Conclusion : The media now devote more coverage to crime than they did ten years ago not because the crime rate has increased, but rather because the public is now more interested in reading and hearing about crime.
Ques : The proposition that the public is now more interested in reading and hearing about crime plays which one of the following roles in the argument?
Pre-thinking : The proposition "public is now more interested in reading and hearing about crime plays" is presented as an explanation to why "The media now devote more coverage to crime".
Lets look at the options now :
(A) It supports the conclusion that the media now devote more coverage to crime than the crime rate alone justifies.
Incorrect because of the following reasons:
(i) The conlusion is
not that "the media now devote more coverage to crime than the crime rate alone justifies"
(ii) The second part of statement "the media now devote more coverage to crime
than the crime rate alone justifies" is not mentioned in anywhere in the passage.
(B) It is presented as evidence that the media decide what to cover and to what extent to cover it depending on the interest of the public. -
Incorrect because it is not presented as an evidence rather as an explanation of why the coverage has increased than 10 years ago.
(C) It is a counterexample to the claim that the media devote more coverage to crime now than they did ten years ago. -
Incorrect because it is not an counterexample to "media devote more coverage to crime now than they did ten years ago" but rather an explanation.
(D) It is a generalization based on the claim that the crime rate has increased over the past ten years. -
Incorrect because this is irrelavant and it is not a generalisation.
(E) It is offered as an alternative explanation of why the media devote more coverage to crime now than they did ten years ago. -
Correct because it is indeed as an alternate explanation for the fact that "he media devote more coverage to crime now than they did ten years ago"