Last visit was: 18 Jul 2024, 10:34 It is currently 18 Jul 2024, 10:34
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Show Tags
Hide Tags
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Status:Perspiring
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 381 [29]
Given Kudos: 216
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
GMAT Club Legend
GMAT Club Legend
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Status: enjoying
Posts: 5264
Own Kudos [?]: 42142 [6]
Given Kudos: 422
Location: India
WE:Education (Education)
Send PM
General Discussion
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 02 Jun 2015
Posts: 7
Own Kudos [?]: 37 [2]
Given Kudos: 41
Send PM
User avatar
Manager
Manager
Joined: 15 Feb 2012
Status:Perspiring
Posts: 71
Own Kudos [?]: 381 [1]
Given Kudos: 216
Concentration: Marketing, Strategy
GPA: 3.6
WE:Engineering (Computer Software)
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
1
Kudos
How do you justify the use of 'people who are seeking employment who' ???
avatar
Intern
Intern
Joined: 20 Aug 2014
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 7 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
Can anybody justify the use of " WHO ARE " in the answer choice B... and among people who are seeking employment who
Intern
Intern
Joined: 16 Aug 2014
Posts: 38
Own Kudos [?]: 43 [3]
Given Kudos: 211
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”

Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 12 Jul 2018
Posts: 22
Own Kudos [?]: 3 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Location: Israel
GMAT 1: 710 Q45 V41
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
mayursurya wrote:
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”



Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.


Sorry but I don't understand: In b reducing (present participle after comma) should refer to the subject of the preceding clause "variables" but the ownership is reducing and not the variables. Please explain!.

Thank you
Manager
Manager
Joined: 16 Sep 2018
Posts: 62
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [0]
Given Kudos: 5
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V40
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
D can be eliminated right away because ‘for reducing’ is awkward. C and E are wrong because they use ‘that’. The use of ‘reduce’ in A is also incorrect. This means that B is the right choice.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 1
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
bobo16 wrote:
mayursurya wrote:
Official explanation Kaplan

Read the Original Sentence Carefully, Looking for Errors:

On initial reading, this sentence appears to contain a series of results of the variables: "will influence the tempo ..., reduce inequalities ...." However, the series is not completed. In fact, the intent of the sentence is that influencing the tempo of economic growth will have the further effect of reducing inequalities among two groups of people. "Reduce" should be replaced with "reducing" to make the part of the sentence after the comma into a modifying phrase.

This sentence also tests knowledge of the use of who verus that. In general, use who (as well as whom) to refer to people and use that (and which) to refer to things.

Scan and Group the Answer Choices:

Each answer choice provides an alternative form of reduce. There is, however, a 3-2 split at the end of the choices between "that" in (C) and (E) and "who" in (A), (B), and (D). In this sentence, the antecedent is “people” (not “employment”), clearly requiring the use of “who.”



Eliminate Wrong Answer Choices:

(A) uses the incorrect "reduce," implying a series of actions beginning with "influence."

(C) and (E) are wrong because they use "that." (E) may also be eliminated because it begins with the awkward phrase "for the reduction of." (C) may also be eliminated because the use of "to reduce" after the comma suggests that a list is in progress: "to control . . ., to reduce . . . ." However, there is no third "to" item to complete the list. The use of the infinitive also subtly changes the meaning of the sentence, implying that the reason for the control of the variables is the reduction of inequalities.

(D) includes the awkward and unnecessary "for" before "reducing." There's no need to use both a conjunction and a participle verb.

(B) correctly uses "reducing" and "who" and does not introduce any other errors. Note that the repetition at the end of the underlined portion of "who" is a little grating stylistically, but it is not wrong. Since all other choices have errors, (B) is the winner.

TAKEAWAY: Longer sentences can have multiple errors. Choose any one error to start eliminating choices instead of reading for all possible errors at once.


Sorry but I don't understand: In b reducing (present participle after comma) should refer to the subject of the preceding clause "variables" but the ownership is reducing and not the variables. Please explain!.

Thank you




A dependent clause preceded by a comma and starting with a VERB+ing, in this case "reducing", can be used to show the result of an independent clause. Another example "I ate a large meal, making my stomach blow up"
VP
VP
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Posts: 1100
Own Kudos [?]: 446 [0]
Given Kudos: 667
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
VeritasKarishma GMATNinja
Should we avoid practising this question since all the options are flawed ?

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
Joined: 11 Sep 2018
Posts: 32
Own Kudos [?]: 8 [0]
Given Kudos: 45
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
Quote:
What does the modifier, ‘who might otherwise wind up in need of state assistance’ modify? Is it modifying those who are seeking employment or those less able to compete in the marketplace or both of the categories? If it modifying the job-seekers as a whole, it is a fallacy to assume that just because somebody seeks a job, he might wind up seeking state assistance on the contrary if it is modifying the less able people, why is it not placed next to them?
Or if it is modifying both the categories, the proximity rule that a pronoun modifies a noun that is in front of it or close to it is fouled. The only salvation is either to shift the less able people to the second part before the relative clause the clause or to shift the relative clause next to the 'less able people'.
All the choices carry through this error. This is a stylistically flawed question basically. If this point is clarified, it will be useful to analyze each of the choices, and conclude why all of them are either syntactically or semantically erroneous.


Your are absolutely right, this question is a flaw.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2020
Posts: 5
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 12
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
no doubt that B is the only possible answer
but "WHO are seeking employment WHO" ????
really?
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17509
Own Kudos [?]: 869 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: State ownership of major economic enterprises allows the government to [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6984 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts