GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Jul 2018, 09:41

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 23 Sep 2007
Posts: 761
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2008, 19:15
2
6
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  45% (medium)

Question Stats:

60% (00:47) correct 40% (00:44) wrong based on 844 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

(A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.

(B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.

(C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.

(D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.

(E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
Most Helpful Community Reply
6 KUDOS received
Retired Moderator
avatar
B
Joined: 17 Sep 2013
Posts: 369
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
GMAT 1: 730 Q51 V38
WE: Analyst (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Mar 2014, 14:17
6
2
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.

B it is

Criminal Penalties,Conservation efforts,SAVE them stickers...Although Enough is being done through awareness, the animals are still not safe.So something not to do with lack of awareness etc.

A- Just because of a separate incidence you cannot conclude that they are unsafe.We cannot say that this will occur again & hence the Manatees are unsafe...Rejected
B- Lives Near Coastal Water where US ppl play--> Swim at boat level--> Although people aware they harm them unconsciously--> Can be a probable answer
C- Tourists are unaware.But how does it matter.Nothing about them hurting the manatees or about tourists frequently visiting the coasts is mentioned in the argument...Rejected
D- Number- Irrelevant-What if there are 100000000 manatees..Rejected
E- Deaths go unreported- We don't know the cause of the death- Is it natural or man made- Rejected
_________________

Appreciate the efforts...KUDOS for all
Don't let an extra chromosome get you down..:P

General Discussion
2 KUDOS received
Director
Director
avatar
Joined: 14 Aug 2007
Posts: 694
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 29 Jun 2008, 20:21
2
gmatnub wrote:
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?


a) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
(this talks only about last year)

b) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
(possible, passage doesn't state anything being done for motorboats)

c) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
(if thers "an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers" then this doesn't seem right)

d) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
(we don't know what was the original population)

E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
(though this is relevant , it does not help to fill in the gap between "efforts being done" & "still considered unsafe" )


B for me
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 29 Aug 2005
Posts: 478
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2008, 01:36
My line of thought -

Conclusion - Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe

Premise - These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play.


Lets look at the options.

a) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
Does not support the premise or conclusion.
b) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
Supports the premise.
c) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
Does not support the conclusion.As the argument mentions that there are lot bumper stickers.
d) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
Out of context.
E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
Does not support the conclusion.


Hence B is the answer.
1 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
Joined: 01 Jan 2008
Posts: 490
Reviews Badge
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 02 Jul 2008, 01:43
1
My answer to this would be B.

A) is out of context,
C) contradicts the premise
d) out of context
e) out of context
2 KUDOS received
Senior Manager
Senior Manager
avatar
Joined: 08 Apr 2012
Posts: 396
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jun 2014, 10:26
2
JusTLucK04 wrote:
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.

B it is

Criminal Penalties,Conservation efforts,SAVE them stickers...Although Enough is being done through awareness, the animals are still not safe.So something not to do with lack of awareness etc.

A- Just because of a separate incidence you cannot conclude that they are unsafe.We cannot say that this will occur again & hence the Manatees are unsafe...Rejected
B- Lives Near Coastal Water where US ppl play--> Swim at boat level--> Although people aware they harm them unconsciously--> Can be a probable answer
C- Tourists are unaware.But how does it matter.Nothing about them hurting the manatees or about tourists frequently visiting the coasts is mentioned in the argument...Rejected
D- Number- Irrelevant-What if there are 100000000 manatees..Rejected
E- Deaths go unreported- We don't know the cause of the death- Is it natural or man made- Rejected

B for me too although it's really more that there was nothing better....
No one said that there are even boats in that area....
So, if not, this argument would be irrelevant.
Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 03 Oct 2014
Posts: 137
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Technology
GMAT 1: 720 Q48 V40
WE: Engineering (Aerospace and Defense)
Reviews Badge
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2015, 06:30
How could something so irrelevant to the argument serve as a strengthener.

"Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures" rules out the probability that motorboats can harm Manatees as extra care will be taken to protect them.

But option A gives a fair enough reason to strengthen argument
2 KUDOS received
Intern
Intern
avatar
Joined: 18 Jan 2015
Posts: 3
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2015, 09:13
2
Satyarath wrote:
How could something so irrelevant to the argument serve as a strengthener.

"Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures" rules out the probability that motorboats can harm Manatees as extra care will be taken to protect them.

But option A gives a fair enough reason to strengthen argument


Satyarath, I answered "A" as well. I think you and I made the assumption that because there is more campaigns around their safety, that boaters will undoubtedly have had to taken measures to be safer, so we can in effect rule out "B".

I think it more has something to do with the fact that the question states that "none" of these animals can be considered safe in the conclusion. If a few get a rare disease, that doesn't mean that none are safe. Those few/several could have been a unique subset in a secluded environment. But if all mantetees swim at boat level near propellers, then none can be considered safe due to risk of injury from boat propellers.
Expert Post
3 KUDOS received
Manhattan Prep Instructor
User avatar
Joined: 30 Apr 2012
Posts: 794
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 24 Jan 2015, 20:46
3
This question always generates a lot of confusion and, as posted above, it absolutely comes down to that word NONE. Since we need a statement that impacts all manatees, only B works.

KW

Posted from my mobile device
_________________


Kyle Widdison | Manhattan GMAT Instructor | Utah


Manhattan GMAT Discount | Manhattan GMAT Course Reviews | View Instructor Profile



Manager
Manager
User avatar
Joined: 17 Jun 2015
Posts: 239
GMAT 1: 540 Q39 V26
GMAT 2: 680 Q46 V37
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Oct 2015, 06:37
I went with B based on the reasoning that it is the animal's fault (with all due respect) that results in its demise even though people are concerned about it. It is as if the animal invites its own death. Is this correct?
_________________

Fais de ta vie un rêve et d'un rêve une réalité

Expert Post
MBA Section Director
User avatar
V
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 5135
Location: India
GMAT 1: 760 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.8
WE: Marketing (Non-Profit and Government)
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Oct 2015, 23:31
Answer choice A says that some manatees died from the toxin. I cannot logically conclude from that that ALL manatees are at risk. I just don't know that. It may be that only some are susceptible to the toxin.

On the other hand, if every single manatee is at risk of getting run over by a boat, then ALL manatees are at risk.
_________________

Have an MBA application Question? ASK ME ANYTHING!

My Stuff: Four Years to 760 | MBA Trends for Indian Applicants

My GMAT Resources
V30-V40: How to do it! | GMATPrep SC | GMATPrep CR | GMATPrep RC | Critical Reasoning Megathread | CR: Numbers and Statistics | CR: Weaken | CR: Strengthen | CR: Assumption | SC: Modifier | SC: Meaning | SC: SV Agreement | RC: Primary Purpose | PS/DS: Numbers and Inequalities | PS/DS: Combinatorics and Coordinates

My MBA Resources
Everything about the MBA Application | Over-Represented MBA woes | Fit Vs Rankings | Low GPA: What you can do | Letter of Recommendation: The Guide | Indian B Schools accepting GMAT score | Why MBA?

My Reviews
Veritas Prep Live Online

Verbal Forum Moderator
User avatar
V
Status: Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Posts: 2090
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: Kelley '20, ISB '19
GPA: 3.2
WE: Information Technology (Consulting)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 04 Feb 2017, 08:20
gmatnub wrote:
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?


a) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.

b) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.

c) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.

d) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.

E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.


(A) The deaths of several manatees from a specific toxin in no way indicates that all manatees are unsafe.
(B) CORRECT. This choice explicitly states that all manatees put themselves in harm’s way by swimming at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
(C) The awareness of programs to save the manatee is irrelevant to the argument.
(D) The simple fact that a limited number of manatees remains in the wild in no way suggests that every one of the 2,500 remaining manatees is threatened.
(E) The deaths each year of a number of manatees, whether documented or undocumented, do not indicate that all living manatees are threatened.
_________________

When everything seems to be going against you, remember that the airplane takes off against the wind, not with it. - Henry Ford
The Moment You Think About Giving Up, Think Of The Reason Why You Held On So Long
+1 Kudos if you find this post helpful

Senior Manager
Senior Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 04 Sep 2015
Posts: 457
Location: India
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 08 Feb 2017, 15:59
Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?


a) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
The deaths last year because of unidentified toxin does not contribute to the reason why the manatee are still under threat

b) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
The best answer which explains that why the manatee population is still under threat even after many efforts do spread the awareness

c) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
The tourist may not be aware but he local populations would be aware of the conservation efforts and are responsibel to protect the mantee population.

d) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
the number of surviving manatee does not impact the argument.

E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.
the reporting of the death is important but preventing those deaths is more important and thus the poit does not address that why the population is under threat
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 21 Jun 2015
Posts: 51
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 660 Q50 V30
GPA: 3.32
WE: Programming (Computer Software)
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 23 Sep 2017, 11:51
2
Charlesalex wrote:
Satyarath wrote:
How could something so irrelevant to the argument serve as a strengthener.

"Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures" rules out the probability that motorboats can harm Manatees as extra care will be taken to protect them.

But option A gives a fair enough reason to strengthen argument


Satyarath, I answered "A" as well. I think you and I made the assumption that because there is more campaigns around their safety, that boaters will undoubtedly have had to taken measures to be safer, so we can in effect rule out "B".

I think it more has something to do with the fact that the question states that "none" of these animals can be considered safe in the conclusion. If a few get a rare disease, that doesn't mean that none are safe. Those few/several could have been a unique subset in a secluded environment. But if all mantetees swim at boat level near propellers, then none can be considered safe due to risk of injury from boat propellers.



A does not talk about all the manatees here. Several are killed because of chemicals. how many? Example: There were 1000 manatees. 100 were killed because of chemicals. 200 manatees were born. after 1 year number is 1100. The number has increased! A is wrong. B is the answer
Manager
Manager
User avatar
G
Joined: 27 Dec 2016
Posts: 231
Concentration: Marketing, Social Entrepreneurship
GPA: 3.65
WE: Marketing (Education)
Premium Member Reviews Badge
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 Dec 2017, 09:50
gmatnub wrote:
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?


a) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.

b) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.

c) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.

d) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.

E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.


First of all, this is a MGMAT question, for someone who can give the tag...

The conclusion is strong : None of these animals is SAFE or ALL of Manatees are UNSAFE.

The answer that talks about ALL is B.

Wdyt?
_________________

There's an app for that - Steve Jobs.

VP
VP
User avatar
D
Status: It's near - I can see.
Joined: 13 Apr 2013
Posts: 1154
Location: India
Concentration: International Business, Operations
GMAT 1: 480 Q38 V22
GPA: 3.01
WE: Engineering (Consulting)
Premium Member Reviews Badge CAT Tests
Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant,  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Mar 2018, 00:35
goodyear2013 wrote:
The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned to the sea some 50 million years ago. These thousand-pound herbivores inhabit the warm coastal waters where Americans like to play. Despite conservation efforts, criminal penalties for harming these creatures, and an overabundance of SAVE THE MANATEE! bumper stickers, none of these animals can be considered safe.

Which of the following, if true, most strongly supports the argument above?

A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin.
B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.
C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee.
D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals.
E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported.

Hi, can anyone explain why the answer choice is the right answer, please.
I found the expression of the answer choice too strong..

OE:
Choice B: This choice explicitly states that all manatees put themselves in harm’s way by swimming at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines.


A) Last year, several manatees were mysteriously killed by an unidentified toxin. Several does not means lot. It may be a one time accident and perhaps may not repeat.

B) All manatees swim at depths that make them vulnerable to the blades of motorboat engines. Accident will happen again and again

C) Most tourists are unaware of the ongoing efforts to save the manatee. Even if tourists know, it does not mean that they will harm manatees

D) The population of manatees in the wild has dwindled to fewer than 2,500 animals. Irrelevant

E) Although dozens of manatee deaths are documented each year, many more deaths go unreported. Irrelevant

(B)
_________________

"Do not watch clock; Do what it does. KEEP GOING."

Re: The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, &nbs [#permalink] 27 Mar 2018, 00:35
Display posts from previous: Sort by

The West Indian manatee, a distant relative of the elephant, returned

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Events & Promotions

PREV
NEXT


GMAT Club MBA Forum Home| About| Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy| GMAT Club Rules| Contact| Sitemap

Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne

Kindly note that the GMAT® test is a registered trademark of the Graduate Management Admission Council®, and this site has neither been reviewed nor endorsed by GMAC®.