Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 04:25 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 04:25
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
thangvietnam
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Last visit: 09 Mar 2023
Posts: 768
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,198
Posts: 768
Kudos: 418
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
pulak1988
Joined: 15 Jan 2019
Last visit: 09 Sep 2020
Posts: 49
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 249
Location: India
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V38
GPA: 4
GMAT 1: 650 Q42 V38
Posts: 49
Kudos: 6
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 360
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Shouldn't "consuming" modify the subject of the previous clause "army cutworm moth"?
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
Shouldn't "consuming" modify the subject of the previous clause "army cutworm moth"?
Hello, lakshya14. The subject of the previous clause is which, and since which is used to refer to bears, or more specifically to many of Yellowstone National Park's grizzly bears, the meaning is perfectly clear:

Many of Yellowstone National Park's grizzly bears overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as 40,000 apiece in a single day.

Do not overlook a dependent clause when looking to apply your understanding of what an -ing phrase modifies.

- Andrew
User avatar
lakshya14
Joined: 31 Jan 2019
Last visit: 27 Jul 2022
Posts: 360
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 529
Posts: 360
Kudos: 45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MentorTutoring
lakshya14
Shouldn't "consuming" modify the subject of the previous clause "army cutworm moth"?
Hello, lakshya14. The subject of the previous clause is which, and since which is used to refer to bears, or more specifically to many of Yellowstone National Park's grizzly bears, the meaning is perfectly clear:

Many of Yellowstone National Park's grizzly bears overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as 40,000 apiece in a single day.

Do not overlook a dependent clause when looking to apply your understanding of what an -ing phrase modifies.

- Andrew

But, if we were to ignore the appositive phrase, then the consuming would refer to the subject of the first clause "moths"? Which is wrong.
avatar
AndrewN
avatar
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Last visit: 29 Mar 2025
Posts: 3,502
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 500
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 3,502
Kudos: 7,511
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
lakshya14
MentorTutoring
lakshya14
Shouldn't "consuming" modify the subject of the previous clause "army cutworm moth"?
Hello, lakshya14. The subject of the previous clause is which, and since which is used to refer to bears, or more specifically to many of Yellowstone National Park's grizzly bears, the meaning is perfectly clear:

Many of Yellowstone National Park's grizzly bears overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as 40,000 apiece in a single day.

Do not overlook a dependent clause when looking to apply your understanding of what an -ing phrase modifies.

- Andrew

But, if we were to ignore the appositive phrase, then the consuming would refer to the subject of the first clause "moths"? Which is wrong.
I think you might be getting your grammatical terms confused. There is no appositive phrase in the sentence we are examining. (In a sample sentence, Andrew, a tutor I crossed paths with on GMAT Club, helped me with a question, the appositive phrase begins with a tutor. If I rewrote the sentence as, Andrew, who is a tutor... I have swapped out the appositive phrase for a clause.) In the sentence in question, we have a relative pronoun in which, but it begins a dependent clause, not a phrase. Replacing which with the proper noun to which it refers makes it clear that the -ing phrase is modifying the bears, not the moths. I am having trouble understanding your issue with (E). It is free of any errors that disqualify the other options. Were you hoping to defend one of them, perhaps?

- Andrew
avatar
Nilanjan Goswami
Joined: 06 Oct 2017
Last visit: 18 Mar 2024
Posts: 5
Given Kudos: 4
Posts: 5
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can which refer to animals...as which cannot modify people?
User avatar
AjiteshArun
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 15 Jul 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,949
Own Kudos:
5,080
 [1]
Given Kudos: 732
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q83 V90 DI83
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V51
GRE 1: Q170 V169
Posts: 5,949
Kudos: 5,080
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Nilanjan Goswami
Can which refer to animals...as which cannot modify people?
Hi Nilanjan Goswami,

Yes, which can be used to refer to animals.
User avatar
CrackverbalGMAT
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 03 Oct 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 4,844
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 225
Affiliations: CrackVerbal
Location: India
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,844
Kudos: 8,945
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
imaru
The army cutworm moth is a critical source of fat for many of Yellowstone National Park's grizzly bears; they overturn rocks to find them and consuming as many as 40,000 apiece in a single day.

A. bears; they overturn rocks to find them and consuming as many as
B. bears; overturning rocks to find the insects, consuming up to
C. bears, overturning rocks to find them and they consume as many as
D. bears, and they overturn rocks to find them and consume up to
E. bears, which overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as

This question is based on Modifiers and Construction.

Option A lacks parallelism. The participle ‘consuming’ is not parallel to the verb ‘overturn’. The pronoun ‘them’ cannot refer to the singular antecedent “the army cutworm moth”. So, Option A can be eliminated.

In Option B, there is only a sentence fragment after the semi-colon. A semi-colon should be followed by an independent clause. So, Option B can also be eliminated.

Option C also lacks parallelism. The participle phrase ‘overturning rocks’ is not parallel to the clause “they consume….’. So, Option C can be eliminated.

In Option D, the pronoun ‘them’ cannot refer to “the army cutworm moth”. So, Option D can be eliminated.

Option E is very clear. The relative pronoun ‘which’ refers to “grizzly bears” as it is placed immediately after the noun. This option uses the word ‘insects’ to refer to the “moth”, so there is no pronoun reference error. Therefore, E is the most appropriate option.

Jayanthi Kumar.
User avatar
himanshu0123
Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Last visit: 20 Mar 2023
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 190
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
D v/s E. Please review my understanding below


D. bears, and they overturn rocks to find them and consume up to

''they'' refers to ''bears''. The only plural noun available in preceding clasue. ''Moth'' is singular. Still there is an ambiguity??


E. bears, which overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as

we have two modifiers : a RPC and an ing verbal separated by a comma. Both are modifying the same subject.

I am not sure is it normally acceptable?
User avatar
RonTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 19 Jul 2022
Last visit: 07 Nov 2022
Posts: 430
Own Kudos:
537
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 430
Kudos: 537
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
himanshu0123
D. bears, and they overturn rocks to find them and consume up to

''they'' refers to ''bears''. The only plural noun available in preceding clasue. ''Moth'' is singular. Still there is an ambiguity??

The red pronoun is the issue. That pronoun clearly wants to stand for "moths" (plural), but "moth" is only present as a singular noun.

"And" is also used incorrectly here. The parts before and after "and" are not two parallel observations.


E. bears, which overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as

we have two modifiers : a RPC and an ing verbal separated by a comma. Both are modifying the same subject.[/quote]



"Which" describes the bears. That's the immediately preceding noun before the comma, so this modifier is fine.



Comma __ING has two requirements:
• It should modify the entire preceding clause;
• The subject of the preceding clause should be the person/thing most closely responsible for the __ING action.

Checking these two requirements:
• "Consuming as many as..." does, indeed, describe what the bears do as they're turning over rocks to find these insects.
• The subject of the preceding clause is "which", which represents the bears. Does "consuming..." describe something that the bears do? Yes it does.

Since COMMA _ING is doing both of its assigned jobs, it's fine.
User avatar
himanshu0123
Joined: 27 Mar 2016
Last visit: 20 Mar 2023
Posts: 190
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 101
Posts: 190
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
few follow-ups here, Ron :)

1. bears, and they overturn rocks to find them and consume up to

In general when ''they'' and 'them' are two pronouns referring back to two different nouns. Is there a guiding principle that such a sentence is ambiguous even if logical antecedent is clear enough.


E. bears, which overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as

can we have two modifiers : a RPC and an ing verbal separated by a comma. Don't we need a 'and' here? Or there is no such guiding principle for modifiers?


RonTargetTestPrep
himanshu0123
D. bears, and they overturn rocks to find them and consume up to

''they'' refers to ''bears''. The only plural noun available in preceding clasue. ''Moth'' is singular. Still there is an ambiguity??

The red pronoun is the issue. That pronoun clearly wants to stand for "moths" (plural), but "moth" is only present as a singular noun.

"And" is also used incorrectly here. The parts before and after "and" are not two parallel observations.


E. bears, which overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as

we have two modifiers : a RPC and an ing verbal separated by a comma. Both are modifying the same subject.



"Which" describes the bears. That's the immediately preceding noun before the comma, so this modifier is fine.



Comma __ING has two requirements:
• It should modify the entire preceding clause;
• The subject of the preceding clause should be the person/thing most closely responsible for the __ING action.

Checking these two requirements:
• "Consuming as many as..." does, indeed, describe what the bears do as they're turning over rocks to find these insects.
• The subject of the preceding clause is "which", which represents the bears. Does "consuming..." describe something that the bears do? Yes it does.

Since COMMA _ING is doing both of its assigned jobs, it's fine.[/quote]
User avatar
ExpertsGlobal5
User avatar
Experts' Global Representative
Joined: 10 Jul 2017
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 5,195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 43
Location: India
GMAT Date: 11-01-2019
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 5,195
Kudos: 4,765
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
himanshu0123
few follow-ups here, Ron :)

1. bears, and they overturn rocks to find them and consume up to

In general when ''they'' and 'them' are two pronouns referring back to two different nouns. Is there a guiding principle that such a sentence is ambiguous even if logical antecedent is clear enough.


E. bears, which overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as

can we have two modifiers : a RPC and an ing verbal separated by a comma. Don't we need a 'and' here? Or there is no such guiding principle for modifiers?


RonTargetTestPrep
himanshu0123
D. bears, and they overturn rocks to find them and consume up to

''they'' refers to ''bears''. The only plural noun available in preceding clasue. ''Moth'' is singular. Still there is an ambiguity??

The red pronoun is the issue. That pronoun clearly wants to stand for "moths" (plural), but "moth" is only present as a singular noun.

"And" is also used incorrectly here. The parts before and after "and" are not two parallel observations.


E. bears, which overturn rocks to find the insects, consuming as many as

we have two modifiers : a RPC and an ing verbal separated by a comma. Both are modifying the same subject.



"Which" describes the bears. That's the immediately preceding noun before the comma, so this modifier is fine.



Comma __ING has two requirements:
• It should modify the entire preceding clause;
• The subject of the preceding clause should be the person/thing most closely responsible for the __ING action.

Checking these two requirements:
• "Consuming as many as..." does, indeed, describe what the bears do as they're turning over rocks to find these insects.
• The subject of the preceding clause is "which", which represents the bears. Does "consuming..." describe something that the bears do? Yes it does.

Since COMMA _ING is doing both of its assigned jobs, it's fine.
[/quote]

Hello himanshu0123,

We hope this finds you well.

To answer your queries, a pronoun and its derivatives can only refer to one noun in a given sentence, so the use of "them" in D is incorrect for two reasons - it does not have a logical, plural noun to refer to, and "them" cannot be used to refer to any noun but "bears" in this sentence.

Further, no "and" is needed between the modifiers in E.

We hope this helps.
All the best!
Experts' Global Team
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 18,832
Own Kudos:
Posts: 18,832
Kudos: 986
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
   1   2 
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7445 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
234 posts
188 posts