she predicts will happen.   He does not ask for a precedence.   (D) Showing that a cause that Sonya claims will be producing a certain effect is not the only cause that could produce that effect.    The cause is increased taxes and the effect Sonya claims is increased revenue. He does not offer an additional cause for increased revenue. (E) Pointing out that a certain initiative is not bold enough to have the effect that Soniya predicts it will have The boldness of the initiative is not discussed. Answer (B) Method Questions are discussed here: https://youtu.be/uA5aXAZI1Z8

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax.

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Sonya: The government of Copeland is raising the cigarette tax.

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards