Last visit was: 26 Jul 2024, 20:23 It is currently 26 Jul 2024, 20:23
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
SORT BY:
Date
Tags:
Difficulty: 505-555 Level,   Strengthen,                     
Show Tags
Hide Tags
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Posts: 2091
Own Kudos [?]: 8998 [84]
Given Kudos: 171
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Send PM
Most Helpful Reply
Tutor
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Posts: 15159
Own Kudos [?]: 66909 [10]
Given Kudos: 436
Location: Pune, India
Send PM
BSchool Moderator
Joined: 15 May 2017
Posts: 207
Own Kudos [?]: 99 [6]
Given Kudos: 8
Send PM
General Discussion
Moderator
Joined: 28 Mar 2017
Posts: 1079
Own Kudos [?]: 2007 [3]
Given Kudos: 200
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Technology
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 4
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
2
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken their effectiveness in treating humans because such use can spread resistance to those antibiotics among microorganisms. But now the Smee company, one of the largest pork marketers, may stop buying pork raised on feed containing these antibiotics. Smee has 60 percent of the pork market, and farmers who sell to Smee would certainly stop using the antibiotics in order to avoid jeopardizing their sales. So if Smee makes this change, it will probably significantly slow the decline in antibiotics' effectiveness for humans.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

A. Other major pork marketers will probably stop buying pork raised on feed containing growth-promoting antibiotics if Smee no longer buys such pork. -Sounds good. If competitors follow Smee, the usage of antibiotics will be definitely reduced.
B. The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene. - We are not interested in the population of hog and its control.
C. Authorities are promoting the use of antibiotics to which microorganisms have not yet developed resistance. - This will weaken the argument because it gives us an alternative
D. A phase-out of use of antibiotics for hogs in one country reduced usage by over 50 percent over five years - This doesn't tell in any way that how smee will have an impact on the usage of antibiotics.
E. If Smee stops buying pork raised with antibiotics, the firm's cost will probably increase. -We are definitely not bothered about the cost/profit of Smee.

Answer => A
Manager
Manager
Joined: 10 Jun 2016
Posts: 73
Own Kudos [?]: 90 [2]
Given Kudos: 589
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Strategy
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.3
WE:Project Management (Energy and Utilities)
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
PP777 wrote:
The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken their effectiveness in treating humans because such use can spread resistance to those antibiotics among microorganisms. But now the Smee Company, one of the largest pork marketers, may stop buying pork raised on feed containing these antibiotics. Smee has 60 percent of the pork market, and farmers who sell to Smee would certainly stop using antibiotics in order to avoid jeopardizing their sales. So if Smee makes this change, it will probably significantly slow the declinein antibiotics’ effectiveness for humans.

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

A. Other major pork marketers will probably stop buying pork raised on feed containing growth-promoting antibiotics if Smee no longer buys such pork.
B. The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene.
C. Authorities are promoting the use of antibiotics to which microorganisms have not yet developed resistance.
D. A phaseout of use of antibiotics for hogs in one country reduced usage by over 50 percent over five years.
E. If Smee stops buying pork raised with antibiotics, the firm’s costs will probably increase.


A. Other major pork marketers will probably stop buying pork raised on feed containing growth-promoting antibiotics if Smee no longer buys such pork. - If more marketers stop buying pork, seeing Smee's change, a very significant portion of marketers would stop buying the pork raised on feed with antibiotics, thereby reducing the benefits of using more antibiotics in feed. Therefore, the decline in effectiveness of antibiotics on humans will reduce (according to 1st sentence)
B. The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene.Improved hygiene is Out of Scope here because we are not concerned with hygiene, but with effectiveness of antibiotics on humans.
C. Authorities are promoting the use of antibiotics to which microorganisms have not yet developed resistance.Irrelevant because we are talking about pork feeding on growth-promoting antibiotics, not about any other antibiotics.
D. A phaseout of use of antibiotics for hogs in one country reduced usage by over 50 percent over five years.Irrelevant
E. If Smee stops buying pork raised with antibiotics, the firm’s costs will probably increase.Certainly not a strengthener, but a weakener. If Smee's costs would increase, it would reduce the cost by buying more pork raised with Antibiotics and thus, the effectiveness of antibiotics would decline sharply if Smee keeps buying the pork raised with antibiotics.

Answer - A.
Retired Moderator
Joined: 23 Sep 2015
Posts: 1258
Own Kudos [?]: 5697 [5]
Given Kudos: 416
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
4
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Premise:
1. use of antibiotics in hog farming can weaken their effectiveness in treating humans.
2. smee is largest pork marketers, may stop buying pork raised on feed containing these antibiotics.
3. farmers who sell to Smee would certainly stop using antibiotics in order to avoid jeopardizing their sales.
4. smee has 60 % of market.

conclusion: So if Smee makes this change, it will probably significantly slow the decline in antibiotics’ effectiveness for humans.

Pre-thinking : if smee has 60% of market, which means 40% of the market is acquired by other marketers. if these 40% kept selling antibiotics pork then conclusion could not be achieved. Mind that this is a kind of pattern GMAT uses to make such kind of problems. Many problems are of this same framework. If something such as this need to stop, make sure others also not doing it.


Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

A. Other major pork marketers will probably stop buying pork raised on feed containing growth-promoting antibiotics if Smee no longer buys such pork. --- on the same lines as pre-thinking.
B. The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene. --- even if this is not less growth will be observed. but this is not evaluate the strategy question. if that then probably this one would be a contender.
C. Authorities are promoting the use of antibiotics to which microorganisms have not yet developed resistance. ---- out of scope.
D. A phaseout of use of antibiotics for hogs in one country reduced usage by over 50 percent over five years. --- irrelevant.
E. If Smee stops buying pork raised with antibiotics, the firm’s costs will probably increase. --- this is not out concern.
Intern
Intern
Joined: 27 Feb 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos [?]: 1 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Straight A.
Premise: The use of antibiotics in hog farming can weaken their effectiveness in treating humans.
Premise: Smee company may stop buying pork raised on feed containing these antibiotics.
Conclusion: if Smee makes this change, it will probably slow the decline in antibiotics' effectiveness for humans.
Assumption: the use of other pork company won't increase significantly

A fills the gap here, if other major marketers will stop buying pork raised on feed containing antibiotics as Smee do, the overall use of antibiotics will decrease, hence it will slow the decline in antibiotics effectiveness for humans
Intern
Intern
Joined: 01 Apr 2017
Posts: 17
Own Kudos [?]: 13 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken their effectiveness in treating humans because such use can spread resistance to those antibiotics among microorganisms. But now the Smee company, one of the largest pork marketers, may stop buying pork raised on feed containing these antibiotics. Smee has 60 percent of the pork market, and farmers who sell to Smee would certainly stop using the antibiotics in order to avoid jeopardizing their sales. So if Smee makes this change, it will probably significantly slow the decline in antibiotics' effectiveness for humans.

if smee stop buying antibiotic feeded pork -> effectiveness of antibiotic will increase in human
given a)use of ab is creating resistance against micro-org b)smee largest port marketer ( 60% market cap) c) farmers will stop using ab

pre-thnk:
something that will strengthen the link plan->increase in effectiveness

Which of the following, if true, would most strengthen the argument above?

(A) Other major pork marketers will probably stop buying pork raised on feed containing growth-promoting antibiotics if Smee no longer buys such pork.
40% market dont sell, overal consumption will decrease. it is touching the plan and effectiveness

(B) The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene.
out of scope discussion

(C) Authorities are promoting the use of antibiotics to which microorganisms have not yet developed resistance.
not touching the link

(D) A phase-out of use of antibiotics for hogs in one country reduced usage by over 50 percent over five years.
might look relevant, but doesnot say whther it will happen because of plan by smee?

(E) If Smee stops buying pork raised with antibiotics, the firm's cost will probably increase.
not sure, if cost will hamper the decision to buy
Intern
Intern
Joined: 22 Dec 2018
Posts: 14
Own Kudos [?]: 6 [2]
Given Kudos: 94
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
1
Bookmarks
I'm stuck between A&B. I seem to treat this problem as "assumption." If negating B, we get "The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can NOT be offset by improved hygiene. " If so, consumers' demand may not be met by Smee and the consumers will turn to other companies that still use antibiotics. So the conclusion is destroyed. So this choice will be an assumption/a strengthener...

Could someone please help explain?
Manager
Manager
Joined: 08 Jul 2016
Posts: 57
Own Kudos [?]: 39 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: United States (NY)
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V36
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
skycastle19 wrote:
I'm stuck between A&B. I seem to treat this problem as "assumption." If negating B, we get "The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can NOT be offset by improved hygiene. " If so, consumers' demand may not be met by Smee and the consumers will turn to other companies that still use antibiotics. So the conclusion is destroyed. So this choice will be an assumption/a strengthener...

Could someone please help explain?

Since, this is a strengthen question, you cannot treat it as assumption question. An answer to assumption question does strengthen the argument, but the other way round in not correct.
Now, even if you had this question as an assumption question, B would not be a necessary assumption. B states that the decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene. This is not required for the argument to hold true. The decline in hog growth can be offset by some other means, say good nutrition. Also, if you negate this statement, it does not necessarily destroys the argument. You are correct with your negated statement, but you are making a lot of assumptions. The decline is hog growth does not mean that smee's demand for antibiotic free pork will not be met. The hog farmers may be producing a lot and their production decreased by a little amount.

A is correct as it says that other major pork marketers will also sell antibiotic free pork products, so consumers will have more access to such products, resulting in decline in antibiotics' effectiveness for humans.
Director
Director
Joined: 03 Mar 2017
Posts: 583
Own Kudos [?]: 420 [0]
Given Kudos: 596
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
AndrewN

Though I marked the answer correct, I was wondering what is option B actually conveying??

Quote:
(B) The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene.

Improved hygiene of humans or hog ??

Please help.
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3507
Own Kudos [?]: 6988 [1]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Expert Reply
warrior1991 wrote:
AndrewN

Though I marked the answer correct, I was wondering what is option B actually conveying??

Quote:
(B) The decline in hog growth due to discontinuation of antibiotics can be offset by improved hygiene.

Improved hygiene of humans or hog ??

Please help.

Hello, warrior1991. Your query gave me a chuckle, I must confess. This is a case in which the structure of the sentence steers us more into one interpretation than another. That is, a decline has its opposite in whatever may offset it.

a) The decline in hog growth...
b) can be offset by improved hygiene.

The passive voice here does lend itself to misinterpretation, as though, say, a farmer washing his hands a little better could potentially help his pigs get fatter. I think the sentence in the active voice is a little clearer:

Improved hygiene can offset the decline in hog growth.

Sure, in hogs is only implied after hygiene, the same as before, but the sentence seeks an anchor for hygiene rather than supplying an unknown actor who may be doing the offsetting that is conveyed by can be offset; that anchor is found in the adjective hog. It is a tricky sentence to write without spelling everything out.

I hope that helps with your query. Thank you for bringing the question to my attention.

- Andrew
VP
VP
Joined: 15 Dec 2016
Posts: 1352
Own Kudos [?]: 221 [0]
Given Kudos: 188
Send PM
The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
Hi avigutman - i have not seen the OA intentionally but i was not sure between A and D

I did not choose A on 1st attempt because

It doesnt address the situation regarding Smee specifically.

Will the decline in effectiveness for humans slow down if Smee specifically stops buying pork

Based on past experience, i have seen many answer choices rendered wrong because it doesnt talk about the specific subject (Smee)

Hence I eliminated A.

Any suggestions on what is wrong in my technique ?
Tutor
Joined: 17 Jul 2019
Posts: 1304
Own Kudos [?]: 1751 [0]
Given Kudos: 66
Location: Canada
GMAT 1: 780 Q51 V45
GMAT 2: 780 Q50 V47
GMAT 3: 770 Q50 V45
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
Expert Reply
jabhatta2 wrote:
Hi avigutman - i have not seen the OA intentionally but i was not sure between A and D

I did not choose A on 1st attempt because

It doesnt address the situation regarding Smee specifically.

Will the decline in effectiveness for humans slow down if Smee specifically stops buying pork

Based on past experience, i have seen many answer choices rendered wrong because it doesnt talk about the specific subject (Smee)

Hence I eliminated A.

Any suggestions on what is wrong in my technique ?


Two points to make here:
1. A correct answer to a strengthen question can reduce the probability that some new factor would interfere with the logic of the argument (in this case, a correct answer could state that the decline in the effectiveness of those antibiotics won’t accelerate over time even if their use is completely discontinued - as in the damage has already been done and now it’s a chain reaction). So your strategy is a bit dangerous.

2. Answer A actually does mention Smee in the last seven words:
(A) Other major pork marketers will probably stop buying pork raised on feed containing growth-promoting antibiotics if Smee no longer buys such pork.
This describes a chain reaction, triggered by Smee’s decision.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
Joined: 05 Sep 2020
Posts: 66
Own Kudos [?]: 27 [0]
Given Kudos: 249
Location: India
Schools: ISB '25 (D)
GMAT 1: 600 Q50 V21
GMAT 2: 640 Q47 V32
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
AndrewN avigutman

Could someone please explain the first sentence of the argument? I couldn't understand it and was bamboozled.
The use of antibiotics in hog farming can weaken their (antibiotics) effectiveness in treating humans and the reason has been mentioned. I am unable to understand the reason.
Volunteer Expert
Joined: 16 May 2019
Posts: 3507
Own Kudos [?]: 6988 [2]
Given Kudos: 500
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
2
Kudos
Expert Reply
shades28 wrote:
AndrewN avigutman

Could someone please explain the first sentence of the argument? I couldn't understand it and was bamboozled.
The use of antibiotics in hog farming can weaken their (antibiotics) effectiveness in treating humans and the reason has been mentioned. I am unable to understand the reason.

Hello, shades28. The pith of the sentence is the suggestion that the overuse of antibiotics—in this scenario, as part of pig farming—can make bacteria more resistant to those same antibiotics, giving rise to a potential problem if humans need to be treated with them (perhaps to promote growth). I may not have had to mull over the matter because I used to volunteer in a hospital, and MRSA, a type of bacteria that had developed resistance to a commonly prescribed antibiotic at one time (methicillin, which lends MRSA its M), was a concern for both staff and patients. So, in short, the overuse of antibiotics diminishes their effectiveness thereafter. Hog farming just happens to be the vehicle for overuse in the passage.

I hope that helps clarify the matter. Thank you for thinking to ask.

- Andrew
Manager
Manager
Joined: 06 Jan 2017
Posts: 127
Own Kudos [?]: 38 [1]
Given Kudos: 751
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
Can some expert please help me with my doubt - why option B is wrong ?

Option B seems to also strengthen since if the decline in growth can be offset by hygiene , then wouldn't it help the fact that Smee company would buy this kind of pork and hence altogether this would help in slowing the decline for the effectiveness of the antibiotic for humans ?

🤔
Intern
Intern
Joined: 03 Dec 2022
Posts: 34
Own Kudos [?]: 4 [1]
Given Kudos: 248
Location: India
Concentration: Marketing, Entrepreneurship
GMAT 1: 610 Q49 V25
WE:Engineering (Manufacturing)
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
1
Kudos
In most explanations, B option is ruled out because it is out of scope.
But, it does have an effect on the decline of antibiotic's effectiveness on humans by elimination the use of antibiotics.
So, why can't B be right?

Could anyone please explain this?
Intern
Intern
Joined: 25 Oct 2021
Posts: 4
Own Kudos [?]: 0 [0]
Given Kudos: 11
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
In this argument smee company has 60% share for pork. And says that it will stop using antibiotics and also farm will stop so conclusion is that effective of antibiotics will also decrease in humans .

This can be strengthened only when other 40 % of company’s who produce pork will follow the footstep of smee company

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Posts: 17526
Own Kudos [?]: 870 [0]
Given Kudos: 0
Send PM
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: The use of growth-promoting antibiotics in hog farming can weaken [#permalink]
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
6985 posts
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
236 posts
CR Forum Moderator
824 posts