Hi everyone,
Got all correct in in 7:50 minutes, including 2:50 minutes to read and 5 minutes to answer the questions.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------P1Here the author tells us that social sciences don't get the same credit as other intellectual enterprises. The reason is that social sciences are easily comprehended and assimilated by people.
Purpose: To explain why social sciences don't get much credit
P2In the second paragraph the author expresses two contrasts. The first one talks about the over utilization of social sciences contrasted with the few credits that social sciences get. The second is the fact that the first contrast is justified by claim of some people the is better to use social sciences than not to use anything at all.
Purpose: To present one contrast (over utilization) and to justify it.
Main pointTo explain that social sciences get few credits but they are over utilized and to justify the over utilization.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------1. The author is primarily concerned with
Pre-thinking
Main point question
To explain that social sciences get few credits but they are over utilized and to justify the over utilization.
(A) advocating a more modest view, and less widespread utilization, of the social sciences
out of scope(B) analyzing the mechanisms for translating discoveries into applications in the social sciences
out of scope(C) dissolving the air of paradox inherent in human beings studying themselves
out of scope(D) explaining a peculiar dilemma that the social sciences are in
Yes, the dilemma is that social sciences get few credits bu are over utilized.(E) maintaining a strict separation between pure and applied social science
out of scope ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------2. Which of the following is a social science discipline that the author mentions as being possibly overutilized?
Pre-thinking
Detail question
From P2: Game theory is pressed into service in studies of shifting international alliances. Evaluation research is called upon to demonstrate successes or failures of social programs. Models from economics and demography become the definitive tools for examining the financial base of social security.
(A) Conventional theories of social change
(B) Game theory
(C) Decision-making theory
(D) Economic theories of international alliances
(E) Systems analysis
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------3. It can be inferred from the passage that, when speaking of the "overutilization" of the social sciences, the author is referring to the .
Pre-thinking
Inference question
We ge an help from this lines: Yet this rush into practical applications is itself quite understandable:
(A) premature practical application of social science advances
In line with pre-thinking(B) habitual reliance on the social sciences
even where common sense would serve equally well No elements from which we can infer this option(C) practice of bringing a greater variety of social science disciplines to bear on a problem than
the nature of the problem warrants [/s]
No elements from which we can infer this option(D) use of social science constructs
by people who do not fully understand them [/s]
No elements from which we can infer this option(E) tendency on the part of social scientists t
o recast everyday truths in social science jargon [/s]
No elements from which we can infer this option ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------4. The author confronts the claim that the social sciences are being overutilized with
Pre-thinking
Detail question
From P2: public policy must continually be made, and policymakers rightly feel that even tentative findings and untested theories are better guides to decision-making than no findings and no theories at all.
(A) proof that overextensions of social science results are self-correcting
(B) evidence that some public policy is made without any recourse to social science findings or theories
(C) a long Jist of social science applications that are perfectly appropriate and extremely fruitful
(D) the argument that overutilization is by and large the exception rather than the rule
(E) the observation that this practice represents the lesser of two evils under existing circumstances
Correct, if policymakers do not use social science tools that are left with nothing. So social science tools, even if not perfect, are preferable to the nothing scenarioThe other options are just not mentioned ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------It's a great day to be alive!