GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 21 Feb 2019, 14:25

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

## Events & Promotions

###### Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar

February 21, 2019

February 21, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

Kick off your 2019 GMAT prep with a free 7-day boot camp that includes free online lessons, webinars, and a full GMAT course access. Limited for the first 99 registrants! Feb. 21st until the 27th.
• ### Free GMAT RC Webinar

February 23, 2019

February 23, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Learn reading strategies that can help even non-voracious reader to master GMAT RC. Saturday, February 23rd at 7 AM PT

# State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Manager
Status: Perspiring
Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Posts: 90
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

Updated on: 15 Oct 2018, 02:42
12
00:00

Difficulty:

75% (hard)

Question Stats:

55% (01:58) correct 45% (01:59) wrong based on 435 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to control variables that will influence the tempo of economic growth, reduce inequalities that will cause increased hardship among people less able to compete in the marketplace for jobs and among people seeking employment who might otherwise wind up in need of state assistance.

A. reduce inequalities that will cause increased hardship among people less able to compete in the marketplace for jobs and among people seeking employment who

B. reducing inequalities that will cause increased hardship among people less able to compete in the marketplace for jobs and among people who are seeking employment who

C. to reduce inequalities that will cause increased hardship among people less able to compete in the marketplace for jobs and among people who seek employment that

D. for reducing inequalities that will cause increased hardship among people less able to compete in the marketplace for jobs and among people seeking employment who

E. for the reduction of inequalities that will cause increased hardship for people less able to compete in the marketplace for jobs and people who are seeking employment that

Originally posted by NickHalden on 29 Aug 2015, 10:08.
Last edited by Bunuel on 15 Oct 2018, 02:42, edited 1 time in total.
Renamed the topic and edited the question.
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 12
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2015, 22:32
1
You can get this one simply by focusing on the parallelism of the verbs "influence" and "reduce". One first read it seems that the sentence is listing out things that the variables will cause (ie - the variables will influence XXX, reduce YYY, and something ZZZ).

However, reading the rest of the sentence, it's clear that this structure is broken and that the verb 'reduce' is not meant to be part of list, but rather acts as an offshoot from the verb 'influence'. In other words, the meaning seems to convey that the influence of the tempo of economic growth is causing a reduction in XXX.

Of the answer choices, only choice B adheres to this construction of 'reduce'.
Manager
Status: Perspiring
Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Posts: 90
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

29 Aug 2015, 23:14
How do you justify the use of 'people who are seeking employment who' ???
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4685
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

30 Aug 2015, 00:34
1
What does the modifier, ‘who might otherwise wind up in need of state assistance’ modify? Is it modifying those who are seeking employment or those less able to compete in the marketplace or both of the categories? If it modifying the job-seekers as a whole, it is a fallacy to assume that just because somebody seeks a job, he might wind up seeking state assistance on the contrary if it is modifying the less able people, why is it not placed next to them?
Or if it is modifying both the categories, the proximity rule that a pronoun modifies a noun that is in front of it or close to it is fouled. The only salvation is either to shift the less able people to the second part before the relative clause the clause or to shift the relative clause next to the 'less able people'.
All the choices carry through this error. This is a stylistically flawed question basically. If this point is clarified, it will be useful to analyze each of the choices, and conclude why all of them are either syntactically or semantically erroneous.
_________________

GMAT coaching under able guidance is only half expensive and time-consuming as a self-study in the final reckoning

Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Posts: 23
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

11 Sep 2015, 23:32
Can anybody justify the use of " WHO ARE " in the answer choice B... and among people who are seeking employment who
Manager
Joined: 16 Aug 2014
Posts: 53
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2018, 02:39
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.
_________________

Hit Kudos if you like the post

Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 22
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

15 Oct 2018, 13:19
mayursurya wrote:
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.

Sorry but I don't understand: In b reducing (present participle after comma) should refer to the subject of the preceding clause "variables" but the ownership is reducing and not the variables. Please explain!.

Thank you
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to   [#permalink] 15 Oct 2018, 13:19
Display posts from previous: Sort by