GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 26 May 2019, 16:45

### GMAT Club Daily Prep

#### Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

# The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court

Author Message
TAGS:

### Hide Tags

Senior Manager
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 442
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

Updated on: 07 Oct 2012, 21:48
2
13
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

57% (01:15) correct 43% (01:08) wrong based on 473 sessions

### HideShow timer Statistics

The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting

_________________
First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html

Originally posted by getgyan on 06 Oct 2012, 02:01.
Last edited by getgyan on 07 Oct 2012, 21:48, edited 1 time in total.
Intern
Joined: 07 Jul 2012
Posts: 31
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Strategy
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)

### Show Tags

06 Oct 2012, 10:18
1
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted had been is incorrect
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted which incorrectly refers to court instead of scam
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted correct
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted is ... resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting
Manager
Joined: 21 Jan 2010
Posts: 248

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2012, 14:06
1
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted // past perfect not required
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted // wrong modifier
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted // correct
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted // wrong tense is -present , indicted -past
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting // wrong -ing modifier .
Intern
Joined: 26 Jun 2012
Posts: 4

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2012, 05:45
Just a small question. Should't which be used to modify the noun, WHICH directly preceeds it?
In this case, the indiction resulted in the loss... Should'nt(E) be the right answer?

Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4768
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2012, 06:06
2
Indiction resulted in the loss? Sorry no; indiction came much later than the fraud and the resultant loss. To avoid confusion, we have to fix the loss to the scam and that is why we have to take a choice that states the pronoun after the scam. C wins over E
_________________
The Take-Away: Grammar First and Then the Rest
Senior Manager
Joined: 28 Apr 2012
Posts: 275
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 650 Q48 V31
GMAT 2: 770 Q50 V47
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2012, 08:54
1
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted // past perfect not required
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted // wrong modifier
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted // correct
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted // wrong tense is -present , indicted -past
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting // wrong -ing modifier .

D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted // wrong tense is -present , indicted -past

"is indicated" is correct as in "This is done" - "is" is the verb and "indicated" is the past participle.
The problem is - we are referring to a completed action and we cannot use present simple tense.
_________________
"Appreciation is a wonderful thing. It makes what is excellent in others belong to us as well."
― Voltaire

Press Kudos, if I have helped.
Thanks!
Retired Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 17 Aug 2011
Posts: 540
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2012, 09:34
1
3
getgyan wrote:
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting

Choice A is wrong because of the past perfect tense. The tense of "resulted" should be happened before the tense of "indicted".

Choice B is ambiguous because of the change in the setence of the 2G spectrum scam and Supreme Court. If set as the choice B, I will think differently that the 2G spectrum scam is caused by the Supreme court

Choice C is the most appropriate choice.

Choice D, the present tense of indicted is not good, and that resulted will be consider to modify the Supreme Court, not 2G spectrum cam

Choice E, the act of indicted by Supreme Court does not result in loss, that is the 2G spectrum scam.
_________________
Senior Manager
Affiliations: SAE
Joined: 11 Jul 2012
Posts: 442
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Social Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.5
WE: Project Management (Energy and Utilities)

### Show Tags

10 Oct 2012, 21:21
Gautam21 wrote:
Just a small question. Should't which be used to modify the noun, WHICH directly preceeds it?
In this case, the indiction resulted in the loss... Should'nt(E) be the right answer?

Hi Gautam

I do not think you understood the meaning clearly.

2G spectrum scam resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer. Therefore, the Supreme court indicted the telecom minister.
Option E suggests exactly the opposite that the indictment of the telecom minister led to a loss to the exchequer. Indictment never costs that much.

_________________
First Attempt 710 - http://gmatclub.com/forum/first-attempt-141273.html
Senior Manager
Status: Gonna rock this time!!!
Joined: 22 Jul 2012
Posts: 434
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q43 V34
GMAT 2: 630 Q47 V29
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)

### Show Tags

09 Feb 2013, 08:33
daagh wrote:
Indiction resulted in the loss? Sorry no; indiction came much later than the fraud and the resultant loss. To avoid confusion, we have to fix the loss to the scam and that is why we have to take a choice that states the pronoun after the scam. C wins over E

I find it difficult to understand tenses sometimes.
Could you please throw some light on why pairing is with indicted doesn't make sense.

Can a sentence which has 'is' and 'verb-ed' ever be right?

Regards,
Sach
_________________
hope is a good thing, maybe the best of things. And no good thing ever dies.

Who says you need a 700 ?Check this out : http://gmatclub.com/forum/who-says-you-need-a-149706.html#p1201595

My GMAT Journey : http://gmatclub.com/forum/end-of-my-gmat-journey-149328.html#p1197992
Manager
Joined: 11 Feb 2014
Posts: 60

### Show Tags

Updated on: 23 Jun 2014, 07:54
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam,
which resulted
in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer.

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted

B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which
resulted

C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam,
which resulted

D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted

E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting

Originally posted by Game on 22 Jun 2014, 10:28.
Last edited by Gnpth on 23 Jun 2014, 07:54, edited 1 time in total.
Merging similar topic
Retired Moderator
Joined: 05 Sep 2010
Posts: 655

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2014, 20:41
C seems best : has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam,
which resulted

faults :

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which
resulted

B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which
resulted

C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam,
which resulted----->correct

D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted

E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting
Intern
Joined: 05 Mar 2014
Posts: 8

### Show Tags

22 Jun 2014, 21:24
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam,
which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer.

A) The indiction and the loss happened at the same time, so it is not a case of two past events. So 'A' is wrong

B)2G Spectrum scam by the Supreme court is erroneous. B is wrong

C) The loss is still relevant now , so 'has been' fits the bill. C is the answer

D) 'is indicted' and 'resulted' dont go together. Not D

E) 'indicted' and 'resulting' are not parallel.

Hope this helps
Manager
Joined: 03 Oct 2016
Posts: 79
Concentration: Technology, General Management
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

05 Oct 2016, 07:26
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted

Had been not required ; there is no requirement to show 2 events here

B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
Which modifies supreme court so wrong

C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
Best of the lot here

D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
IS and resulted - nah doesnt look proper to me and clearly we are talking in the past here

E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting
resulting could have been the answer but its a wrong modifier here
_________________
KINDLY KUDOS IF YOU LIKE THE POST
Senior Manager
Status: Active
Affiliations: NA
Joined: 24 Oct 2012
Posts: 260
GMAT 1: 590 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 600 Q48 V25
GMAT 3: 730 Q51 V37
GPA: 3.5
Re: The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

18 Jun 2017, 21:37
A good discussion is here :

https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/foru ... 13554.html
_________________
#If you like my post , please encourage me by giving Kudos
Manager
Status: Searching for something I've been searching..LOL
Joined: 14 Dec 2016
Posts: 58
Location: India
Concentration: Healthcare, Operations
Schools: Ross '20
GMAT 1: 590 Q35 V42
GPA: 3.5
WE: Medicine and Health (Health Care)
Re: The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

21 Jun 2017, 00:10
anje29 wrote:

Thanks a ton for that. Helped me to solve an argument with my friends over this question.
Intern
Joined: 13 Apr 2016
Posts: 44
Location: India
Schools: Great Lakes
GMAT 1: 660 Q37 V42
GPA: 2.99
WE: Information Technology (Retail Banking)
Re: The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

08 Oct 2017, 11:03
getgyan wrote:
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting

B. here which modifies the Supreme Court instead of the 2G scam
C. Correct
D. is indicted will be incorrect
E. Incorrect. the sentence seems to mean that the whole act of indicting the minister by the SC has resulted in a loss to the exchequer instead of the 2G scam causing the loss
Intern
Joined: 13 Sep 2016
Posts: 22
Location: India
GMAT 1: 640 Q48 V29
GPA: 3.5
Re: The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

31 Mar 2018, 11:23
getgyan wrote:
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting

Need help , Well I couldn't trace the error/errors in choice D , can't " that " refer to 2G Spectrum Scam ??
What is wrong with using is in this sentence ?
Board of Directors
Status: Stepping into my 10 years long dream
Joined: 18 Jul 2015
Posts: 3631
Re: The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2018, 02:11
Siddhuftr wrote:
Need help , Well I couldn't trace the error/errors in choice D , can't " that " refer to 2G Spectrum Scam ??
What is wrong with using is in this sentence ?

Hey Siddhuftr ,

Problem with D is the change in the tense usage and hence the entire meaning of the sentence. D implies the action is happening in the present while the original meaning is action started in the past and is still in progress.

Also, "that" is a restrictive modifier and it refers to the noun nearest to it. When I am changing the modifier from which to that, I am implying there could be multiple 2G spectrum scams and I am talking about the one that resulted in a loss of \$1.7 trillion. This is not the case. The meaning of the sentence is 2G scam was one and this scam led to the given loss. hence, we have used "which" (non restrictive modifier).

Does that make sense?
_________________
My GMAT Story: From V21 to V40
My MBA Journey: My 10 years long MBA Dream
My Secret Hacks: Best way to use GMATClub | Importance of an Error Log!
Verbal Resources: All SC Resources at one place | All CR Resources at one place

GMAT Club Inbuilt Error Log Functionality - View More.
New Visa Forum - Ask all your Visa Related Questions - here.
New! Best Reply Functionality on GMAT Club!
Find a bug in the new email templates and get rewarded with 2 weeks of GMATClub Tests for free
Check our new About Us Page here.
SVP
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1677
Location: India
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Real Estate)
Re: The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court  [#permalink]

### Show Tags

01 Apr 2018, 03:40
getgyan wrote:
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted in a loss of about \$1.7 trillion to the exchequer

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted
C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted
E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting

A. had been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted
wrong tense

B. has been indicted in the 2G spectrum scam by the Supreme court, which resulted wrong modifier

C. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, which resulted [b]Correct

D. is indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam that resulted wrong tense

E. has been indicted by the Supreme court in the 2G spectrum scam, resulting wrong modifier
_________________
"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."
Intern
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Posts: 19

### Show Tags

13 Apr 2019, 07:12
daagh wrote:
Indiction resulted in the loss? Sorry no; indiction came much later than the fraud and the resultant loss. To avoid confusion, we have to fix the loss to the scam and that is why we have to take a choice that states the pronoun after the scam. C wins over E
If conducting fraud would result in a loss, why would you participate in illegal activity? Also, once you’re indicted, you lose money. What?

Posted from my mobile device
The telecom minister had been indicted by the Supreme court   [#permalink] 13 Apr 2019, 07:12
Display posts from previous: Sort by