Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 17:39 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 17:39
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
555-605 Level|   Weaken|         
avatar
shwetachauhan
Joined: 17 May 2017
Last visit: 19 May 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
53
 [14]
Given Kudos: 67
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
WE:Analyst (Advertising and PR)
GMAT 1: 690 Q50 V33
Posts: 17
Kudos: 53
 [14]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
9
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
guptarahul
Joined: 27 Mar 2017
Last visit: 31 Jan 2018
Posts: 57
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Status:Gmat lover
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
GPA: 3.91
Products:
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V39
Posts: 57
Kudos: 25
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
jcerdae
Joined: 30 Apr 2020
Last visit: 28 Feb 2021
Posts: 45
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 288
Posts: 45
Kudos: 20
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
ravigupta2912
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 26 May 2019
Last visit: 16 Feb 2025
Posts: 726
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q46 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V40
GPA: 2.58
WE:Consulting (Consulting)
Products:
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jcerdae
Hi!
Could someone explain why the answer is not C?
My thought is that if we calculate the age of the limestone alone, and then calculate the age of the drawing, the scientists can calculate the age of the drawing.

Could someone explain what is the flaw on my thought?

How will you calculate the age of drawing? This technique is itself a way to determine the age of drawing. How do you do that? By analysing the age of vegetable paint. Condition? It should be free of minerals containing carbon.

The argument stem says that in a painting the vegetable paint & limestone (mineral that contains carbon) cannot be separated and hence the age of painting cannot be determined.

B is correct since it gives us a technique which can separate limestone from the vegetable paint.
User avatar
RahulSha
Joined: 05 Oct 2020
Last visit: 17 Dec 2022
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
34
 [1]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Healthcare
WE:Account Management (Healthcare/Pharmaceuticals)
Posts: 64
Kudos: 34
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One of the premise in the argument-
"it is impossible to collect samples of this prehistoric paint without removing limestone"

Option B says- Laboratory procedures exist that can remove all the limestone from a sample of prehistoric paint on limestone.

Isn't this option trying to do the credibility check for the premise? In that case this should not be the answer.
User avatar
Deep32470
Joined: 06 Apr 2023
Last visit: 12 Sep 2023
Posts: 85
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 283
Location: India
Posts: 85
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It might be that paint on that limestone is made after many years after that limestone came into existence. Hence only with computing the age of limestone you cannot be sure of the age of the paint.

Regards,

DB
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,721
Own Kudos:
2,258
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,721
Kudos: 2,258
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Standard archaeological techniques make it possible to determine the age of anything containing vegetable matter, but only if the object is free of minerals containing carbon. Prehistoric artists painted on limestone with pigments composed of vegetable matter, but it is impossible to collect samples of this prehistoric paint without removing limestone, a mineral containing carbon, with the paint. Therefore, it is not possible to determine the age of prehistoric paintings on limestone using standard archaeological techniques.

Which one of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

(A) There exist several different techniques for collecting samples of prehistoric pigments on limestone. - WRONG. Techniques matter but whether they are helpful or not is not known.

(B) Laboratory procedures exist that can remove all the limestone from a sample of prehistoric paint on limestone. - CORRECT. With no limestone present the SATs would be able to determine the age of paint.

(C) The age of the limestone itself can be determined from samples that contain no vegetable-based paint. - WRONG. Limestone mightbe a billion years old but a paint might be a few million or few hundred thousand years old or less.

(D) Prehistoric artists did not use anything other than vegetable matter to make their paints. - WRONG. Irrelevant.

(E) The proportion of carbon to other elements in limestone is the same in all samples of limestone. - WRONG. Proportion is irrelevant.

Answer B.
User avatar
kittle
Joined: 11 May 2021
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 318
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 618
Products:
Posts: 318
Kudos: 161
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GMATNinja can you explain how option choice B is correct? Because even if B is true, then it strengthen's our conclusion that SAT cannot help determine the age as we had to get outside help of another procedure to determine the age of prehistoric paintings on limestone. Would look forward to knowing your thoughts. I think option B could have been better worded, sure it is the best out of the worst options.
User avatar
GMATNinja
User avatar
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
Joined: 13 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 7,445
Own Kudos:
69,778
 [3]
Given Kudos: 2,060
Status: GMAT/GRE/LSAT tutors
Location: United States (CO)
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V46
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 800 Q51 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V170
GRE 2: Q170 V170
Posts: 7,445
Kudos: 69,778
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kittle
GMATNinja can you explain how option choice B is correct? Because even if B is true, then it strengthen's our conclusion that SAT cannot help determine the age as we had to get outside help of another procedure to determine the age of prehistoric paintings on limestone. Would look forward to knowing your thoughts. I think option B could have been better worded, sure it is the best out of the worst options.
Let's start with the exact conclusion, in the author's words:

Quote:
Therefore, it is not possible to determine the age of prehistoric paintings on limestone using standard archaeological techniques.
Notice that is quite a broad statement -- we can't determine the age using standard archaeological techniques. Does (B) weaken it? Well, if we could remove the limestone from the sample, then we could use standard archaeological techniques to determine the age. So strictly speaking, (B) does weaken the conclusion as it is stated.

But removing the limestone isn't a standard archaeological technique, right? That's true. But the argument doesn't claim that we can't determine the age using ONLY standard archaeological techniques. Rather, it says we can't determine the age using standard archaeological techniques PERIOD. In other words, to weaken this argument, we don't need to find a way to determine the age using ONLY standard archaeological techniques. We just need to find a series of steps that includes standard archaeological techniques.

Long story short, (B) tells us that by applying a certain laboratory procedure, we can then use standard archaeological techniques to determine the age of the paintings. For this reason, it weakens the conclusion.

I hope that helps!
User avatar
arjunpratap
Joined: 02 Oct 2024
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 1
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jcerdae
Hi!
Could someone explain why the answer is not C?
My thought is that if we calculate the age of the limestone alone, and then calculate the age of the drawing, the scientists can calculate the age of the drawing.

Could someone explain what is the flaw on my thought?
buddy it does not matter how old the limestone is. It may have been formed before ther artists made those paintings. So it is not of any value for us.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts