The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
Conclusion- tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
(A) The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
(B) The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.- irrelevant, we are concerned whether tetracycline in food explains the low incidence of typhus
(C) Typhus is generally fatal.- irrelevant
(D) Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer.
(E) Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.- irrelevant, the argument claims tetracycline in food
I was down to options A and D and chose option A.
A on negation, The tetracycline deposits did form after the bodies were buried.
D on negation, Tetracycline is rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer.
Both options seem like assumptions to me.
AjiteshArun ,
GMATNinja ,
MagooshExpert ,
GMATGuruNY ,
VeritasPrepBrian ,
MartyTargetTestPrep ,
DmitryFarber ,
VeritasKarishma ,
generis ,
nightblade354 other experts - please enlighten
_________________
When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long