Last visit was: 18 Nov 2025, 23:35 It is currently 18 Nov 2025, 23:35
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
505-555 Level|   Word Problems|                     
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,367
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,367
Kudos: 778,140
 [25]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
20
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,367
Own Kudos:
778,140
 [4]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,367
Kudos: 778,140
 [4]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
aja1991
Joined: 03 Dec 2013
Last visit: 23 Oct 2017
Posts: 6
Own Kudos:
31
 [2]
Given Kudos: 57
Location: Uzbekistan
Concentration: Finance, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GRE 1: Q790 V400
GPA: 3.4
WE:Analyst (Commercial Banking)
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q42 V33
GRE 1: Q790 V400
Posts: 6
Kudos: 31
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
WoundedTiger
Joined: 25 Apr 2012
Last visit: 25 Sep 2024
Posts: 521
Own Kudos:
2,534
 [3]
Given Kudos: 740
Location: India
GPA: 3.21
WE:Business Development (Other)
Products:
Posts: 521
Kudos: 2,534
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The total cost of an office dinner was shared equally by k of the n employees who attended the dinner. What was the total cost of the dinner?

(1) Each of the k employees who shared the cost of the dinner paid $19.
(2) If the total cost of the dinner had been shared equally by k +1 of the n employees who attended the dinner, each of the k +1 employees would have paid $18.

Sol: Since the cost was shared equally by K employees. Let the contribution of each of the K employees be x then Total Cost of the dinner = K*x

From St 1 we have that x=19 so Total cost =19K (Not sufficient)
From st 2 we have (K+1)*18= Total cost of Dinner (Not Sufficient)

Combining we get that St 1 = St2 ie. Total Dinner cost is same. So

19K= (K+1)*18 or K =18 and Total Cost of Dinner : 18*19 = $ 342
Ans C
User avatar
stne
Joined: 27 May 2012
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 1,771
Own Kudos:
1,974
 [2]
Given Kudos: 658
Posts: 1,771
Kudos: 1,974
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aja1991
The correct answer is D!

(1) is obviously sufficient.

(2) is also sufficient because (k+1)18=19k. From this euality we can find k wich can lead us the solution of the problem.


A is not suff.
B also not suff.

how did you get 19K from statement B alone ? This 19 is obviously given in statement 1

let total cost be x
then from (1)
x/k = 19 we do not know K hence insuff.

from (2)
x/(k+1) = 18 again we do not know k+1 hence insuff.

1+2
2 linear distinct equations hence we can solve for x = total cost
which is 342, suff.
answer is C
User avatar
PerfectScores
Joined: 20 Dec 2013
Last visit: 19 Mar 2025
Posts: 104
Own Kudos:
274
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 104
Kudos: 274
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The total cost of an office dinner was shared equally by k of the n employees who attended the dinner. What was the total cost of the dinner?

(1) Each of the k employees who shared the cost of the dinner paid $19.
(2) If the total cost of the dinner had been shared equally by k +1 of the n employees who attended the dinner, each of the k +1 employees would have paid $18.

Total cost of the dinner: k(cost paid by each employee)

Statement I is insufficient

It just tells about the cost paid by each employee however we need the total cost of the dinner means the value of k as well.

Statement II is insufficient
Total cost of dinner = 18(k+1)
Again value of k is unknown

Combining is sufficient

Total cost = 19k = 18(k+1)

18k + k = 18k + 18
k = 18

Hence answer is C
User avatar
GMATinsight
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 08 Jul 2010
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 6,836
Own Kudos:
16,349
 [2]
Given Kudos: 128
Status:GMAT/GRE Tutor l Admission Consultant l On-Demand Course creator
Location: India
GMAT: QUANT+DI EXPERT
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
WE:Education (Education)
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Schools: IIM (A) ISB '24
GMAT 1: 750 Q51 V41
Posts: 6,836
Kudos: 16,349
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sagarsabnis
The total cost of an office dinner was shared equally by k of the n employees who attended the dinner. What was the total cost of the dinner?

(1) Each of the k employees who shared the cost of the dinner paid $19.
(2) If the total cost of the dinner had been shared equally by k + 1 of the n employees who attended the dinner, each of the k + 1 employees would have paid $18.

Question : Total Cost of Dinner = No. of Contributor*Contribution amount of each person = ?

Statement 1: Each of the k employees who shared the cost of the dinner paid $19.

i.e. Total Cost of Dinner = 19*k
Since k is unknown hence
NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement 2: If the total cost of the dinner had been shared equally by k + 1 of the n employees who attended the dinner, each of the k + 1 employees would have paid $18.

i.e. Total Cost of Dinner = 18*(k+1)
Since k is unknown hence
NOT SUFFICIENT

Combining the two statements
i.e. Total Cost of Dinner = 18*(k+1) = 19*k
i.e. k =18
i.e. Total Cost = 19*18 = $342
SUFFICIENT

Answer: Option C
User avatar
andi1
Joined: 03 Sep 2018
Last visit: 19 Feb 2020
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Posts: 20
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
SOLUTION

The total cost of an office dinner was shared equally by k of the n employees who attended the dinner. What was the total cost of the dinner?

(1) Each of the k employees who shared the cost of the dinner paid $19 --> the total cost of the dinner was 19k. Not sufficient.

(2) If the total cost of the dinner had been shared equally by k +1 of the n employees who attended the dinner, each of the k +1 employees would have paid $18 --> the total cost of the dinner was 18(k+1). Not sufficient.

(1)+(2) We can solve the two equations we have to get k and then get the value of 19k. Sufficient.

Answer: C.

Thanks for the solution, Bunuel.

When we consider both statements 1 and 2 together we make the equation equal. Why is that? I understand we can then solve for k but I don't understand why we have to make them equal.
User avatar
Farina
Joined: 21 Aug 2019
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
43
 [1]
Given Kudos: 352
Posts: 100
Kudos: 43
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi,
Can anyone plz tell me what is the meaning of k of the n employees? Isnt it total employees are k and n are selected? Hence equation will ne n*k?
Please guide

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,367
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,367
Kudos: 778,140
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Farina
Hi,
Can anyone plz tell me what is the meaning of k of the n employees? Isnt it total employees are k and n are selected? Hence equation will ne n*k?
Please guide

Posted from my mobile device

That means that there were n employees at the dinner and only k of them payed. For example, there were 20 (n) employees and only 18 (k) of them payed, the remaining 2 did not.
User avatar
Farina
Joined: 21 Aug 2019
Last visit: 13 Oct 2020
Posts: 100
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 352
Posts: 100
Kudos: 43
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Farina
Hi,
Can anyone plz tell me what is the meaning of k of the n employees? Isnt it total employees are k and n are selected? Hence equation will ne n*k?
Please guide

Posted from my mobile device

That means that there were n employees at the dinner and only k of them payed. For example, there were 20 (n) employees and only 18 (k) of them payed, the remaining 2 did not.

Thank you so much, its clear now :)
User avatar
ScottTargetTestPrep
User avatar
Target Test Prep Representative
Joined: 14 Oct 2015
Last visit: 18 Nov 2025
Posts: 21,712
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 300
Status:Founder & CEO
Affiliations: Target Test Prep
Location: United States (CA)
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 21,712
Kudos: 26,993
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
The total cost of an office dinner was shared equally by k of the n employees who attended the dinner. What was the total cost of the dinner?

(1) Each of the k employees who shared the cost of the dinner paid $19.
(2) If the total cost of the dinner had been shared equally by k +1 of the n employees who attended the dinner, each of the k +1 employees would have paid $18.
Solution:

Question Stem Analysis:


We need to determine the total cost of the dinner given that k people contribute an equal amount for the dinner. Notice that if we know the value of k and the amount that each of these k people contributes, then we can determine the total cost of the dinner.

Statement One Alone:

The total cost of the dinner was 19k. However, since we don’t know the value of k, we can’t determine the total cost of the dinner. Statement one alone is not sufficient.

Statement Two Alone:

The total cost of the dinner was 18(k + 1). Again, since we don’t know the value of k, we can’t determine the total cost of the dinner. Statement two alone is not sufficient.

Statements One and Two Together:

From statement one, we know the total cost of the dinner was 19k, and from statement two, we know that the total cost of the dinner was 18(k + 1). Therefore,, we can create the equation:

19k = 18(k + 1)

19k = 18k + 18

k = 18

It follows that the total cost of the dinner is 19 x 18 = $342. Both statements together are sufficient.

Answer: C
User avatar
bumpbot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 09 Sep 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 38,583
Own Kudos:
Posts: 38,583
Kudos: 1,079
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hello from the GMAT Club BumpBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
Moderators:
Math Expert
105368 posts
496 posts