|
Author |
Message |
|
TAGS:
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 402
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
|
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
 30 Jun 2012, 16:05
4
This post received
KUDOS
16
This post was
BOOKMARKED
D
E
Question Stats:
53% (01:34) correct 47% (01:32) wrong based on 1096 sessions
HideShow timer Statistics
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies? (A) The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried. (B) The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline. (C) Typhus is generally fatal. (D) Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer. (E) Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline. Similar question from GMATPrep: LINK
Official Answer and Stats are available only to registered users. Register/ Login.
_________________
If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 402
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jun 2012, 17:35
aligol wrote: My vote is A  Please substantiate your answer with reasoning. It will help.
_________________
If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 798
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
30 Jun 2012, 20:43
1
This post received
KUDOS
Choice D is really the assumption of the argument. It defend the case that the tetracycline is exposed into ineffective form after processing through baker.
_________________
Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you
The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need
CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 26 Nov 2011
Posts: 6
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
01 Jul 2012, 01:21
1
This post was
BOOKMARKED
such a tricky question  Now, I think D is the correct one. Both A and D look correct, but what makes D the correct one, is the part that says "Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains..."
|
|
|
|
|
|
BSchool Forum Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 798
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: International Business, Marketing
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
02 Jul 2012, 20:29
1
This post received
KUDOS
Use negate technique for choice A: The tetracycline deposits FORMED after the bodies were buried. If the tetracycline formed after the bodies were buried, this kind of antibiotic still did not relate to the tetracycline that produced by bacteria in beer and bread.
_________________
Rules for posting in verbal gmat forum, read it before posting anything in verbal forum
Giving me + 1 kudos if my post is valuable with you
The more you like my post, the more you share to other's need
CR: Focus of the Week: Must be True Question
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 28 Jul 2011
Posts: 210
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
03 Jul 2012, 10:56
1
This post received
KUDOS
Will vote for D because
Question type : Assumption (Strengthen the conclusion)
conclusion : tetracycline in food explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Premise 1: skeletons do show deposits of tetracyclinean antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil.
Premise 2: This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread.
A. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
--> one of the premise already state that "skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease", so option A cannot be true
B. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.
--> Out of scope nothing talking about another diseases
C. Typhus is generally fatal.
--> Doesnot strengthe the conclusion.
D. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer.
--> Provide additional evidence that will strength the conclusion. If the Tetracycline which acts as antibiotic is not destroyed in the process of making bread or beer, then we can correctly conclude that
tetracycline in food probably explains the low incidence of typhus.
Correct
using ANT
Tetracycline is rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer.
This clearly contradicts the conclusion, if Tetracycline doesnot act as antibiotic, then incidence of typhus would have been higher
E. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
--> wrong because thay cannot be only source as they were made from grains and bacterium flourished on the dried grain.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Posts: 302
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
06 Jul 2012, 12:04
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians. So I chose (D), because it most directly speaks to the evidence in the argument, "tetracycline in their food...'. However, I do not know whether this would be a valid GMAT question. (A) also provides a perfectly reasonable assumption on which the argument depends. If the tetracycline entered bodies after those bodies had been buried, then clearly it was not responsible for preventing typhus. In GMAT-land, I can't remember seeing an assumption question in which two answer choices are assumptions upon which the argument depends, but one of them speaks more directly to the text/conclusion. If this is valid, and it is simply slipping my mind as to ever having seen such a question, surely this question is a 700+. I'd be interested to see if anyone has encountered a similar question. If so, then this is definitely a valid question, and a toughie .
_________________
Christopher Lele
Magoosh Test Prep
|
|
|
|
|
|
Senior Manager
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 402
Location: United States
Concentration: Marketing, Technology
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
07 Jul 2012, 19:18
ChrisLele wrote: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians. So I chose (D), because it most directly speaks to the evidence in the argument, "tetracycline in their food...'. However, I do not know whether this would be a valid GMAT question. (A) also provides a perfectly reasonable assumption on which the argument depends. If the tetracycline entered bodies after those bodies had been buried, then clearly it was not responsible for preventing typhus. In GMAT-land, I can't remember seeing an assumption question in which two answer choices are assumptions upon which the argument depends, but one of them speaks more directly to the text/conclusion. If this is valid, and it is simply slipping my mind as to ever having seen such a question, surely this question is a 700+. I'd be interested to see if anyone has encountered a similar question. If so, then this is definitely a valid question, and a toughie . ChrisLele The conclusion of this argument is "Tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians" as in the last sentence. This means that author expects food to be a reason for presence of Tetracycline. I understand that presence of tetracycline can be linked a defender kind of assumption, but we also know that tetracycline has always been there in Nubian soil, making me to go away from A, and the conclusion here should defend the low incidence of typhus( and not the presence of tetracycline on skeletons). Let me know if this sounds logical or even if there is some flaw here.  The source of this question is a CR document from a gmatclub member. It says the question is from gmatclub or MGMAT. Just hoping for this to be true now gmat-prep-critical-reasoning-collection-106783.html#p840353
_________________
If you know what you're worth, then go out and get what you're worth. But you gotta be willing to take the hits, and not pointing fingers saying you ain't where you wanna be because of anybody! Cowards do that and You're better than that!
The path is long, but self-surrender makes it short; the way is difficult, but perfect trust makes it easy.
Fire the final bullet only when you are constantly hitting the Bull's eye, till then KEEP PRACTICING.
Failure establishes only this, that our determination to succeed was not strong enough.
Getting defeated is just a temporary notion, giving it up is what makes it permanent.
http://gmatclub.com/forum/1000-sc-notes-at-one-place-in-one-document-with-best-of-explanations-192961.html
Press +1 Kudos, if you think my post gave u a tiny tip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 29 Jan 2013
Posts: 44
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Jan 2014, 10:00
2
This post received
KUDOS
IMO D
Because on negating A we get. The tetracycline deposits did form after the bodies were buried (Nothing told about scenario before bodies were buried). this implies two statements.
1) Tetracycline formed only after bodies were buried
2) Tetracycline formed both before and after bodies were buried
1 inverses the conclusion but 2nd does not inverse the conclusion.
Hence D
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 10 Mar 2013
Posts: 246
GMAT 1: 620 Q44 V31 GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V37 GMAT 3: 610 Q47 V28 GMAT 4: 700 Q50 V34 GMAT 5: 700 Q49 V36 GMAT 6: 690 Q48 V35 GMAT 7: 750 Q49 V42 GMAT 8: 730 Q50 V39
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
29 Jul 2015, 18:18
I am questioning the source of this question, because BTG http://www.beatthegmat.com/nubians-t5138.html has the same question but one different answer choice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 05 Jun 2016
Posts: 26
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
21 Oct 2016, 06:20
This is a valid GMAT question. However, if the gmat gives such a question, it will not include both choices A and D in the same question, because both are correct. The same question has been asked, but in place of choice (A), a different choice has been stated. See here: the-ancient-nubians-inhabited-an-area-in-which-typhus-occurs-44937.htmlAgain, in this question, both choice A and D are correct.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 30 Sep 2015
Posts: 52
Location: United States (MD)
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q49 V25 GMAT 2: 620 Q49 V27
WE: Marketing (Consumer Products)
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
27 Oct 2016, 17:45
It was a tricky question!, but a good one. I choose A at the beginning but I was wrong. Reading carefully the conclusion and the premises that support D makes more sense.
First of all this is a causal argument:
Conc: Tetra in food --> probably explains low incidence of Typhus
P1: Skeletons of N show deposits of Tetra (antibiotic produced by a bacteria in N's soil)
P2: Bacteria can flourish on the dried grain used for making N diet: beer and bread.
P3: N inhabited an area with typhus, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show evidence of this disease
Pre-thinking:
For a causal argument to be true:
-No other causes provoke the effect
-The effect doesn't cause the "cause"
-The cause happened before the effect.
Option A) The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried. Incorrect
This option is apparently aligned with the latter one (sequence of events); however, option A doesn't talk about the real cause mentioned in the conclusion and supported by premises: Tetra in food. We know (from premises) that Tetra was indeed present in N's diet. So this is a real fact. Option a provides irrelevant information because even if Tetra deposits formed after the bodies were buried, the few evidence of the disease in the skeletons could or could have not happened because of Tetra in food.
Option D) Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer. Correct
If the Tetra in food had loose its properties as an antibiotic after it was processed to beer and bread, It would have been ineffective to prevent the disease. So the few evidence of the disease in the skeletons would have been attributed to other causes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Director
Joined: 17 Dec 2012
Posts: 635
Location: India
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
04 Jun 2017, 02:51
joshnsit wrote: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies?
A. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried.
B. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline.
C. Typhus is generally fatal.
D. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer.
E. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline. Facts: few of the skeletons of Nubians show the usual evidence of the disease typhus even though they inhabited an area in which typhus occurred,. But their skeletons show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Missing Information:There is no alternate explanation to what is shown in bold or it is not falsified, such as Tetracycline being rendered ineffective as an antibiotic by exposure to the process involved in making bread and beer. Conclusion: Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians. Choice D is the best match for the missing information. Choice A seems very close. To eliminate one of the two, we have to focus on the reason for the conclusion. It is shown in bold. It means that the author believes that tetracycline was their in their food and this would eliminate A because choice A is more a premise. So actually attacking author's argument is showing tetracycline in the food is not responsible for the low incidence of the disease. So the assumption of D saying that the tetracycline in the food is effective, is required.
_________________
Srinivasan Vaidyaraman
Sravna
http://www.sravnatestprep.com/best-online-gre-preparation.php
Improve Intuition and Your Score
Systematic Approaches
|
|
|
|
|
|
Manager
Joined: 13 Mar 2013
Posts: 174
Location: United States
Concentration: Leadership, Technology
GPA: 3.5
WE: Engineering (Telecommunications)
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
Updated on: 12 Sep 2017, 07:50
The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians. Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument relies? A. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried. B. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed would not be affected by tetracycline. C. Typhus is generally fatal. D. Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producing bacteria prior to being harvested. E. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubians which could have contained tetracycline.
_________________
Regards ,
Originally posted by TheKingInTheNorth on 12 Sep 2017, 06:17.
Last edited by broall on 12 Sep 2017, 07:50, edited 1 time in total.
Merged topic. Please search before posting question.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 28 Sep 2017
Posts: 15
Location: India
GPA: 3.9
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Dec 2017, 10:31
Option A can be clearly eliminated because " The skeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil". This statement means that irrespective of the skeletons that show deposits of tetracycline, the bacterium found in the soil produces tetracycline. So, tetracycline is always found in the soil irrespective of the presence of the deposits that were formed after the body was buried or before the body was buried.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intern
Joined: 04 Nov 2017
Posts: 10
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su [#permalink]
Show Tags
24 Dec 2017, 22:03
There is one more point, which makes A weak as an assumption. If tetracycline deposited from the soil into the skeletons of these bodies, it still does not explain why only " few of their skeletons showed the usual evidence of typhus. After all, the ancient nubians inhabited in the area where typhus occurred, making them more susceptible to the disease. Most of them would have incurred the disease when they were alive. Typhus would invade their bodies when they were alive.
_________________
Cheers,
Varsha Madhav
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kudos please if my post helped you...!!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Re: The ancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet su
[#permalink]
24 Dec 2017, 22:03
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
