GMAT Question of the Day: Daily via email | Daily via Instagram New to GMAT Club? Watch this Video

It is currently 29 May 2020, 12:30

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Affiliations: UWC
Joined: 09 May 2012
Posts: 328
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GMAT 2: 680 Q44 V38
GPA: 3.43
WE: Engineering (Entertainment and Sports)
Reviews Badge
The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 25 Jan 2019, 03:08
19
105
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  5% (low)

Question Stats:

84% (01:18) correct 16% (01:23) wrong based on 5387 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.


(A) having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it

(B) having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they

(C) with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' assuming that they

(D) with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists' assuming that it

(E) with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it

Originally posted by macjas on 11 May 2012, 22:45.
Last edited by Bunuel on 25 Jan 2019, 03:08, edited 1 time in total.
Edited the question.
Most Helpful Expert Reply
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: enjoying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 5561
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 12 May 2012, 07:34
24
4
A case of SV mismatch and pronoun ambiguity and reference. The subject is the singular structure and the verb therefore should be helps, which is three in B, C and E. In B. the plural pronoun, they refer to anything plural but what is in issue is the singular insect eye that is compared with vertebrate eye. C also has the same pronoun mis - reference as in B. E remains with the use of the singular verb helps and singular pronoun it
_________________
God grant me the serenity to accept the things I cannot change,
the courage to change the things I can,
and above all the wisdom to know the difference.
-The Serenity Prayer - A GMAT aspirant’s first entreaty

Over 200 pages of personal course material on all gamuts of GMAT SC for non-native speakers, great value for the money; 919884544509
Most Helpful Community Reply
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 670
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2013, 07:51
24
20
gmatter0913 wrote:
Could somebody please clarify me how "with" is different from "having" here.

How is it that "having" is modifying "structure", while "with" is modifying "compound insect eye". Kindly help me understand the usage of with here.

Thanks a lot GmatClub.


hi

having = have + ing = verb + ing.
verb-ing modifiers are very versatile modifiers.
there are two case


if verb-ing modifiers appear after a clause and is preceeded by comma ,then it modifies the entire preceeding clause.It
a) either presents additional information about the preceeding clause or
b) result of the preceeding clause.


if verb-ing modifiers appears without a comma==>it modifies the immediate noun.

now in our question:

The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.

so according to rule HAVING is modifying the entire preceeding clause....
so in this sentence ...meanig coming out: intricate structure are having hundreds of miniature eyes==> this is illogical as structure cant have eyes...
hence we can eliminate all the option using HAVING


please refre to this also.

usage-of-verb-ing-modifiers-135220.html


hope it makes sense now.
_________________
When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss
General Discussion
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2010
Posts: 266
Schools: IE'14, ISB'14, Kellogg'15
WE 1: 7 Yrs in Automobile (Commercial Vehicle industry)
Reviews Badge
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 Aug 2012, 09:18
12
1
A having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it (SV error)
B having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they (Pronoun error)
C with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' assuming that they(Pronoun error)
D with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists' assuming that it (SV error)
E with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it (Correct Answer)
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 19 Jun 2012
Posts: 2
sentence correction  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2012, 00:05
1
Hi......
i have a doubt regarding antecedents for pronoun,.....
In OG13,#81,
"Fossils of the arm of a sloth found in Puerto Rico in 1991, and dated at 34 million years old, made it the earliest known mammal of the greater antiles islands. "

OG explanation for this sentence being wrong- "sloth is the object of a preposition and not the subject of the sentence, there is no reasonable antecedent for the pronoun it ".

but in OG13,#7,
"The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrae eye."
above is the correct sentence as per OG....
here, compound insect eye is the object of the preposition... so in the modifier "with its...." , its cannot refer to compound insect eye.... but OG says its refers to the compound insect eye..........
contradicting explanations in two different sentences... help pls...
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Status: SLOGGING : My son says,This time Papa u will have to make it : Innocence is BLISS
Joined: 16 Jan 2012
Posts: 126
Location: India
WE: Sales (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2012, 13:55
4
1
First split : The intricate structure......... HELP/HELPS explain........

The intricate structure ( singular )..... must be paired with Helps ( singular verb )

A,D disappears, Left with B, C, E

2nd Split : Scientists assumed that....... THEY / IT........

The pronoun refers back to the EYE ( Singular )........ So the Pronoun should be IT ( SINGULAR ) and not THEY.

Thus B n C get back to their cocoon.

Leading to E, my take
SVP
SVP
User avatar
G
Joined: 14 Apr 2009
Posts: 2271
Location: New York, NY
Re: sentence correction  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Aug 2012, 14:39
1
Hi stotite,

The difference here lies in the meaning. You're basically asking why the descriptive phrase seems to be describing the second noun or object of the sentence--but in one case, it's used correctly and in the other case it's used incorrectly.

Here are the two examples:

(1) "Fossils of the..sloth, made it the earliest known mammal..."

(2) "The intricate structure of the compound insect eye..."


The sentences seemingly have the same structure. Why, then is (1) no good and (2) is good?

The difference is in the meaning.

In (1) when we say "fossils of the sloth" - we are bringing up two very different things. One is the actual sloth. The other is a fossil - something that was DERIVED from the original sloth.

In (2) when we say "intricate structure of the eye" - INTRICATE STRUCTURE is merely a DESCRIPTION of the eye. We're still talking about the eye, but more specifically we are referencing the intricate structure of the eye. You're still talking about the eye in general in both cases.

This contrasts with the situation in (1) where you are potentially referencing two different things - one is the fossil of the sloth and the other is the sloth itself. So when you use the word IT - the reader won't know which one you are referring to.

But in (2) when you use IT - you are clearly referencing the "intricate structure of the eye" as a whole mainly because the phrase is not composed of 2 different elements. Rather, the intricate structure is a characteristic of the eye. Whereas the "fossil" is not really a characteristic of the "sloth."

For more information on these subtleties and other SC frameworks, please reference the SC Pill Core Framework #3.
Director
Director
User avatar
Status: Been a long time guys...
Joined: 03 Feb 2011
Posts: 964
Location: United States (NY)
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
GPA: 3.75
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: help me in this SC  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 07 Nov 2012, 01:07
1
Hii supri.
Though I am not an expert, I will still try my best.
(A)having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia,help explain why scientists have assumed that it Note that "haiving hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia" is modifying the entire preceding clause "The intricate structure of the compound insect eye". Logically the "structure" is not having hundreds of eyes but "compound insect eye" has. Also, on removing this modifier, the sentence becomes The intricate structure of the compound insect eye HELP explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.
The HELP does'nt agree with the subject of the previous clause "the intricate structure" and hence incorrect. It should be HELPS.
(B)having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia,helps explain why scientists have assumed that they "They" hasn't got any logical referent here. Use of "that are called" seems pretty wordier. It can be easily written as "...called".
(C)with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia,helps explain scientists` assuming that they
"scientists' assuming" is a noun and cannot come after "explain" in this context. Since you are also a noun, try putting your name after explain. ex-"...helps explain supri". Its illogical. "that are called" is still wordier. No logical referent for "they".
(D)with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia,help explain scientists` assuming that it
Same as C.
(E)with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia,helps explain why scientists have assumed that it CORRECT..

+1E.
Hope that helps.
-s
_________________
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 7
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2013, 01:58
I figured out the errors with each answer choice much similar to the ways listed above. I was looking at one point in OG answer explanation that "using 'assuming' with possesive 'scientists'' form" is incorrect. Say, if i change answer (C) as below, will it be correct.

(C) with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' ASSUMPTION that IT
Retired Moderator
User avatar
Joined: 15 Jun 2012
Posts: 968
Location: United States
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2013, 22:26
6
mamathak wrote:
I figured out the errors with each answer choice much similar to the ways listed above. I was looking at one point in OG answer explanation that "using 'assuming' with possesive 'scientists'' form" is incorrect. Say, if i change answer (C) as below, will it be correct.

(C) with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' ASSUMPTION that IT


Hi mamthak

Even you change assuming to assumption, the sentence is still wrong because:

- Structure: "assumption that + clause" is not as good as "assume that + clause"
(1) Scientists have the assumption that whale evolved from elephant
(2) Scientists assume that whale evolved from elephant
Which one is better. Definitely, GMAT likes the latter, it's more concise and has clear meaning.
Remember the order V-A-N (verb-adjective-noun). If you can use verb, use verb, do not use noun form.

- Idiom: assumption that ==> incorrect. Correct idiom is "assumption of/about"

Hope it' clear.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 242
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2013, 07:35
Could somebody please clarify me how "with" is different from "having" here.

How is it that "having" is modifying "structure", while "with" is modifying "compound insect eye". Kindly help me understand the usage of with here.

Thanks a lot GmatClub.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 242
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2013, 09:57
1
Could you help me on how "with" modifies the "eye" and not the "structure"?
Director
Director
User avatar
Joined: 14 Dec 2012
Posts: 670
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 700 Q50 V34
GPA: 3.6
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post Updated on: 18 Jul 2013, 11:00
1
gmatter0913 wrote:
Could you help me on how "with" modifies the "eye" and not the "structure"?



WITH ...will modify eye.....according to context of the sentence)

it cannot modify intricate structure as that will be illogical....to say intricate structure have hundreds of miniature eyes.


The intricate structure of the compound insect eye,withits hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye


HOPE IT IS CLEAR.

_________________
When you want to succeed as bad as you want to breathe ...then you will be successfull....

GIVE VALUE TO OFFICIAL QUESTIONS...



GMAT RCs VOCABULARY LIST: http://gmatclub.com/forum/vocabulary-list-for-gmat-reading-comprehension-155228.html
learn AWA writing techniques while watching video : http://www.gmatprepnow.com/module/gmat-analytical-writing-assessment
: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=APt9ITygGss

Originally posted by blueseas on 18 Jul 2013, 10:03.
Last edited by blueseas on 18 Jul 2013, 11:00, edited 1 time in total.
Manager
Manager
avatar
Joined: 12 Mar 2010
Posts: 242
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 18 Jul 2013, 20:49
3
I thought I understood the usage of "with" until I saw this official sentence.

I believe that if I am changing the rules of using a concept every time so as to match the correct answer, then I am sure that I didn't understand the concept well. I believe that is exactly what is happening in this case in understanding the usage of "with" on the GMAT.

In our previous conversation, we thought "with" modifies the preceding noun or the clause. But, it looks like we're missing something here. Below is an official sentence from the GMAT Prep.

Sentence: (This is the correct option in the question. But, the stress here is to understand how is it correct?)

Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline.

The official explanation says "with" is modifying "monkeys" correctly and it is not modifying "branches".

I don't understand why is it so? According to our understanding, "with" should modify the preceding noun "branches".

I understand that branches cannot have arms and legs and hence it modifies monkeys. I think this explanation doesn't solve the problem. Because, there has to be a better explanation to this usage. Else, we're saying that "with" is always correct on the GMAT as it can be associated to modify anything as desired by the context of the sentence.

I believe we need to understand this better.

I request the experts on this forum to please help us on this.

Thanks a lot!!
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 21 Jan 2013
Posts: 36
Concentration: General Management, Leadership
Schools: LBS
GPA: 3.82
WE: Engineering (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Aug 2013, 22:37
1
1
gmatter0913 wrote:
I thought I understood the usage of "with" until I saw this official sentence.

Visitors to the park have often looked up into the leafy canopy and saw monkeys sleeping on the branches, with arms and legs hanging like socks on a clothesline.

The official explanation says "with" is modifying "monkeys" correctly and it is not modifying "branches".

I don't understand why is it so? According to our understanding, "with" should modify the preceding noun "branches".

I understand that branches cannot have arms and legs and hence it modifies monkeys. I think this explanation doesn't solve the problem. Because, there has to be a better explanation to this usage. Else, we're saying that "with" is always correct on the GMAT as it can be associated to modify anything as desired by the context of the sentence.


Firstly, both the verbs "have often looked up" and "saw" are associated to "Visitors". I'd expect the second verb also to be in a a form that aligns with "have" => verb should be "have seen" .

Secondly to generalise this concept of usage of "with XXX" --> it falls into the category of prepositional phrases , which are very versatile , and everything that's said about "with" being a versatile modifier applies to all prepositional phrases

In this specific Question - i think "with arms and legs hanging like ..... " modifies the noun phrase "monkeys sleeping on the branches" . it simply cannot modify just branches or monkeys. "with ....." here describes HOW monkeys are sleeping on the branches , modifying the action denoted by the -ING modifer sleeping.
Intern
Intern
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2012
Posts: 31
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Nonprofit
GMAT Date: 09-13-2013
GPA: 4
WE: Engineering (Energy and Utilities)
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 31 May 2014, 23:18
The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.

A having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it
B having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they
C with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' assuming that they
D with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists' assuming that it
E with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it


This sentence addresses why scientists have decided that the vertebrate eye arid the insect eye evolved independently of each other. The insect eye is much more intricate, with hundreds of miniature eyes. The sentence needs to be clear as to what has hundreds of miniature eyes. The structure or the insect eye? Furthermore, the singular subject intricate structure requires the singular verb helps.

A. having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it
having..modified subject of the preceding clause "The intricate structure" and meaning looks like The intricate
structure has miniature eyes(insect eye has miniature eyes).so this option is out


B. having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they
Option B is out for the same reason as given in Option A.

C. with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' assuming that they
The intricate structure ...helps(correct). they(plural) is refer to back to The intricate structure(singular)..so
Incorrect


D. with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists' assuming that it
The intricate structure ...help(incorrect)

E. with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it
The intricate structure ...helps(correct).It refers to The intricate structure...Correct.
_________________
Remember that potential unused turns into pain. So dedicate yourself to expressing your best.
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Status: Verbal Forum Moderator
Joined: 17 Apr 2013
Posts: 448
Location: India
GMAT 1: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 2: 750 Q51 V41
GMAT 3: 790 Q51 V49
GPA: 3.3
OG13 Q7 SC - The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, havin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Jul 2015, 07:59
The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.

A having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it
B having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they
C with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' assuming that they
D with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists' assuming that it
E with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it

Sir,

This is OG13 Q7 SC. I have seen your Video on You tube, but still I have a doubt.

As per my understanding comma+with modifies the action in the preceding clause.

This is not a clause "The intricate structure of the compound insect eye". Since it doesnt have SV pair (verb missing). How come comma+with modify anything before it?
If there would have been no comma then the case be different. I think w/o comma with modifies the closest noun. Please help me where do I have Knowledge Gap.

OA : E
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
User avatar
G
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 4485
Re: OG13 Q7 SC - The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, havin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Jul 2015, 06:47
honchos wrote:
The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.

A having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it
B having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they
C with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists' assuming that they
D with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists' assuming that it
E with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it

Sir,

This is OG13 Q7 SC. I have seen your Video on You tube, but still I have a doubt.

As per my understanding comma+with modifies the action in the preceding clause.

This is not a clause "The intricate structure of the compound insect eye". Since it doesnt have SV pair (verb missing). How come comma+with modify anything before it?
If there would have been no comma then the case be different. I think w/o comma with modifies the closest noun. Please help me where do I have Knowledge Gap.

OA : E

Dear honchos,
I'm happy to respond, my friend. :-)

I don't know where you have heard that rule about "comma + with," but that's too rigid. The preposition "with" is very common, and it could come after a comma for any one of a number of reasons. A prepositional phrase beginning with the word "with" can be a adjectival phrase, that is, a noun modifier, or it can be an adverbial phrase, that is, a verb or clause modifier. If the "with" prepositional phrase acts as a clause modifier, then, yes, it is likely to come after a comma. Here, the "with" phrase is a noun modifier, modifying the noun "eye." It is set off by commas because it is a non-vital modifier. See:
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/that-vs-which-on-the-gmat/
http://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/gmat-gramm ... modifiers/
Does all this make sense, my friend?
Mike :-)
_________________
Mike McGarry
Magoosh Test Prep


Education is not the filling of a pail, but the lighting of a fire. — William Butler Yeats (1865 – 1939)
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 14 Jul 2014
Posts: 84
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
GMAT 1: 620 Q41 V34
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 17 May 2018, 20:47
1
The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it evolved independently of the vertebrate eye.

"having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia" modifies the entire preceding clause "The intricate structure of the compound insect eye"

The subject here in the sentence is "The intricate structure of the compound insect eye" which is singular.
Hence if we eliminate the middlemen i.e. "having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia". It clearly shows the Subject/Verb agreement issue as the first split is "help" or "helps".
With Singular subject it has to be "helps".
Hence A and D go out.

(A) having hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain why scientists have assumed that it
Incorrect, because of the reason mentioned.

(B) having hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that they
(C) with its hundreds of miniature eyes that are called ommatidia, helps explain scientists’ assuming that they
The last split "they and it", "they" has no clear antecedent. Here "they" refers to "hundreds of miniature eyes" but this isn't the subject here. The pronoun here must refer to "The intricate structure of the compound insect eye", which is singular, so a singular pronoun is required.
Hence B and C go out.

(D) with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, help explain scientists’ assuming that it
Incorrect, because of the reason mentioned on the top.

(E) with its hundreds of miniature eyes called ommatidia, helps explain why scientists have assumed that it
Correct, with no above mentioned issues.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
V
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Posts: 1802
WE: General Management (Education)
GMAT ToolKit User CAT Tests
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 15 Jun 2018, 08:02
daagh Can singular pronoun it refers to Eye which is in preposition structure?

daagh wrote:
A case of SV mismatch and pronoun ambiguity and reference. The subject is the singular structure and the verb therefore should be helps, which is three in B, C and E. In B. the plural pronoun, they refer to anything plural but what is in issue is the singular insect eye that is compared with vertebrate eye. C also has the same pronoun mis - reference as in B. E remains with the use of the singular verb helps and singular pronoun it

_________________
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of   [#permalink] 15 Jun 2018, 08:02

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 38 posts ] 

The intricate structure of the compound insect eye, having hundreds of

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne